| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
451
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
03-23-09 11:51pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
452
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Skip's Reply
They do that every now and then. They are up now and it is a bit different. I see what you mean about the Vivid and Evil Angels videos. I wonder what upgrading costs and what that would do to a 10 month membership like I have?
|
03-23-09 11:27pm
|
Reply
453
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Xororos's Review
Looks like a site worth checking out sometime.
|
03-23-09 10:34pm
|
Reply
454
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Skip's Reply
I do not like the sounds of that. I guess I will have to be careful where I click around.
|
03-23-09 10:32pm
|
Reply
455
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Fortunately I am 23, so my high school crushes and such are still porkable. My neighbors are fairly young too. But I am sure in a few years I will be singing a different song.
|
03-23-09 04:56pm
|
Reply
456
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I would not want to see someone I have been with or could be with in the future. A high school crush would be pretty cool though, or perhaps the neighbor. In fact I would not mind banging my neighbor myself!
Celebrities are nice, but nothing special.
Besides, we all have sex videos of our ex girlfriends anyway! :)
|
03-23-09 12:34am
|
Reply
457
|
Girlfriend Files
(0)
|
Reply of
Bigpapasmurf's Review
Bigpapasmurf. You are going to have to do better than that. When the staff wakes up Sunday morning they will delete this review because it helps no one. A review needs to contain details and opinions. Please tell up more about this site. At this point we know nothing about it.
|
03-21-09 10:26pm
|
Reply
458
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
As did I. This is a terribly hard deal to pass up.
|
03-19-09 01:48am
|
Comment
459
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
|
03-17-09 10:09pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
460
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
It is not really my thing. I can go for light stuff, and it has to be all girl for it to have any appeal to me. The heavy stuff is a turn off for me.
Women dressed in tight leather or PVC outfits can be very attractive if done properly. Beating the shit out of someone is another story. I do not see much sense in sex being painful.
|
03-17-09 12:26am
|
Reply
461
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
Does not sound too promising. Guess I will have to put them on my avoid list for now. Thanks for the review.
|
03-16-09 04:40pm
|
Comment
462
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
|
03-13-09 10:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
463
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
This explains the idea pretty well. It has been a year since I read the terms, and yes I did actually read them. I truly can see what you mean. It is kinda like me eating hamloaf, it is only good when it is free. It is not something I would pay for. Free things always seem better, but unfortunately there are not many free porn sites that are worth the page space they would take to even type in here.
I was not trying to be argumentative, I just had not though this issue through as well as you guys apparently have. As I frequently say, you guys have thought of everything!
Simple solution. Next time time one of us asks something like this, instead of explaining it in length just say "because I fuckin said so!" It is so much more dramatic and would act as a reminder to read the terms and rule every now and then. Speaking of which... Seriously though, thanks for the explanation. Your philosophy on this makes perfect sense.
|
03-13-09 08:31pm
|
Reply
464
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan
Even to a site that normal does charge? I understand that there are no reviews to things such as TGPs. I only mention this as a special circumstance. The idea was to have a trust worthy, usual member here have a chance to poke around this site and construct a review of the actual content without having to fork over the membership money.
I can understand as well not wanting people to have free access in exchange for writing reviews. I had not thought of this before, you guys think o everything! I can see it being very hard to write an objective review for someone after they gave free access. Plus I would want to know that people were not being paid off for writing less than truthful reviews to boost the site.
Although I think in this special case it may be appropriate, I can certainly live with your decision after figuring out for myself why you do not want them. You should have explained why exactly you do not allow this in your reply, but that is okay I figured it out, I think. If I am wrong about why please let me know!
|
03-13-09 02:53pm
|
Reply
465
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
That sounds like a tall order there! If yo do not eget an answer you could always try emailing the webmaster, they might be willing to tell you.
|
03-13-09 02:39pm
|
Reply
466
|
XXX Movie Online
(0)
|
Reply of
pornoman's Review
We all very fresh from jumping all over some other people giving 100's to a site with out giving justification. There is still blood in the water here and hungry PUs. So please do not feed us!
