Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good site/network of "amateur" content.
- Navigation is surprisingly good, there's a lot of content, but all can be accessed from the toolbar at the top of the Net Video Girls site.
- There's multiple "sites" included: Net Video Girls, Backroom Casting Couch, Exploited College Girls, Black Ambush, Casting Couch HD and Broke Model.
- Some of the sites include picture sets that are downloadable as zips ... but there's a con involved here.
- Download speeds are extremely fast for me, hitting right at 90% of my max download speed consistently, the average porn site downloads at 50% of my max speed.
- Nice diversity in models, both in body type and race.
- Have liked it enough to let it recur for a second month.
- There are weekly updates. Though, these vary by site. But overall there are new scenes across the network.
- Another that will border on pro/con depending on the user, some of the videos are very long. I've seen as long as 93 minutes.
Cons:
- The biggest con is the inconsistencies. Some of the sites have filenames that name the model, other ones have the name of the site and nothing else. Some of the sites have picture sets that you can download in zips. Other ones don't even have pictures you can view. Some of the sites have dates on the content. Other ones don't. These are minor and common annoyances, but annoyances nonetheless.
- I'm having video resolution inconsistencies, but maybe it's because I'm downloading some of the older videos and they just have them listed as "HD"? One of the ones I downloaded as HD was 768x432 resolution.
- No pictures on the Net Video Girls site.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying I really like this site or network of sites however you see that. The majority of these models look like real amateurs, some chubby, some slim, some in-between, and there's a good variety of races as well.
I really don't like that Net Video Girls doesn't have pictures. Several of the other sites do have downloadable picture sets. Then there's the inconsistencies, I don't have enough knowledge of computer programming to know why a non-HD video would be listed under HD, but it's not that big of a deal. I consider as low as 720p to be HD. Their newer videos also have 4k option, so they're putting out high technical quality content overall. It's just their older content is worth looking into too and that seems to be where the inconsistencies show up.
The length of the videos and size of videos also varies greatly. I've dowloaded scenes as large as 2.5GB and as mentioned above, as long as 93 minutes. I'm not complaining about that. It just should be known that the videos can be very long considering it's one scene.
There is a more natural feel to this site than most amateur sites, like the really long scenes, compared to some that are only 20-30 minutes. That makes the scenes more believable to me. Some of the models seem to really enjoy teasing as well, which is why I don't understand the absence of pictures on Net Video Girls.
The amount of content you receive with the site and the network is impressive. I would say it's the largest amateur site I've been on. They're not doing any favors though on content count or exact numbers. Each year (dating back to 2000-01) has a list of calendar girls, most of the earlier years it was 12 per year, but over the last few years there's been more than 16 per year. That's just on Net Video Girls. Then Casting Couch HD has a similar setup back to 2013 and no set number per year, but there's more than 12. A little cleaning up would help these sites.
But the overall picture here is there's a lot of content between the seven sites they list in their network.
Luckily, the navigation lets you move from one site to the next and a model list and there's those fast download speeds to mention. I've seen a few known porn stars, but most of these models are genuine amateurs. You also find something fairly rare here and that's two amateur models in a scene together (girl/girl).
The filename problems seem to just be on Net Video Girls, where all the scenes I've downloaded are named netvideogirls(dot)hd(dot)mp4. So, you'll need to either manually rename them to the model's name or let your computer rename them to netvideosgirls(2) and so on. I've just renamed them to the model's name since one amateur site I was on recently didn't even give you a model name. This one at least does that.
I would recommend it to anyone who likes the casting, amateur-type site, it has a lot of content, good technical quality and the good blend of model types. And if it shows my own enjoyment of it, I let it recur and have been a member for nearly two months now. Just be warned of the inconsistencies listed above.
I believe the VOD site is free to join. It is separate from the New Sensations membership. One of the above replies asked about DVDs. That is what the VOD site is. It is the New Sensations/Digital Sin DVDs. They cost $6-$20 to rent or buy. I haven't ever used VOD or pay per scene sites. It wasn't any use to me. I've run into a lot of walls with porn. Every scene I watch that doesn't try at least something of a theme, I automatically lose interest. It just seems like it's lazy porn. My feelings on their newer content varies but to me, it's at least better than where their scenes were 10 years ago.
