| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
dogspoon's Review
Good site but I am more interested in watching babes whose tits move a little whilst they are boinking the dudes. I swear that Brazzers girls have arranged for a group discount on aftermarket breast enhancements. The silicone market soared when they created this site.
|
02-28-10 10:28am
|
Reply
952
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I like 'em all.
But my all time favorite, Jennifer Avalon, was into rather hard core lezzie stuff with a lot of strap ons involved and also did some BJ's but I never saw her doing BG hardcore. And I like it that way.
Then there's Danielle from FTV who has established a no BG standard since Rob made her a feature on FTV, then created her own site where there's also no BG.
But she did some BG stuff before Rob made her rich that was ho-hum stuff compared to her erotic solo and GG.
Then there's Jana Jordan (aka Jana Foxy, aka Yana) who currently does hard core lezzie as well, including in group scenes. She works on the babes while others are working on guys, but I've never seen her boinking guys at all.)
So my answer is yes, if they move toward BG hardcore, I'd prefer gradual. But the fantasy is better for me if they stay away from BG.
But once a babe succumbs to BG, then I want them to go for it all, like Jessica Moore, who will do anything at all no matter how perverted.
|
02-28-10 10:24am
|
Reply
953
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Just saw an ad for a 4 Terabyte external hard drive for $398.00. That's about 10 cents per GIG and 1 tenth of a cent for one meg. External drives were about $1 a gig just 4 years ago.
At this rate of deflation, I'll be in the market for a 10 Tb hard drive for $100 in the next two years. That would just about cover my total stash right now and would free up all my current external drives.
|
02-27-10 09:31am
|
Reply
954
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
I signed up in August when they offered a three month "one time" network deal for $25.00 per month. Since then they've set that as the standard price and I've now re-upped twice.
I, too, love the site for its high standards of both videography and models.
I am planning to write a review shortly but just a few observations.
CONS:
They regularly post updates on the home page that have either not been loaded on their servers yet, I assume so they can say they stay on their schedule (1 By Day means just that...one update per day.) They eventually show up, sometimes the next day, sometimes a week later.
Eve Angel headlines updates are posted on DDFNet but the content is not available unless you also sign up for EveAngel.com for an extra membership fee.
They post something they call "Joke" headlines that are single photos with no video or photo content...and no explanation. I don't get the joke.
PROS:
A major pro, beside the absolutely outstanding quality of the videography and photography is the search feature that offers almost every possible theme a dedicated horndog would want to find.
Another one is a feature on one site, House of Taboo, where they actually provide segments of full video content that feature a single element of kink. Example, if you like pissing scenes, H. O. T. has a full summary (with screen shots) of all pissing segments in the H. O. T. site.
Don't get me wrong. I have renewed twice and am now in my 7th month as a member and will probably stick around until I can drain off all tghe good stuff in their huse base of delicious babes (if I live long enough).
|
02-24-10 08:16am
|
Reply
955
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Thanks a million RB.
I use the clunky windows WMV editor. (Or, rather, I once used it but stopped.) The editor was very clumsy and error-prone and the quality of the end product was reduced. So my stash is loaded with great scenes that have a whole lot of crap that I'd like to edit out just as I used to do back in the old VCR videotape days.
I'm doing as Denner is, downloading the trial to make sure it's Monahan-proof.
|
02-22-10 08:37am
|
Reply
956
|
N/A
|
Reply of
redrum's Reply
Ditto redrum's comment completely.
Porn, to me, is about beautiful women doing erotic things to themselves, to men and to other women whilst exposing their delicious body parts in all their glory.
The eroticism is enhanced by the fantasy that lets me think I'm a vicarious participant rather than just a voyeur.
|
02-20-10 11:13am
|
Comment
957
|
Jelena Jensen
(0)
|
|
02-19-10 08:42am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
958
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Looks like Ken worked his magic. The price is now as TBP advertised. It's now $17.95 and, as a result of Ken's efforts, they now have a new (or, more accurately, returning) member.
