Not enough room in the previous response for explanations.
The photos are smallish (768)
The video scenes are the full length scenes taken from the original DVD. The DVD starts with scene 1 and each day they add th next scene until the complete DVD is posted. Then they start with a new DVD the next day.
Updates are posted 7 days a week. Each update lists the cast with a link to the total inventory of all videos by that performer.
In other words, ths is not a great site for photos, but a treasure trove for videos.
Here's today's list of updates:
PHOTOS (3 sets): Models in set: Sara Jess Alicia Diana (84 pix)
Models in set: Kathleen Kruz (42 pix)
Models in set: Trina Michaels (146 pix)
VIDEOS (23)
20 Teens Who Like To Suck Cocks scene 14
All Sex - No Talk 2 scene 8
Almost Jailbait 3 scene 1
Backside Bounce 2 scene 2
Black Heat In White Meat scene 7
Blacks In Blondes 2 scene 1
Booty Bandit scene 3
Built For Sex scene 2
Butt Busters 3 scene 2
Filthy Cum Sluts scene 1
Hotter Than Hell 1 scene 7
I Like Cum 2 scene 4
I Was Tight Yesterday scene 1
Interracial P.O.V. 3 scene 3
Legal At Last 2 scene 3
Pimp Daddy scene 4
Pussy Farts scene 4
Ravishing Beauties scene 3
Ready To Serve scene 4
Ripe Juicy Teens scene 2
Swallow Every Drop 3 scene 4 Throated 10 scene 15
White Guy's P.O.V. 2 scene 3
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
A huge amount of content - old and new - video and photo. (They claim to have over 1 million photos)
20+ daily updates, mostly video but several photo
Good video D/L options (iPod, wmv and Xvid (AVI) with some MOV and MPEG's). Vids are all full length scenes.
A huge model listing that is accurate and linked accurately (that's becoming rare).
It's genre is Whale Tail (the rear view of a babe wearing thong panties under low rise jeans or slacks) and there is a good selection of whale tail scenes in that specialty area.
No DRM or D/L limits
Huge Bonus Site options; some excellent and some lousy, but there are enough opportunities to keep you busy looking 24/7.
Cons:
Biggest fault, IMO, is no zip for the photos. 1 million photos and no zip, you do the math. Worse, each photo needs the user to label. There's no unique numbering or lettering. (Remember the good old days back in 2000 and 2001?)
Photos are smallish.
Navigation is rather clumsy and not intuitive, but after a while it becomes much easier to use.
Mostly non-exclusive video, but some of the photos look like they are exclusive.
The mechanics of name searching is rather clumsy but once you figure out the shortcuts (use the "favorites" feature when you find a model you want to track) it's a bit easier.
Bottom Line:
This site is a real sleeper but I recommend it to everyone. At $9.99 it's a Helluva great deal.
The TBP review claims they are not updating, but the site is slamming a lot of new content (20+ additions - video mostly) every day.
My score of 86 would improve to 90+ if a zip download feature was added to the photo sets. (Incidentally, my score is based on content and ease of use, not on the fantastic price.) The score would also improve with a search feature that made it easy to locate a specific model by name.
If you are into "whale tail," there's enough content to make you happy. But the site name is somewhat misleading because it's far, far more than just the whale tail genre.
Do not be turned off by the less than exciting appearance of its home page and its annoying characteristic of dimming down as it's loading a page. (I was and almost canceled without giving the site any chance to show me its stuff.) Give it time and once you get used to it, you'll find it acceptable. Not great, but not terrible either.
BOTTOM LINE - Go for it and drop $10 and check this site out. It's worth the effort to understand the design and, once you do, you'll be happy when you discover the treasure at the end of your quest.
The PPV reference is now gone. But the review still mentions a download limit, which the Webmaster also says is gone. Perhaps that comment can be corrected as well.
The very good news is that "In The Crack's" Webmaster understands and gets it. Unfortunately he started the site off with some user-unfriendly attributes that, although they are now corrected, will linger on in the review sites because they once existed.
Now, that said, it's time to check my "playtime" budget to see if I can handle a $35 whack...then on to a signup.
(By the way, Khan, this is why PU is such a terrific site for us porn users. The communications capability through this site results in the consumer knows what he/she is getting and, more importantly, provides a site's webnaster an opportunity to address questions and misunderstandings about a site and, thus, increase traffic.)
