| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
926
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I just enrolled in YoungBusty.com which requires that you buy a 3 day trial before being permitted to buy the full month.
Interesting method.
|
06-13-10 11:15am
|
Reply
927
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm different. When I find a site that looks good I buy a trial membership where PU says it's full access to see how I like the site, and if there's enough GOOD content to sign up for a full month.
In some cases I've actually been able to drain all the good stuff in the time permitted in the trial membership that I didn't need a full month.
|
06-12-10 02:15pm
|
Reply
928
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Ditto what Jay G said. I don't get the appeal of pissing in someone's mouth or of extreme bondage/humiliation, but it must work for some because there's so much of it out there.
|
06-10-10 07:48am
|
Reply
929
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Creampie. No interest in either a spitter or swallower.
|
06-04-10 11:52pm
|
Reply
930
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
That would be me as well.
I let my fellow PUers' comments guide me whenever my libido is exercised by a site that is new to me but looks appealing.
The old reviews, when followed by new reviews that tell a different (better?) story tell me whether or not the webmaster really gives a shit about improving the site or is just interested in the revenue stream from porndogs who sign up without doing any research.
|
05-31-10 10:17am
|
Comment
931
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
|
05-31-10 09:58am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
932
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Downloading HD video is no problem, finding space to store it is the issue; I'm constantly adding hard drives to my servers.
Welcome to my world.
Just bought a Hitachi 2.0 Tb ($129.99) to add to my two Seagate 1.5 Tb's and a maze of smaller ones. I remember only 3 years ago being "sure" that my HUGE 500Gb would be enough. Wrong.
|
05-30-10 01:34pm
|
Reply
933
|
N/A
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
My ISP says 1.5Mb but I've actually exceeded 1.0Mb only a few times and only by a small amount. The speed is usually limited by the site's servers and not by my ISP's offered speed.
|
05-29-10 09:32am
|
Reply
934
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The economics of online porn are huge. And as we see every day big money rules and influences all government policy setting.
That said, and given the fact that the Obama administration is following the European model of secular policies, I don't really see them putting religious morality ahead of their interest in continuing to attract big campaign contributions from the porn biz.
Porn producers always win when we have Democrats in charge and when the Republicans are on top, the best they will ever do is to maintain the status quo. They'll never be able to reverse policies that are already in place.
|
05-27-10 08:54am
|
Reply
935
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
1618to1's Reply
I agree with you about shady practices, but I've always had honest dealings with Paycom/Epoch and no problems. And based on the positive new review by exotics4me, I'm ready to pop with this site.
|
05-23-10 01:20pm
|
Reply
936
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Ditto, that. I may want to chat her up as well, but that's about it. Now if she wants to engage in something deeper...that's another story.
I recently ran into a porn star in a Target store in Woodland Hills CA (just south of Chatsworth) and just said "I really enjoy your work." She said thanks and that was it. BTW, she was modestly dressed with her nice mammaries packaged properly and looked like a sweet but gorgeous babe. She turned a lot of heads.
A while back I was in an Orthopedic doctor's waiting room when Randy West came in looking like the total stud. Tempted as I was I left him totally alone, as did everyone else. I still wonder why I never said anything to him.
|
05-23-10 01:13pm
|
Reply
937
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
I'm curious. Now that the site is back up on PU, can we assume that whatever they were doing that caused you to "de-list" the site have stopped and they are now playing it straight?
I'm a bit leery about trying again, but at the special price and with PU/TBP's restored listing, I may just go ahead and try it for a month.
|
05-22-10 08:49am
|
Reply
938
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Interesting. Glamour Models Gon bad is $25 per month and Shay Laren is $30 per month. So it looks like I can save $5 just by selecting the Glamour Models Gone Bad site.
Sloppy management, but if they have good stuff on their sites, then I'm in.
|
05-09-10 10:32am
|
Reply
939
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
I'm really happy seeing this review. I keep thinking about joining but $30 is a high price to take a chance on this being just another lousy one girl site.
And I like Aria and Jessie a bunch so I may be able to cobble up some new stuff there as well.
Looks like I'll be spending some time checking the various connections out there before signing up. [I have a lot of Shay's stuff, but if this site has assembled most of what's available elsewhere, chances are good there will be new stuff for my collection.)
A one month sign-up to one of the "partner sites" may be in my future.
|
05-08-10 08:54am
|
Reply
940
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Let's face it. The majority of us Porndogs are into porn because we love to check out the body parts of gorgeous ladies. While the preferred activities may vary among us pornoficionadoes, it's the babes we enjoy.
