| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1001
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
If it's the model's choice to go with a single common name, it's a lousy one. Her income is directly tied to her popularity so if she cannot be found on sites, her popularity diminishes.
Why does Gianna Michaels always show up with both names? Because there are several Gianna's out there. She knows (or her handlers know) that there are those of us who want to check out her superb fun bags and she wants all webmasters to know that people are looking for her, not for one of the lesser Gianna's.
The real problem is when a site chooses some arbitrary name to make a babe appear to e exclusive.
Anyway, being a guy who, when he finds a babe he likes, wants to find anything and everything in that babe's body of work, I answered with the first option.
|
01-05-10 08:49am
|
Reply
1002
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
I was a member of SexyBabes for several years and got Babelicious when it was introduced. I'm a video guy and, because SexyBabes had a long history of excellent video offerings, I stuck with it until I finally gave up waiting for the quality to return to both SexyBabes and Babelicious.
I'm very happy to see your post mainly because I'd love to see your sites return to their original glory. Please keep us up to date on how it goes. I'm ready to rejoin when you tell me things are back to your original standard.
|
01-04-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
1003
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
shroom's Reply
I just checked.
The Hegre Art site accessed directly is offering monthly at $29.95 and annual at $150.00
PU link offers 1 month for $19.95 (renewed at $29.95 after the first month) and $99.95 for 1 year.
If you like Hegre, the PU one year offer is far better at 27 cents per day compared from Hegre's 41 cents per day
|
01-04-10 06:13pm
|
Reply
1004
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
I was a member for a few months 2 or 3 years ago and felt the same way. Way too many standard set ups. But on several occasions a real knockout babe showed up with a super pro photographer shooting some outstanding stuff.
I quit because the videos (I'm more of a video guy) were tepid and mostly videos of the photo shoots (yawn...wake me when it's over please)and I found myself both bored and frustrated; bored with the sameness and frustrated with the difficulty finding good stuff to download.
So I'm in agreement 100% with your review. The score of 85 you gave it is very fair given the quality and quantity compared with other photo sites and reflects my view more than the higher scores posted by others.
|
01-04-10 12:02am
|
Reply
1005
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
When a guy does a gorgeous babe for far longer than I ever could, then for the guy to find it necessary to jerk himself off for a "money shot" is a major turn-off for me.
I didn't much like John Leslie as a person (he was always nasty to the female talent), but I aqdmired how Leslie always splattered (back, ass or pubic area) as he pulled it out of the babe's cunt. He never had to fuck his fist to ejaculate.
That tells me he was really into the fuck and not just going through the motions.
As for where the guy splats, the only two places that make any sense are inside (creampie) or on her back or her pubic area. I don't see anything at all erotic about a mouth or tit splat (other than the possible humiliation factor, which also turns me off).
|
01-03-10 10:36am
|
Comment
1006
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
|
01-01-10 11:46pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1007
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I chose Southern but would also have voted for French and British (incl. Scottish, as Drooler mentioned) as well.
But also, as Drooler said, I'm into the visual more than the aural element of pornography.
|
01-01-10 01:07pm
|
Reply
1008
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I may be a jackass at reading but I am kinda confused about the 1byday site. Is this site part of the network?
1 by Day is part of the network offerings.
What's the network's specialization? I know you say all is covered, so is there a good ratio of all the fetishes covered or would you say one type stands out the most?
Covers the waterfront with all of the various genres. There are more big tit babes than most other sites, but you'll get a lot of BJ's, bondage, gang bangs, lesbo, solo masturbation, legs, fisting, pissing, foot insertions, toys, group sex, etc. No emphasis on MILFs or barely legal babes.
|
12-30-09 10:21pm
|
Reply
1009
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
If you sign up now, the new Eve Angel site is included as a bonus. But some of the Eve Angle stuff is already on the 1 By Day site in the DDF network.
|
12-30-09 06:20pm
|
Reply
1010
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm a newbie to the DDF stuff so the "recycling" doesn't bother me...except that it's strange to see updates of babes with smaller tits than earlier updates.
In fact the fact that the recycled stuff has been re-edited to improve resolution is a good thing rather than what other sites do...just repost the old stuff as iswith no enhancements.
|
12-30-09 06:06pm
|
Reply
1011
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I joined in August when they offered three months access to the full network for $75 for 3 months. That expired in November but then I found out they made the deal permanent so I signed up for another 3 months.
I was starting to compile my notes to draft up a review, but exotics4me beat me to the punch.
I will say that DDF Prod is among the best sites, if not the best site, I've joined for all the reasons he stated.
A few observations.
- They have some updates that are photo only updates. Not a problem, just a point.
- They have "Casting" videos show up occasionally. They appear to be short audition type videos when the babe first walked in. The Casting videos disappear rather than being added to the archive so they need to be snagged and downloaded quickly.
- Some updates are posted but nothing is available for download. Don't understand why they do that because they are dated when the update first appears but a member has to wait until the video is actually loaded. That means keeping track, offline, of updates that need to be checked out and downloaded.
- The quality of the videos is beyond superb. I have finally decided that it's time to get me a 1.5 Tb external dedicated to just DDF Prod stuff.
- The search engine that exotics4me mentions is one of the best in the business. If you want to see just blond, big titted babes pissing for example, it returns a collection for your viewing pleasure. If you also decided that you want the result limited to shaved pussies, no sweat. It's done fast. And it's accurate, unlike many other sites.