It looks like some of the DVD scenes are included with the New Sensations membership but definitely not all. They have a Video On Demand site that has the DVDs for rent or sale on it. The Cute Little Babysitter series has a few scenes available to download on New Sensations site with a regular membership but most of those are interviews with the models. The same for the Digital Sin DVDs there are some scenes from those to download on the regular New Sensations site but to get all those you have to buy those separately through the VOD site. You can see the VOD site by clicking on the DVDs tag on the New Sensations website. Looks like those cost $6 - $20 each to rent or buy.
Thanks RA, the main thing I would say is just be sure there's enough new content. My last membership, on New Sensations, was 2012. Nearly each site, listed on the New Sensations listing here on PU, is new to me. I do think the improvements in video download options improved the older content, but those new(er) sites are the ones that are impressing me the most.
You are right on the way you understood it. It's still 480p but it has higher bitrate. They give you really four options on those scenes that are higher than the original. The scene I mentioned, the original had an 800 bitrate. The move up to 12000. It brought a lot of clarity out, made everything look more vivid. Just to show the point of that scene and how much of an improvement it is. There is a part where Krystal Steel is fingering Sky Lopez, violently. I remember them being real-life lovers at one time. Sky has a little tank top on. She had implants. In the scene that I have the original of you can see that Sky was scooting so much it was causing her tank top to move and bunch in the back. One of her boobs pops out and the angle of the camera is perfect to show how hard Sky's nipple was. The new 12000 bitrate version, it's clear how hard it was. The old version, you could see the shape of her hard nipple. You can see it plain in the 12000 bitrate version.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I’m as surprised as can be. I can’t believe how much New Sensations has improved over the years.
- It comes with 12 “sites”. They show more than 12 but it is what it said when I joined it.
- Everything newer is high-quality and even creative.
- Good navigation for a network, easy to use tabs and the site design is even nice.
- A studio that I was a big fan of mainly because of their pictures. They don’t disappoint there, either.
- Very good download speeds (80-90% of my max). Am crediting my ISP for that. I don’t think I share a connection with many people.
- Could easily be listed as my favorite network after I’ve seen all these changes.
Cons:
- I am having a little trouble with their programming while using Firefox. This site may be hard for older computers to use.
- For all the improvement, they still have their old scenes that I got sick of. I don’t even look at the older scenes. The normal should be mentioned, lower quality on the older scenes, repetitive, boring, cookie-cutter. The newer scenes are a major step forward.
Bottom Line:
I was going to review another of their sites but may wait on that. I don’t get good surprises in porn. I’ve been through so many sites over the years. I thought I would give New Sensations a try. One of my all-time favorite porn scenes is Krystal Steel and Sky Lopez in the 4 Finger Club. That site is still on here. It was the first thing I looked up. They still have it; released all the way back in 2007. They’re done something I noticed. That scene being so old only has 480p downloads but it has four versions of 480p, 3MBPS, 6MBPS, 8MBPS and 12MBPS. That 12 bitrate is 1.5GB to download. That’s probably a better way to remaster old porn instead of trying to stretch it. The scene looks good, much better than I remember.
This is a big network. It’s big enough that I’m not for sure if I can do the numbers justice. I’m going to try estimating. There are 21 scenes per page and there are 315 pages. That’s over 6,000 scenes and from all the ones I have looked at those all photos with them. New Sensations was the first studio that I remember using what we generally call, “screen captures” except they make sure to get the first 20-30 of them just of the model in her clothing. The pictures on the newer scenes are not only downloadable in a zip they are in 5000-6000 long end. I think my focus has been on the newer sites. There are sites on here that I was a member of before 2010, like the 4 Finger Club. The problem I remember New Sensations having was a focus on their male stars. They still have the male solo sites. Fame Digital was just as bad.