Give up a bunch of information about this one. It seems there are no reviews yet, so you get to set the bar on this site. Set it high. Answer all the questions that where asked and tell us even more than that. The review as written is meaningless. Take a few moments to look over a few reviews by several usually reviews and you will quickly see what I am talking about.
Welcome to PornUsers! I hope to hear more from you about this site and many more.
|
03-12-09 09:11pm
|
Reply
467
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
6000! Gee my job just keeps getting harder. One day I will final download their whole site. Maybe they will give an award for doing it. :)
|
03-12-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
468
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I 100% agree with this. As I always say, you guys seem to get everything right around here when it comes to these decisions. I was hoping all of our work would not get deleted, there is some good stuff there.
|
03-12-09 08:19pm
|
Reply
469
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
That is what I am worried about. Sometimes it can be better to be known as a site that has fake reviews written by site operators or "end of the Earth" fans than to not be known at all. I just hope that people looking for this type of site take the time to look at all the comments and replies to the reviews.
The site might be good, I honestly can not comment there. And that is exactly the problem, after all these recent reviews I still can not even speculate on the quality of the site because the reviews are not usable. I was hoping out of al of this to at least have one good, solid review come from someone who has been there on their own accord and can give us some honest perspective. But I certainly would not ask any of our members to pay the site simply to have that review.
Personally I beleve the best solution to all of this is for the site to offer a one or two day free trail with no credit card information to at least a few of us. This way someone trustworthy can provide a honest and useful review. I say it would have to be someone that has been a member here for at least a few months and more than 20 positive trust votes. This way it would well established that these reviews would have the user's best interest in mind. If the site is not worth joining people need to know, and it very well could be that the site lives up to all the hype. I for one am not going to pay them just to satisfy my ever so slight curiosity.
As for PU getting abused. We can abuse them back. Besides I am sure if this abusive shill reviewing gets out of hand the staff will take addition measures. One perhaps being to mandate for this site the review must have a score of 5 or so and must fill out at least half of the personal question in their profile. This is just one idea, but I am sure they have their methods.
|
03-12-09 08:13pm
|
Reply
470
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
I was thinking about the same thing, but I do not think they deserve our money at this point.
|
03-12-09 02:07pm
|
Reply
471
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Reply
How long would it take to simply look for us? Also, there is no reason to jump all over us over typos. We can all appreciate getting you jollies from whatever does it for you, but a lot of us are collectors as much as we are pervs. So we really want to know that is on the site.
|
03-12-09 02:05pm
|
Reply
472
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
higgy's Review
Yup....going to have to do a lot better than that. Give us some actual information. You guys need to give up on this people, we are not buying into it.
|
03-12-09 01:55pm
|
Reply
473
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Review
This is yet another very subjective review to a site that has had a lot of attention because of these type of reviews. There is no fact in this, only personal opinion. It read the same as the other reviews that have been scrutinized and I again suspect it is the same person or someone from the same group being asked to write these and told what to say.
Everything in this review I could have wrote, and I have never subscribed to this site. If you read the first review written by JoeMushashi you can see that he complains about a lack of cum shots. And guess what, that is the only real con listed here. Image that, a site where a shemale wears boot and nylons, of course they do it is to make the performer appear more feminine.
The simple fact of the matter is that this review really did not tells us anything new and I must concur with Jeffrey with the conclusion that this is yet another ad. Seriously, we are not buying t and this is making the site look back, thus we will not buy a membership to the site and warn others against it.
|
03-12-09 10:29am
|
Reply
474
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Can say that I do. Just a good guess. Glad to see it is working now. I have this issue from time to time.
|
03-12-09 12:47am
|
Reply
475
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Uh oh...sounds like somebody is having a less than stellar day! Take a few breaths and try again, and let us know how it goes.
|
03-11-09 09:46pm
|
