| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
826
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Sevrin's Comment
I like the change but as you say they are still working out the kinks.
That said, I wish they would distinguish their videos between simple videos of photoshoots and actually thought out creative pieces.
I just discovered a great video of Nikki Case on Met Art that had her strolling through a museum(?) with a tight sweater and even tighter jesns, in HD. She looked hotter than Hell. Then suddenly she's totally naked in the same setting.
No photo flashes to mess up the video and it definitely transformed my Little Richard into Big Dick!
|
04-25-11 10:36am
|
Reply
827
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
I have had no recent trouble with Bang Brothers. Before I posted this reply I accessed the site and downloaded the Raylene update posted on 4/23 with no difficulty.
I suggest you contact their support people. Not the fastest in their response but they will get back to you with real suggestions, not blather.
|
04-25-11 10:29am
|
Reply
828
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Back in the day (over 5 years ago) Danni.com had great webcam stuff as part of their basic package with videos of the sessions available for download a few days later.
That is something I would go for; but sadly I don't know any sites at all that do that today.
|
04-25-11 10:19am
|
Reply
829
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
My crush was on my sixth grade teacher, Miss Stein. As with Yote, I enjoyed it when she flashed her charlies when she sat down or bent over. The real problem was that, at that age, I was just beginning to experience boners. And being asked to stand or go to the front of the class got a bit awkward.
My most memorable moment was when Miss Stein's panties were a bit tight and she showed a great cameltoe.
I really learned a lot from Miss Stein.
|
04-16-11 09:59am
|
Reply
830
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
After a long relationship with RK (over 18 months straight) I also threw in the towel.
Main reasons are:
Several download problems.
Non responsive customer support.
Less than exciting updates compared to other sites.
I found two sites that are great and are working hard to keep my business: 21sextury and DDFProd. They have convinced me that RK is no longer worth continuing.
The signs are there that you may be right; the site may well be on its way to oblivion.
|
03-19-11 11:56am
|
Reply
831
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Me too.
Pantyhose hide the genitalia and don't do anything to enhance the view. Long stockings enhance the legs and stop where the fundamental interest starts.
I really get off on legs along with anything that enhances the pussy, especially crotchless panties that are on top of long, sheer nylons.
|
03-19-11 11:49am
|
Rating
832
|
Nude Fight Club
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
03-18-11 09:57pm
|
Reply
833
|
Nude Fight Club
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Rusty's review and the two that precede his, are accurate and all three are from the same basic perspective; guys who aren't into the genre but who checked out the site as part of the 21Sextury network.
I agree that the video quality and photo quality are top notch and the videography is generally well done such that it captures what those who enjoy the "catfight" genre are interested in. And that would be checking out gorgeous babes and their body parts in some lesbian action beyond basic mutual masturbation and pussy munching.
The only possible quarrel I would have with the site is the inclusion of videocams in so many of the scenes. On the one hand they're a distraction but on the other hand, it adds a bit to the reality of the scenes by suggesting that the action is spontaneous and not staged.
As for a score, I give it an 88. I ranked it at a mid to high 80 because of the high quality, the consistently gorgeous babes and the loyalty to the genre. It doesn't get a 90+ score because it doesn't have a lot of content, yet, and the scenes are very repetitive...but I'm not really sure how they could introduce any more variety than they already have.
|
03-18-11 08:12am
|
Reply
834
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
I'm very happy with the current quality, but am very unhappy with the limitations placed on the downloads.
I can only D/L one video at a time and worse, I can't get speeds better than about 67.0 Kb/S. The only saving grace is that the speed maintains at that level while I do high speed D/L's from other sites like 21Sextury.
I use Down Them All and IE for my downloads. Because you did not mention speed in your comment I'm curious if you are having the same slow speeds as I experience.
|
03-17-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
835
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
I'm a bit confused. I joined last year. I think I'm still getting everything on all of your sites, both the regular site and the extreme site.
In other words, the change is only for new subscribers, not us "oldtimers" who are continuing our subscriptions uninterrupted.
Is that correct?
By the way, I really love your site and the very broad assortment of material...and especially the consistently excellent quality of you high def material and of your videography.
|
03-05-11 01:28pm
|
Reply
836
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
That's why I dropped out a few years ago. But I've decided to try again taking advantage of their on again, off again $20 price, which is now available through TBP right now.