Another estimate, around 2,000 models and I see some models that retired a long time ago. The old scenes are still here. One of the sites I remember standing out as a very high scoring site was Jizz Bomb. It's still here and it looks like Ramon Nomar is in the same position Nacho Vidal used to be on Jizz Bomb. Let’s get away from the male-led sites.
The newer sites, I don’t know how many are listed here on Porn Users. There is Hot Wife XXX which I have a review for. The Tabu Tales, I haven’t seen any of those. There’s The Lesbian Experience. Family XXX and I don’t even remember Fresh Outta Highschool, that must have been after I got frustrated with them. Part of it is the site is so nice, new and improved, it makes everything look new.
The scenes I have checked out, all the newer ones have 4K, 1080p and 720p. Those also have 2 different bitrate files for each resolution. It has kind of caught me off-guard. I was expecting the worst. I ended up getting a network that is one of the best I have been on. The models are mainly professionals. Professional porn can be good. It looks like they do still sell their DVDs and these scenes come from those DVDs. Is 4K the same as Blu-Ray?
The site is a little hectic. They have some changing ads. You’re going to click a lot. You have to click the download button to download, that doesn’t start the download. It gives you the download options. You then have to click the one you want. The picture zips, you have to click to get the download option to show up. They could streamline that part and save my mouse buttons from wear.
The older scenes may be good to other people. Considering I stopped joining it and hadn’t been back in years, it tells how far I felt they dropped off. It’s good to see this newer content. Those newer sites have series on them. I really believe they are trying to be creative. They do give you the favorites button which you will probably need. Because their overuse of male talent annoyed me as much as it did years ago. If you don’t like Ramon Nomar, you might want to look into how many scenes he has on the network. I don’t mind him. I got used to him on Reality Kings.
It's going to be overwhelming to try and get by with a one month membership. I just don’t see that happening. I am in the first month. If nothing else, I’m giving a heads up not to think this is the old New Sensations. This is currently a very good network. They are updating, looks like every 2-3 days. It’s definitely worth joining for a month. They have worked a miracle on it, in my opinion.
I had meant to reply to this earlier since you may collect Lana. I wouldn't have believed it, but I found a very explicit set of Lana at Kink's Fucking Machines, really surprised me seeing Lana on there, but the set was worth more than this whole solo site was. Also found 3 lesbian sets of her on Brazzers which I wouldn't have expected either. For some reason I always had a problem with confusing Lana Lopez and Luna Lane so I first thought those were Luna, but they are Lana including maybe the "cutest" femdom set with Lana dominating Ella Milano. It looks like it hurts Lana just to act "mean". But those three sets are much more than I'm used to seeing her in.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lana Lopez, one of the sexiest models I have ever seen.
- Photos vary in size, biggest resolution I saw was 2000 long end, the majority are 1200x1800 and come zipped.
- 24 webcam shows in the archive, but see cons, bottom line
- Photos are nice and crisp, Lana is an excellent poser and the photos here are worth way more than the videos.
Cons:
- Download limit on photo zips, 21 zips allowed per day. Will further in BL.
- I was pretty excited about the video section. No download limits, the first one I downloaded was HD quality. Then I noticed the videos were downloading in 1-2 minutes.
- Three upsell "zipsets", no joke, $17.95 each, each one has an "explicit" video and matching photo set. So if you want to three explicit videos, a subscription plus the zipsets will set you back around $70.
- It's not all exclusive, quite a few of the videos are from Holly Randall's site. Some of the pictures in candids are from car websites.
- The webcam videos, I thought for sure these would be the saving grace for this site. Then I watched them, they average 5 minutes in length, go to full nudity, but no masturbation. At least Lana has a good personality and is really cute in these, otherwise, they would be useless.
Bottom Line:
I probably would have gone a little easier on this site if they had included access to their other sites, but they don't.
Instead you get a site of one of the most underrated softcore models, Lana Lopez, that has just a little over 100 photo sets including candid sets, which are often not even close to being nude, questionable if they are even "porn". The pictures are good quality, very nice colors, settings and Lana as always really shines in them but these photo sets average maybe 35 photos in each.
