| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1601
|
Chick Trick
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Exactly.
My comment followed a 50 point review of this site by another member who reported that the site support function was totally non responsive to his calls for help. He also said that the content updates stopped a long time ago. That's why I checked out the tour for myself just to see what this site looked like. It reminded me of my early searches back in the early 2000's both in the quality of the videos and the nature of the content.
I've seen similar thematic approaches (phony scam perpetrated on supposedly innocent and unsuspecting babes), but all of them were two or more years ago. The tour is intended to get the user to spring for a subscription, so if it's a crappy tour, why should I expect the real thing to be any better?
|
10-28-07 04:10pm
|
Comment
1602
|
Chick Trick
(0)
|
|
10-28-07 03:40am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
1603
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
When I found TBP a few years back, my first reaction was that it was just another a site sponsored by the industry intended to promote the sites that paid for the endorsements.
However when I found negative and tepid commentary on sites where I had similar issues I started to pay closer attention to TBP. Now, when I discover a new site on a surf, I won't even think about signing up before I see what TBP has to say. If the site is not in TBP, I conclude that the site is too new or so flakey to waste money on.
I will not pay for a site until I've fully reat all there is about the site on TBP and on the PU forum.
On the other hand, I do check the reviews on TBP and posted by members and have found sites that I like and have signed up for.
|
10-28-07 03:30am
|
Reply
1604
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
I admit to a weakness that started when porn was limited to magazines and black and white stag smokers on 8mm film. (Yes, I'm that old! I even attended a strip show by my all time favorite, Candy Barr.)
If I like a video I save it. If I like a pornstar I want everything available with that pornstar in it.
Result is that I have over 1.5 Tb of external hard drives that, cumulatively, are about 60% full (closing in on 1.0 Tb). I have watched, perhaps, 50% of the stuff. Normally I'll delete about 50% of what I download and watch so it won't be long before I'll max out.
I agree with DivBZero. Selectivity is the key. One of these days...
|
10-22-07 10:55am
|
Reply
1605
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't really see the point in just keeping them in a zip file. The space requirement is about the same and the objective is to check them out, not to just collect them.
|
10-18-07 08:11am
|
Reply
1606
|
Ed Powers
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Wow! jd, you nailed it. Before Internet porn developed to where it is today, Ed Powers seemed to get a whole lot of undeserved shelf space in the video stores and always did a lousy job on his vids...but he seemed to stay on top.
I really learned`to dislike that smelly looking scumbag but thought it was just me. Glad to see I'm not alone.
|
10-14-07 10:11pm
|
Reply
1607
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Lews Therin's Comment
I agree that PU should have a new category to rate customer service and support, especially with a site problem like this one.
This site should get no new business from PU and TBP users unless and until it fixes its customer service function.
(Danni.com has the same problem, a non-responsive customer service function.) Bummer when you spend good money and can't get access or any support function to respond.
One suggestion. If the biller is CCBill, you can call them for help in contacting a site's customer support function.
|
10-14-07 02:19pm
|
Reply
1608
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cblodg's Poll
The forum on Babelicious is interesting and monitored by the webmaster who is quick to reply to comments, suggestions and concerns. However their sister sites have a separate forum that is very inactive and gets no attention at all from management when posts appear.
The only other site I've signed up for with anything resembling a forum is VideoBox with their "reviews" of both a full video and of individual scenes. The "reviews" are really more like a running commentary on the site.
IMHO, forums are useful but not essential to an otherwise good site.
|
10-14-07 02:11pm
|
Reply
1609
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Denner,
Sorry to hear that. So far the P U commentary suggested that this was a good site with an interest in high standards, including their business practics. Their pricing in sensible and their samples are efective. (I plan to try LSG after I've checked out FTV throroughly and have written a comprehensive review.)
The noton that you can pull a stunt like that suggests that the webmaster doesn't expect to maintain any loyalty even with the discounted price for renewing members.
I suspect that our friends in the business will discover how lousy practices like this really are. The old story in business is, if you make one customer happy, one person knows. If you make one person unhappy, five people know. If you make one person REALLY unhappy 25 people know.
Add to that if you piss off a P U member enough, it may result in "hasta la vista, baby" for the site itself.
|
10-13-07 01:06pm
|
Reply
1610
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
While it's a PITA, it's also way overdone, in my opinion. If someone successfully accesses a site with a difficult UserID/Password combo, then what's the point in requiring repeated entries of the same UserID/Password...unless there's a known security hole in the site's access control protocol.
However, in network sites where access can be direct or via a network link, it makes sense to require reentry of a UserID/Password.
My answer, then, is that if it's a hot site that I enjoy, the access protocols are annoyances but do not alter my feeling about continuing as a member. If it's a borderline site, I'll probably drop out anyway regardless of the access controls employed.
|
10-05-07 11:36am
|
Rating
1611
|
MetArt
(0)
92.0
|
No Review.
|
10-02-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
1612
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Spend a few minutes going through the archives and it won't be just your head that will be big. I find old Woody gets very active whenever I go to the lineup on my favorite porn ladies.
|
10-02-07 07:35pm
|
Rating
1613
|
FTV Girls
(0)
96.0
|
No Review.
|
10-02-07 07:29pm
|
Comment
1614
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
|
10-02-07 07:27pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1615
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I seem to match everyone else.
