| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1476
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I found TBP quite a while ago and used it always before signing up. On the few occasions where I signed up on a site not reviewed by TBP, I was disappointed.
When PU was set up, it only added to the mix because I am now able to carefully evaluate a site knowing what I can expect.
PU also provides a great way to warn others when a lousy site or rip-off wembaster practices are discovered.
The two resources are must reads before I'll even think about a site.
|
06-16-08 06:55am
|
Reply
1477
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
As a previous subscriber and a subscriber to their free newsletter I received an email from Met-Art offering a $19.99 per month deal. I don't think the price is available to "walk-ins."
But if this genre is your thing, they have a $99.99 per year deal which is a Helluva deal in comparison to the month-to-month price ($8.33 per month). After 3-1/2 months you get the rest of the year free.
|
06-15-08 10:28am
|
Reply
1478
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Dawn123's Reply
Bottom line, I've taken advantage of several TBP/PU discount offers and all, except Bang Bros, have been honored as offered and all of them were really good deals.
And the folks at TBP/PU immediately pulled the offer as soon as I reported it.
Finally, BangBros belatedly extended my full price membership to make up for the matter.
So I lost nothing except a few minutes of time posting these messages. I suggest staying on top of any deals and squawking immediately if you run into any snags.
|
06-11-08 08:48am
|
Reply
1479
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Review
Excellent review.
Your score doesn't match what I'll score it when I've finished my review, but you did an excellent job of explaining why you scored it as you did which, if always done the way you did, adds a lot to the value of P. U. reviews.
I, personally, like a variety of insertions, because that means the girl is enjoying herself, showing off her body and giving me a good opportunity to enjoy looking at her private parts.
While fornication is also fun to watch, seeing a hairy male asshole staring back at me while his sausage is doing its thing in the babe's vagina or butt hole, does nothing at all for me.
That said, each of us has our individual preferences. I really am turned off by excessive and/or poorly located tattoos (example, a lousily oriented script "F" on Friday's lower groin area). I just cannot watch a porn vid with excessive tat's for more than a minute. But some people love tat's.
Your experience with ALS Scans matches mine for an all tattoo site I wasted my money on. The site had good PU reviews and a high average score but it took me about an hour after signing up to put through the cancellation.
It's all about what floats your boat and when people post good descriptive reviews like yours, it really helps the decision process.
|
06-09-08 11:23am
|
Reply
1480
|
Gangbang Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
OK. Based on your reply I signed up for a 3 day shot at $5.
A quick run through and a successful download of two otherwise unavailable Christoph videos downloaded at "wicked" resolution - which isn't quite HD but pretty damned good) has convinced me that you are dead bang right. I'll be busy for the next few days exploring the site and doing some downloading, but this one looks great.
Jay, thanks a million. First, I would never check out a site like this that has such misleading stuff, and second, I'm not into Gangbang videos.
The webmaster needs work on how to market his site, but I agree with you. At $40 for 2 months it's a Hell of a deal.
I'll be canceling my trial on Monday, then will sign up for the 2 month gig.
Again, thanks Jay, and thanks PU for providing such a useful site.
|
06-07-08 05:14pm
|
Reply
1481
|
Gangbang Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
Question.
You say this is part of the Evil Angel network, but when I go to Evil Angel using the autolink in your review, they want $14.99 for a 30-day license for each video. The same results for EvilEmpire.com
Based on your comments I'm ready to pop $40 for 2 months, but I don't want to pay $15 more for each download and the GangbangPlayground.com says nothing about that subject.
Also, in GangbangPlayground.com's signup page the other 20 sites are listed but they aren't linked, and a search yields nothing.
I am a big fan of Christoph Clark whose "Big Natural Tits" is listed in the "other 20 sites"
Are they real "sites" or are they just sections of this website?
Thanks for any input you can provide.
|
06-07-08 02:52pm
|
Reply
1482
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Is masturbation healthy? Damned right.