When your pictures are the strong point of the site, I would hope for at least 75-100 photos per set.
The videos range in quality. One is HD, but it's licensed from another site. The videos that are exclusive to this site are videos of the photoshoots or very softcore/tease. And excuse me for saying this, but why can't the dumbass photographer get his head out from in front of the video camera? It's bad enough that his camera is flashing, making noises, but now I get to see the back of his head?
There are some good videos. Lana was very softcore for most of her career, there are some masturbation videos mixed in though these are in the minority. The quality is okay on the videos, most are standard DVD quality 640x480. At least her tease videos are sexy though and were able to get the photographer out of the frame.
Where I became most annoyed with this site was when I clicked "zipsets" at the top of the site, right in with the site's menu options like "pictures", "videos", "webcam" there is "zipsets".
Here you can buy 3 "explicit" videos and matching photo sets for $17.95 each. First of all, there are explicit videos on the site that are included in the membership price. Also, I know for a fact that Aziani has at least 2 very explicit videos of Lana. Why should I pay for 3 videos that should be included with the site? That's $55 for three videos. If this was supply and demand, I could maybe understand, but you are giving me explicit videos with membership. Why would I pay for something I'm already getting? If none of the videos included with the site were explicit, then I could maybe understand it.
The webcam archived videos. I really like these videos with any solo model who has a good personality. Lana has that and more. She's smiling a lot, laughing and teasing, but then she takes her clothes off, spins around a few times and that's the end of the video. It reminds me of those cam sites where you can see the model teasing, sometimes even nude, but if you want to see more you have to pay for a private show. That's exactly how these webcam videos are.
I really can't tell you when the site last updated. There are no dates, but the live webcam calender was last marked for Wednesday, November 19th, looking at my calender the last November 19th on a Wednesday was in 2008. So those haven't been updated in 3 years. The last diary entry was in August 2010 and says she did sets for Twistys and would be posting those sets on this site without the Twistys watermark, so there goes more of the exclusivity of the site.
It's a poor site overall. No updates. Lots of photoshoot videos which aren't very desirable since you see the photographer's head as much as Lana.
The photo sets are nice, but as mentioned above they are small photosets. It should be a bonus site to another site or include bonus sites at the $20 price.
I can only recommend this site if you are a huge fan of Lana and even then, you may still regret it. There just isn't much good with this site except Lana. Not even close to recommending for casual or even moderate Lana fans. There are other multi-model sites that have good content of her and won't try to get you to pay $55 for 3 explicit videos either.
After probably a few years of debate on whether to join this site, I finally did, knowing it isn't updating and that the overall size of it is underwhelming.
But it's Lana Lopez.
So I get into the underwhelming amount of content and figure I will download the entire site in a day or two and be satisfied with the addition to my Lana collection since she doesn't have a ton of content out there.
After downloading 21 what I would call "small" zip files of photos, I got this comment, "Your daily download limit of zips has expired".
I have the exact numbers and can even link a screenshot of what I have downloaded to reach this limit.
21 zips, total size = 362 mb = "Your daily limit on download zips has been expired!"
It's probably not that big of a deal since this was one full page of her picture sets and there are only 4.5 pages, so I will go back tomorrow and download 21, then 21 the next day and so on, but what's the purpose of a download limit on what is an archive site? I haven't tried the videos yet, but those too may have a download limit on them as well. I will get back to a review later this week since I should have everything downloaded by then. Just thought I would throw this early warning in on the download limit on photo set zips.
I was curious to see if this site is still updating. I've always been a fan of Lana, but have never joined the site. Drooler's review is nearly 2 years old and the site facts haven't been updated in 2 years so anyone have any new information on it?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
– Formerly Tug Pass, a handjob focused network, but offers more than just handjobs.
– Unlimited video downloads and most have 720p and 1080p
– Download speeds are good (80% my max).
– Includes access to Handjob Hub
– 15+ sites are advertised as part of the Nookies network.
– Quantity in a relatively rare niche is the biggest pro.
Cons:
– Many years of joining Tug Pass and have heard quite a few negative comments about the attractiveness of their models. Rebranding doesn't change that.
