| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
DDF Network
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Great content if you're into bare feet (hotlegsandfeet.com) like me or some of their other content types like blowjobs, big tits, kink, les, etc.
-Overall decent quality photos and video.
-Good quantity of material.
-Good variety of content.
-Download speed seems good.
-Navigation is fairly straight-forward and easy with a decent search engine. |
| Cons: |
-Most models are pretty pro-looking (too much make-up and some silicone).
-Some dead links if you're using parent site (ddfprod.com)
-Quality of images and videos could be bumped up.
-Repetitive settings and content.
-Site designs seem a bit dated.
-Not much model info. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'd like to preface my review with the fact that I mostly just signed up for the network to get access to hotlegsandfeet and have some additional bonus material for the same money as simply signing up for the one site. I originally was a member of hotlegsandfeet.com about 4 years ago and thought I'd give it another whirl since stumbling across the multi site access through ddfprod.com. I remembered enjoying the barefoot-oriented material back then. I have a soft spot (or hard spot, if you will) for cute barefoot girls. I'm actually quite disappointed that I rejoined now. I've only been a member for a couple of days now and I'm already bored by the content and models. I felt that there was a lack of focus on cute girls posing with their bare feet on other sites, so I thought there must be enough new material on hotlegsandfeet.com by now to rejoin. I'm regretting having shelled out $35 now for the rejoin. The material looks about the same now as it did back then. There aren't a ton of new models it seems and most of the cuter girls that they had on the site back then have not been renewed by more recent cute girls. The girls all look too pro for my taste. I like the more innocent girl-next-door type. If you're into the porn star look, then the DDF sites are probably for you. There needs to be a void filled with cute younger girls in a foot fetish site. Most of the other foot fetish sites out there just don't have the quality or quantity that DDF has. So far hotlegsandfeet.com has the best site focusing on foot fetish. The navigation is fairly straight-forward. There is not much information provided about the models. I think until a site appears that has excellent quality, decent quantity and caters to barefoot lovers, I will be returning to teen-based sites that merely have some occasional barefoot material. |
|
01-30-10 11:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the most beautiful natural-looking girls on the internet. Nicely shot. Large selection of material. Large amount of content. |
| Cons: |
Video and picture quality not very good. More search options would be nice (i.e.; hair color, toy type, skin tone, foot fetish, etc.) |
| Bottom Line: |
Paul Markham has hands-down some of the cutest girls on the net. If the picture and video quality were upgraded to today's highest standard, I would probably be a life-long member. I would like to see picture quality and size in the 4k range and HD video with avi and wmv options. Overall this is a great site that could use some upgrading as far as quality and navigation/search features. If you like some of the most natural-looking beautiful teens on the net in a variety of content types and do not place a high value on video and picture quality, this may be your site. Would like to see the quality up there with sites like ALScans or SaphicErotica, etc. |
|
07-22-08 10:55am
Replies (3)
|
|
