Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
851
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
01-01-11 07:04pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
852
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Boy, you sound like me. I grew tired of the sameness. But worse was when the babe was a real turn on but the photographer was not into any eroticism.
The change to a bit more erotic stuff makes me interested in trying again.
|
12-05-10 11:56pm
|
Reply
853
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Interesting point.
I was a member about 12 months ago and have been thinking of rejoining just because the TBP price is very attractive. I hesitated only because I gravitate more to video than pix.
As for what galleries to check out, it's interesting that your issue seems to arise more from the HUGE volume of content than on anything else. My only issue is that there's so much content and their naming convention is so clumsy it's really hard to sort through the downloaded stuff.
This discussion has me thinking that it's about time that I plunk down $20.00 and give it another go.
|
12-04-10 10:01pm
|
Reply
854
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
Yep. I voted for "other" because all of the above was not an option.
|
12-04-10 09:46pm
|
Reply
855
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Not sure why it should be permitted at all. It's distracting at best and kills productivity at worst.
If you work in a government agency, however, it may be a good thing. Bureaucrats can't fuck things up if they are watching porn instead of spending money or raising taxes.
|
11-23-10 08:12am
|
Reply
856
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
The content on is site will more than satisfy your interests. My guess is that the site is roughly 2/3 softcore (if you consider BJ's and penetration as being midcore or hardcore). And it has great variety and decent navigation, except that locating a model by name can be frustrating (see my review).
I use Download Them All for downloading. It's screaming fast on sites like 21Sextury but slogs along at very slow speeds for Young Busty.
|
11-09-10 09:04am
|
Review
857
|
Young Busty
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Updated: |
11-07-10 03:25pm (Update History)
Reason: I updated the score from 78 to 79 to reflect a score more consistent with my standard. I also cleaned up some typos and grammatical issues.
|
Pros: |
Absolutely all natural babes with great natural titties with most in excellent resolution.
The videography is excellent for mammary lovers like me. Concentration is on boobs in virtually all aspects whether soft core, midcore or hardcore
Appears to be all exclusive content with several top models inn the mix
Simple navigation
Frequent updates, no DRM.
A wide variety of situations and a very large number of models. I saw no evidence of any aftermarket enhancements.
Best part is that I saw no "BBW's" (they are all in great physical shape) or MILF's (they are, indeed, Young Busty models).
A TIT LOVER'S DREAM |
Cons: |
Lousy naming for models. Several well known ladies are in their portfolio but with totally different names. I never understand why they do that.
Very (extremely) slow downloading. Considering that many of the videos exceed 500Mb in size, the d/l speed of a max of 90Kbs is totally unsatisfactory and cost the site 7 points in my rating.
The site logs the user off automatically if there is no activity in 15 to 20 minutes. That mean that, unless you are browsing other content whilst downloading, you can expect to being required to log on after each download. Worse, if you start the download and leave your computer inactive the logoff cancels the download.This cost the site another 6 points.
Unlike other sites this site prevents you from downloading more than two videos at a time.
No zip files for photos. Excellent quality but very slow process to download. |
Bottom Line: |
I've remained a member for 6 months because I wanted to download the good stuff but could not invest the time to do more than 2 d/l's per session.
The frustration is that this could be a terrific site with a high score by making the downloading process more user friendly and extending the logon time. I wrote tech support about this problem and got a brief response that the server they use here in the US is slow (no kidding!) but no promise of any correction at all.
The site is among the best big tit sites for content, quality, variety and quantity. Worth a score of 92 before the deducts mentioned above.
If you are interested in the site, you should sign up for the 3 day trial and see if you are good with the download process. If you can deal with the slow speed and logoff issues, you should be a very happy member. |
|
11-07-10 02:07pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
858
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
|
11-07-10 01:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
859
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I'm cool with the scoring approach.
21Sextury is loaded with superb material for every taste - if we could only find it easily! - so a new site in the network that is adding content gives a subscriber access to many more sites deserves to be rated higher than if the site was a stand alone site.
I am not that much into gaping, but I do enjoy the more extreme stuff as is found in Zoliboy, for example, so it's likely that I would rate teh gape site lower than you if it were a stand alone site.
|
11-07-10 11:42am
|
Reply
860
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Your reply makes me wonder about my first "mainstream theatre" flick, Russ Meyers' The Immoral Mr. Teas, that displayed a nice smorgasbord of mammary flesh. But I wouldn't call that a porn flick because it was more a slapstick comedy with bare boobs; no eroticism or pussy shots, let alone penetration.
|
11-07-10 10:13am
|
Reply
861
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Taxi Girls with Nancy Suiter. I still get off on it with her fab body and attitude. The fisting scene in the jail is outstanding but has since been deleted from the reproductions that are available from some vendors.
My copy is a VHS tape that I copied to a DVD, but the VHS tape is clearer.
|
11-07-10 12:31am
|
Reply
862
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
That's my feeling as well.
