| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1451
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Great review, although I have yet to see anything worthy of a 100. 99 maybe, but 100?
One thing you didn't mention in either your review or in your replies is the accuracy of the search capabilities of the various sites.
VideoBox is sloppy in identifying the models in each video. Way too often they misname a babe in a video which makes it nearly impossible to find all scenes for that babe. Brazzers.com is also rather bad at that as well. Bang Bros has an inefficient search capability and seems to have a bad time spelling even simple model names. RK, while they have an "intelligent search" capability similar to what you describe for NA, they also have accuracy issues.
TrashMan, can you comment on how accurate NA's identification and labeling efforts are? When I find a babe I want to see more of, I want to be reasonably confident that the search function is accurate so I don't have to look for the needle in the haystack.
Again, thanks for a superb, well written review. Love your stuff.
|
02-20-09 08:20am
|
Reply
1452
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
According to the TBP notes, no. A trial does not get you full access.
|
12-17-08 04:08pm
|
Reply
1453
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Rattrap's Review
The various "teaser" sites that offer clips of specific babes are, more and more, posting clips from Naughty America. More to the point, many of the newer babes in the biz seem to have stuff on this site.
So, Rattrap, thanks for your review. Yours, and the ones posted earlier, all say that this is a great site. At $25 it's also reasonably priced but as said elsewhere, it's too bad they don't offer a 3 month or 6 month deal at a lower price per month.
One question. Have you had any problems with their billing service? It's not CCBill or Paycom, who are, in my opinion, fully trustworthy. They show their billing service as DHDmedia.com (which is likely Danni's Hard Drive [DHD] getting into the billing business)
I'm always leery of non mainstream billing services.
|
12-09-08 11:31am
|
Reply
1454
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
My point was that the site itself is part of the Twistys site, a fact not mentioned in your review.
Apart from that, I agree completely with your comment about the point score. If this site was a stand alone site and not part of Twistys, a 69 is too high for the reasons you stated.
Also, if you go to the preview site there is no mention made that it is a part of Twistys, so I'm not even sure that, if you sign up for Naughty Office from the preview site, you are also getting Twistys.
The best thing Twistys could do is to move the 15 videos over to Twistys and shut down the Naughty Office site altogether.
|
12-16-09 02:55pm
|
Reply
1455
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Naughty Staff is a part of the Twistys site and is not an independent site. Twistys announced last year that it was discontinuing the site and the content being created for it would appear on the primary Twistys site instead of the "Naughty Staff" site.
|
12-15-09 05:55pm
|
Reply
1456
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
There are a few duplications with other network sites that the site says will be corrected. I'm looking forward to the Naughty Staff site growing with more of the super-high quality of material it has already provided.
|
07-19-08 10:21am
|
Reply
1457
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
insomniacxxx's Review
I'm a current member and still draining off content from the large inventory, but I agree with this review. I'm easier on the score, however. I would go with a 65-69 because the quantity of decent quality material is far better than many sites at equivalent pricing.
I see a 60 score to be one to use for a site with a few (very few) redeeming qualities such as feeding a fetish, a single model who is spectacular but little content, etc.
An example of a 60 is a solo model site I found a few years back that I was able to drain completely in a few days' time.
That said, NS is a big site with a bunch of good stuff in its archives, so it's worth a month or two membership, but unlike other popular sites like BZ and BB, it looks like they've lost their mojo.
|
09-26-10 08:49am
|
Reply
1458
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Drooler,
I just found this site and of course I immediately went to PU to see what has been said about it.
Yours is the only posting and it's 15 months old so I'd like to know if you've gone on the site recently. Their preview site looks good but has no info about how many videos are available. It also brags about 5 updates per week, but it also talks about "new model Mondays." Does that mean that the other four are recycled or are they new shoots of current models?
Thanks,
Jack
|
09-26-11 08:27am
|
Reply
1459
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree. I probably gave too much weight to the nice titty action by Nicole which was, in turn, nicely recorded by the cameraman.
I've given 50's to totally worthless sites like Angelica Costello's site (aka Venus) and one of Jana Foxy's lousy sites.
On reflection, this site is probably worth a 60 overall, not 69.
|
05-06-13 10:42pm
|
Review
1460
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nicole Peters has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets.
Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.
The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.
That's about it for the "Pros" list. |
| Cons: |
Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.
No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don't recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.
Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It's conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.
It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain't worth it. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is a "throw-in" site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That's how I became a member.
If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you'll like Nicole, but as with many "throw-in" sites this one definitely isn't worth the TBP discounted price of $18.
The four videos available on the parent site, Scoreland, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with Scoreland and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.
The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.
The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality. |
|
05-05-13 10:17am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1461
|
Nubile Films
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Reply
I don't think so. Reading through all of the details on TBP, it looks like the two sites are totally different and are shown as being owned by different companies.
Unfortunate that the newer site (Nubile Films)chose that name.
|
05-09-13 11:09am
|
Reply
1462
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
I agree with your point and will add another element.
I, as you, would go for the cost per day bargains of 1 year memberships. But when new (to me) sites showed up on PU I would sign up for one month with the idea of going for the 1 year deals if I liked the site.
That tendency created a serious overload where I had 3 sites at once with 1 year memberships and found that I was unable to take advantage of them all (the time aspect). In fact I discovered that I would access one of those sites only once or twice a month which negated the economic benefits altogether.
Nubiles, however, by their misguided pricing strategy, makes it easy to opt out of signing up for a full year.
