| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1651
|
More Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Review
Just to make sure I understand what you are saying...does MORE GONZO provide access to all of the stuff on All Internal, Prime Cups, etc., or just what it feels like providing?
In other words, if I want to have access to everything in Prime Cups, do I need to sign up for that site in addition to More Gonzo?
|
08-27-07 12:05pm
|
Reply
1652
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I don't try the $1.95 or $2.95 deals where TBP has the caution message jsut because I know it's worthless.
However there are some sites that sell brief, 3 day or so, access to the site without restrictions for, say, $9.95. I've tried that once and was happy I did. I was ready to sign on for a month to see what it had, but the 3 day option was a better idea. Why? Didn't like the site.
|
08-26-07 02:14pm
|
Reply
1653
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
To be honest there are a few more than "three ugly ones" but I used that phrase as a take-off (so to speak) of the old Deja Vu Gentlemens' Club ads.
In an effort to fill the ranks of the Big Tits Round Ass site, they chose a few ladies whose avoirdupois is likely tipping the scale past the 200 pound mark and there are a few that couldn't do any damage over the 100 pound mark even when soaking wet.
To their credit, however, almost all of their stuff is definite woody generating material.
|
08-25-07 04:32pm
|
Review
1654
|
Ox Pass
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 15 sites as of this writing; 10 active and 5 "archival".
- 2 sites updated each weekday, no Sat or Sun updates
- Very easy going, frat party style to most of the videos
- While POV is excessive, a lot of the angles and details are outstanding
- Enjoyable concepts and fantasy stuff
- Lots and lots of gorgeous babes plus 3 ugly ones
- Models usually are into the fun which adds to their sex appeal |
| Cons: |
- Videos are far too long. Way too much garbage is left in for reasons known only to the producers.
- The later updates are very high quality but some of the older stuff is hard to watch. It's a shame because the babes are gorgeous in many of the old ones.
- Ancillary features not well maintained. One example is that a Jane Darling video is listed on one site as #6 in the top rated list, but the link has been broken since I signed up |
| Bottom Line: |
The site accesses for $23.95 per month which, considering the volume of material, isn't too bad a price.
The navigation is OK once you get used to it but at first it's difficult to figure out how to access all scenes involving a specific girl.
The BangBus series has some stuff that I don't find enjoyable. I'm sure degradation schtick appeals to some, like waving $100 for a bus side blow job or kicking a chick out with her face covered with goo in a homeless area as the Bus takes off and the guys giggling about that "stupid broad." (Given hat the girls all must sign a legal release this nonsense is all part of the act/fantasy, but it's still unnecessary.
After 1-1/2 months of membership, I'm still discovering new stuff and features, so I suggest you ration your time when surfing Oc Pass (also known as Bang Bros Network). There's an incredibly large quantity of stuff to check out. |
|
08-24-07 07:42pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1655
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pornjackker's Reply
If you find that you signed up and paid for a totally sucky website go immediately to the site's support page and look for the Customer Service number (or CC Bill's customer service number). Call 'em up and tell them you don't want to be a member and please close your account and refund your money.
I've done that and occasionally have had success in closing the account and getting a credit back within 5-7 days.
If it works, fine. If not, it's definitely worth a shot, isn't it?
|
08-22-07 12:55pm
|
Reply
1656
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I had the same problem when a babe turned me on and a search found her website. I'd say "what the Hell" if the whack was $19.95 or less and was always, literally, disappointed by the crap. That's when TBP becomes my go/no go source.
I still have situations where I was negatively surprised by unadvertised limitations. The most recent case was "Girls Love Toys" where I discovered that zip downloads were not available unless you renew at least once. That sucks and was not mentioned in TBP's review or in the preview material. That's why I posted a review of this otherwise high quality site so that I could alert others to that fraudulent practice. (The volume of content is not sufficient to stay a member for more than one month so the fraud is clearly to whack you for an extra month if you like downloading photos.)
Conversely, I've signed up for sites based on TBP reviews where I intended to stay only one month but have stayed on much longer, which I guess one can call "Buyers Delight." (Sexy-Babes/Babelicious, etc. is one significant example.)
