| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1326
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Forgive my ignorance, but what's a "pornpass" discount site? Sounds like something my wallet needs to learn more about.
|
11-26-08 04:49pm
|
Reply
1327
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
I agree with everyone. Great review! This site has been high in my Favorites list but the price has always stopped me from giving it a go. If I can see a period where I can drain out everything I would want in 30 days (no distractions like work and such ;o)) I probably would spring for one month at the current price.
But if the site decides that they would grab a large number of new subscribers by dropping the price by just $5, I'll be right there in line.
One more thing. This site has some of my favorite babes such as Andrea (Andie) Valentino, she with the perfect body and attitude, and a pair of labia lips to die for...and in HD as well. YIKES. Dammit! There goes my libido again working overtime trying to convince me to drop $35 on a porn site.
|
11-25-08 03:51pm
|
Reply
1328
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
The PPV reference is now gone. But the review still mentions a download limit, which the Webmaster also says is gone. Perhaps that comment can be corrected as well.
The very good news is that "In The Crack's" Webmaster understands and gets it. Unfortunately he started the site off with some user-unfriendly attributes that, although they are now corrected, will linger on in the review sites because they once existed.
Now, that said, it's time to check my "playtime" budget to see if I can handle a $35 whack...then on to a signup.
(By the way, Khan, this is why PU is such a terrific site for us porn users. The communications capability through this site results in the consumer knows what he/she is getting and, more importantly, provides a site's webnaster an opportunity to address questions and misunderstandings about a site and, thus, increase traffic.)
|
07-03-08 10:39am
|
Reply
1329
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Interesting. TBP, today (7/3/08) still says the video is PPV.
I've never signed up for a site that wants more than $29.99 but this one really looks like it might be the first. But a PPV program sucks.
I'm counting on TBP being wrong on this because I'm about to spring for a one month membership.
|
07-03-08 08:09am
|
Reply
1330
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Northern Pike's Review
Once again I call for PU to start listing all sites with known cases of scam billing like this. At least a caution list of some kind is called for. It would be a tremendous positive feature in PU.
|
06-01-08 11:33am
|
Reply
1331
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
nickdv's Review
I really would like TBP to create a warning list of some kind based on this sort of problem.
|
05-07-08 07:30am
|
Reply
1332
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
1618to1's Reply
I agree with you about shady practices, but I've always had honest dealings with Paycom/Epoch and no problems. And based on the positive new review by exotics4me, I'm ready to pop with this site.
|
05-23-10 01:20pm
|
Reply
1333
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I totally agree. Another excellent review by Trash Man. The network looked very promising when going onto the preview site, but thanks to Trash Man;s review it's clear that the majority of the "bonus sites" are just archived old stuff.
I'm seeing how this is becoming a more prevalant practice...advertising a big network that turns out to be a collection of dormant sites, usually with crappy quality.
|
06-15-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
1334
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Kami's Review
Talk about false advertising! It's Real and much of the content is fake. Sites like this are what give internet Porn a bad name.
|
10-15-10 07:52am
|
Reply
1335
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Good news. Looks like that $5 drop will get them another $20 from me.
|
09-08-08 08:51am
|
Reply
1336
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I was correcting williamj's review that mentioned a $19.95 price by pointing out that PU is showing a $24.95 price.
|
08-22-08 10:35pm
|
Reply
1337
|
Jaime Hammer
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Looks like the price went up. The PU advertised price is $24.95.
Apart from that your review tells me that this is a great individual model site. There are so many sites out there that are totally dormant and are there only to suck some cash from unwitting horndogs who happen by.
I really like Jaime Hammer for her obvious major assets but also from a personality standpoint.
Your review was very informative and tells me that this site could be a one month deal where I can go in and drain the site in a month's time then sit it out for a year or so before I go back in to update my collection.
