| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
Basically, all of the above can be a royal pain if they are overdone. On the other hand, if the tats or boob jobs are subtle or well done they don't really take anything away from the experience for me. Moderation is OK, over the top is just a mess.
I agree with Drooler in that some of these chicks go way overboard with the tats. What happens when they're 40, have stretch marks, faded tats and big ol' "ass antlers" that would make the most perverted teenaged boy loser cringe?
|
12-21-08 12:31pm
|
Comment
577
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
12-20-08 12:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
578
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Thanks for the heads up on this. However, it sounds like you'll definitely need a download manager and some time to maximize the 5 days of access to the other sites.
|
12-20-08 12:12pm
|
Reply
579
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I voted "no". Is there some repitition, yes. Is it out of control, no. About the only thing I could see for now is a slightly more sophisticated search function but that would be too much effort for anyone to invest their time into for now.
|
12-17-08 01:24pm
|
Reply
580
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Probably every few weeks for me but mostly because the majority of sites I join are the less expensive trials so you only have access for a week at most. Otherwise, I'll stick with a site until I've got all I wanted and then move on.
|
12-13-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
581
|
Peter Janhans
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Thanks for the heads up on this one, I might check it out. Bye the way, nice holiday avatar update there.
|
12-11-08 12:42pm
|
Reply
582
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Mmmm, this is a tough one. Are they breaking the law? In the US some states have laws against public nudity but they can sketchy and not uniformly enforced (some states might also have laws against public sex acts but I don't know). If there is one distinction to make it is between exposing children to pornography and children coming across sex acts. If the producers showed porno movies in public then they would be in big legal trouble if children saw it. Filming people going at it in a public setting is a grayer issue. Hard to say. Sounds like a great PU forum topic, I would suggest reposting your comment there for more feedback.
|
12-11-08 12:06pm
|
Reply
583
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I also have to chime in as a picture guy and agree with Drooler's post. TBP lists the screen size of the vids so why not the pics too?
Overall, I rely a lot on the TBP site statistics. Some you have to take with a grain of salt, especially claims of exclusive content. If you prefer quality over quantity then you really need to be thinking about the technical stuff and statistical facts about a site.
|
12-11-08 11:58am
|
Reply
584
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Thanks for kudos on the review. I just looked and it appears that there's about 320 anal scenes throughout the network. They do a pretty good job of tagging as I don't recall seeing any anal scenes that didn't have the tag but, then again, I don't look at every scene. Either way, if you like it backdoor they do have a good amount of material for you.
|
12-11-08 11:54am
|
Review
585
|
Brazzers
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ 22 sites and growing of exclusive hardcore content
+ No DRM, No DL limits
+ Multiple daily updates, nearly 2000 scenes throughout the network
+ Good search function across whole network
+ Very good user interface
+ All scenes have vids and pics (pics have zip)
+ Scenes actually have story lines although acting is, well, about average for pornstars
+ 40 bonus sites (nonexclusive third party movie clips, not really worth it but it's there) |
| Cons: |
- Pics are a bummer coming in at 900x600
- Video quality is just OK
- Too many pics in sets but they're getting better (new stuff has 700-1000 pics per set)
- 8 of the network sites no longer update
- Some minor technical problems
- Quality is only OK but certainly not amateur
- Smallish opaque watermark but it sometimes gets in the way of the action |
| Bottom Line: |
I reviewed this site 10 mos. ago but recently rejoined and I'm re-reviewing as I was too harsh on my initial take. For the uninitiated, this is a large network focusing on the Sir Mix-a-Lot school of porn (big booty and big busts). I'm not really a fan of the genre but there is enough content to satisfy just about everyone: they have big tit, big butt, anal, teen, interracial, schoolgirl and milf content. For those into American girl booty, silicone and tats, it's probably about the best site around for you.
PHOTOS: I'm a photo guy and so all I can say is that you join here for the vids. For some reason, the "Walmart's of Porn" (Brazzers, Newsensations, RealityKings, NaughtyAmerica -- they make their money on volume while the quality is spotty) all seem to go small with the pics (900x600). You get too many landscape shots here with a lot of dead space (hint, turn the camera sideways and zoom in a bit more). What is frustrating here is that some sets have random 1350x900 shots so they obviously know how to make them. Some shots are a bit grainy and out of focus but overall they are OK for the size.
VIDEOS: Vids come in WMV, Mpeg1, Mpeg4, and Ipod/psp formats and have a streaming option. The vids are not hi-def and come in clips or full length. They average about 30 min. long and are about 300-400 megs in size. Screen size is 640x480. Sort of like the pics, sometimes they get too much "dead space" in the shots but for the most part they are well done and entertaining with no talking camera men (yay).
I would say this site has the best user interface I've seen on a porn site. You can rate each scene and post comments. They have a "personal favorites" function too. There is a user forum with a ton of postings although it's mostly "Beavis & Butthead" level commentary. There are discount (tastefully small) ads for other sites with good prices. There is a very good search function with multiple search options available.
I did have some small technical issues: a few browser crashes, some sets had pics that didn't match the thumbnails, some dead links and pages that wouldn't load but most of these were overcome.
