| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Quality first. I agree. But I've been a porn user for longer than I'm willing to state publicly...but one hint; since before Deep Throat was produced.
So when I check out the discount page I look for some of (Does a movie called "The Immoral Mr. Teas" ring any bells/)
|
07-30-14 09:40am
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
As I join a site only after I've gone through all PU reviews and comments, I'm generally ready to attack the site for the content that drew me to signing up in the first place.
So my answer is "it depends."
|
07-27-14 11:48am
|
Reply
378
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
What's a floppy? Are you talking about my schlong after about 2 minutes or so of serious boinking?
Seriously, the last floppies that were truly floppies were the old 5-1/4" deals. The 3-1/2 devices were far better because they weren't really "floppy." I still have some photos on the good old 5-1/4" guys just because I can't find any way to transfer them to a flash drive or anything else.
|
07-26-14 02:15pm
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If it's CCBill or Epoch, I am good to go. All others I will do some extra checking. In a very few cases the biller is unidentified. Those I avoid like a computer virus.
|
07-20-14 12:03am
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
New 'puter (already bought) and a new HDTV to replace an old analog TV that's about 20 years old.
|
07-07-14 12:49pm
|
Review
381
|
Christy Marks
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Christy Marks - Fantastic mammaries and a fun loving attitude
High quality content professionally done
All videos are high def (1280)
Updates once a week or so
Imaginative solo scenes
Christy's an incredible contortionist. Example - she could fuck herself with her nipples. When she squeezes her mams between her legs it sends me off. Her patented "frog" position is unique.
NO INK. A major plus for me.
No broken links. |
| Cons: |
No interaction with members
A total of 60 videos* and associated pix
Only two non-Christy videos - both Merilyn Sakova, with tits equal to Christy's
All of Christy's material is 5+ years old and is remastered (very well, by the way).
Some material is also available on one or more of Score's other websites and some is unique to this site.
Hard core material is all SSDG - Same sex different guy. Little imagination in the hard stuff.
The g/g/b and g/g stuff isn't particularly good. (Exception - her scene with Terry Nova with two guys was outstanding)
Slowish downloads
* One scene was taken down before I had a chance to download it. No idea why it was removed. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is $19.95 with the PU/TBP discount and, for horndogs like me who really enjoy watching Christy enjoying her great tits. I was able to drain the entire site in four sessions.
The total amount of video content as of 7/1/14 is just a tad more than 15 Gb.
Thus site is not included as an add on (free or otherwise) with any other Score site so it must be considered a "hot property" by management.
I decided on a point score of 76. It would be higher if the site had more content and included all, not just some, material from other Score sites. It would be lower except they have done a good job of upgrading their catalog to HD.
Bottom line, I recommend the site to huge tit aficionados who like young, seemingly carefree models. It comes to about 33 cents per video scene which, if you enjoy world class huge natural boobs bouncing (flopping) all over the screen, is a great value.
Set aside a few hours a day for four or five days if you plan to download everything on the site.
I plan to cancel about a week before my first month is used up and may, but probably won't, rejoin a year or so from now.
I can't comment on customer service because I had no need to use it during my brief stay. |
|
07-03-14 07:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
382
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
I've been a member for a rather long time and have similar observations about the age of some of the content. It's not until you drill down to a specific scene that you discover that it's a low quality offering.
However, I like the DDF approach far better than most other sites that simply take down the old stuff. When I get a strong interest in a specific model, I'm happy getting as much stuff as possible. But it certainly would be helpful to identify the quality level of each offering that appears on a model's "home page" (the page that displays all material for a model).
From a quality perspective, I'm in agreement with you as well. DDF's last few years have added some truly spectacular babes and even the not quite as spectacular ladies have terrific video material.
I've said publicly on the PU site that I view DDF far superior to 21Sextury in its efforts to work with their customers and, more importantly, its business ethics. 21Sextury has some great content but have lousy business practices and virtually non-existent support. Their loss. DDF's gain.
|
07-01-14 02:41pm
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
All I ask is that the video focuses on PTA*, and not on some dude's schlong.
Yes, a BJ is a normal activity, but frankly about 30 seconds to a minute is definitely plenty of time. I also get tired of the dude's hairy ass taking up a lot of real estate on the screen during basic porking activity.
I really like pussy in all styles ranging from a nice neat slit innie (Example: Jana Jordan)all tghe way to the extreme labia flapper ham sandwich pussy (examples: Catalina L'Amour & Sandie Valentino)
* PTA = Pussy, Tits, and Ass
|
06-29-14 11:49am
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Ditto that. I see PU as the Consumer Reports of porn and want to know about the bad apples in the biz.
|
06-21-14 02:31pm
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
The usual disk externals are best removed unless being used. The new solid state externals, however, are built with the intention of very long connection times.