– No 4K for the resolution lovers
– If you were going to judge the entire network on technical quality, it would be average or at best, slightly above average.
Bottom Line:
I remember reviewing Tug Pass a long time ago and within minutes, someone replied and commented on the models being old and unattractive. Old, I don't think, can really be subjective, but attractiveness is. I am not saying those models from the older scenes were top tier in looks, but this is a handjob site, not a glam site.
I can tell you the models started getting younger and more attractive, but we get to see the pro/con at work. Those older, less attractive models, really seemed to enjoy playing with dicks. Sure, you can make the joke that they don't get many in real life, but can't deny their performances are great. The newer, younger models do sometimes seem more bored than anything and I think that's expected with handjob porn.
Once beyond that, you have a network here, Nookies, that offers one of the biggest handjob collections you will ever find. Their videos and pictures sets are both over 3,000. Not all are handjob only, there are scenes of nearly all male/female niches.
I believe having more than just handjob scenes has helped the network. Having unlimited downloads is a major pro, too. The video quality is good enough. That is my way of saying, unless you're wanting the highest video quality possible, you will be happy with these videos. I still am mostly downloading 720p. I won't give the long explanation, but the short one says I have some vision damage and really can't see a huge difference between 720p and 1080p and see even less with 4K. I do believe video resolution preference has a lot to do with how long you've been viewing online porn. HD was such a major step up from SD. It makes HD more than good enough for me.
The handjob genre is covered well. Several of the models, especially in older scenes, were and maybe still are experts in milking and edging.
Navigation is good, but could be better. I've been using online porn long enough that I rarely need navigation or tags to lead me to what I'm looking for.
Besides the unlimited videos, you can also download unlimited photo zips and there's the added “bonus” of being able to access Handjob Hub Premium.
Handjob Hub Premium is owned by Nookies and is a handjob tube site. A lot of the content on Handjob Hub Premium is from Nookies, minus the cumshots, yeah, not kidding. They do have some scenes not from Nookies so there's a little bonus to the content. It's just not as big of a deal as it is advertised as.
The Nookies scenes do not cut out the cumshots.
I am scoring this network higher than I expected when I joined it. Some of the reasons include: The newer scenes are trying to add new elements even to the handjob scenes. They seem to be aiming for various niches like voyeurism and teasing. Personally, I would rather see a site or network, trying something different and unique, than adding 4K videos. The older scenes relied on the woman taking on a nearly dominant role, while the newer scenes show the male, while physically in the submissive role, turning it into more of a neutral role where the woman is getting as much out of the physical stimulation as the guy is, without the woman needing the dom role. I like it. It's a real evolution in human sexuality. It's nice to see a woman enjoying herself making the guy cum, not because she's feeling superior.
Maybe it's the key to porn’s future success even? So many females seem to struggle with anything presenting themselves as dominant. These newer scenes are showing a compromise, the middle ground, where the male and female are more focused on being playful and enjoying their sexuality, instead of worrying about who is dom and who is sub.
A good network that's somehow, in 2024, improving themselves instead of rehashing their past success.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- 14 sites for $14.95 with the TBP Discount
- Not bad quality on the videos, most are 640x480
- Nice variety of content/genres from site to site on the network
- Excellent customer service, lost my password, sent in a "ticket" that morning, had a new password when I got home from work.
- Most of your top Euro and American models are on here in at least some capacity
Cons:
- Search engine is very frustrating, will explain in botton line.
- Pic sets are usually very short, 40-60 pics
Bottom Line:
I was doing a search on NS A-A for my favorite model Eve Angel, nothing shows up. So I went ahead and started getting the videos of the other models that I like. One of the network sites is the 4 Finger Club, Lesbian genre site. I go onto it, and lo and behold there was Eve Angel. This to me is a major no-no. If you are going to have multiple sites, the search engine is maybe the most important feature, especially its accuracy. Most of the searching is done with a drop down box that lists the models on each site.