As an aside, I was happy to see Nicole Sheridan come out of retirement for a hot new scene here.
I'm scoring this site an 86 for two reasons. The main issue is quality. Like I said, Brazzer's has the Wal-Mart mentality of porn: they produce a lot and have reasonable membership fees with frequent discounts but they skimp on the quality. They're getting better but still have a ways to go. With HD vids and hi-rez pics, I'd put a score of 90 or more on this site. The other reason is that it does get a bit stale. A lot of scenes seem alike, performers appear in multiple genres, and the girls they use are usually not top shelf "hottie" talent.
Like I said, there is enough here for most anyone to get their money's worth for a month. It's not the best site but it's certainly worth a membership to check it out. |
|
12-10-08 10:19pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
586
|
N/A
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
I agree, if you're going to do a solo shot then you should have a litte tease factor and start with the model clotehd or wearing whatever skimpy thing she dug out of her closet. Personally, I prefer toys over a straight softcore shoot but when she starts toying ... well, I leave that up to her.
|
12-09-08 05:22pm
|
Reply
587
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I think the soul searching goes on here because PUer's take their porn seriously. If you're here and you're not serious, you're going to be ignored or lambasted by the rest and you'll probably just get bored or p.o.'ed and move on. That leaves the rest of us, trying to define the PU Cultural Ethos (isn't PUCE a nice acronym) that rivals a conclave of Cardinals symposium.
|
12-07-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
588
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I think it comes down to how motivated people are by the idea of getting some raffle winnings ... unless you're gunning for a "hardcore" badge but strikes me as a ridiculous concept and one that would be too hard pull off without piling up the negative trust votes.
Regarding the raffle, it still would take time to cook up a passable fictional review and for what? Increasing your raffle chances by maybe 1% or 2%? Not really worth it in the grand scheme especially in a community of this size where the regulars and big point leaders pretty much know each other.
|
12-07-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
589
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
OMG, if they did a Met-Art hardcore site I would be in heaven, especially if they used the same high quality production and quality at the flagship site. However, I am also of the opinion that I don't really see a h/c site fitting into their marketing scheme. At best it would be a small site since most of the models their probably wouldn't do hc and why ruin a great thing they already have going.
|
12-06-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
590
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm with you, doesn't matter what it is so long as the model is hot and the acting isn't cold. I think Drooler sort of summed this concept up best with his quote from the forum "A soda bottle in her twat! Now that's what I call product placement."
|
12-05-08 04:18pm
|
Reply
591
|
Amateur Facials UK
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Actually, I saw some previews on a tgp post a while back and took a gander at but didn't sign up in large part due to the lack of TBP/PU reviews. The only thing I could ever find resembling a review, and I can't till if it's a schill or not, is here: http://www.free-handjobs.com/reviews/amateurfacialsuk/ . Sorry can't be of more help.
|
12-04-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
592
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
sitsat's Review
Just wanted to say very good review there Sitsat and welcome to PU. Hope to see more reviews our coming our way. Glad to see you've found the forum too.
|
12-04-08 07:36pm
|
Reply
593
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Isn't really the holiday we should be celebrating this season. Screw to food; go straight for the good stuff ;)
Yes, Prohibition is once again proof that when the government tries to take away something most people think is good you're going to end up with nothing but problems ... until the government figures out that you can tax the hell out of it and make a lot of money from it.
|
12-03-08 12:31pm
|
Reply
594
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
Mmmmm, I just snagged this deal about 30 minutes ago. I'll see what I conjur up (play "Jeopardy" theme music while I open a new page).
You are right, it now looks like the $7.50 is now only for the multi-month membership. However, they still have the $10 per month offer going. Here's the url: http://tour.brazzersnetwork.com/tour/?action=home
Hope that isn't a big disappointment. I'll re-edit the comment to reflect this.
|
12-02-08 07:45pm
|
Reply
595
|
Her First Big Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
Hey, thanks for the good review on this one. I was a member there years ago. They had decent sized pics then, just wondering what size the pics come in at now and if there are zips.
Pity about the streaming vid thing. My take is that streaming is going to replace DRM as the next big net limitation ... giving us all something new to beef about, especially when they make streaming harder to download.
|
12-02-08 07:35pm
|
Comment
596
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
|
12-02-08 07:27pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
597
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
If I want "drapes" I'll shop the K-Mart Martha Stewart collection. Until then, I'll stick with the clean and subtle modern look.
|
12-01-08 01:14pm
|
Reply
598
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
For me it's one of those things that I find interesting once in a great while. I find no interest in the really hardcore s+m stuff, just some mild stuff every now and then. It's not something I'm into in real life so it doesn't have a big draw for me in fantasy land. But, to each their own.
|
11-29-08 10:12pm
|
Reply
599
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Can only say a month. My whole motto is to take what you want and if you really like the site come back later on and check out the updates. I just haven't found any place yet that I could justify staying for longer.
|
11-27-08 12:02am
|
Reply
600
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I figured Andy would be the heavy user here, at least you won some bucks this week to support the next external hard drive ;) I'm like Drooler, I join sites but don't download vids that often, especially since I'm more of a pic guy I get most of my vid downloads in one shot.
|
11-25-08 03:09pm
|
