Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
I haven't joined there in a number of years but as memory recalls the material is almost all nonexclusive. If you've been a member of Twistys or Babestv or Babelicious or similar megasite fecently you've probably already seen most of what they have. Twisty's is cheaper so I haven't bothered to go back to Glamourmodles in a while.
|
03-13-09 10:10pm
|
Reply
527
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
higgy's Review
Man, what is the deal with this site? A never heard of niche that suddenly gets a bunch of glowing reviews from newbies with no content to any of the reviews. Spam conspiracy or coincidence? I choose the former unless the reviews on this place start getting better.
|
03-12-09 12:32pm
|
Reply
528
|
Black Cream White Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I like the idea of a "CIA covet" operation, it definitely has Biblical implications ... sort of what canceling might be like here. This one caught my eye because it has a 3 day trial which is usually enough time to cancel. If this offer is still around in a week or two I might test the waters after digging through the fine print on the sign-up page and confirming that they use a reliable billing processor.
|
03-11-09 11:47am
|
Reply
529
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Oh, I like the idea of the PU board game. You get penalty cards that say you didn't read the reviews before joining a site or get sent to "PU Jail" by Khan for being a nasty poster in the forum. I assume the ultimate goal would be to amass the most points and win big raffle money and trust scores?
|
03-11-09 11:44am
|
Comment
530
|
Black Cream White Ass
(0)
|
|
03-11-09 12:43am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
531
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
It all depends on how it's done. If it's some gross looking Ron Jeremy wanna be tossin' some young girls salad it really doesn't do anything for me. If they guy is still in decent shape and the production value is good I really don't care. Too often though it's just some old farts porn fantasy that he's trying to peddle on the web or it's just some gonzo angle that they're using to push a niche site.
|
03-11-09 12:33am
|
Reply
532
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Yeah, this has come up in the forum before so I thought I'd toss it out as a poll question. I would buy stuff it was tasteful in regards to clothing. If there was something like a coffee mug or something similar that you don't tote around in public everyday I'd probably snap it right up.
|
03-11-09 12:27am
|
Reply
533
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Poll
Since I happen to have seen more than 1 or 2 porn vids in my lifetime I'd have to say that it's nice to see some variety in the shoots and that goes for the scenery as well. There are times when the photographer gets carried away trying to emphasize that they're shooting on location someplace exotice. However, when looking at scenes from a particular production company it gets pretty generic when every scene is shot on the same couch or same hotel room, etc. Everything starts bleeding together.
So, I guess variety is good, just don't go overboard trying to emphasize variety for its own sake.
|
03-09-09 11:57am
|
Reply
534
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornviewer's Reply
I've actually never joined but I know that I have seen B/G scenes on some tgp sites and you might find some on the tour. How much b/g they have I can't really say. You might try posting a comment under AO30 here at PU to see if someone else knows more than I do.
|
02-27-09 06:22pm
|
Reply
535
|
Enigmatic Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
marco2006's Review
Just wanted to say welcome to PU. However, you're going to need to put more effort into your reviews if indeed this is not just a spam posting. Giving a site a "100" is going to get you grief. Giving a "100" without any detail in your analysis is not really helping anyone out who might see your reviews in the future. I hope you take the time to come back and edit your review otherwise you're going to get a lot more negative trust ratings than you're already starting to get.
|
02-25-09 02:35pm
|
Reply
536
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Actually, there's a good tat ration here. Only a few and they tend to be more modest. As for the vids, can't really help you there. Most of the solo vids are in the 10 to 15 minute range if that helps at all.
|
02-25-09 10:31am
|
Reply
537
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have a few times, mostly before I started relying on PU and review sites to help guide me. Since then it's mostly been because of a fracked up sign-up process that left me wondering who the hell the billing processor is or wondering if I might have been cross sold because I wasn't careful enough in making sure the pre-checked boxes were unchecked. It's been a while since I've felt shafted by the content after a few minutes. A few hours or days? That's a different story.
|
02-25-09 12:04am
|
Reply
538
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for the kick-ass review on this one. It's on my list but I still need to check out ALS Scan first. I know, I'm lame for not having been there but I'm more into hardcore.
|
02-24-09 10:08pm
|
Reply
539
|
Pantyhose Line
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornviewer's Comment
In response to your question about how to join scenes together, that came up in the forum some time ago. I don't know if it will help you but here's the link: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=194.
