| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1551
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
Just FYI, I'm a member of Brazzers and live in the USA. I am billed in dollars and I am paying the USD19.95 rate.
I see no reason why you should be paying at par in Euros. By my calculation, the Euro price should be Euro13.12 at the current exchange rate of USD1.52 per Euro1.00.
Please post the reply you get from Brazzers. It should be interesting.
|
03-27-08 02:27pm
|
Review
1552
|
Busty College Coeds
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Reasonably fresh roster of busty young models
Two "bonus" sites, identical interface:
- Fuck for dollars
- I film myself
Great TBP discounted price makes it worth 1 month.
Simple navigation, but with so little content, that's no big deal.
Galleries are Zip downloadable
No DRM
Several "Non-Exclusive" sites, whatever that means, with just streaming vids only - no downloads from the non-exclusive sites, no pix. |
| Cons: |
Only 19 models/video scenes on Busty College Coeds and, with some duplications, 61 models/videos on the two bonus sites combined.
They claim to update every Tuesday but I haven't seen any updates in 2 months.
Videos not top quality, slow loading
Photos are quite small
Content not dated. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is probably wrapping up its existence. Tired structure and appearance with no effort to create any excitement at all. With so little content and no updates, there's no chance to "grab" a member for any length of time. (I am a 2 month member because I forgot to cancel in month 1. I actually forgot I signed up until I saw it hit my credit card.) At the price, you can find enough stuff to warrant a membership. And with a good download manager, you could drain all the content on the three sites in a month. But there are enough much better sites that skipping this one is no big lost opportunity. |
|
03-26-08 07:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1553
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That's about how I feel as well. I'm not out to get a Pulitzer Prize, I just want to help other P. U. members get the most for their money, just as I do.
Frankly, this site has saved me a bunch of money and frustration because the reviews, both by TBP staff and P. U. members, really tell the story without any "hype." Better yet, I've found some terrific sites that I would never have found without TBP/PU.
|
03-26-08 06:35pm
|
Reply
1554
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I guess I really never understood T-shirts that have messages of any kind. Or, for that matter, bumper stickers. What's the objective? To "make a statement" to strangers that you will never see again? To change the way someone thinks?
Yesterday I saw a T-shirt that said, simply, "Kerry-Edwards, A Fresh Start for America." How, exactly, should I react to that?
I don't even like "logo shirts" with a Nike "swoosh" or a LaCoste alligator. They don't pay me to advertise their merchandise.
|
03-22-08 02:09pm
|
Reply
1555
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
EuroBabez and Dream Babes are back up and running with all the past missing updates now posted. All seems well.
Up do date sites through today:
Babelicious
Sexy-Babes.tv
DreamBabes
EuroBabez
Inactive sites:
BabesUK (last updated in Dec. 2007)
BabesOnFilm
BikiniBabes
CumminAtYa
RoyalBoobs
|
03-18-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
1556
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
Nick,
Good to hear and thanks for your response on the member forum as well. Hope all goes well as you are getting back up and running.
|
03-18-08 06:52am
|
Comment
1557
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
|
03-17-08 11:40pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1558
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
BINGO. and that's why I switched to Brazzers, which I find much better in that regard.
|
03-02-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
1559
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
powerman's Reply
Fair enough, powerman.
Now if you're free tomorrow, I'd like you to chat with my boss about how one can achieve 100 with a few minor "cons." His perspective is that it takes 100 attaboys to offset one you dumb shit...and that a score of 100 means perfection, no improvemt is possible.
For what it's worth I agree that in a sea of relative mediocraty in the Porn Site field, Brazzers definitely rises far above the norm, and in the genre of exclusive material, these Brazzers guys do a fabulous job in producing their stuff.
I can only dream of being a part of the production crew, who seem to be swimming in a constant stream of gorgeous fucking ladies. And I can't imagine life with a magic wand even remotely as prodigious as the dudes on this site carry in their charlies.
By the way, you write like a pro. Great reviews.
|
02-25-08 07:25pm
|
Reply
1560
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
powerman's Review
While I'm troubled by a 100 rating as well, I've now been a member for a few months and plan to stay a few more months.
My issue is that many of the more recent ladies are the "reconstructed" type (excessively exaggerated aftermarket tit jobs, excess botox fills, etc.) rather than basicly beautiful women (even those with more modest body shop work.
All natural babes like Jenna Doll and Natasha Nice get a lot of excellent exposure in exclusive content that, by itself, is worth the price of admission, and gorgeous babes like Bree Olsen and Carmella Bing also predominate.
The best kept secret is that their alphabetic listing of models in a plain drop down located in a hard to find box on the lower left of the Home page is loaded, and far more accurate (comprehensive) than the other, more visible indexes. The search function is a waste of time.
I will be writing a review shortly, once I get more experience using the site, but right now I would give it a 90-93 score; excellent but room for improvement.
|
02-25-08 11:41am
|
Reply
1561
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I can relate completely. Most of the good sites with high resolution videos offer 200-400Mb downloads. Those don't take long to fill up even a 500Gb hard drive.
I've tried using Windows Movie Maker to trim out the garbage from big ones and save just the portions I want but the process downgrades the resolution.