I'm a video guy and know that I won't get too much good stuff but I am interested in seeing if their photos have returned to their normally high quality.
I'll be reporting back once I've checked the site out in more detail.
|
03-05-11 01:13pm
|
Reply
837
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Normally I would have said 3-5 years but two things have occurred that make the period longer: 1) Windows Vista & Windows 7 both make me want to keep my Windows XP computer; and, 2) Toshiba offers, and I bought, a long term warranty that has done quite well in keeping my older laptop functioning as well as any new one might.
|
03-05-11 10:32am
|
Reply
838
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Ditto, but they cost $1 in tokens on 42nd Street in NYC. Don't dig BJ's in my porn (unless I'm getting serviced at the same time) and don't have any interest in watching a guy's dick sticking through a hole in the wall. Ugh.
There's only one saving grace; we don't have to hear the guy blabbering and/or moaning.
When a glory hole scene comes on, I move on to other stuff.
|
02-10-11 07:52am
|
Reply
839
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
FZKK's Review
CFNM=Clothed Female Nude Male
I did what the webmaster suggested and found the preview site to have some real babes. I'm not into that genre, but a specialty site that lasts for 6 years obviously is doing a good job satisfying its market niche.
|
02-01-11 08:19am
|
Reply
840
|
Sex Video Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Yes, there is real hardcore, but no, not a lot. My cynical mind says the two or three guys who are there for the audition shoot check out the babe to see how far she'll go without causing trouble. And we get to share those few cases where it actually happens.
|
01-30-11 05:28pm
|
Review
841
|
Sex Video Casting
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gets them young and fresh. This site is really an adjunct to the DDF Prod network and, IMO, is a place for them to share their "audition" shoots with their members. You can see some of their very popular babes looking quite young and, usually, without any "stage presence." As you might guess there normally is only one relatively brief shoot. Downloads are fast and reliable. The separate site has over 200 models, some with just photos, some with just videos and some with both.
Very easy navigation and a rudimentary search function where you can find babes by category: Solo, Hardcore, Blowjob, Big Tits and Legs.
In some cases there are some great shots and/or activity that one doesn't encounter in the professional DDF productions. Brief, but still quite good.
Updates posted 3 times a week. |
| Cons: |
Many (most?) of their stuff is in low definition (which, I suppose, is consistent with these being audition shoots.
Lots of interviews, which is also expected, with inane questions and monosyllabic answers. Many of the interviews are hard to understand because of very heavy accents of both the interviewer and the model. In some cases the interviews are in their native Eastern European language.
There are no direct links to the DDF Prod site's inventory and in a few cases the names on the SVC model list differ from the names in DDF Prod (and in a few rare cases, to the name mentioned by the model herself during the interview.
Not all the models on the DDF Prod sites are included in the Sex Video Casting site.
The SVC shoots are not included in the model directory on the main DDF Prod site. (Not a real problem. Just reporting the facts.) However the updates page on DDF Prod do include the Sex Video updates. |
| Bottom Line: |
I may be strange but I really like the audition videos. Yes they are plotless and all have essentially the same, "what is your name" start, with a model showing a variety of apprehensive attitudes. In a few cases (very few) the model has a persona of self confidence but most times they give the impression that they aren't sure they really want to be doing this.
The shoots range from short clips of the newbie just stripping down to nude to full, hot and heavy hardcore. That's one of the positives because one never knows what may be coming up. And being part of the "discovery phase" of a truly gorgeous babe's career is always fun.
Responses to direction (such as "take off your sweater," or "show me your pussy") are almost comically rapid; sort of like when a cop pulls you over and asks for your license.
Bottom line. I don't recommend joining this site individually because it will be disappointingly repetitive and the babes are not up to their full blown quality, both in appearance and in "stage presence." Also the quality in production values and in the actual video quality is not up to DDF standards. But I strongly recommend joining DDF Prod and later finding this site to enjoy the first shoots of your favorite babes.
I wish more network sites would do this.
My score of 83 is an amalgamation of subjective opinion (I really enjoy the raw footage aspects for some perverse reason) and objective evaluation (the content is not of the same caliber as the material on the rest of the DDF Prod sites by any means) with a 6 point enhancement solely because it is an integral part of the network and not trying to be a self sufficient site. |
|
01-30-11 09:58am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
842
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Ever since I encountered the well endowed Catalina L'Amour in the late 90's and enjoyed her magnificent labia I have been a big fan of "outies."
