| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
801
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Professional photography
- Over 500 hardcore scenes (all have pics and vids)
- High rez downloads for newer postings (up to 1800 pixels at a rate over 1 meg per second) and no DRM
- High rez pics (up to 2000 pixels but most at 1600) with zip available
- Only hardcore sex divided into 7 categories
- Model index and generally good navigation
- Good customer support |
| Cons: |
- Some content recycled through other DDF sites
- Older content is only average quality (standard sized .wmv downloads available only in sections and pics only at 800 x 600)
- Pics come up in a separate window
- No bonus content
- Download speeds can vary |
| Bottom Line: |
I am a big fan of Deny DeFranco and his DDF sites (1ByDay, Hotlegsandfeet) but had never joined here mostly due to a high fee. I noticed that the site is now $30 month and tried it.
First, the site is what it says. No solo or lesbian sets, everything is m/f sex in 7 categories.
The professionalism is first rate. No out of focus pics or shakey videos. The models are almost all European.
The newer sets, about 1/3, have the high quality download options in several download formats (wmv, dvx). The oldest material, about 1/3 again, can only be dowloaded in sections and only display around 440 x 250. I noticed that download speeds varied depending on the time of day but speeds were generally good.
The pics are very good with most being at 1600 pixels with S, M, and L options available. Most sets have around 120 pics. The newest pics in their largest size also have the actual photographic data from the shoot stored in them if you're into that.
My only disappointment with the site was that a fair number of sets here also appear on other DDF sites. One of the recent updates (site updates about 2 - 3 times a week) was a set I've had for years. If you're already a frequent visitor to the other DDF sites you might want to consider if you want to join here.
This is a great site if you like nonreality based hardcore. The only thing that could really be better would be more frequent updates and more original content. Overall, well worth the money |
|
05-01-08 11:46pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
802
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Poll
Get with program people, this is the 21st century and we download these days, we don't "buy" over priced dvds. I think the most humorous way to resolve the situation would be to call the number and leave a phone message like "If you are the owner of Ass Gapers #67, Cum Drenched Twats #12 and Sado-Slave-Chained Boys and can identify the rest of the materials I just found, I will be happy to return your belongings." Hope the poor sap doesn't have a family voice mail box.
|
05-01-08 11:25am
|
Reply
803
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review, thanks Denner. I had my eye on this site for a while but I think I'll put it on hold at least for now.
|
04-30-08 03:59pm
|
Reply
804
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Hey Pinche. The difference between 90's porn and today. The best response I can give is to analogize by thinking back to my high school years. Would you rather be driving the '72 Gremlin or the new Bitchin' Camaro?
|
04-28-08 12:02pm
|
Reply
805
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
You mean to tell me that the names the pornstars use aren't really their real names ?!?!?!
|
04-27-08 11:27pm
|
Rating
806
|
Karup's PC
(0)
92.0
|
No Review.
|
04-25-08 02:49pm
|
Reply
807
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Poll
If my mom was on a milf site I know there would have to be something pretty seriously screwed up in the world ... kind of like imminent rapture and we're all doomed to hell ... in which case I'd have to say "GO MOM".
I agree with Toadsith in that the whole milf thing is a big fad. I wonder though, not being into gay porn, is there such a thing as a "Filf" (father I'd to to f***)?
|
04-25-08 11:05am
|
Comment
808
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
|
04-23-08 04:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
809
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I've joined probably a half dozen using the discounts. I've only had a couple bad experiences and joined a couple, like Brazzers and Suze, that I probably would not have gone to without the discount.
I'm simply waiting for all my favs to offer discounts ;)
|
04-23-08 04:23pm
|
Comment
810
|
Taste The Babes
(0)
|
|
04-23-08 04:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
811
|
Pink Fever
(0)
|
|
04-23-08 03:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
812
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Just a quick question. I'm more into pictures and I'm wondering what the picture size is? From samples I've seen on tgp sites it looks like 800x600 but those don't always tell the truth.
|
04-22-08 02:29pm
|
Reply
813
|
POV Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
This guy's excuses really do take the cake. I only had limited space in my review but this guy also came up with the lines that his support guy in charge of updates was trapped in a snowstorm in Canada; that a hosting service took him for $30,0000 and abandoned him; and, a month or two later, had the audacity to claim that all the problems were now fixed. All I can say is that his ego seems a lot bigger and better than his site.
|
04-21-08 07:52pm
|
Reply
814
|
N/A
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Poll
How come no one is chiming in for Mrs. Howell??? The clueless wife to a clueless millionaire. That has sugar mama written all over it ... and the lifestyle you'd be sponging off of might be enough to be able to pick up Mary Ann or Ginger on side.
|
04-21-08 07:13pm
|
Comment
815
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
|
04-21-08 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
816
|
POV Network
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Access to 5 sites
- In expensive trial ($5)
- Some high quality vids and OK photos
- No DRM
- Exclusive content |
| Cons: |
- Sites are poorly designed
- Sites stopped updating as of 1/08 with few updates prior to that
- Most sets are lower quality vids and pics
- No zip and only one photo size
- Many dead links
- Not a lot of content
- Admitted history of problems with sites by the webmaster
- Newer pics have large watermarks that sometimes obscure "the stuff" |
| Bottom Line: |
This one was pretty much like a bad trip down memory lane. If you remember what porn sites looked like 10 years with broken links, one size fits all vids and photos and minimal web design then you have this site.