These days I will go in steps; one month, three months (if it is cheaper on a daily rate basis) and, after seeing what my visit rate has been during the 3 month membership period, will decide that the annual membership makes sense.
|
04-27-14 11:22am
|
Reply
1463
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
My personal preference is for a 50/50 mix of new vs. repeaters.
|
06-24-12 09:49am
|
Reply
1464
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
Now this is one great review. Well written and it held my interest beginning to end.
I've been keeping this site near the top of my round tuit* list of sites and tjhis review may just get me off my ass and signing up for it.
*Round tuit=when I get around to it.
|
08-13-09 09:01am
|
Reply
1465
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
obsessedoverit's Reply
"For future reviews... maybe curtail my personal preferences a tad."
Don't do that. References to your personal interests are what make a review useful and provides context to your ratings.
|
10-29-08 07:19am
|
Reply
1466
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
obsessedoverit's Review
Just a comment.
As I see it the review was in conformity with the normal expectations of we Porn Users and was well written. I re-read the review and don't think that obsessedoverit ever suggested a bait and switch occurred with Nubiles. He simply said he likes ebony and flashing and that it wasn't available on Nubiles.
While I'm OK with ebony and flashing, it's not something I look for so that observation has no impact on my interest in the site.
I guess the only issue I have with the review is that P. U. offers the same discount as paysitesdiscount.com and he didn't mention that.
His review reinforces my interest in the site because his "pro's" are what I want and his "con's" are of no significant concern to me.
In fact, his credibility is really established by his comment that the site's focus is "not his niche" which explains his score. The site is definitely my "niche" because it has some hardcore and does a far better job of editing than FTV Girls.
obsessedoverit's review was very well done, in my opinion.
|
10-28-08 07:45pm
|
Reply
1467
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
I'll give you a quick reply and when I join I'll be more complete (so other members can supplement my comments).
I really enjoy watching an uninhibited girl who likes her body and happily shows it off. One of your models is Andie (aka Andrea) who also appears on FTVGirls. She does heavy masturbation but some of her FTV stuff is PG where she dances, plays with her labia, gets really down with breast play and leg spreads.
Some ideas for pretty girl stuff would be floor level upskirt stuff, breast massage underneath a transparent bra, nipple tweaking, etc. I also enjoy public scenes where a gorgeous girl with erect nipples in a tight sweater, a nice pair in a low cut blouse, short plaid skirt and pantiless, etc. is showing off her PTA [pussy, tits and ass] in subtle and not so subtle ways.
The issue we both face, you as a content creator and me as a consumer, is that I don't see how you can make a video that is longer than 10-15 minutes without losing my attention. That's why, although I prefer "soft core" (PG and masturbation) over hard core (damages the fantasy to some degree), I can see the need to include some HC just to add variety to the offerings.
I'll probably be joining Nubiles in the next few weeks so I'll add more comments then.
If you'd like to chat directly feel free to PM me on PU or to email me directly at jackmonahn@hotmail.com .
Thanks,
Jack
|
09-27-08 01:50pm
|
Reply
1468
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
I'm into this genre (I really like FTVGirls, for example) and this site looks like it is as good, if not better. Hardcore is good occasionally but I prefer the masturbation/pretty girl (no insertions) genre more.
I will be joining shortly based on this review, and more importantly, because Nubiles Captain posted such informative responses to the comments in this thread. He reassures me by his thorough and literate comments that I'll be getting just what I want and that he'll be there if I have any problems or beefs.
As for Nubiles not being a video site, anyone who checks out the public site will see that it is very heavily loaded with video content; perhaps more than most other sites in this genre. For those who haven't checked out the public site, I suggest you do. The number of models is huge and growing, and the site provides very well done 20 second samplers for almost every model.
BTW, the quality of female talent emanating from Eastern Europe is, simply, jaw dropping and I'm hoping it continues forever. Yes, US talent is fine as well but there is something about all natural bodies not messed up with "body art" (tattoos) that I find extremely appealing.
|
09-27-08 01:17pm
|
Reply
1469
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
indybt30's Review
Excellent review, indybt30. I really like your writing style because it reads like a real review and not like responses to a questionnaire.
Nubiles is on my short list of sites to join when I get tired of a site I'm currently on because I do like the genre...but because I'm more a video guy your comments about the vids are important to me.
Bubble butts are not important to me but variety and quality is. I may lower Nubiles one notch on my short list.
Thanks.
|
09-13-08 11:16am
|
Reply
1470
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Thanks. Your comments really help. I've been trying to decide whether to switch or to continue to find as much good stuff as I can on FTV before I switch. With FTV I can always skip past the boring stuff, but I totally hate lousy and unprofessional camera work that fucks up a great scene with a gorgeous babe.
I think I'll stay with FTV for another month before I switch.
|
08-30-08 09:00pm
|
Reply
1471
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Not being a big photo guy I totally forgot about that. FTV is way below average as a photo site vs. a video site.
But you and Denner tend to match my tastes so as I said to him, I'm going to switch over to Nubiles for a month to give it a go.
|
08-21-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
1472
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You and Drooler (see comment #3) tend to match my tastes and your comments tell me that I should cancel the auto-renewal of FTV and use the $30 on Nubiles instead.
Thanks.
|
08-21-08 01:21pm
|
Reply
1473
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
We're on the same page about FTV.
They make it hard to love with the unnecessarily long and boring stuff interfering with the really good stuff. My sense in checking out the Nubiles previews is that they are more conventional with single episode videos that get to the point much quicker than FTV.
|
08-21-08 01:18pm
|
Comment
1474
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
|
08-21-08 07:32am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
1475
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, it helps a lot. I prefer video and softcore so this looks like a good site. I think I'll check it out.
Thanks.
|
08-17-07 07:43pm
|