I have some other observations that I'll save for later, but I'm down with the 96 score. Mine would be a 93-94 just because they do need to either load the videos when they do the update or just hold the update until its ready to fly.
|
12-30-09 06:02pm
|
Reply
1012
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Only once on an American Airlines flight.
I was seated in seat 19D and a guy who was seated in 18C was watching a porno on his big screen laptop...with the sound on.
Surprisingly the flight attendants saw and heard it and said nothing.
The worst part is that he had a smoking hot looking babe with him but from my angle I couldn't tell if it was her in the porno.
|
12-26-09 10:40am
|
Reply
1013
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Good point. The expertise of the photographer (lighting, angles, etc.) is far more important than the costume. A sexy Santa outfit works if the photog knows what he/she is doing, and doesn't if it's a hack behind the camera.
|
12-25-09 11:45am
|
Reply
1014
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
True, but I hear that some European sites do have some of her stuff.
|
12-24-09 08:43pm
|
Reply
1015
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Just curious whether this site has any stuff by Candy Barr (1950's era), Virginia Bell (1950's & 60's), Nancy Suiter (1970's) and/or Traci Lords (1980's & 90's)
Also, one of my favorites is the porn musical version of Alice in Wonderland.
I'm thinking about signing up for the 3day trial but thought I'd ask first.
Thanks.
|
12-24-09 02:43pm
|
Reply
1016
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Good review. The search process, as Denner says, is virtually useless. name searches return totally random results. If (a big IF) a model is correctly identified with a correctly spelled name in a scene, you have a better chance finding more of that model's stuff by clicking on the cast name in the scene than if you type the name in the search box.
With their huge inventory that grows at the rate of over 1,800 new DVD's per year, it's a real shame that they've failed so badly in the indexing process.
The price is right (esp. for the 1 year membership that I purchased), but the frustration I experience in trying to find scenes with specific babes makes the 85 score posted by Denner a bit high. I am more like an 82 myself.
|
12-21-09 11:25pm
|
Comment
1017
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
12-20-09 11:44am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1018
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
jimmy71's Comment
Happened to me too. The security (or detection) problem is at the source, not with you.
I've had it with these jerks.
I'm a proud to join the swelling ranks of EX members of Brazzers and their sister site, MoFos.
|
12-20-09 11:35am
|
Reply
1019
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Not interested.
I like some porn, not other porn.
Example, I get bored with a BJ when the cameraman fixes his/her closeup on just the schlong and the babe's mouth. I also get tired of shots that focus on a guy's asshole while he's porking a gorgeous, but impossible to see babe. I love the female body, not the guy's man meat.
In a theatre I would need a good book to read when the 10-15 minute BJ scenes or the lousy camera angles come on. There isn't any fast forward in a theatre.
And the price would probably stop me as well. For $10+/- to sit in a dark theatre waiting for the "good stuff" to show up is better spent on a porn site where I pick what I get to see and when.
Finally, with the large screen TV sets these days, if you want to see the angel hair in the anal cavity of a babe, the HD stuff will give you just what you want...and the ability to see it over again to make sure you don't miss anything.
|
12-20-09 10:18am
|
Reply
1020
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Exactly!
It would be interesting to know what it was that generated your decision in this case, but it's not important enough to create a possible legal or other issue for PU/TBP.
What would be useful, though, is a listing of all sites that are on your suspended list. Another interesting, but not essential list would be a summary of the criteria that can result in a site joining the list.
|
12-18-09 06:51pm
|
Reply
1021
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Nope. I've wondered how many people actually go into those sites just like I used to wonder how many people actually called those phone sex numbers that ran in front of the old VHS porn videotapes.
Based on the PU poll, not very many.
|
12-18-09 02:41pm
|
Comment
1022
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
|
12-16-09 05:52pm
Replies (10)
|
Reply
1023
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler said:To a point anyway. When the girl's been so overly, Tweedlely-dum done, and she looks like something that could be hanging around in the older woman's room in that "rape with the precious work of art" scene in Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange, well, it might be worth considering that things have been taken a little too far.
My term is "Twistied," not "Tweedlely-dum" -a take on the Twistys site's over use of photoshop on its photos and why I am a member of the site just for the videos that cannot be photoshopped. So many of the Twistys babes look almost like they were computer simulations rather than real naked girls.
My response to the poll is no photoshop. If she can't pass muster without photoshop, does she really belong on a porn site in the first place?
|
12-16-09 03:03pm
|
Reply
1024
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
My point was that the site itself is part of the Twistys site, a fact not mentioned in your review.
Apart from that, I agree completely with your comment about the point score. If this site was a stand alone site and not part of Twistys, a 69 is too high for the reasons you stated.
Also, if you go to the preview site there is no mention made that it is a part of Twistys, so I'm not even sure that, if you sign up for Naughty Office from the preview site, you are also getting Twistys.
The best thing Twistys could do is to move the 15 videos over to Twistys and shut down the Naughty Office site altogether.
|
12-16-09 02:55pm
|
Reply
1025
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Naughty Staff is a part of the Twistys site and is not an independent site. Twistys announced last year that it was discontinuing the site and the content being created for it would appear on the primary Twistys site instead of the "Naughty Staff" site.
|
12-15-09 05:55pm
|