I took the trial primarily for povporn.com There were about 30 to 40 girls there. Of those, about 12 had better pics (1020 x 660) as well as good quality vids. The rest had 800 x 600 pics with low quality vids that have to be downloaded in segments. Two other sites only had about a dozen sets each. The main emphasis of the network is on Petersgirls which had the most content but was almost all softcore. By the time I got there, I was pretty much "done" with the whole thing and didn't look at much.
I got a good laugh at the Lapdancegonebad.com website. None of the photo links worked and there 8 videos. The main page had about 24 months of updates. There were no updates on any of the page. Instead there were some webmaster postings dating back to 2006 trying to calm customer complaints about bad links, slow updates, etc. His excuse then was bad support staff and people taking advantage of him. The next month, though, he was bragging about he was going to build a porn empire and turned down a $1 million offer for all his content. Apparently, he "relaunched" in the summer of 2007 but the same problems seem to have continued.
Basically, this network is a waste of time even for the trial offer. Let's just say I took one for the team here. |
|
04-21-08 06:47pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
817
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
Just curious, about what size are the pictures now and are the new sizes only for the current material or did they also boost the resolution on their older material too?
|
04-19-08 03:43pm
|
Review
818
|
Suze Video
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Expanded libary now (100s of videos each in several different categories)
- Lots of attractive models
- No DRM
- Good customer support
- Good unrestricted trial offer (when available)
- Professional camera work |
| Cons: |
- Download speeds a little slow
- Video quality is average at best
- Navigation could be better |
| Bottom Line: |
I recently did a review of suze.net (photos site only) and recently reupped for the combined suze.net and suzevideo.net. I'm limiting my review here to the videos.
I'm primarily into photos and didn't spend a lot of time with the videos. You have several download options in WMV format. I did note that the speeds were a little slow and you don't get hi res, just average video quality at best. For the most part, the women are attractive and the scenes are hot so that is the trade off.
Navigation is a but of a bummer for both sites. When you have years worth of material but can only jump 2 pages at time you think they would make paging easier.
In a nutshell, the videos arent' bad, the most recent videos are best. However, Suze and company started in the photography era and the photos are probably the best part of the site. Maybe this will change. I would probably stick to the trial offer when they advertise for one -- in my other review I noted that you have to hunt for their trials but they are out there. |
|
04-17-08 04:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
819
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I was a member here about 2 years ago and several times before that. I know that they recycle their content and don't do new shoots any more. They keep their shoots up for a while then take them back down. They are simply making a living off of their past (nothing wrong with that). So, my guess, not having been there lately, is that the "new" stuff is simply material taken down and reposted.
|
04-17-08 04:04pm
|
Reply
820
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
If Canada and the UK are close, what about the US and the UK with their "special relationship" that George W and PM Gordon Brown jus discussed ... that is webcam I would pay not to see.
|
04-17-08 03:31pm
|
Reply
821
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
In the same vein as PinkPanthers query, I joined about 6 months ago and eventually got kicked off the site at the end of my membership because my membership "got hacked" too many times. I got repeated emails about hacking and they kept changing my password during my membership even though I was not constantly logging on and off, sharing my password info or had spyware on my computer. I thought that the customer support was pretty lousy as no one responded to my pleas. I've thought about rejoining sometime in the next few months but I'm wondering if the "password hacking" problem has been fixed there or not. This is the only site I've been to in recent memory that ever had that problem.
|
04-17-08 01:17pm
|
Reply
822
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Clearly the 9% or so who live somewhere "other" are shacking up in Antarctica, the new hot bed of porn. I'm waiting for the new website "40 Below Cuties" showing off their frozen assets.
|
04-17-08 01:09pm
|
Comment
823
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
|
04-16-08 01:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
824
|
All Inclusive Pass
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Reasonable Trial Price
- 10 Site Access
- Generally Good Photo Quality
- No DRM
- OK video with various download features
- Exclusive content |
| Cons: |
- Limited Updates
- No zip on photos
- Slowish download speeds on videos
- Navigation could use improving |
| Bottom Line: |
The name of this site should be changed from "Allinclusivepass" to "Allwegotpass". I had been a member several years ago and after a computer crash I decided to come back to replace what I lost. Basically, the content was unchanged. Only about half the sites seemed to have any real updates in the last year and only 2 or 3 of the sites seemed to have any real regular updates. Most of the sites have around 20 sets to choose from, some more and some less.
There are some interesting niches with the "Sleepassault", "Motherdaughterfuck" and "Usemydaughter" sites but, again, the lack of quantity and updates hurts.
The photos come in at full screen or larger and are OK in quality. The vids are generally just OK.
I don't have much to say that Roseman didn't include in his review. So the bottom line is this: The material you get is fine for a trial membership but there isn't enough quantity, quality or updates to stick around for any length of time. Join once and you probably don't need to go back. |
|
04-16-08 01:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
825
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Thanks for the review on this site; good review and funny by the way. I had joined years ago and was recently thinking about checking it out again. Sounds like the site has kept on going strong. I'll probably pass at the moment given the smallish pic sizes and premium pricing.
P.S. Congrats on winning the $100 raffle, you beat me out (I got the $50). Who knew ordinary Joe's writing about porn could make it big ;)
|
04-15-08 06:43pm
|