While they have some decent content my main beef with the site was that the content only had limited angles. By that I mean, for example, in the hardcore stuff you might only get a couple of positions in a scene. That sort of left me wanting.
It is a good site for those who like women and hosery but it needs help in my opinion before I'd rejoin.
|
02-24-09 10:05pm
|
Reply
540
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Reply
I agree with Badandy, if you go back and make some changes we'll cut you some slack being this is your first review.
|
02-24-09 12:05pm
|
Reply
541
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Whizz's Review
Have to admit, this is as close as I've seen to a blatant website advertisement here in a while. Let's see, a member over 6 months ago, no site facts or specifics, and your "cons" section make it sound like there's hardcore boy/girl content on this site when there's not. I'd go on but I'm not going to waste my time.
|
02-23-09 06:31pm
|
Reply
542
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Now that I reflect on it for a moment I guess I primarly use tgp's to look at niches that I happen to like. With so many tgp sites out there it's not too difficult to find one that suits what you're looking for.
Since I'm more of a pic guy, I also use them to look at sets from sites that I might be interested in joining to find out what their pic size is like although this can sometimes be misleading.
|
02-23-09 06:25pm
|
Reply
543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I have several that I visit a several times a week (ones that don't keep taking you to other tgp sites). I find them useful to see what new sites come up from time to time and what kind of content they have. If there is something that looks interesting I'll then check it out here. I've also found a few membership deals from the links on them.
In all honesty, I think TGP sites are mostly good for people trolling for free porn and porn newbies who occasionally get suckered into misleading promos.
|
02-23-09 11:47am
|
Reply
544
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I've only paid more than $30 for a site once and was only partially satisfied with the content. Sine then I've tended to shy away from the pricey stuff mostly on the idea that there are lots of sites for $30 or less that I would to join before. A rocking site with great reviews would be worth extra but until I exhaust myself, I'll wait.
|
02-22-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
545
|
Sperm From Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
Matt33's Review
Hey Matt, welcome to PU. As a note, I'm glad you're chipping in with some reviews on gay sites since most members are hetero. However, you do need to add more content to your reviews. As they are now, they really don't provide any useful information to readers. I'd suggest looking at some of the reviews of the top posters here or checking out the following forum thread on writing reviews: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ead.html?threadid=57
|
02-20-09 05:16pm
|
Reply
546
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
I do admit you did a good job of justifying your "100" score. My only beef with NA is that their pics lack size, especially the older stuff which hurts them in my book a pic guy. When looking at your score it's more based upon your preference which is perfectly acceptable. Overall, when looking at everything the site has to offer in terms of specs I couldn't pull the trigger on such a score. Guess I try to be too objective.
|
02-20-09 11:56am
|
Reply
547
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Yeah, it's probably time for a review but I'm thinking it's just marketing. They recently reduced the number of updates to the Brazzer's site in order to start beefing the rolls on Mofos. You're going to see the same girls and pretty much get the same thing as Brazzers just in a new package.
|
02-19-09 11:34am
|
Reply
548
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
If they were straight and if they ever went on a date with me, at that point they would become lesbians ;)
|
02-19-09 11:29am
|
Reply
549
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Since it's my poll I guess I'd better chime in and say that pretty much my cutoff line is 70 but realistically it's more in the mid to high 70's if there is a review. Knowing that I tend to be harsher than the TBP staff I generally only look at TPB sites rated in the mid 70's or up.
I'm sort of surprised that so few profess to have a cutoff line. Let's be real, how many people are signing up for or actively searching for sites that get scores in the 50's or 60's?
|
02-17-09 12:31pm
|
Reply
550
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
Don't know exactly how big you like them but Brazzersnetwork is relatively inexpensive, has a ton of big chested gals, no DL limits and has reasonable quality. DDF Busty is more expensive but has better quality and no DL limits.
|
02-13-09 03:27pm
|