Back in the late 80's and early 90's there was the modified porn stuff on cable TV (no straight penetration shots, just the action with genitalia blocked by body parts or fussed out) that got my attention, but my VCR was my primary access to porn (rental stores).
Since the quality and diversity of internet porn has increased over the last 4 years has caused my DVD library to join the video tape library in the attic gathering dust.
|
10-02-07 06:31pm
|
Reply
1616
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Websites exist to make money. That means they need need enough subscribers to cover costs and make a good profit.
A site that runs short of models can still do well with good marketing if it has a decent level of content. A stagnant site will lose subscribers, but it also saves a bunch on content costs.
|
09-24-07 01:00am
|
Reply
1617
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Rick, I feel sorry (not!) for the poor bastards with the lousy ripoff sites. You guys are really making life quite miserable for the low-enders and are rewarding the guys who work hard at putting together the great sites.
Nothing like "sunlight" to make the rats scurry. Great work.
|
09-21-07 06:17pm
|
Reply
1618
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
sullivan's Review
Just checked the site and there is no mention of any videos, just image sets.
TBP says there are 550+ 10 minute clips. Does each and every model have a video clip?
|
09-20-07 06:41pm
|
Reply
1619
|
Wicked
(0)
|
Reply of
VetteFreak's Review
Thanks, VF. The super price and the large number of pornstars almost had me signing up. Your review saved me money because I have no interet if I can't d/l the videos...and I also hate the no name nonsense.
Looks like these guys don't really care.
|
09-20-07 06:27pm
|
Reply
1620
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I found it yesterday and wondered why I hadn't seen it earlier. Now I know. It's new.
And it's great! I must have spent an hour just looking through all the features.
As I've said before, TBP is, in my opinion, the Consumers Reports of Porn Sites. And it gets better every day.
|
09-20-07 08:05am
|
Rating
1621
|
Babelicious
(0)
94.0
|
No Review.
|
09-19-07 07:28am
|
Reply
1622
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
For what it's worth, the recent site redesign was nicely done, but there are many other sites that are better managed than Danni.com.
In 2004 the site was outstanding but really went to Hell in the late summer of 2005. It's better today but not even close to its heyday.
If you want a trouble free experience I suggest you try another site. If they return to a reasonably responsive customer support function, fix the plethora of broken links, and install a functioning search function (it's been there for more than 3 years but it doesn't work), they may be returning to being in the top 10 porn sites.
|
09-18-07 06:52pm
|
Reply
1623
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
Just reporting in. I signed up for one more month and the site navigation has been improved.
With one update per week I had no problem grabbing all the new stuff I wanted to keep in the 4 weeks I was a returning member.
Suggest no more than 2 sign-ups per year...not enough new stuff to sign-up more frequently.
|
09-18-07 06:46pm
|
Review
1624
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A group of 9 sites, 8 active (see below) and one inactive with quality ranging from superb to adequate.
- Outstanding babes with soft core more dominant than hardcore.
- Reliable. No site downs in over 1 year as a member and only a few broken links.
- Responsive customer service (for minor issues)
- Most photos (all posted in last few years) are in zip downloads.
- Exclusive content (as far as I can tell)
- Easy navigation.
- Babelicious has some good features - see sparate review |
| Cons: |
- Older content lower resolution; some without zip.
- Ambiguous model names. Same babe in Sexy Babes has a different name in Eurobabez, for example. Others are fictitious names for known pornstars.
- Inactive users forum that is not monitored by webmaster. (But see Babelicious, below).
- UserID and Passwords required for each site; no unified log on. |
| Bottom Line: |
Sexy Babes TV is the "parent" site with 5 photosets and one video clip per week, Eurobabez, also with 5 photosets and one video clip per week, Dreambabes with 5 photosets per week and no video, and BabesUK with 1 photo set per week.
Then there is Babelicious with 5 photosets and 2 videos per week, and a great design and a very active users forum. (See separate reviews.)
Bringing up the rear are Babes on Film that has 1 clip from a porn vid posted each week, Cummin' At Ya! with 1 BJ video per week, BikiniBabe.TV with 1 photoset of babes in bikinis that never come off, and finally RoyalBoobs.com, an inactive site with about 10 big tit video clips.
Last note - Babelicious is the newest site of the bunch and has several characteristics that are similar to Twistys, but with Hi Def video clips now available on Babelicious, they win. (See the separate reviews for Babelicious for more details.)
While the main sites are very similar, the hottest babes (IMO) show up on SexyBabes.tv, Eurobabez.com and Babelicious.com that really make the membership price for sexybabes.com worth the money.
The site(s) are LOADED with a ton of content |
|
09-18-07 06:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1625
|
Victoria Pink
(0)
|
|
09-18-07 06:03pm
Replies (3)
|