Frankly I am really into masturbation videos in a big way. I enjoy watching babes doing themselves with whatever is available including baseball bats, pool cues, panties, dildos, cucumbers, zucchinis, carrots, pearl necklaces, even fingers. Babes who are into self pleasuring sure beats the Hell out of looking up a guy's butt while he's doing the dirty.
And you know it's much more healthy for the babes if the objet's d'penetration are fresh veggies and not some tattooed dude's sausage because no STD's can be transmitted via a celery stick.
Oh? What's that? You say the question is about men jerking off? Sorry.
|
06-06-08 01:36pm
|
Reply
1483
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
On that note, I have been told about pretty good sites by people on here rather than reading a review I will have someone actually suggest a site, Aniazi.com for example.
I'll betcha you meant Aziani.com. And that is a good site!
|
06-04-08 05:58pm
|
Reply
1484
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Because you refined the question so that nit includes any website, I changed my vote to Often.
I keep a small pad in my wallet where I jot down sites mentioned by colleagues and friends, that I see published in newspapers and magazines, and that are mentioned on radio and TV. I also check out links mentioned here on Porn Users, some of which (porn and non-porn) have been most useful.
|
06-04-08 12:58pm
|
Reply
1485
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
Reply of
joekerr1's Review
joekerr1:
This network of sites renames some of their girls for reasons I know not. However, the network hosts this FREE site: http://www.indexxxed.com which summarizes a lot of things including on which of its 10 sites a specific girl appears.
I'm still waiting for these guys to offer a multi-site access package of some kind. The previews are terrific and they seem to do a great job finding the right babes to do their thing.
Good review. Thanks.
|
06-02-08 08:57am
|
Review
1486
|
Angelica Costello
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
There are some photos of Venus Knight (aka Angelica Costello)
There are some photos of Venus Knight
There are some photos of Venus Knight
At least there is no scam billing. They take your money and then they take off.
That's all the Pro's I can come up with. Seriously |
| Cons: |
Dead site with no activity.
No customer support at all
Very sloppy navigation
Hardly any content
What's there is lousy quality |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line, forget this site.
I signed up because they sent me an email that offered a 2 month non-recurring at $19.99. Being a Venus Knight fan, BIG TIME, I figured that was a great deal although PU/TBP had no G2 at all about the site.
As soon as I accessed the site for the first time I went to work to find stuff about Venus. It took a while but I finally found a few photos, No videos, just photos.
Having committed my money I thought I'd see what else was there. Yes there was some low quality stuff but none of it was worth previewing, let alone downloading.
When you consider that you can get a ton more material on Venus Knight on Twistys for the same investment, you will conclude this site is a waste of time and money.
To give you some idea how bad it is, I'm as tight as they come when it's my money, so when I sign up for a site, I drain as much as I want as quickly as possible so I can cancel and move on within the first month. In this case, after day one when I determined what a crap site it was, I don't think I revisited it more that 3 or 4 times and that was just to see if I missed something the first time or if the webmaster woke up and worked on it.
Why a score of 51 and not 50? Remember, I'm a Venus Knight fan and there were a few photos of Venus Knight that I did not have nestled away on my harddrive.
That's it. |
|
06-02-08 07:23am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1487
|
YouStrip
(0)
|
Reply of
njolin's Reply
Thanks. Maybe someday a download capability will come along, but at their prtice, storing the videos of interest as favorites will be fine.
Interesting site. Thanks.
|
06-02-08 07:04am
|
Reply
1488
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
But men should also have the right to stare at their unadorned mammaries without fear of being accused of molestation or any other crime.
|
06-02-08 12:13am
|
Reply
1489
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Northern Pike's Review
Once again I call for PU to start listing all sites with known cases of scam billing like this. At least a caution list of some kind is called for. It would be a tremendous positive feature in PU.
|
06-01-08 11:33am
|
Reply
1490
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think Hillary would be most likely because the feminists view porn as misogynist exploitation of women and are the leaders at attempts to close or restrict porn shops and "gentlemens' clubs" in most cities.
