| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1351
|
Just 18
(0)
|
Reply of
blueascanbe's Review
Check out the review of All Network Pass. Sounds like both sites are sites to avoid.
https://www.pornusers.com/review/allnetworkpass/
|
09-12-08 10:52pm
|
Comment
1352
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
|
03-14-10 11:29am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
1353
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Can you make a comparison between Just Nudes and Met Art?
The photo quality and variety of Met Art makes it a superb site, but I'm always looking for the new site that can outdo the established sites.
|
03-14-10 11:27am
|
Reply
1354
|
Karina Hart
(0)
|
Reply of
kman1982's Review
Outstanding review. My reaction when visiting the site via a source other than PU was somewhat negative because all the preview site had was streaming video and there was no mention of downloading capability.
Now for tits, holy mammary, Batman. I don't think I've ever seen natural boobies like Karina's and I'm not sure I'd survive if my face was buried between them...but what a way to go!
So when you say the site permits full downloading, I went from NFW* to "I think I may spring for this site."
At $19.95 for the limited amount of content it's overpriced. But they offer 3 months for just $10 more which buys you 13 more videos if they stay on schedule. So if there are 45 videos for $29.95, that nets to about 67 cents per video (or 33 1/2 cent per funbag) which ain't a bad price at all. (Those puppies gotta weigh more than the rest of her weighs.)
So KMan1982, they will owe you for getting my money. And keep writing comprehensive, and very interesting, reviews.
* NFW=No Fucking Way.
|
01-12-09 03:29pm
|
Reply
1355
|
Kelly Madison
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Any news yet? I'm ready to sign on but if there's a ridiculously low D/L limit, I will look elsewhere.
|
08-12-10 04:14pm
|
Reply
1356
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
I'm not big on photos, so ZIP is a secondary thing with me. I want to see the babes active, not static.
|
03-05-09 05:06pm
|
Reply
1357
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Being more of a tit man than a leg man, I still appreciate a gorgeous set of gams, especially when they are well photographed (or videotaped) and the visual exploration ends up in the magic kingdom where the legs come together.
This site had my interest (especially at the $20 price point) snd is (or rather, was, after reading your review) on my short list of sites to try a one month membership.
As always, TrashMan, your reviews are very helpful and always provide me with all the info I need to make a good, informed decision.
Thanks.
|
03-05-09 03:12pm
|
Reply
1358
|
Lightspeed World
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
In my opinion, a site that whacks you $40 with no preview option is an automatic ripoff. ("You pays your money and you takes your chances.") If these guys charged $10 less ($29.99) they would probably get 3 or 4 times the signups and make a whole lot more money...and you know they know that.
However they must also know their site is crap and that it won't attract renewals (that's where the big money is) so they do a hit and run, cash in for a few months, then they'll go away.
Shame, because they could be good if they raelly wanted to.
|
07-27-07 11:36am
|
Reply
1359
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
The $15 price works just for one month. It rebills at $30, so is it possible they've deliberately put the brakes on downloads so a new member can't drain the site during the half price month?
|
10-11-09 12:11pm
|
Reply
1360
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
xbigvmanx's Review
If you use the PU/TBP link to the site, you will also get the $19.95 rate for the first month...recurs at b$29.95.
|
05-31-09 12:39pm
|
Reply
1361
|
Little Summer
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I second that motion. Great review.
|
11-03-09 09:57pm
|
Reply
1362
|
Lovely Vanessa
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Shap,
Thanks for your reply. I see that there have been several photosets added recently on Twistys but no recently added videos. Hopefully you have some additional video material on this gorgeous lady.
|
01-20-11 12:39am
|
Comment
1363
|
Lovely Vanessa
(0)
|
|
08-15-10 10:54pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1364
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
|
08-06-11 09:46am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1365
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
OK, I decided to take the plunge on the LSG Models site and will write a review when I've checked it out in detail. First impression is that it's somewhat similar to FTV with very fast download speeds.
If the update dating on the site is accurate, the last update was June 5, 2011. The next earlier update was April 17, 2011. A total of 7 updates in 2011.
|
08-06-11 08:37am
|
Reply
1366
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I checked out the three sites owned by this company by using the TBP links. Based on the dates shown for updates it looks like the sites became dormant early this year and are now trying to gather a few extra bucks before shutting down their servers.
