| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1401
|
Girls For Old Men
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I don't doubt it. I once bought a full network access at something like 80 plus dollars and I didn't save a single scene from any of the sites. These days I would only try one of their trial memberships because I don't know if there is anything that I truly care to save for a rainy day.
|
05-29-13 06:23pm
|
Reply
1402
|
Girls For Old Men
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I don't know if you are aware but ferro came up with a blog site where you can view the more recent updates. I often use it to see which sites might be worth joining based on the amount of recent updates.
|
05-29-13 06:04pm
|
Reply
1403
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I can't remember exactly when I was a member of the WTF network but I know it was sometime last year and you could already see that they were in deep trouble because the number of new scenes was less than it was the last time I'd been a member. I still visit the network once a month and frankly there is now nothing that I want to save and I don't expect that to change any time soon.
|
05-29-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
1404
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think several times a week is the best example of frequent updates. It's more than 2 and less than 7. I'm a lot less interested in the total number of new scenes per week as to the quality of those scenes.
|
05-29-13 05:57pm
|
Reply
1405
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
That and you can also get most if not all of porn fidelity's stuff as well.
|
05-29-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
1406
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I can't confirm if there is a 10GB daily limit because I've never downloaded that much in a single day. Mind you even if they have a limit and you only take the 3 day trial then you should still be able to download a good chunk of the sites content. Mind you I think if you truly want to download the entire library then you probably should join for the full month. This way you'll help the site stay alive and you won't have to worry about the limit since 30 days is more than enough time to download everything.
|
05-28-13 06:15pm
|
Comment
1407
|
Gang Bang Dee
(0)
|
|
05-27-13 06:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1408
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I name all my files in a certain way to make it a lot easier to find them later on but I definitely need to clean some of my stuff because there's just too much content and a large enough amount of it is duplication or stuff I'll never watch again.
|
05-27-13 04:54pm
|
Reply
1409
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I'm pretty sure that this is either a portal to wicked pictures or the site that Manwin has created to replace wicked pictures. Either way. You are not going to get more out of your membership except the movies they added since you were last on WP.
|
05-26-13 05:21pm
|
Reply
1410
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
jullie958's Comment
Wow! You are a demanding customer. I agree that it's great site but they already update with two new scenes per day, 7 days a week. I don't think they can updates more often. You are paying less than
20$ a month for 56 scenes. Many sites only update once a week and their membership cost is higher.
Now it would be different if you had said that you'd like them to update a particular series more often because it's one that you like.
|
05-25-13 09:15am
|
Reply
1411
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Roger Siskel's Reply
Let me first say that I tend to be rather intense in my feelings toward Tube and Torrent sites so some of my vocabulary tends to be more intense then maybe it should be.
Now it is quite possible that the people that own this site like many others in their position are now stuck at having to use tube sites to generate some revenue. I can assure you that they do not do it out of a true desire but because they need those extra dollars said revenue will bring them. I think they and us at TBP/PU would be a lot happier if people used a direct link to join or a review site like
us.
Here's an example to explain what I mean. Imagine you owned a cherry producing farm and for years thing were great. The crops were always pretty good and you could afford to hire many workers to work the property. The weather conditions were so good that there were plenty of other farms all doing quite well and then one day someone started to steal cherries from the different farms and offering them for free to anyone visiting their road side stand. At first no one noticed it because there weren't too many stands and people were still coming to the source for their cherries but as time went by more stands started to open and more cherries started to disappear from the different farms. Now some will argue that the cherries being given away aren't as good as those on the farms but they are free so people make do with their taste. It became so bad that farms started to fire their employees while others had to close their doors and those that remained open had to make some drastic changes to the production and marketing of their cherries to the point that they aren't as juicy and tasty as they once were.
Now transpose cherries for porn and this is the reality for every porn producers today. That is why a lot of the porn being made is not as good as it once was. why so many studios closed their doors, why porn performers spend more time on the escort sites then they do shooting porn and why so many new and established performers are no longer doing porn.
|
05-21-13 03:44am
|
Reply
1412
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Roger Siskel's Comment
Let me ask you a huge favor and please do not ever mention free sites because you are talking about peoples lives here. There's no such thing as free porn. You and others that use tube and torrent sites may not have paid for it but someone like me and other members of PU have paid for it and we certainly never expected others to get it for free nor did any of the people producing and starring in those movies.