Caveat Emptor is alive and well in the Porn Site biz.
|
08-21-07 05:50pm
|
Reply
1657
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I agree. Exclusive stuff adds a lot to a site, but totally exclusive means a smaller site and more seraching for models or content I prefer.
|
08-18-07 03:57am
|
Reply
1658
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, it helps a lot. I prefer video and softcore so this looks like a good site. I think I'll check it out.
Thanks.
|
08-17-07 07:43pm
|
Reply
1659
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Your review makes it sound like Nubiles is primarily a photo side with some video. Is that the correct impression?
|
08-17-07 05:25pm
|
Reply
1660
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Poll
I agree. CCBill and Paycom. Always accurate, always trustworthy. Forget the rest.
|
08-11-07 11:20am
|
Reply
1661
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Ditto that. On occasion there is a dry spell (today, for example) where I spent 15 minutes on sites and about 1/2 hour on TBP site.
Last week I signed up on a new (for me) site and spent almost 3 hours on just that site.
|
08-09-07 05:09pm
|
Reply
1662
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Poll
I generally like trial memberships because I like seeing what the site has to offer and how it's constructed. I'm OK with LIMITED trials as well, but only when it's very clear that's what you're getting before you pay anything. The only place to find a warning about a limited trial is by referring to TBP.
The rip[off not mentioned here, however, is when the trial signup includes a small print "opt-out" trial...or signup for another site. Unless you read everything in close detail, you can miss the alternative offer and you'll find out about it when the $39.99 hits your credit card.
|
08-05-07 02:50pm
|
Reply
1663
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Gee, Pinche, don't hold back. Please, tell us how you really feel!
;-)
Just curious. You don't mention porn vids that are all BJ, or anal sex. What is your opinion of those genres?
|
08-05-07 11:09am
|
Reply
1664
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've been 1/2 hr late on occasion when doing some early morning surfing but never skipped altogether.
|
08-05-07 11:05am
|
Reply
1665
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I use a different approach. I have a single card I used just for joining sites and had the issuer reset the limit to just $80.00. (That's my monthly budget for this stuff.)
I track the account online and whenever a charge its the account, I'll pay it with an online payment from my bank.
It keeps everything simple and makes life easy when a site bills me after a cancellation. (Happens, but not often.)
If my card number is compromised (hasn't been yet), the perp will hit the $80 wall very quickly.
|
08-03-07 07:07pm
|
Reply
1666
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I like 'em but only as part of a vid that does a 100% checkout of a fabulous babe. Sorta like peeing. Once in a while is fine but that's not something that I need a lot of.
Now show me a nice set of flappers (labia lips) along with a guy who enjoys cunnilingus (eating her out) and who flaps the flappers with his tongue and I'm hooked.
|
08-02-07 06:55pm
|
Reply
1667
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
Reply of
Mastobeam's Reply
Good comments. What they demonstrate is how a great site can lose a lot of credbility by how its webmaster addresses issues on this site.
I've had my eye on this one for a while but it's pricey.
It boils down to an issue with the administrator (webmaster) of the site and not the site itself. Thanks Mastobeam. I'll put it back on my "sites to consider" list because your comments tell me it has much of what I want on it.
|
08-01-07 09:48pm
|
Reply
1668
|
Big Tits Round Asses
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Comment
I just joined OxPass based on meember comments on this site and am still getting used to it. It's got a messy navigation process that takes a while to understand.
But one thing seems to me to be apparent and that is the more recent videos are far sharper and better than the older ones on all of the network sites.
The best part so far is that every video I've run has been original material and almost all have made my woody come to attention. Better yet they have fun and don't take their profession too seriously. And that's a good thing.
|
07-27-07 11:42am
|
Reply
1669
|
Lightspeed World
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
In my opinion, a site that whacks you $40 with no preview option is an automatic ripoff. ("You pays your money and you takes your chances.") If these guys charged $10 less ($29.99) they would probably get 3 or 4 times the signups and make a whole lot more money...and you know they know that.