The content looks quite good. I'm more into beautiful babes doing midcore* scenes so I may just sign up for the 3 month deal to give me plenty of time to check out the content in detail.
*I define "softcore" as the stuff you see on MetArt and "midcore" as content that includes insertions of toys and such like this one seems to do.
|
08-05-11 09:06am
|
Reply
1367
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Denner,
Sorry to hear that. So far the P U commentary suggested that this was a good site with an interest in high standards, including their business practics. Their pricing in sensible and their samples are efective. (I plan to try LSG after I've checked out FTV throroughly and have written a comprehensive review.)
The noton that you can pull a stunt like that suggests that the webmaster doesn't expect to maintain any loyalty even with the discounted price for renewing members.
I suspect that our friends in the business will discover how lousy practices like this really are. The old story in business is, if you make one customer happy, one person knows. If you make one person unhappy, five people know. If you make one person REALLY unhappy 25 people know.
Add to that if you piss off a P U member enough, it may result in "hasta la vista, baby" for the site itself.
|
10-13-07 01:06pm
|
Comment
1368
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
|
01-01-10 11:46pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1369
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Mac & Bumble was a great site several years ago and was rather popular with great content.
Two possibilities since then, both not particularly good:
1. The site's owner has lost and is just letting the site sit dormant while he collects revenue to support his retirement.
2. The site was sold to someone who has decided to use it as a scam operation.
These days there are so many great sites at great prices, and there's also Porn Users where many will be educated about shit sites like M&B that their approach to doing business will fail.
|
07-17-08 07:11am
|
Reply
1370
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
brixze's Comment
I also agree.
The sites that play games with their paying members are screwing themselves more than the consumer.
If I like a site I'll "let it ride" for several renewals until I tire of the existing content and the updates aren't enough reason to stick around. The site makes good money at very little cost on these renewals.
The minute I see a deceptive practice, like the zip file surcharge mentioned in brixe's comment, or the sneaky assent hidden in the signup template that he mentions, I'm gone and the site is out the revenue.
The cancellation policy mentioned by exotics4me's review is also a bit on the sleazy side where the site takes your money but fails to deliver the goods.
The worst part for the site is the information sharing available to us on PU. The money spent by Mac & Bumble promoting its site and the special discount offered to TBP members is now a lost cause to M & B just because they tried to be a little bit too slick.
Their loss.
I'd like TBP to consider revising their high score (90.8) for M & B to reflect these serious deceptive practices.
|
11-22-07 08:01pm
|
Reply
1371
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That's exactly why I always check TBP and PU before signing up for any new site. I have saved a lot of money doing that.
|
04-20-13 10:40am
|
Reply
1372
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Reply
Thanks a million. Great info, and your comments have convinced me to drop $30 and give it a go.
|
11-17-08 08:21am
|
Reply
1373
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
2 Free K's Review
I found this site today while tracking down all sites with Victoria Vonn content. (She's either out of the biz or is very selective because she's been around since mid 2007 but there isn't much.) Never heard of it until today, so I went to the PU listing and found your review.
I checked out a few of the trailers for some of the babes (Victoria Vonn is on page 18, +/- a page or two) and was very intrigued. (BTW, she also appears in the upper right masthead of the login page as well.) A few questions.
1. How long are the video sequences?
2. The quality of the trailers is quite good. Are the videos all equally good (or better)?
3. There seemed to be a decent front end tease segment in each trailer, but it's hard to tell. Is there a tease before the handjob where the babe shows off her assets in most, if not all, scenes?
4. The trailer sets all indicate the number of videos. Is that an accurate number as far as you know?
5. Is there any download limitation such as DRM or a maximum download limit?
|
10-12-08 04:16pm
|
Reply
1374
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Must have been a short time offer because the preview site linked from PU still says $29.95.
|
12-01-09 01:11pm
|
Reply
1375
|
Meggan Powers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Very interesting and it's really not hard to understand. The site is part of what looks like a schlocky network of single girl sites that all look rather dormant. And when she became a Vivid girl, it appears she was under contract (or maybe that was a marriage contract?) because she really didn't do much, if anything, else.
Thanks for the info.
|
06-19-11 11:06pm
|