Now I'm getting off my soap box. I'm pretty sure the people behind this site are the same ones as girls do porn so whatever is wrong in regards to the navigation on GDP is also wrong here. At least the guy shooting the scenes here is a lot better than on GDP and they actually have a camera man who shoots the scene. Mind you he doesn't really know how to shoot porn so that doesn't help.
There is plenty wrong with Mom's POV but maybe they will fix it in time. The site is still quite young.
|
05-20-13 06:43pm
|
Reply
1413
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sadly there are many performers with implants but I don't think they pick them because of it but rather because that's what is currently available.
|
05-20-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
1414
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Couldn't the answer simply be....Why Not.
|
05-19-13 12:00pm
|
Reply
1415
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I don't like facials so you can just imagine how much I dislike this fetish. I know that there is a percentage of people that love this fetish but I don't know why. Maybe some day I'll get an answer that I understand.
|
05-17-13 04:30am
|
Reply
1416
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
A full access trial membership is rare so even if you don't find as many great videos as I did then you are still getting plenty for your money.
|
05-16-13 06:37pm
|
Reply
1417
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
My issues with the network was never about cost. Of course I'd be happier if they charged less but that never stopped me from joining in the past. That changed when they started to use more and more leased material becausae the join price didn't go down. These days only the new members get their money's worth since there is a lot of great older stuff but any returning member is paying way too much for content that he could find elsewhere for a lot less money.
|
05-16-13 06:36pm
|
Reply
1418
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Great review to what was once a really great network of sites. I used to love joining this network because they always seemed to have the cutest Eastern European models doing the nastiest kinds of porn.
That changed a few years ago. I suspect that Tube and torrent sites have a lot to do with that plus the recession and finally Russia passing stringent laws regarding the shotting of porn on their soil.
I knew it was the beginning of the end when so much of their content was leased material available on so many cheaper sites. These days the bulk of their updates is all leased material. If they were a less expensive network then I could overlook that part but they aren't and therefore they are on my list of sites to be avoided.
|
05-15-13 05:23pm
|
Reply
1419
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I've always used a desktop. I like the fact that it's easy to do upgrades.
|
05-15-13 05:14pm
|
Reply
1420
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd much rather they didn't exist but a few are okay since most if not all porn sites need the money they get from those adds to survive.
|
05-11-13 09:23am
|
Reply
1421
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I agree with everyone who said that it depends on the girl and the style of glasses. I think Penny Pax is the only current new porn girl who actually wears glasses in most of her scenes and I don't think it's a fashion statement.
|
05-07-13 06:36pm
|
Reply
1422
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
She is an attractive woman so I can see why you might get distracted.
I don't think the difference in score makes too much of a difference since sites in the 60's are normally the ones to be avoided at all cost. The ones in the 50's are the same but the person feels even more cheated and/or is royally pissed.
You gave sufficient data that anyone curious will know whether it's worth trying or avoiding.
|
05-07-13 03:34am
|
Reply
1423
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
You are a generous man because I don't know if I could have given this site a score in the 60's. The preview section is pathetic so anyone thinking that the good content is inside would have to pay to discover that it isn't.
|
05-06-13 05:32pm
|
Reply
1424
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I always check to see if a site I'm about to join has at least one review and regardless that it's an older one. The info may no longer be accurate but I doubt that a site that got an horrendous score with supporting data will have improved to the point of where it is now a good site.
It's a little trickier with a site that was tagged as good or better and has no recent review because it may still be the same but it can also have had a serious drop in quality. The fact that a good site has not had a recent review can be cause for concern.
|
05-05-13 07:06am
|
Reply
1425
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I picked novels and books because I only recently bought a tablet but you can be certain that I will be buying some e-novels in the months to come.
|
05-03-13 05:59pm
|