My next purchase will probably be a good video editing software disc that I can use for editing my porn collection.
|
02-21-08 04:50pm
|
Reply
1562
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Also a tittie lover, any activities that show REAL fun bags in all their glory, including nipple tugging/twisting is fine. Self sucking of nipples by big titted honeys also results in my Willy coming to full attention.
|
02-19-08 11:17am
|
Reply
1563
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I signed up twice quite a while back (2006 and 2005) and both times I was denied access a day or two into the membership. In both cases the "don't really care" attitude was apparent because I couldn't get any reply at all for several days from the support people. And when I finally did, the reset password didn't work.
In both cases, I got a full refund of my membership fee so I have no beef about that, but I have stayed away from that site ever since. Interestingly I've been a long term and satisfied member of their Sexy-=Babes.tv site (with several other sites attached) and have had no trouble at all.
I may give it another try because I do like the stuff on their other site and there appears to be a level of satisfaction expressed by everyone.
|
02-17-08 05:57pm
|
Reply
1564
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Actually this question has been on my mind all day (shows you how little I have on my mind since the football season is over) I do have a method to my timing. If I'm signing up normally for a month with a 25/75 chance (25% chance I'll let it auto-renew - 75% chance I'll cancel a week or so in) I'll time it so that the end date of the subscription is a Monday so I can get 5 weekends of membership. And I'll never sign up in February because a month membership will be date to date so it's only 28 or 29 days instead of 31 in the membership.
Aren't you sorry they asked? ;o)
|
02-17-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
1565
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I agree completely, but that was the only reason I could see other than they just ran out of poll questions.
|
02-17-08 01:34pm
|
Reply
1566
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I suspect the webmasters might be interested. There was a recent case where one of our fellow members reported a pricing glitch ($5 too low) that the webmaster instantly fixed. If the error is made during a slow enrollment period (such as weekend days) their loss is insignificant.
|
02-17-08 08:42am
|
Reply
1567
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Danni's Hot Box had very well produced FREE live shows with chat room interaction using multiple high res cameras. Because they had to deal with the traditionally unpunctual porn whores, they frequently had late starts and unhappy participation by paying menbers. (I quit the site for other reasons, so I don't know if those sessions are still there.)
|
02-15-08 07:08am
|
Reply
1568
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Model Name>Website>Variable title/name
I also have specialized filing for sites (like FTV, Amateur, etc.) that just use phony first names.
I also keep an Excel spreadsheet with thumbnail photos and comments* and with links to the files to make it easy to find the babe/content that will do it for me.
*Big naturals, great face, large labia, etc.
|
02-07-08 10:56pm
|
Reply
1569
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I understand the urge to purge is a major problem when a babe takes it up the shitter.
Nothing can shut down a magic moment any faster than a turd showing up at a very inopportune moment.
The sensation to some women may be positive, but I think it's really a creation of something to add a little variety to a normal vaginal fuck.
As a porn lover, the best part of an anal fuck is that the RCG position shows off the porn whore's cunt in all its glory with no schlong in the way.
|
02-01-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
1570
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Agree. The face is a part of the package. Gotta see the eyes, the lips, the hair, the expressions, etc.
The good news is that the hidden face is a rapidly disappearing phenomenon that started with some low end porn videos in the 1980's.
I suspect the market place has spoken because I don't recall seeing any hidden face stuff in a long time.
|
01-31-08 07:28am
|
Reply
1571
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Frankly I skip past all that "what's your name?" "When did you first have sex?" and "How long have you been in the business" nonsense unless the babe is bare-assed naked and is showing off her assets while she's talking.
Foul language makes no sense to me because it expresses nothing of any value other than to show that the porn whore knows the terminology.
Repeating stuff too frequently, what ever the word (or noise) makes me turn off the speakers and go for just the babe and the sex.
|
01-27-08 02:32pm
|
Reply
1572
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I agree with the general trend of replies; that I go to paysites almost exclusively. The free sites are not that good and there are plenty of paysites that have good pricing (there's a recent trend nowdays where the successful sites have discovered that there is a lot more money to be made at a slightly lower price than by keeping the price high.)
|
01-27-08 02:24pm
|
Reply
1573
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
never's Review
I went to the site. There was no 3 day trial option, just the TBP $5 discount, so I assume that was available 5 months ago when you joined, but not now.
|
01-06-08 06:52pm
|
Reply
1574
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Not enough options. I like 'em starting with sexy clothing and stripping down to the level where PTA* are fully exposed so we can see the action without any camouflage. I get really pissed when a babe with great tits leaves her bra on throughout or when the panties are pulled aside but not removed. Stockings or no stockings, who cares?
By the way, when a chunky lass like Brandy Talore (aka Brandy Taylor) wears something around her waist/belly, that's fine. I like watching her bouncing titties, not her bouncing belly.
* PTA - Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
01-06-08 06:42pm
|
Reply
1575
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I think Jay G has nailed it. Three ratings makes the most sense.
Quantity:
I have gone to a great looking site at a good price to find that I can download everything on it in a week or so. Relatedly, I've gone to high rated sites that have infrequent updating, or none at all. A quantity rating makes great sense.
Quality:
A rating of quality that is not influenced at all by price or quantity adds considerably to the value of the rating.
Price:
Stating the price is good, but the TBP folks have seen everything so they can add a price/value subjective rating to the mix. If it's independent from the content rating, than it's a big addition to the review.
|
12-30-07 08:38am
|