However they must also know their site is crap and that it won't attract renewals (that's where the big money is) so they do a hit and run, cash in for a few months, then they'll go away.
Shame, because they could be good if they raelly wanted to.
|
07-27-07 11:36am
|
Reply
1670
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I agree 100%. I see a Trust Rating as useful, but only when they communicate something worthwhile as well. A "No" without any explanation is useless except in making the reviewer not want to waste his time writing additional reviews.
A "Yes" without a comment doesn't do much either except that it doesn't drive away those who sincerely want to write good reviews.
|
07-26-07 08:44pm
|
Reply
1671
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Two adds to NYGiants' review.
1. One of the sites included in the subscription is Big Ass Adventure, which stopped all updates back in February. Another site is he phony chance encounter stuff which generally finishes with a BJ in a dark alley or garbage area of an apartment bldg. even after 30 minutes you might get a glimpse of a nipple and a pussy. In other words, sign up for the boobies (wow!) but don't count on the other sites to add much to your value.
2. All scenes, whether the low res 320's or the high res 640's, are in three parts; the first is the phoney chance encounter with a bit of nudity near the end. The second is solo tease/masturbation, and the third is hard core...most of the time. The cameraman is clearly a big tit lover because he gets a lot of great angles and movement.
PS for Snow Dude...all models are natural, a very good thing. And unless you are a BBW fan, the ladies are, for the most part very well built with a few that are borderline BBW's. You should be satisfied spending $24.00 for one month.
|
07-26-07 08:35pm
|
Reply
1672
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My formula is rather simple.
If a site is $9.99 or less then I can be very forgiving, provided that it pops regularly with some woody creating content.
If a site is $10.00 to $19.99, I look at it as a site designed to maximize revenue because I (and I suppose many others) are willing to "let it ride" every month because it costs about the same as 11 days worth of vente's at Starbucks.
If a site is $20.00 to $29.99, I'll check out the trial unless TBP warns that it's a "limited" trial in which case I'll forget it unless it's really special (like Met Art) where I'll spring for just one month. A site that doesn't let a trial subscriber see everything it has to offer has a reason to hide their content...which gives me a reason not to trust them to provide decent content.
If a site is $30.00 or more I will not check it out unless somehow the site is overwhelmingly special. Have never signed up for any site over $29.99.
Frankly the site is foolish if it charges more than $19.99 because the buyer resistance will go way up. And when you figure the cost of operating the site is almost entirely fixed, it seems silly to overprice a site. Isn't 10 subscribers at $19.99 a whole Hell of a lot better than 5 at $29.99 and 3 at $39.99? ($199.90 vs. $149.95 vs. $119.97)
|
07-26-07 08:13pm
|
Reply
1673
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Poll
I've got three external hards and will probably get a big guy (500Gig) next tmne there's a sale on. But the question is, when will I ever have the time to go through each and every saved video?
I need to establish a personal parameter for when to save and when not to. I like what Jay G says (see above) and may start to weed out some of the stuff that doesn't qualify as keeper quality!
|
07-24-07 03:55pm
|
Reply
1674
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Poll
I'll look at a review that has a score under 70 just because I'm curious what makes the site that bad but I'll never sign up for such a site. There are way too many good sites out there that I don't need to waste my money on a lousy site.
Don't get me wrong. A 70-79 score makes me a bit concerned as well, but because there are several cases where the 4 professional TBP reviewers award a high 70's or low 80's score (with good reason) to sites I may have an interest in, I may sink a month's membership in a site to see what it's got.
An 80 plus gets my juices flowing and my attitude is that, unless there's something I don't like about the site's preview, I'll spring for it.
|
07-24-07 03:51pm
|
Reply
1675
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Jay,
Sorry buddy, but I gotta break the news to you. There's a good market out there for old Playboys on eBay and other sites. Yes it's a pain in the ass to mail and deal with bogus complaints, but there's gold in them thar magazines. Got $15,00 for the Carol Lynley issue, for example.
Jack
|
07-19-07 08:34am
|
