| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1476
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Your review makes it sound like Nubiles is primarily a photo side with some video. Is that the correct impression?
|
08-17-07 05:25pm
|
Rating
1477
|
Nude Fight Club
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
03-18-11 09:57pm
|
Reply
1478
|
Nude Fight Club
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Rusty's review and the two that precede his, are accurate and all three are from the same basic perspective; guys who aren't into the genre but who checked out the site as part of the 21Sextury network.
I agree that the video quality and photo quality are top notch and the videography is generally well done such that it captures what those who enjoy the "catfight" genre are interested in. And that would be checking out gorgeous babes and their body parts in some lesbian action beyond basic mutual masturbation and pussy munching.
The only possible quarrel I would have with the site is the inclusion of videocams in so many of the scenes. On the one hand they're a distraction but on the other hand, it adds a bit to the reality of the scenes by suggesting that the action is spontaneous and not staged.
As for a score, I give it an 88. I ranked it at a mid to high 80 because of the high quality, the consistently gorgeous babes and the loyalty to the genre. It doesn't get a 90+ score because it doesn't have a lot of content, yet, and the scenes are very repetitive...but I'm not really sure how they could introduce any more variety than they already have.
|
03-18-11 08:12am
|
Reply
1479
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Great review, as always, Messmer. It's efforts like this that make Porn Users so far superior to any other porn review sites.
|
11-14-08 01:22pm
|
Reply
1480
|
Only Blowjob
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
As with my other favorite network, 21Sextury, I suppose yet another review is pointless unless there's something that needs to be mentioned.
That's where comments come in. 21Sextury just added yet another feature; a point system so that members leaving the site can have some post membership benefits.
I read the comments section first then the reviews of sites that interest me second.
|
06-26-11 12:27pm
|
Reply
1481
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
Being 29.95 Euros, the cost of this site can vary in US$ terms (they charge your credit card in Euros, they say.) Right now it's about US$42.00. Also, their preview site claims on one place that there are 18 sites in the network, and, in another, 13 sites.
In any case I really liked the review. It told me everything I wanted to know and, because I like the same things, I'm seriously considering joining up.
|
06-06-09 10:12am
|
Reply
1482
|
Oversized Erect Nipples
(0)
|
Reply of
KeiraFx's Review
Makes me wonder if PU/TBP should indicate on their summaries that a site is inactive.
More troublesome is that the TBP summary says 26+ videos which compares to the two you mention. Could the remaining 24 be the random, off subject, videos you mention?
|
01-25-14 11:48am
|
Reply
1483
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
To be honest there are a few more than "three ugly ones" but I used that phrase as a take-off (so to speak) of the old Deja Vu Gentlemens' Club ads.
In an effort to fill the ranks of the Big Tits Round Ass site, they chose a few ladies whose avoirdupois is likely tipping the scale past the 200 pound mark and there are a few that couldn't do any damage over the 100 pound mark even when soaking wet.
To their credit, however, almost all of their stuff is definite woody generating material.
|
08-25-07 04:32pm
|
Review
1484
|
Ox Pass
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 15 sites as of this writing; 10 active and 5 "archival".
- 2 sites updated each weekday, no Sat or Sun updates
- Very easy going, frat party style to most of the videos
- While POV is excessive, a lot of the angles and details are outstanding
- Enjoyable concepts and fantasy stuff
- Lots and lots of gorgeous babes plus 3 ugly ones
- Models usually are into the fun which adds to their sex appeal |
| Cons: |
- Videos are far too long. Way too much garbage is left in for reasons known only to the producers.
- The later updates are very high quality but some of the older stuff is hard to watch. It's a shame because the babes are gorgeous in many of the old ones.
- Ancillary features not well maintained. One example is that a Jane Darling video is listed on one site as #6 in the top rated list, but the link has been broken since I signed up |
| Bottom Line: |
The site accesses for $23.95 per month which, considering the volume of material, isn't too bad a price.
The navigation is OK once you get used to it but at first it's difficult to figure out how to access all scenes involving a specific girl.
The BangBus series has some stuff that I don't find enjoyable. I'm sure degradation schtick appeals to some, like waving $100 for a bus side blow job or kicking a chick out with her face covered with goo in a homeless area as the Bus takes off and the guys giggling about that "stupid broad." (Given hat the girls all must sign a legal release this nonsense is all part of the act/fantasy, but it's still unnecessary.
After 1-1/2 months of membership, I'm still discovering new stuff and features, so I suggest you ration your time when surfing Oc Pass (also known as Bang Bros Network). There's an incredibly large quantity of stuff to check out. |
|
08-24-07 07:42pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1485
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
|
01-24-07 10:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1486
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RedRoger's Comment
Great heads up. Lost interest fast. No way I'm signing up.
|
10-31-13 11:51pm
|
Reply
1487
|
Perfect Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
I understand Mike11w's point completely. There are way too many porn productions that way overdo the close-ups, in some cases never showing other body parts...or even the faces of...the models. And, yes, the Perfect Gonzo videos do have a lot of extreme close-ups.
I, for one, enjoy the video style of these videos. Yes, there are a lot of "extreme" close-ups, but they are nicely integrated into fully well structured episodes.
As Mike says, some people will like this site. I'm one of those people.
|
05-13-14 11:43pm
|
Reply
1488
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
This review brings back memories, and not fond ones, of the early days of what looked like great material on sites with lousy D/L speed. I'm spoiled these days and sites that get cheap on the delivery side of the business will have wasted their money building the content side because no one will buy, or if they do they won't stick around.
|
06-23-08 06:23am
|
Review
1489
|
Pinup Files
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good selection of zaftig* ladies, mostly Caucasian. Most are naturally big boobed but some have had some surgical assistance. The vast majority of the models are gorgeous.