By the way, the limited (very limited and not particularly good) trial is $1 for 2 days, not $2 as in the header.
|
02-16-10 10:13pm
|
Reply
959
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Agree with the comments so far.
This site is so far and away superior to any other review site there's no way I would be happy with any replacement. This site is well organized, permits open and candid discussion of all sites and a whole lot more and it has a great deal of variety.
Most of the sites to which I belong can thank TBP/PU for getting my business simply because the honest and open comments provided both by the members and by the staff.
I've said before and I'll say again, TBP/PU is the Consumers Reports of Porn; the go to place to check out new sites and to see what's happening on/to the older sites.
|
02-16-10 08:11am
|
Reply
960
|
Big Tits At School
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'm OK with the "...at School" gambit.
I enjoy the fantasy because I had a few real foxy teachers when I was still learning how to wank my shank.
And that may be why I love watching babes who can wear plaid skirts and loose blouses getting paid to be laid.
|
02-15-10 09:38am
|
Reply
961
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
Ditto that about the photos, but I'm a video guy. And the RK videos still rule.
|
02-15-10 09:33am
|
Reply
962
|
Amateur Emo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Nathan1000's Review
The preview site pretty much confirms that the word "Amateur" in the site's name applies to the site more than the well worn professional models in their splash page.
Thanks, Nathan, for confirming that this site isn't worth a minute of my time.
|
02-14-10 09:05am
|
Reply
963
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Good review and I agree that VB is the baseline site for any horndog into web porn.
One issue I've raised before and that I consider to be a major failing is their accuracy in their search capabilities with many misspellings and worse, their genre tags. (Gianna Michaels - small tits?????) Gianna Michaels spelled 10 different ways rendering a search for her stuff to be much messier tha n necessary, etc.)
I consider that carelessness/sloppiness to be a real problem with a site with as much content as VB has.
|
02-10-10 03:49pm
|
Reply
964
|
Melissa Ashley
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
From her website this update on her situation. Go to her site for more.
February 2nd, 2010 - Lately I've been doing decent... I'm feeling okay and my Doc's agree that I'm hanging in there.
Since the scare with my heart last summer I've been very careful to keep myself calm and relatively stress-free (that part's been hard) and I've been cautious with heavy exercise and strenuous activities. Sometimes I feel kinda lightheaded and dizzy and I notice when that happens usually my heart is pounding and beating fast. So I lay down for a few minutes until I feel better. I have been seeing a Cardiologist as often as possible (those specialist appointments are expensive without insurance!) to monitor the situation and make sure I'm doing fine. We have been periodically doing stress tests and CT scans to check everything out and so far my heart has been fairly healthy. As long as I'm aware of myself and how I'm feeling, I think this issue is under control.
|
02-09-10 06:15pm
|
Reply
965
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I said "Sometimes." The jizz biz is extremely careful about any possible taint of scandal and is very protective of the health of the talent.
Many babes do other things outside of porn, such as escort service and gentlemen's clubs, where they can be exposed to HIV, etc. so the producers will test the bejeebers out of the talent to make sure "shit don't happen."
Thus I voted "sometimes" not for the mainstream talent but for the young babes who just turned 18 and entered the biz and who seem to be so totally brain dead that they may not have any idea of the devastation HIV can cause...so they happily let some slimy scuzz in the local pick-up bar have at 'em in the dark corner.
|
02-08-10 09:32am
|
Reply
966
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
By the way, the 2 day (limited) trial is still $1,00, not $2.00 as per TBP, but the trial offers only the first of three segments. The first segment has no hardcore and in most cases no full nudity.
And the last update was in June, 2009, which means the site has gone dormant; another reason it isn't worth $24.95.
|
02-07-10 04:17pm
|
Reply
967
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Public site still shows $24.95 and TBP still shows $17.95. I'm interested if they offer a $17.95 price but not a $24.95 price.
|
02-07-10 04:04pm
|
Reply
968
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto.
