| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site does exactly what it promises to do - it delivers great ass licking action!
There is definitely allot of content to download here.
The movies are approx 9-10 min long and start out with the girls discussing ass licking for a minute or so and then they get right to it.
The movies are DRM free - yay!
You can download the movies in either one of four parts or as an entire WMV of MPG file.
The girls are very hot and some scenes have big names like Jenna Haze, Charlie Lane, Tory Lane, Sammie Rhodes and so on.
There is a variety in the scenarios of scenes, ranging from beds to couches mostly with the occasional outdoor scene. |
| Cons: |
The VIDEO QUALITY IS POOR. It is hard enough to shoot great salad tossing action as it is, but the website is not helping any by using below acceptable video quality.
There is almost no consistency with the action in the movies. Some girls do a mind blowing job and really attack that ass, where as some other girls seem to be afraid of going near the other end!
I have wondered if there was even a director present at the shoot!
The scenes are only 9-10 minutes long and the variety of camera angles is poor.
Updates are only once a week for pictures and videos - for the same movie. |
| Bottom Line: |
For people that absolutely love watching women pucker up each others assholes, this site is a true godsend as it fits the niche perfectly.
It is a great site for the niche and thats about it.
They do not provide network access to their other tushy sites.
Unless they drastically improve the video quality, I can safely say that this analingus lover will never ever come back.
If they do, I'll be a member for life. |
|
02-15-08 02:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
We Live Together
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The entire network access for reality kings is definitely worth joining up to. I especially liked the flower tucci site. We live together has evolved over the past few years and it can seen very easily by browsing through their older videos.
There is allot to download here and you definitely get your moneys worth.
The women are extremely sexy and the site seems to do justice to being a 'reality ' videos.
The scenes themselves are of an acceptable to good quality.
The content is not bad, however I would prefer some more one on one scenes rather than the threesomes which seem to dominate the site.
Theres some great girl/girl action with toys and some occasional dirty talk too!
There is almost no anal action here, however their sister web-site 'milf next door' can make up for this loss. |
| Cons: |
They definitely need to do something about the video quality. Sometimes it seems to be good, other times it definitely needs some more work.
The settings for the scenes do seem to vary and they do great 'off set' pre-sex shooting. There is however room for improvement with the camera angels, audio and occasionally even lighting.
The updates are frequent enough for the network, perhaps not quite enough for the girl/girl lovers out there.
The daily download limit is a bit off putting, but from the perspective of the guys that run the website, this is definitely a wise business decision, as heavy downloaders can get allot of downloads for a mere 30 bucks! |
| Bottom Line: |
The bottom line is that this is a great site and a must join for all the lesbian and reality lovers out there. There is enough variety in the network to accommodate most porn users and lovers. There are enough downloads available as of now to last you for a whole 2 months worth of non-stop downloading, based on the daily download limit! |
|
02-15-08 02:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
3
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
daveboy's Review
I agree with daveboy.
The site is definitely great with really attractive/sexy girls who seem to know what theyre doing.
One thing I think they need to work on is camera angles. I think they seem to zoom and and then zoom in at the wrong time.
|
02-15-08 02:32pm
|
|