The best test...if your external is hot after being plugged in for a period, best to remove it and let it cool down.
|
06-15-14 04:41pm
|
Reply
386
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Thanks for a great review. The Babes site was one of the very first sites I joined and it was good (not great) at the time.
Your comparison, for example, to Met Art is perfect as a reason why Babes goes off my short term join list. I like the technical excellence of Met Art but I literally fell asleep watching one of their videos last year when I was still a member (boring video, but a sip of Glenlivit scotch contributed to my drowsiness. I don't think I've ever dozed off watching a porn video.
I've evaluated the "lifetime" deal and did the match as you did. Unless you stay a member of a site for an extended period it's not a deal by any stretch of the imagination.
|
06-14-14 05:46pm
|
Reply
387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
The number of points the site is worth.
How do I score a lousy site? A great site? A lousy site with some good/great stuff, a great site with superb content but lousy navigation, a good site that has crummy business practices, etc.
There are so many variables, good & bad, that it makes it very tough to decide on a single score.
|
06-13-14 10:24pm
|
Reply
388
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
When an external gets close to full (within 15% of capacity) that's a reminder to me to review my stash and to see what I have that I really want to save.
I currently have 5 active WD Passport drives, 3 are 1 Tb and 2 are 2 Tb.
I use the review to separate the primo babes from the gorgeous but not necessarily primo babes so that the hard drives are now in categories. The hard drives are all connected via USB to my computer so the process works rather well.
|
06-12-14 12:51pm
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Ditto that. The only exception is one DVD I rented back in 2006 or 2007.
|
06-08-14 12:23am
|
Reply
390
|
Homegrown Video
(0)
|
Reply of
grakkie's Comment
Stupid nonsense.
They will lose a lot of business from PU's who will pass.
Last rites.
|
06-05-14 11:54pm
|
Reply
391
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Reply
Ditto that evaluation. I think I'll go ahead and drop $30 to check out this site. Love unencumbered mammaries of all sizes and especially in public scenarios.
|
06-05-14 01:11pm
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
"Normal" clothes is not clear. I like sexy street clothes (mini skirt, high heels, tight blouse or sweater, etc.) that are removed in rather short order.
Also not sure what a playsuit is or what sex clothing is but for puroses of this poll I assume what I like, sexy street clothes, is what is meant by "sex clothing."
So that's what I voted for, playsuit or other sex clothing.
|
06-03-14 10:28am
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
That's my approach as well. I have afile for each babe, and a sub file by source so I can go back and check the source site for any new stuff.
This approach makes it very easy to use the search function.
|
06-02-14 05:24pm
|
Reply
394
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Bukkake
Yuck
Does nothing at all except destroy the end of a quality fuck flick.
|
05-30-14 12:01pm
|
Reply
395
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'm surprised that I'm the only one (so far) who said "will only sub through TBP."
Yes, on occasion the price may be lower from another source, but I trust TBP far more than I do the site and/or an unsolicited email.
In the distant past I've been burned wasting my hard earned money on a scam deal of one kind or another. Just yesterday I got an email from a trustworthy site (Score) that offered me "an unprecedented price" that happens to be the same price as has been available on TBP/PU for a long time.
|
05-27-14 01:57pm
|
Reply
396
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I always do. I like to see whether others agree or disagree with the comment or review.
The best replies to reviews and comments, however, are those posted by webmasters either thanking the reviewer/commenter or offering explanations or excuses for something or other.
Ever since the webmaster of 21Sextury became engaged in defending his sleazy business practices, Interestingly his behaviour still has not changed.
The webmaster for DDF also participates in a professional and effective way.
Guess which site gets my business.
|
05-25-14 11:16am
|
Reply
397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Fake (or at least clearly fake) tits turn me off completely. Natural biggies (see Hitomi Tanaka for an example of some super huge boobies on a perfect body with a very pretty face) really get my attention, as do teeny weenie little guys like Jana Jordan (aka Jana Foxy).
Natural boobs on gorgeous babes are part of the package.
|
05-22-14 05:35pm
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I'm really into healthily large labia lips but can't say I've seen any surgically enhanced pussy lips. At least that I know of.
You old timers out there may remember a babe in the late 1990's named Catalina L'Amour who made some superb videos that featured her fabulous flappers.
Another lady (FTV) arrived in the 2005 - 2007 time frame who did just soft core - Andie Valentino.
|
05-19-14 12:34pm
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Agree.
Lip jobs are totally unnecessary in my opinion. Most boob jobs are spoilers as well and, for me, lip jobs and boob jobs cause me to move on.
|
05-18-14 12:13pm
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Just bought me a new laptop (Toshiba) with Win7. Love it. 17.3 screen, 1 Tb hard drive, less than $1k.
I considered a desktop but couldn't really see any significant advantage.
I'm guessing the mfrs are moving away from desktops for home use...and in the early stages of moving away from full featured laptops.In 10 years the computer landscape will be quite different.
|
05-16-14 06:55pm
|