Great review. Thanks.
|
08-22-08 11:46am
|
Comment
1338
|
Jan's WebRing
(0)
|
|
06-06-09 09:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1339
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
After further review, the original call stands. Libido wins. Looking forward to checking out much, much more this babe.
She's one of those rare little sweeties with a fabulous face, nice body and ohhhhh those puffy nipples that just drive me totally wild. And she's one of the very few who I would not like to see doing hardcore with some hairy balled retard with tattoos and stringy hair.
I suspect I could handle a b/g scene with a Tom Byron type (early on when he looked like a clean cut teen aged kid; not after he did drugs and got gnarly looking.
But so long as she sticks with solo and g/g, I'll remain a devoted fan.
Thanks, Pink Panther. Your comments really helped.
|
11-22-08 11:34am
|
Reply
1340
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Sorry. I worded it badly. The update schedule listed only past dates and did not state if they were photos or videos...or how many. Having been burned many times where an "update" consisted of a single photo I was hoping you, or someone else, may have direct knowledge of how the site operates.
I guess I'll have to take one for the team and sink $25 into the site and check it out.
As you suggest, there's a Hellofalot more potential for this site than that POS JennaRocks.com site.
My wallet says, "hang on, big fella, you already dropped $15 on a piece of crap."
But my libido says, "Go for it. You know you really want so see much more Jana Jordan. And what's $25? That's just one lap dance with that skank at the titty bar, including tip"
Sigh. The libido always seems to win these arguments.
|
11-22-08 08:54am
|
Reply
1341
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I checked out the Club Jana Jordan site but I see mo evidence at all that it's an active site with reasonably frequent updates apart from a sole announcement that she was appearing on November 20 at the Hustler in DC., and an "update" calendar that says nothing at all about what they updates are...photos, videos or whatever.
There's also a list of Cam shows that looks good, if it's accurate and if it's complied with.
Are you a current member? If so, can you provide an estimate of the number of video updates per month?
Thanks.
|
11-21-08 11:45pm
|
Reply
1342
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks.
I have to admit something. I am fascinated by Jana Jordan's chicks cute body and even cuter face, especially with her blonde bangs in the early days. So I actually spent more time last night checking out some of the individual photos on the site which are, despite her body parts being fully covered, rather sexy anyway. And they are, indeed, early in her career because she has some rather distinctive tattoos today that were not in the photos I checked out.
So, although not worth the $15 by any means, it wasn't a total loss. (When it comes to porn, I'm a "glass is half full" kinda guy.)
[Just occurred to me. Perhaps I should do an academic study on Ms. Jordan tracing her body art and public displays of her body parts as they have occurred over her career and submit it to some elite University for publication! ;o)]
|
11-19-08 09:18am
|
Reply
1343
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
In the interest of full and fair disclosure I must note that I misstated a few details.
- The total combined run time of the site's 9 videos is closer to 10 minutes, not the 25 minutes I said in the review.
- In one video (the Valentine's Day 30 second one) if one watches very carefully one can detect an accidental flash (about 1/2 second) of a small portion of Jana's right nipple. But ya gotta be very quick.
- In one video (the black dress one) she actually lifts up the back of her dress and pulls down her panties so that we get a long shot of her ass crack (nothing else, but she does have a nice ass) for about 2 or 3 seconds.
So I suspect that, if this site were to be shown on Mr. Roger's Neighborhood, they might need to block out about 3 seconds of material.
|
11-18-08 07:01pm
|
Reply
1344
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks Squirrel.
I knew, going in, that I was probably pissing my money away because there are no reviews on PU, TBP or any of the other porn site review sites on the web. That's a good indicator that the site is probably pure garbage.
But because my libido seems to be more powerful than my common sense, I went ahead and signed up. My consolation, as I suggested in my review, is that I may have steered others away from this waste of time site.
|
11-18-08 06:23pm
|
Review
1345
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Jana Jordan is the featured model, needless to say, and even when fully clothed she's still a "dy-no-mite" babe.