Decided to sign up for the trial. Shay Laren is model # 14, added yesterday (7/1/08) so there's a faint hope that the webmaster will eventually populate the site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Great talent.
Great concept, dealing with the babes as REAL PEOPLE and not porn whores.
Attractive site and interfaces.
Interesting thematics.
$2.95 [b]trial[/b] price is a good deal
Cons:
Very thin content.
Way overpriced for monthly membership (but great price for trial)
Slow, but not terribly so.
The interviews are fun, but most are done fully clothed from beginning to end. (Out of 43 total videos, 13 are interviews and 13 more are sloppily edited "behind the scenes," leaving a total of 17 videos that are full productions (but those 17 are very well done.)
One very cute babe, Franchezca Valentina, has no videos, just 118 photos. The other 13 have photo sets and at least 3 videos each.
Navigation is easy and well structured for a future fully populated site.
Bottom Line:
I signed up after reading Drooler's Comment. There are now 14 babes in the stable - SHAY LAREN was added on July 1 with 117 photos and 3 videos, the first update since mid-March.
I signed up today at 1:00pm. I completed a 100% drain of all content by 7:15pm, even with a lot of interruptions. I'm guessing that, with a normal broadbnand connection and no distractions, one could drain all of the content in two to three hour's time, tops.
The site has a lot of potential and really should have been loaded with a lot more content before going live, but for us Porn Users, it's a great deal at $2.95.
I'm hoping the webmaster works on building the site with much more content because I'll be back when it's ready for prime time.
(The 80 score is a direct result of the paucity of content. With 140 babes instead of 14, and if they are all of the same top drawer caliber, this site would warrant a mid 90's score.)
If it's two gorgeous babes and the kiss is a slow, tonguing, heavy breathing, deep down heavy duty smooch, I almost blow my load even when the babes are fully clothed...but when the camera pans down slowly past four tits with fully erect nipples down to a mutual and energetic finger fuck, I'm totally sold.
Forget anal, forget mish. Two babes going at it hot and heavy where the camera almost picks up the feeling of hot breath and the sweet tuna smell of sopping wet pussy mixed with the subtle aroma of a French perfume.
Damn. Ol' Willy is anxious for me to go find some of that because he's really getting ready!
Not being a big anal fan, I really don't feel qualified to vote for anyone on the list.
I voted for Hilary Scott who is a total babe and really seems to enjoy getting rammed up the ol' poop chute. Sandra Romain, as a total babe, comes in a close second.
You said "ok, who needs a video with 2GB on his hd?"
I agree completely.
I am about to spring $30 (USD) for a month of Prime Cups and went in to the public site just to see if anything has changed. I tested the super HD (1920) test run that used up 15.8 mb for about 25 seconds...and although the picture was crisp and nice, the 960 version of the test was virtually the same on my screen, yet it used "only" 5.6 mb (65% less). Then I tried the 640 version and it came in at a paltry 3.0 mb. And it was damned good as well.
The difference, to me, isn't sufficiently large enough to warrant the lost hard drive space. (After all, only a breast research doctor or a gynecologist may need better definition than you get with 640, IMO.)
I plan to sign up and do a full drain of the pre-identified "good stuff" on the site (anyone can get a full index of all Dev8 stuff at Indexxxed.com . so I've already D/L'd the trailers for each and every video on that site and know which scenes I'll want to D/L once I've signed up.)
By the way, I sent an email to Dev8 asking if there was any less expensive way to access all their stuff like a network pass or something. They referred me to their site called More Gonzo. That site has an inventory of 120 videos from 6 of their 10 sites, total. As they add a new (to this site) video they remove an old one. At any given time they will have 20 older videos from each of their six big and established sites...but nothing from their newer sites, PurePOV, Fist Flush, Milf Thing and FistFlush.
With daily updates (except Sunday), then, one can, with proper planning, drain off 144 videos (the 120 on the sight at signup date and 24 daily updates) in a month and then quit...or just stay enrolled and, if they play it straight, eventually get access to most of their overall inventory.
More Gonzo is probably a good site for a starter to see what the full videos are like in the 6 sites covered (the trial provides access to very short videos so you'll never see an entire video without signing up for a full month)
The answer to my question now appears on the public site. They hold to an inventory of 120 videos, total. As they add a new one (to this site) they remove the old one. At any given time they will have 20 older videos from each of 6 sites...but nothing from their newer sites, PurePOV, Fist Flush, Milf Thing and FistFlush.