I personally like solo, no toys; solo,toys; two girls, "lez lite"; two girls, "hard lez; AND anything girls only, so an "all of the above" option would be my choice.
And I agree with Denner. The one important element is the quality of the camera operations; good lighting, good angles, good focus and full shots, not just shots that let you count the hairs on the babe's pussy.
|
04-17-10 07:57am
|
Reply
941
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
I'm with Badandy on this.
I've been a member for a year now and am very happy with the site. Very fast download speeds, great quality videos, a lot of variety and plenty of imagination that sets the site apart from the Brazzers/Bang Brothers kind of sites.
Scoring a site is a subjective process, of course, but in my view this site is at least an 85 and probably is worth a lot more if cost is added as a consideration.
|
04-01-10 10:00am
|
Reply
942
|
All Internal
(0)
|
Reply of
shinobi's Review
Outstanding review.
The sad part is that DEV8, the producer of this and several other equally stunning sites, apparently has gone dormant. I would think that, with no money being spent on new content, these guys would either reduce the high price of $30 per site per month, or go network to attract horndogs like me who would jump at the chance.
Sadly, the one site they had that I sprung for was MoreGonzo.com, a site that grabbed several clips from each of their ten regular sites, and rotated the content monthly.
When I win the lottery I plan to sign up for all ten sites at a total cost of $299.50 per month.
Until then I'll wait for some good business sense to creep in and see them get smart (the way DDF Prods did last summer when they networked all of their outstanding sites).
|
04-01-10 09:56am
|
Reply
943
|
N/A
|
Reply of
larss's Reply
Ditto. But for me it's not a big deal because I'm more a video fan. Back about 10 years ago when web porn was in its infancy, I grabbed all the pics I could find because the video stuff was just plain garbage.
But today with all the photoshopping and with the superb quality and quantity of HD videos, I use the photos more for preview purposes than for collecting.
|
04-01-10 08:09am
|
Reply
944
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Ditto that. In fact Netflix is going the online route. I anticipate that most entertainment will be delivered that way in the near future.
I still have my "last century" technology (unused) and really don't need to spend any more money on that stuff.
|
03-20-10 09:22am
|
Reply
945
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I have no idea what the attraction could possibly be to a handjob video. What's to like about watching some anonymous dude getting jacked?
The only socially redeeming value that would make me watch a handjob video is if the babe doing the work is gorgeous and shows off her body parts in the process.
Almost the same for BJ's except that there are the occasional sensual BJ's undertaken by a babe who does the weenie slurping with a special artistic touch.
|
03-18-10 08:05am
|
Reply
946
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mikebarrx's Review
Agree completely with this review.
Normally I would stick around at $10 a month just in case a good video pops up, but the frustration trying just to download one video convinced me that life is too short to bother with porn.com.
|
03-15-10 10:34pm
|
Comment
947
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
|
03-14-10 11:29am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
948
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Can you make a comparison between Just Nudes and Met Art?
The photo quality and variety of Met Art makes it a superb site, but I'm always looking for the new site that can outdo the established sites.
|
03-14-10 11:27am
|
Reply
949
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I chose "other" because I reeeally don't like the night club scenes where there is no structure or organization. One babe is getting boinked whilst another is giving a blow job to some other dude and the camera man is bouncing from one action to another.
I love looking at a really gorgeous babe from head to toe going from the foreplay through to the splat shot at the end.
As for the settings listed in the poll, I'm good with any setting where the lighting is good and the cameraman is a dedicated horndog who knows what we porn fans really like.
When the lighting is right and the cameraman knows how to compensate for white balance and sun glare I tend to like outdoors scenes just because it seems more real. But what is really bad is where the cameraman is oblivious to the light balancing problems that occur when he shoots into the sun.
|
03-14-10 11:20am
|
Reply
950
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Ditto.
By and large it's difficult to imagine that a babe can have a real orgasm under the circumstances with the heavy lighting and all the camera men, directors, "grips" and so on all around her as the stunt cock is being told to adjust position for better camera angles and so forth.
Orgasms are a product of several factors occurring at the same time and usually when the couple is into the act in an intimate and non-distracting environment, which is just not very likely whilst "performing" on command in front of an audience.
That said, I've seen some scenes where the babe is rather convincing that she's achieving an orgasm, which, after all, is what the fantasy requires. I'm good with a babe who can give a realistic and convincing orgasmic performance
|
03-06-10 10:16am
|