A few fatties but the vast majority are proportional.
Good assortment of photos with occasionally functioning zip downloads (see Cons). My estimate is 850 videos on the entire site with an average of 1 to 2 updates per week.
Reasonably simplistic, but accurate, navigation.
There are several models that appear on other sites (such as DDF) so the site seems to be willing to pay for better talent for short cameo type appearances.
*Webster's definition of zaftig - "of a woman: having a full rounded figure : pleasingly plump" |
| Cons: |
Most (close to all) videos and photos are only focused on mammaries. So far I haven't found any examples of pussy shots of any kind let alone any B/G material. I'll acknowledge I haven't browsed through the entire site but if you want a site like Score with pussy tease and some heterosexual action, you'll be disappointed.
Cross selling on signup.
Some ads. Not overwhelming but still annoying.
Peddling separate sites of models that appear on the main site which really irritates me. If you have a model on your site, don't tease into buying a separate site to see more. Score does that too as do other sites, but it seems like Pin-Up files could be a preview site for its many solo model sites in it's inventory.
Most videos have music soundtracks. There isn't any significant action in any of the scenes so there wouldn't be much point in recording natural sounds. (How much oohing and ahhing is involved in taking off tops and occasionally squeezing a pair of big tits?) |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line, I have been receiving a bunch of promotional emails peddling the site. I finally decided to bite and signed up to see if the promotional stuff was accurately representative of the actual content.
I didn't spend much so I don't feel shortchanged but I don't plan on renewing when my first month runs out.
The one positive benefit of the site is that it helped me enhance my listing of well built big titted models with good photos.
If you are a fan of well shaped and natural boobies, the site is worth a single month signup. But if you are like me where you enjoy nice floppers bouncing away in reverse cowgirl scenes while a stunt cock is rocking her socks, you will be disappointed.
My score is 74 because the promotional material did not "overpromise" but there's only so much one can enjoy girls pulling off t-shirts while wearing securely tight shorts (or slacks) that seem to be firmly fixed to their waists.
The 74 score meets TBP's guideline for 70-79, "Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend." |
|
11-30-16 05:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1490
|
Pinup Files
(0)
|
Reply of
runnoft's Review
Thanks for your review. Just got an offer for the site at $14.97 per month and I'm OK with that for one month of gorgeous babes with great natural knockers.
You implied that all updates are dated so it's easy to find the newer stuff...and if I drop $15 and quit, I'll have no problem finding new stuff next year when I rejoin. Am I correct?
|
12-12-15 01:06pm
|
Reply
1491
|
Piss Bank
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
The price is actually $34.90 for one month and $39.90 for two months ($19.95 per month). Still, not a terrible price to check out the site.
|
03-05-14 09:00am
|
Comment
1492
|
Piss Bank
(0)
|
|
10-12-13 10:57am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1493
|
Piss Domination
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Review
Good review. I think they made a huge mistake, however, starting off at $30 with a very limited amount of content. The preview site is well done, but I think I'll be hanging loose for a few months before whacking my porn budget for a membership.
|
08-28-15 11:19pm
|
Reply
1494
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I like the site and the quality of the content but I am with Squirrel on this one.
Navigation is everything and as he says it sucks big time on the 21Sextury sites.
That said I would not go as low as a 50 because in my evaluations I give quality and variety of content and frequency of updates as much weight as navigation. But if one of those elements is just awful, I will never give the site a score higher than 70, and then only if the other elements are high quality. I just joined 21Sextury and am not ready to post a review or post a rating.
But Rusty J's right click suggestion may well help me be more generous just because it greatly reduces the frustration of wading through the swamp to find the good stuff.
|
10-23-10 07:46pm
|
Reply
1495
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Another point that I really find lousy is the fact that, when servers go down and access to all, or a major portion, of a site is gone, there is seldom, if ever, any remedy such as an extension of membership for a day or two.
It wasn't mentioned in Panther's rant, but I'm guessing that he just lost the time with no recompense.
|
10-23-10 07:22pm
|
Reply
1496
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Yes I did see your review of Club Sandy. In fact that was the review my reply was intended for. I got them confused.
The deal you mentioned in that review is very appealing and is likely to get me to subscribe. I have jumped into other seemingly great deals and have been disappointed because all, or most of, the sites in the group have become dormant...which is why the great pricing deal.
It sounds like, based on your reviews, that's not the case here; a good thing.
|
11-02-09 11:29pm
|
Reply
1497
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
PinkPanther reported in a comment he posted last month than a goodly number of the 40 sites have stopped updating. That kinda takes a little of the edge off the "loyalty deal" even though the price is still terrific.
The reason I raise this point is that so many of the big sites are slipping badly on updates and/or content lately that when it happens on sites like 21 Sextury sites, I get a bit concerned.
|
11-02-09 03:49pm
|
Comment
1498
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
|
11-17-15 08:53am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1499
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
I was damned lucky. I tried to buy 1 year on Twistys and screwed up my credit card number so it didn't go through, so I tried to sign up for a single month. Got the same pitch for the premium service and discovered what that meant. I bit and paid the extra, but just for one month, then canceled.
The download restriction really sucks and should be highlighted in the PU/TBP listings whenever it exists.
|
12-26-16 11:07pm
|
Comment
1500
|
Playboy's Busty Babes
(0)
|
|
04-09-14 10:34pm
Replies (1)
|