She is listed on the iadf.com data base as being 5'2" and 96 pounds, but she has the prettiest eyes and puffy nipples on top, a perfect pussy and an elegant pair of legs. And she loves to show off.
Jana, as far as I know, just does solo and lez stuff, but some of the lesbian material I've seen has been pretty nasty and never fails to transition Little Richard into Big Dick.
That's about it for the "pro's" ladies and gentlemen. The babe is the only thing going for this site. It sure ain't the content!
Worse, if you join this site to check out Jana's fine body parts, you'll be sorely disappointed. Go to one of the many "preview material" sites like freeones.com and you'll see a whole lot more of Jana than on this site. |
| Cons: |
The site has a total of 9 short videos (the same number as stated in the TBP "site facts" page for this site). There are 4 wmv's, 3 mov's 2 mpg's totaling about 25 minutes of Jana showing her car, magic tricks, bunnies and silly crap but no pussy, no boob.
There are 61 photo sets (nothing zipped, but in this case who cares) where TBP's "site facts says there were 55+).
All 9 movies and 61 photo sets showed Jana fully clothed, a few in semi sexy poses in bikini underwear. There are about 5 photos where she has wet toilet paper squares covering her nipples in a manner that suggests that hers are a bit on the puffy side (one of her main assets).
The TBP "site facts" was last updated on 12-24-05, which means the site has been dormant for three years.
There are 5 G-rated photo sets of her "friends" as well, that left limp Little Richard asking me why I bothered. I had no answer so I went back to my FTV Girls download to make the poor little guy turn back into Big Dick. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is suitable for kids because there is no, I repeat, no material that isn't available on basic over the air broadcast TV. I wondered as I went through the material if it wasn't, in fact, created before Jana Jordan turned 18 because it wouldn't bother a censor or a lawyer in the strictest of situations.
This site got my cancellation about 1 hour and 45 minutes after enrolling because I had completed a review of all of its content in about an hour. That was, for me, the fastest time from sign up to cancellation ever. (My last record was with the Shay Laren site that has a whole Helluva lot better content. That one took me about two days to drain everything and be done with the site.)
The only reason I scored it a 51 is because, although they had the usual check box option to sign up for another of their sites, Lili Jensen.com, they had the decency to have left the box unchecked rather than the usual trick of pre-checking the box.
That should earn them 1 point over the minimum.
FINAL COMMENT: If you had any thoughts about signing up for JanaRocks.com, you should reconsider. Give your $15 to that guy standing at the bottom of the freeway off ramp with the cardboard sign. You'll at least feel like you accomplished something with your money.
(Boy, I need an attaboy for wasting my time and money. But it shows what torture I'll put myself through in my quest for the PU team! ;o)) |
|
11-18-08 06:02pm
Replies (14)
|
Comment
1346
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
|
11-18-08 05:06pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1347
|
Jelena Jensen
(0)
|
|
02-19-10 08:42am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1348
|
Jerkoff Zone
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Impressive review.
When I first saw it I wondered why anyone would spend so much time reviewing a site with a 55 score until I read it. It's a fair warning, especially because the did a great job on the preview site.
It reminds me of the time many years ago (before PU) when I was jazzed up about Hustler having a website so I joined it. Awful. No. Worse than awful. And with DRM yet.
I've never even been tempted to try it again. Same deal here. JMP stuff at the store is good but this time rearadmiral has done an excellent job of explaining why this site isn't a good one to join.
|
09-24-11 09:07am
|
Comment
1349
|
Jim Slip
(0)
|
|
10-07-13 06:50pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1350
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
The right answer is that we PU's boycott those sites that set traps like this. I've already been doing that but if other members of PU not only refuse to join these sites but also post their beef on the comment section, we might get to the webmasters and make them realize that they are losing business.
Jules Jordan will not get any money from me until they start playing fair.
|
01-09-14 09:13am
|
