Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Why would you waste your time playing some poorly designed pointless game on a pay porn site? If you're done ripping content I certainly wouldn't stick around to play the low rent game district. I think, if anything, it's a poor attempt at marketing to the younger generation who expect to see games and entertainment everywhere.
|
04-06-09 11:13am
|
Reply
502
|
Day With A Pornstar
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
I've been trying to figure out what identity Mofos has in comparsion to Brazzers? I assumed Brazzers was just branching out to generate more revenue, just rebranding their stuff for the new place.
|
04-03-09 04:07pm
|
Reply
503
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Skip's Review
Hey Skip, welcome to PU. Just wanted to say that overall we're kind of finicky about reviews. Everyone is free to put in what they want but in order for your reviews to be helpful they need more information (video size, quantity, organization, search function, overall quality, etc.). The more info the better the rest of us are able to make a buying decision in the future. Videobox has been reviewed to death but for other sites this extra info becomes more importent.
|
04-02-09 12:56pm
|
Reply
504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Whoo-Hooo. My poll and I'm the first to respond. Of course I freakin' live here. However, after I submitted this I actually took the time to ponder my poll and realized that if you're only coming here once a week or so then you're probably not going to be voting on this poll. Proof once again that there are only statistics and damned lying statistics.
|
04-02-09 12:11am
|
Reply
505
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
One of the benefits of being more of a porn picture guy. Dump the porn movies? No problemo. However, I own very few regular movies so losing them would be no big deal either.
|
03-31-09 11:37am
|
Reply
506
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
I think I made an "oops" in my prior comment. I had recently joined, Brazzer's, not Bangbros so you should ignore my comment regarding the condom thing. Haven't been to Bangbros in a few years. Reading and thinking, maybe two great ideas that I should try using together ;)
|
03-30-09 01:51pm
|
Reply
507
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Amen brother!
|
03-27-09 03:02pm
|
Reply
508
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
Good review (here and on Hegre Art too). My only advice is that if you start reviewing sites that don't have as many reviews as these is to give a few more site statistics (pic and video sizes, zips, etc.). Otherwise things look pretty sweet.
|
03-27-09 03:00pm
|
Reply
509
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
"Strip, strip, strip, strip, nude". Sounds like these gals would be great at refinishing furniture ;) Maybe that's why their staying clothed, those chemicals can be nasty.
|
03-26-09 12:07pm
|
Comment
510
|
Lily Wow
(0)
|
|
03-25-09 01:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
511
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
|
03-25-09 01:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
512
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I have three views on this. First, the military is rejecting a bunch of potential recruits because they're too damn fat !!! At least 25% of American youth got too many cheeseburgers hanging off their butt cheeks to even meet the military's weight criteria. So, by expanding to gays you're opening up your recruiting base by about 6% (about the national average of gay people in society) to help offset against the lard butts.
Second, I've never really bought into the whole concept that you got to watch your behind in the foxhole or the shower mentality. There were gays at the gym I used to go to and frankly I didn't really care if they saw me naked or not. Hey, if they're interested in my bod then I figured I mut be hot to trot for the ladies too. Ultimately, when you go to war it's trust that your fellow grunt won't let you down that counts. Whether or not that fellow grunt rubs loins with the ladies or the guys makes no difference to me when you're staring the wrong end of an RPG.
Lastly, there seem to be a lot of women in the military now in front line support positions yet somehow it seems our military continue to function with the female equation added in. I guess what I'm getting at with the last 2 points is that the modern military takes young people from all walks of life and molds them into a professional fighting machine. I think it's sort of silly to think that the machine is going to break down because of someone's sexual preference.
|
03-25-09 11:58am
|
Reply
513
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ah yes, the old J. Giles Band classic "Angel Was A Centerfold" comes to mind. Of course, that song in itself is about as old as any ex I'd be interested in seeing in a porno ;)
|
03-23-09 09:42pm
|
Reply
514
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
Celine's Reply
I've never been a member but have been considering signing up at some point. My question is that by purchasing credits do you actually get to keep the download? Otherwise it sounds like the monthly membership is more of a DRM deal; you get to watch it only while you're a member. Also, how much is one credit? Thanks.
|
03-23-09 05:26pm
|
Reply
515
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
I re-upped a few months back and can say that that there is little to no condom use going on any more. Hope that helps.
|
03-23-09 05:22pm
|
Reply
516
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Well, I'm to crush everyone's little fantasy trip here with a dose of reality. Let's face, when you start getting older, you really don't want to be seeing your ex's, friends or high school heart throbs doing the whole over-the-hill MILF thing. Man, getting older sucks. That and my neighbors are fat asses. That pretty much leaves me with the celebrity picks. Somebody just shoot me now.
|
03-23-09 11:43am
|
Reply
517
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I actually got burned on that one when I signed up a few months ago. I had a hell of time getting the stuff cancelled when I found out that they had "hidden" the cross sales below the transaction button. I should have noted that one in my review so good work in getting a comment posted on this devious practice.
|
03-22-09 08:24pm
|
Reply
518
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I put that it's nice but not that important. I agree with Drooler that a good search function makes rejoins a lot easier. Most of the sites that I do rejoin have a simple and clear update schedule or good search that makes this easy. As you might expect, they tend to be the higher scoring sites (not that amazing that good quality porn and good site design and search seem to go hand in hand).
However, for most sites that I don't plan on going back to or rarely go back to, it's not that important. If I pick up a few duplicates so be it. I'd rather have the quality over the search capabilities.
It is frustrating that a lot of sites can't seem to figure out the search thing. It's pretty easy, put some hidden tags on a scene or set and enter it into the data base and put a date on the update. However, this takes work and too many sites, even decent ones, seem to skimp on this aspect.
Large sites that don't have good search like Teendreams get knocked a couple of points in my reviews for crappy search. For smaller sights, it doesn't really hurt their scoring for me.
|
03-21-09 12:16pm
|
Reply
519
|
Cara's Nylon World
(0)
|
Reply of
marinette's Review
I'll echo what G Code said. Sorry about getting ripped off. However, we usually rely on reviews to see what the general content of a site is and what you get for your membership. Thus, adding some of that info to your review would be welcomed, along side your problem with the custom shoot.
|
03-19-09 02:40pm
|
Reply
520
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Uhhh, how about on a sweet set with a hot babe and with good photography and editing skills. Once I find this fantasy land I'll let you know.
|
03-19-09 12:19am
|
Comment
521
|
Felched
(0)
|
|
03-18-09 10:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
522
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I prefer to think of it as bad porn. They sucker you in, rip you off and take your money to pay royalties to the producers who left long ago after turning in their worthless turd productions.
|
03-18-09 10:22pm
|
Comment
523
|
Cuties In Tights
(0)
|
|
03-18-09 10:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
524
|
Dream Stash
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
I really dug this site years ago. Yes, it has stopped updating and so I don't go any more. Haven't been a while but sounds like they've downgraded the pics and removed some of the sets. Too bad as I thought it was one of the best POV sites around.
|
03-17-09 09:19pm
|
Reply
525
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Denner has talked about is issue a few times in the forum (there's a new thread by him today on the topic). Basically, contact NS and see if they'll change their pricing or give you a partial refund or something.
|
03-14-09 01:53pm
|