| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Banana or zucchini, just so long as the sucking is sensual.
|
12-05-15 11:59am
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
That's me also. I used to edit the garbage as I did when ripping scenes from rented videos but it took far too long. Now I just use the fast forward. I also take a screen shot using the snapshot feature of DTA and note the highlights and approximate time of the "good stuff" in the file name of the jpeg.
|
11-30-15 07:53pm
|
Comment
203
|
Cameltoe Tease
(0)
|
|
11-28-15 12:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Ditto that. I'll check it out to see what it does and can do.
|
11-26-15 11:32am
|
Reply
205
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
Looks like they are going for the multiple month sign-ups. 3 months for $39.99 is $13.33 per month which is a darn good price (3 months for just $10 more than one month. The one year price is even better, under $8 per month.
Being my first shot at this site, I'm gonna start with the 3 month deal and will re-up for a year if it's a good as I think it is.
|
11-24-15 09:59pm
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Red wine, yes. But I like a lighter red like Pinot Noir over a bold red like Barbera.
|
11-23-15 06:10pm
|
Reply
207
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Hi, GM,
I've finally had it with Twistys and started looking around for another site to cuddle up with.
When I saw a non-discounted price of $29.99, I just moved on without looking in. Today, however, I clicked on the PU link to discover that their multi-month deals were $39.99 for 3 months (that's $13.33 per month) and $94.99 for a full year ($7.92 per month). Both prices are too good to pass up.
I agree that too many sites seem to think we're interested in a continuing education program for gynecologists. While I like a good looking snatch in a gallery or video, the preoccupation with snatch limits the amount of time available to check out the mammaries, the gluteous maximus, and other sweet attributes of the models. But I can skip past the stuff I don't care about.
Just a few questions on your review.
- I assume there's no b/g hardcore at all (OK with me) but it wasn't clear if there was any lesbian content on this site.
- Does the site have a decent search function (like Twistys once had) where I can do a search on attributes such as cup size, hair color, natural vs. enhanced, etc.)?
- Was Epoch OK with how they handled your cancellation? I've had very good experiences with Epoch and am OK with calling in the infantry when a site makes cancellation tough.
|
11-22-15 03:25pm
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I'm OK with smoking...but seeing a nude model puffing on a cigarette does not start my engine.
|
11-21-15 04:45pm
|
Reply
209
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I bought an annual membership to MetArt at a great price, but after several months I got bored with it and did not renew it.
I also had annual gigs with Twistys back in the good old days before they sold out. That was fine at the time.
|
11-19-15 11:28am
|
Reply
210
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks, tangub. Based partly on your review, I invested $28.00 for a full year on this site. No it isn't a Bang Bros or Twistys, but it definitely does a great job on tease and the "real life" kind of sexy exhibitionism that does the job for me.
|
11-17-15 03:59pm
|
Reply
211
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
zishy's Reply
OK, I accepted, at long last, your challenge.
Yes, I admit that I'm into attractive young ladies who show off their girly parts, but I'm also into babes who look great in everyday attire and are willing to pose for those great "candid" situations like uopskirts, down blouses and so on.
After figuraatively bumping into a new model - Lily Ivy - totally by accident of timing, on indexxx.com, I followed a link to Zishy.com and wondered what took me so long to check out your site in more detail...especially considering your very attractive pricing.
I've spent a bit of time after contributing $28.00 to your site (for one year) checking out a few of your efforts and am pleasantly surprised at how much great stuff you have on your site. One example is your Lily Ivy set where she's showing a hint of some of her sweet bush and even one panty wedgie which really started my engine.
I'll write a review once I've had a chance to enjoy more of your stuff.
|
11-17-15 03:55pm
|
Reply
212
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nineinch's Reply
Ditto nineinch.
Natural matters but the set or video should have a variety, not just one expression.
|
11-17-15 09:07am
|
Reply
213
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I assume the question means how many sites simultaneously.