Obama is my second choice because he has shown a preference for government controls over almost everything.
McCain is least likely to meddle in that arena because his base really doesn't care that much about passive issues like porn (on the web, in clubs or in stores). His base is much more interested in activist issues such as teaching condom use to 3rd graders, encouraging gay studies for 6th graders, bans on gay marriage, etc.
By the way, it's a real kick to see political philosophies being argued when the question was a very simple one about who would most likely restrict porn.
|
05-31-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
1491
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Thanks. Interesting site...for sure. And his success at communicating with the webmaster has me thinking about doing a lot more myself.
|
05-30-08 08:36pm
|
Reply
1492
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
joekerr1's Review
I agree. This is the kind of review that adds to the quality of PU and I'm looking forward to seeing more of your reviews going forward.
As for Video Box, I've been with them for at least 2 years and agree with both you and Denner. There is no site that has more stuff and as frequent an update schedule than these guys (imagine, 1,825 updates per year).
My primary beef with that site (and with many porn video productions in general) is that many of the girls are not identified at all so the search function will not capture all scenes for a particular babe. My secondary beef is that they are getting careless when they do identify the chick so that the name and scene don't match correctly.
Minor issues because it's fun digging thru the archives looking at the stuff and always finding some stunning talent that I haven't seen before.
And the comments for each scene/DVD are amusing, and occasionally useful. Always watch for comments by Rope-a-Dope. This guy has an all consuming passion for porn and seems to have cataloged each and every porn flick ever made...and he's always posting great info.
|
05-30-08 01:07pm
|
Reply
1493
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
"Even better was/is the correspondence with the Crazies who run AO30."
What's AO30?
|
05-30-08 12:54pm
|
Reply
1494
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If the site has a public forum that is read by the webmaster I'll post a lot of suggestions and comments, but otherwide I seldom do. But it may be a good new habit to get into. Feedback can't hurt!
|
05-29-08 07:02am
|
Reply
1495
|
YouStrip
(0)
|
Reply of
njolin's Review
Very interesting site...a new find for me. I assume that there is no way to expand the videos to full screen or to download any of them, but if there is could you post the method?
Also, what does Xtra buy you? The vids I found are all about 1 minute long and stop before the panties come off. Does Xtra go the "full monty" as they say?
|
05-28-08 09:49am
|
Reply
1496
|
All Elite Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
bjorn7's Reply
Yet another direct scam.
When will PU start a warn list of sites known to be scams...just like this one?
|
05-27-08 08:34am
|
Reply
1497
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
My activity on Porn sites began in 2002, and the volume of spam back then was rather high already, but has increased over the past few years.
I can't correlate the spam traffic to joined sites so the increase could just be more spammers out there. But yes, spam has risen dramatically.
|
05-27-08 06:58am
|
Reply
1498
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
The choices are so simple I always pick the one that matches my actual reason. Can't hurt.
Apart from "Just moving on," my usual reply, I've also clicked download problems and quality problems, if those answers apply.
Danni.com asked these questions when I cancelled in 2006 and I answered "support problems." I got an email from someone asking for more info, so I responded hoping they would pay attention and possibly even get a free month. Instead I got a very defensive and insulting reply from them.
Strange. With the big bucks that can be made with good sites and good customer service it seems like some webmasters are thick and stupid.
|
05-25-08 07:35am
|
Reply
1499
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Did . Don't now. Waste of time.
|
05-21-08 08:18am
|
Reply
1500
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
I like the idea, but not as a replacement of my day job.
I can just see that entry on my resume:
Professional Porn Reviewer - Wrote comprehensive reviews of pornographic websites. Have an extensive database of various sexual activities that I have explored and evaluated as an observer but have only fantasized about doing personally. Have earned more positive trust ratings than negative ratings from Porn Users.
|
05-19-08 12:29pm
|