Otherwise, this is one of the best networks around. Over 1,000 video scenes, 640x480 resolution. Check out the top 10 sites you get with a membership, Jizz Bomb, New Sensations' own site, Papa Loads, Butt Divers, Lil' Latinas, Screaming O, Four Finger Club, Internal Violations, Mr. Biggz and Nacho's Killer Pussy. The lowest rated by TBP by itself is Nacho's Killer Pussy a 79. Everything else is in the 80s. I was happy to see that Jizz Bomb wasn't just cumshots, it is actually a very hardcore site that has the full sex in the clips.
I've been a member now on 3 separate occasions, but honestly, am not seeing as much new stuff that I like, as I used to. Similar to my feelings on videobox, if you have never been there or here, this is an excellent place to start. There is a little something for every porn fan on this site, so you should easily get your 15 bucks worth. That is still less than one porn DVD. I think I came away with 20 GB or so. Recommended!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that needs to be brought back, it’s not really casting and that makes it much better.
- Only 67 scenes, but you possibly could download all of them. This is very good porn.
- Pretty women, and easily the prettiest camerapersons in porn. Will explain in the bottom line.
- Even though the site isn’t updating and has been dead for a long time, all the scenes have 1080p downloads and two forms of 720p, 540p, and mobile.
- Biller is CCBill, good and trusted biller.
- Download speeds are fast at over 90% of my max, probably not many people downloading these.
Cons:
- It’s not updating and it’s not big enough. This site should have 500 scenes.
- Realizing a site nails, a mostly untouched niche and they stop it. I have seen one other site that does this style or porn. It stopped updating too.
Bottom Line:
Very few sites annoy me in a good way. This is one of those sites. If you have a hard drive problem but know about these scenes, you’re going to join to download these scenes on your new hard drive. It’s very simple and that’s why it works. The scenes are based on a female “model” posing as the casting director. Like porn has one of those? If they do, they need to fire them. Anyway, the female behind the camera videos a male and female having sex. What is going to happen? Sometimes the cameraperson is sexier than the woman in the scene. She’s going to get involved. I know of one other site that does this niche really well. That site had a chubby, short guy filming and the porn guy would talk the woman into giving the chubby, short cameraman a blowjob.
This site goes much simpler. The woman and the guy in the scene very clearly want the woman behind the camera. You get yourself a nice little porn story of woman A was there to cast for a porn spot. Woman B was filming it and woman B becomes very aroused. See how that simple that is? That’s how you make good porn. You hit the seductive fetish, you hit the exhibitionism fetish, the voyeurism fetish and you did so by calling it “casting”. That is clever by porn’s standards. My favorite scene on this site is Cali Doe Cast Sofia Lata. Sofia Lata needs to be in more porn. I guess she’s older now. That scene was filmed in 2013. The casting director sometimes hands the camera to the other woman and has sex with the guy. How has that niche slipped by all these porn producers? We need to bring Seinfeld back to make an episode about that.
The site is small at 67 scenes. The scenes are not usually long. The scenes are very entertaining. Their tags are good except for one part. The tags usually lead you all over the network. I clicked on one that was a tag of something I like and it sent me to a page with the scenes from all their sites that had that tag. If I’m in the mood for watching the cameraperson get involved, I don’t want to leave the site. This site does have the opposite advantage of not being big enough to make you need tags. Just scan through the scenes. They are all good scenes. Just to give a mention to the tags, who decided to have a “tender fingering” tag? Maybe they had a site called Tender something.
You do get better than good quality. I still haven’t made the jump to 4K or 6K or 8K and don’t see 16K in my future either. I sold my 4K monitor/television. I’m looking at the naked woman. Did I really hear that the higher resolution looks more real? It’s real people! I know that blurry is a problem. These 1080p scenes are crisp and clear. Here is what really sold this site on me, the pictures. The downloads, even though from 2013, are 6000 long end. Seeing these models trying to act like it’s really casting means they will have on their normal clothes. I am a clothes fetishist. That is a big selling point. This sums up how I feel about this site. If I could join it for $5 a month and didn’t have the scenes, I would pay it just for these 67 scenes and that to me, makes it a very good site. You can join Nubiles Porn for $10 a month and you get this thrown in. I am sure most people just look over it as another casting site. It’s not a casting site. That’s a mistake they made when they named it. Casting porn usually doesn’t interest me. I knew about this site and have been a member many times. Don’t look over this site. It’s a good site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best networks as long as you don’t forget you have access to Nubiles.net. It still doesn’t show up in their included sites. I checked, you still get access to it with Nubiles Porn.