A preview site is the most important one for a porn site because it's the only real hook they have for dragging a horndog into it.
If a webmaster does a shitty job on the preview site, there's no way I'll waste my money on the member site. Clearly they have no idea how to attract and keep members.
Using the comment section of PU to alert members to this kind of thing is a service that is not available anywhere else on PU except, perhaps, in the Forum.
|
10-24-10 11:38am
|
Reply
863
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I like the site and the quality of the content but I am with Squirrel on this one.
Navigation is everything and as he says it sucks big time on the 21Sextury sites.
That said I would not go as low as a 50 because in my evaluations I give quality and variety of content and frequency of updates as much weight as navigation. But if one of those elements is just awful, I will never give the site a score higher than 70, and then only if the other elements are high quality. I just joined 21Sextury and am not ready to post a review or post a rating.
But Rusty J's right click suggestion may well help me be more generous just because it greatly reduces the frustration of wading through the swamp to find the good stuff.
|
10-23-10 07:46pm
|
Reply
864
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Another point that I really find lousy is the fact that, when servers go down and access to all, or a major portion, of a site is gone, there is seldom, if ever, any remedy such as an extension of membership for a day or two.
It wasn't mentioned in Panther's rant, but I'm guessing that he just lost the time with no recompense.
|
10-23-10 07:22pm
|
Reply
865
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Ray O's Reply
Any update on how things ultimately worked out?
I really like it when a webmaster takes the time to read and respond to a PU post and would like to know if Advent was successful in keeping you back on the site as a long term member.
|
10-19-10 09:13am
|
Reply
866
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Denner said what I would have said but he beat me to it and said it better than I.
Posting a trust rating should be motivated by the quality of the contribution, not by the possible reward.
|
10-18-10 11:07am
|
Reply
867
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Kami's Review
Talk about false advertising! It's Real and much of the content is fake. Sites like this are what give internet Porn a bad name.
|
10-15-10 07:52am
|
Reply
868
|
Busty Brits
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I'll be waiting until next week (no time to do my thing until then) but will join then for a month and will post comments or a full review after I've given the site a full workout.
|
10-13-10 11:46pm
|
Reply
869
|
Busty Brits
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, I suppose so.
But now my question. Have you taken the leap yet? TBP gave this site a rather high score and the price isn't terrible. I'm giving some thought to a one month run but would like some comments from any who may have already given it a shot.
|
10-13-10 12:34am
|
Reply
870
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I agree with the review and thanks for the tips.
A few months back I was having problems with the logon so the techs changed it. Happened again. Fixed again. Happened again. Fixed again.
Each time I lost access until tech support fixed the problem, but no extension of time was offered in any of the cases.
Minor point but each interruption lost me from 24 to 48 hours. (Gave me time to check out other sites.)
Logon has been stable now for at least 4 months.
|
10-10-10 11:18am
|
Reply
871
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I use freeones to check out sources for additional material on models that I find on a site that are new to me. Then I'll go to Eurobabes Index just because I am into the great babes coming out of eastern Europe.
For specific genres (I know that's not the poll question) I use Google to find out if there's anything new.
Much as I rely on TBP for evaluation and price deals for paysites I really don't know how I could find specific models through TBP except perhaps through a solo girl site or some such.
|
10-10-10 08:30am
|
Reply
872
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
This discussion made me go back and do a few random hits on my older files on externals (one is a 2Tb, two are 1.5Tb and one is 1.0 Tb. I also have some 200Gb's +/- with really old stuff) just to see what my reaction would be.
Interesting result was that I was seeing some really great stuff that I totally forgot about and deleted off maybe about a half dozen videos at 320 that were really hard to watch even though it was good content.
|
10-09-10 08:37pm
|
Reply
873
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
That's my answer as well. I really don't get scenes that focus only on some dude's wang and no shots at all of the babe doing the job.
BJ's are good for the recipient but not as the prime (only) subject of a video.
Conversely, I love watching cunnilingus (or is that "cuntilingus") especially when the babe has large labia lips.
And I prefer babes doing babes but am OK with guys doing the slurping as well.
|
10-08-10 08:50am
|
Reply
874
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
When Danni.com decided to renege on their deal to support their DRM override for members who canceled their membership, I deleted about 30 Gigs of stash because it was no longer viewable.
Other than that, I have two external hard drives; one the "gold drive" for the "good stuff" and the other, the "yellow drive" for "on probation stuff" awaiting a decision.
I review the probation drive periodically and will move the "good stuff" to the gold drive and delete the other stuff.
I guess that about 25% of my probation reviews are moved to the gold drive and 75% wind up being deleted after the review.
|
10-08-10 08:43am
|
Reply
875
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just signed up for BangBros after a discussion on PU about how they are now identifying Natural vs aftermarket tits in their search function.I've canceled Brazzers because they don't have that same feature.
I have a long term subscription to VideoBox and Twistys and will normally carry a third one.
|
10-03-10 10:06am
|