With daily updates (except Sunday), then, one can, with proper planning, drain off 144 videos (the 120 on the sight at signup date and 24 daily updates) in a month and then quit...or just stay enrolled and, if they play it straight, eventually get access to everything.
More Gonzo is probably a good site for a starter to see what the full videos are like in the 6 sites covered (the trial is a very limited video so you'll never see an entire video without signing up for a full month)
I like girls of any age who have taken care of themselves, aren't extensively tattooed and who have great attitudes.
And the ones with great eyes and other body parts!
For example, I go nutz over the older types like Vicky Vette and Penny Porsche...and over young babes like Natasha Nice and Jenna Doll. (And I like their names as well. Classic cars and "nice dolls" always do it for me.
Thanks for the tip. The public site is very nicely structured and it has some stuff not available on VideoBox. I especially like that it lets the casual drop-in lurker operate all of the functions (except watching the videos, of course) so an interested purchaser can be sure he is satisfied. That's rare in most preview sites.
However, the bad news. They didn't try very hard to identify the talent so one cannot do complete searches by model name. This shows a sign of laziness because they display the cast on the cover.
The good news, for what it's worth, they say they have 844 DVD's (20% of VideoBox's inventory) so searching through each and every box cover won't be as bad.
At $15 bucks (w/ the PU/TBP discount) it's worth going in to supplement my collection (which is organized by model name) with otherwise unavailable stuff. I see what my wekend project will be already.
This review brings back memories, and not fond ones, of the early days of what looked like great material on sites with lousy D/L speed. I'm spoiled these days and sites that get cheap on the delivery side of the business will have wasted their money building the content side because no one will buy, or if they do they won't stick around.
Your reference to your being a moderator of a Psychological forum on the web prompted me to add a new thread in the PU Forum: The Psychology of Porn - Actresses. I'd appreciate reading your thoughts on the subject.
I checked out the site and it's my guess that the $4,95 was a typobecause of the sperial $14,95 TBP price.
The site permits nonmembers full access to the navigation and scene details which I really like, But the one annoyance I have with Video Box occurs on this site even more, and that is the large number of cases where the porn star name is "not available." While in some cases that can be true because the producer does not make them available, there are so many missing names that the search feature is of marginal value.
That means a serious collector has to go to another source (iafd.com, for example) to get a listing of all titles in which a porn star appears, then go back to this site and do a title search.
At $14.95 I can't complain and will probably sign up to grab a few scenes missing from my collection from Video Box and other sources that look like are in the A.M.C. collection.
I have Big Naturals on my A list of sites that I'm signing up for when I cancel my membership in a current site. The PU reviews are great and I like the public site.
Just to let folks know, the network is Brazzers.com. I'm a current member and agree with much/most of the review. My only beef is that many of the current updates of this and other network sites are babes with oversized aftermarket boob enhancements. I'm an "all natural" kind of guy. That said, this is a very good site that has, in my opinion, overtaken Bang Bros. in its genre.
The bad part is that I suspect it can get rather nasty when dealing with content providers unless I'm creating my own content, and the process for establishing good contact development must be difficult. In other words, it takes a lot of hard work and one must be ready for the crap that must go on behind the scenes, but once established, the notion of making a nice buck and having access to all manner of stuff is attractive.
Thanks for this review! Well done. I hadn't heard of this site until your review today so I checked it out (no pun intended).
First things first. Boy, the gene pool in Eastern Europe is just wonderful when it produces so many fine, innocent looking and just gorgeous women.
Now, after checking out some of the sample videos, the reproduction quality isn't up to current standards. If the site has been stagnant for a year or two, I suspect the member access videos are equally not as crisp and sharp as they could be. Am I right?
Also, based on your comments and what I saw in the samplers, the content could be described as a bit edgier than what is on Met-Art.com (where several of the models can be found in shoots and videos that are less erotic than the ones on this site).
I'm tempted to sign up for a month and, as you did, drain off as much as I can, then cancel.
Thanks for finding this site and for your review.
By the way, for you Silvia Saint fans out there, on page 5 of the models directory there is a small set and a sample video of the Saint herself when she was very young. Take the time to check it out.
Just found this out with the Twisty's review. I've been holding off signing up again (had a 10 month membership in late 2006 for $99 before they dropped that deal) but with the three bonus sites and the PU/TBP $19.99 price, I'm in. Too bad they dropped the $99 for 10 month deal, but the 6 month price is still pretty good.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