One babe who has left the biz but who has a superb set of lips and a great body is Andie Valentino. Unfortunately she did only softcore. It would have been great to see some lucky dude munching on her roast beef sandwich. She also appeared as Andrea on FTV Girls.
OOPS. You were discussing navels, not labias. Sorry.
Regarding navels, I normally don't even notice them except when there's an ugly tattoo that calls my attention to them.
|
01-20-11 12:45am
|
Reply
843
|
Lovely Vanessa
(0)
|
Reply of
Shap's Reply
Shap,
Thanks for your reply. I see that there have been several photosets added recently on Twistys but no recently added videos. Hopefully you have some additional video material on this gorgeous lady.
|
01-20-11 12:39am
|
Reply
844
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
In compar5ison to most other sites I find DDF Prod to be superior in many (most?) respects, such as video quality, variety (DDF has several specialty genres like Hands on Hardcore, House of Taboo, etc.) and the mainstream 1 by Day, all of which have extremely well produced exclusive content.
Yes, a few of the older material remains in multiple segments but the vast majority is done in one complete video.
The only issue of significance that I have is that some current updates are not available in WMV format and can only be downloaded in MOV (Apple)format.
The scoring is always a subjective matter but, having been a member of well over 30 sites over the last 6 or 7 years, this site (network) remains a leader in my opinion.
|
01-18-11 11:36pm
|
Reply
845
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Reply
Agreed. The question was framed as a personal preference, not a matter of morality or legality.
I understand kinky (I enjoy watching a babe peeing but not if she's peeing ON someone, or if the scene involves drinking it) and have no concerns if someone's "kink" is as odd as my kink in enjoying watching a babe pee.
So my comment was only my personal reaction to the practice, not to the practice itself.
|
01-16-11 12:23pm
|
Reply
846
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Just curious. Pussy eating can remind one of raw tuna, which is fine. And the tactile element of munching on labia lips and diddling a clitoris is really the best part for me.
But I wonder what an asshole tastes like and where the tactile element comes into the picture? Is it like my fond memories of the aromas I remember from latrine duty in the Army? Yuck.
|
01-16-11 10:51am
|
Reply
847
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Although it's really tough to figure out what graymane really thinks about ass licking, etc., I think I might agree.
For the life of me I can't remotely understand why anyone would do it, let alone enjoy watching it done in porn.
Pornography is about fantasy. Speaking for myself, the porn user is into porn primarily as a fantasy where the doers in a video are creating a vicarious experience for the porn user. I also really enjoy watching the female body and the female engaging in heavy tease.
I can even understand the amount of attention paid to blowjobs from the context of wanting to have my wang slurped by the babe on the screen. But who wants to see extended shots of a schlong?
But asshole licking!?! How is that gross activity even remotely entertaining? It's like my other question. In extreme porn one can see piss drinking and shit eating, which are, in my opinion, as disgusting as ass hole licking.
|
01-16-11 10:46am
|
Reply
848
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
SimonSubAms's Reply
I like the site but a few samples would be nice to help evaluate the style and quality of reproduction.
|
01-16-11 10:14am
|
Reply
849
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Graymane's review said the videos were poorly done, but did not describe the nature of the videos...are they still just model shoots or is there even a little imagination involved/
Their babes are really outstanding and the quantity of photo material appears to be extremely huge. If the thematic aspect of their videos has moved on from just photo shoots to more serious focus on the model's attributes, even if thematically lousy, I may convince myself to drop a Benjamin and go for it.
By the way the listing on TBP/PU still says $109.99 for 1 yesr. The lowest (auto. renew) price is $99.99.
|
01-02-11 04:59pm
|
Reply
850
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Procrastination loses again. My nouveau annum gift to myself was going to be a one month membership in MetArt.
Well, anyway, the 365 day rate dropped from $109.99 to $99.99, so I may go for the long term deal. I usually stick around for 2-3 months anyway so....
Just one question. My last membership in MetArt was 3 or 4 years ago and I had two issues with them:
1. Inaccessibility. Frequently the site was down...or overloaded...so I couldn't access when I wanted to. Is that still an issue?
2. While I know it's primarily a photo site, I was not impressed by their videos which were nothing more than videos of their photoshoots. Boring as hell. Have they gotten any better lately?
|
01-02-11 10:12am
|