Like LPee, I have two sites with long term subscriptions and can have anything between 2 and 6 monthly subscriptions at any one time which I'll let renew or will cancel when they've had their shot.
|
11-17-15 09:04am
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Close call because I focus a bit lower when checking out the babes. Of all the choices I would say I prefer the models who look at the camera, but it must be a natural look.
That said, I'm OK with her looking at whatever she wants if she's gorgeous.
What made me so conscious of this characteristic is what I see on the FTV Girls videos. A frequent scene style is recording the model walking toward the camera in a populated area. When the girl is looking directly at the camera, the shot is very effective. However when she's trying to look nonchalant it always looks forced and awkward.
So on a scale of 1 to 10, looking at the camera gets a 6 and looking at other things, is a 5-.
|
11-17-15 09:01am
|
Comment
215
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
|
11-17-15 08:53am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like dates but preferably the date of the production, not the date the material was posted to the site.
|
11-11-15 12:06am
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto that. indexxx.com is a terrific tool to research models who seem to have a variety of names created by various sites. Example is that gorgeous babe Mandy Dee who has a series of sets on MetArt named Millis, along with an assortment of other names.
This site is especially good for finding other names for MetArt babes because MetArt uses unusual aliases for the vast majority of their talent.
|
11-11-15 12:03am
|
Reply
218
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
First I am primarily a video collector but I do collect photos as well. So I have two master directories; VIDEO and PIX.
Then within each I have folders starting with the model name, then within each model folder I have folders for each website source of the material.
|
11-10-15 11:46pm
|
Reply
219
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet has been deemed to be porn by some because it suggests the deed was done while Juliet was under age. Many other examples.
Potter Stewart, a Supreme Court Justice, said, "I can't define porn, but I know it when I see it."
Potter Stewart is no longer living so I've replied instead of him.
|
10-28-15 11:36am
|
Reply
220
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I said probably not because it all depends on what happens when the camera is turned off. If the babe is abused, physically or mentally, I would not be interested in the final product. But if the work was professionally done, you bet I'd love to see the final product.
|
10-27-15 12:45pm
|
Reply
221
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
Unemployment in LA is a big problem. What they did to the porn industry has pushed the number of unemployed way up. Think of all the people involved in producing porn; cosmeticians, gaffers, grips, location staff, security, editors, production assistants, and a ton of distribution staffers are now either moving to Miami, porn capital #2, or are on the street.
While similar jobs in the main stream movie industry exist in general, the rocket scientists in Sacramento are placing other restrictions and limitations that Vancouver and Toronto are thrilled to see because they've been promoting the bejeebers out of their motion picture production enticements via tax breaks and subsidies.
|
10-17-15 11:21pm
|
Reply
222
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm with Pat. I find that I now have access to more great content on the sites I'm on than I can possibly look at.
With unlimited funds, I might add a few sites, especially single model sites, but not much more than that.
|
10-12-15 11:02am
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Not sure.
My first pay site was Danni's Hard Drive (Danni Ashe) that she sold several years ago. the new owners renamed it Danni.com and when I checked back about 6 months ago, it was non-existent.
PU/TBP has a site "Danni's Playground", which appears not to have any association with Danni's.com.
It was a good site for it's wide variety of material but the interviews were too long and boring and the "virtual lap dances" were ssdd. (Same situation, different dame).
I was curious whether they were in business and how they've updated their content so I asked PU (Khan) if they knew anything about the old site. They checked and de-listed it as an inactive site.
|
10-10-15 03:02pm
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Jenna Doll
|
10-06-15 05:32pm
|
Reply
225
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
ghosty's Review
I joined Hustler back about 10 years ago and I lasted only a few days, then canceled and let the membership expire. Lousy site design and DRM. I'm sure they've dropped the DRM but there are so many great sites that I don't see any reason to try this one again.
|
10-03-15 09:49pm
|