I really don't understand how anyone can have interest in a guy getting jerked off, especially by himself. But when a babe does it, it's usually because the dude went flaccidly limp during the scene and she's still into it.
Tug jobs don't make any sense while blow jobs can, occasionally, be damned erotic.
I just don't see any reason for any focus on a schlong in porn except when it is in business with a cunt or an asshole...or if it's a gay flick.
|
02-07-10 03:54pm
|
Reply
969
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Porn is fantasy and real life has no relevance to porn. Living in the San Fernando Valley, I've been involved in occasional cross-overs where I'll bump into a porn star in a store or restaurant.
One example is when I was sitting next to Herschel Savage in a restaurant about 4 years ago. He looked terrible, probably because of the variety of abuses his body had experienced over the years. I also see an occasional nameless but recognizable porn babe in a Target or WalMart. They also look worn out.
Onee exception was Randy West who I saw in, of all places, my orthopedic guy's office (I had shoulder surgery) who looked totally buff and the stud that he always was.
I deal with those encounters the same way I deal with porn. I look but I never engage.
|
02-04-10 08:39am
|
Reply
970
|
Holly Celebs
(0)
|
Reply of
MortTort's Review
I just signed up using that $9.95 deal.
More comments later, but first impressions:
Has a pornstar category with non-exclusive stuff...and no zips.
The celeb pix in many cases are photoshopped collages and not individual photos.
I found a few babes on the preview site's list that did not appear on the member's site, a bait and switch
Videos are crisper and clearer than other Celeb sites (but as MortTort says, not HD)
One of my faves, Amanda Righetti from The Mentalist, has no video on this site but there's some hot video stuff (and the same photos) on other Celeb sites.
But the volume of the photos on this site, as MortTort says, is overwhelmingly HUGE and the ones I've checked out so far are really very good.
It would be helpful if the site had zips and easier navigation (such as a search function).
First impression, a good value at $9.95, but not sure I'm down with $29.95 quite yet.
|
02-03-10 06:53pm
|
Reply
971
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Addicted's Review
Have not been a member for over a year, but it sounds like nothing much has changed.
I was constantly finding scenes in their public site that were nowhere to be found on the member site and I never got any response from the support function.
I had no special problems with their download speeds, but that was in 2008. Servers and their bandwith could have changed since then.
And the quantity of silicone installed as aftermarket equipment on their models is HUGE, as you suggested. When I see tits in a porno scene, I like to see a little bit of movement.
|
02-03-10 10:59am
|
Comment
972
|
Brittaney Starr
(0)
|
|
02-02-10 05:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
973
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Reply
Thanks.
I went back as you suggested and found the update schedule. They had a total of 4 new videos in January, not quite the 2 a week they promised in their preview site. But the previews they offer for the four appear to be quite well done.
But my other question is, what is your opinion about the quality of the videos? With about 300 videos, I am ready to sign up for a month at $30.00 to drain off the good stuff but before I do I'd like your opinion. Does your "passionless" observation apply also to the videos?
|
02-02-10 11:55am
|
Reply
974
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Capn: "I like real world formal & smart casual outfits too."
Agree, especially if she's wearing real life "smart" high heels and not those silly platforms or other outrageous footwear.
Capn: "None of it is any good to me unless it starts fully clothed & ends with full nude!"
Agree, so long as the start is brief and the end is nice and long.
|
02-02-10 11:42am
|
Reply
975
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Review
Thanks for your review. I was aware of this site but it was not on my radar until I saw your review. I'm interested.
The preview site says they add 2 videos a week. Is that accurate?
As a video guy, I shy away from photo sites that have a few videos because they are usually just videos of photo shoots (MetArt, for example).
But the preview site of FEMJOY has some excellent previews of videos that make me want to check it out and drain off their video content, but before I do I'd like your opinion of the video content (quantity and quality).
Thanks.
|
02-02-10 09:17am
|