- Consider Nubiles Porn a support site to Nubiles.net, there are 18 other sites included.
- All of the Nubiles Porn sites are themed. You either like that or you don’t. I do.
- The quality is high on every site they have. All the newer videos have 4K. Even if you don’t like 4K or use it, their 1080p and 720p are both very clear.
- They are one the best at pictures. Most of the newer photosets have up to 7000 long end in downloadable zips. That’s very good.
- It uses CCBill
- I have very good download speeds with their sites.
Cons:
- This con shows my experience and knowledge of Nubiles’ history. The whole themed site idea came about to offer something more than Nubiles.net offers. Nubiles.net could be viewed as repetitive, I have heard boring. That could be a con for some. I have found that staying away from the site for months makes it interesting again.
- The themed sites seem to come and go. That’s how I see the network. It’s their drawing board to try out different ideas.
Bottom Line:
Nubiles.net is one of the top sites of all-time. I have reviewed this network lower than Nubiles.net for years now. You do get access to Nubiles.net but if you’re focused on Nubiles.net all this network part is a distraction. I decided to review this from more of the perspective of just Nubiles Porn.
Two sites that have automatically interest me. PetiteHDPorn and PetiteBallerinasFucked. My wife is a former ballet dancer and she’s petite. I don’t know that she really is that petite. She just looks it beside me. They don’t update the Ballerina one which is disappointing to me. Even before I met my current wife. I loved flexible women. PetiteHDPorn continues to update and has a much bigger collection. Those are two sites I like a lot. One I wish they didn’t stop is the NubilesUnscripted. You’re going to have the same problem I have. I thought Driver had good potential. They also have multiple stepfamily sites. Family Pies, StepsiblingsCaught. To me, it adds value one month, the next month, Nubiles Porn takes away value.
Besides not forgetting about Nubiles.net being included, NubilesPorn is a site too. It’s not just a network. You could easily miss those scenes. That is why I have been scoring the network lower than Nubiles.net. Do that many pornstars have stepfamilies?
I think you have to join Nubiles Porn with the mindset that you’re going to focus on the themed sites one month, then Nubiles.net, in another month. I have talked about this in reviews of their sites. I still don’t get the Seasons and Episodes. Which just adds to the confusion. The good parts are across all the sites.
They have 4K video on the newer scenes. I am perfectly fine watching 720p. Their 720p is clear and crisp. Their pictures separate them from other networks. I believe that one day, porn will come full circle and pictures will be more important than videos. The videos leave little to the imagination. The pictures leave a lot to the imagination. The pictures are downloadable in zips. Most of the newer ones I’ve downloaded are 7000 long end. I do believe Nubiles has changed some of their thinking. The sex scenes are more graphic, the masturbation is less innocent than it used to be. The lesbian scenes are good. There’s so much going on with their network it’s easy to forget about Nubiles.net. Which hasn’t changed much since 2006. It’s pretty, young women getting naked. I think that reached a point it wasn’t enough. You can see the progression. Where’s the progress there’s going to be regress.
It's still hard to find much negative. Their site works very well except for having to sign-in to Nubiles.net. I see they do have it listed in the bottom list of sites. I already logged in before I saw that. I don’t know if it logs you in instantly. For a while, you had to sign-in on Nubiles.net even if you were signed in on Nubiles Porn. I am thinking because of different servers.
I’m trying in this review to stay on how good or bad is just Nubiles Porn? I think it compares with any of the big networks. I just wish they, like the other networks, would stick to updating sites instead of starting new ones. The network, without Nubiles.net has 1,632 videos and roughly the same amount of photosets. That’s a big network with multiple themes being explored. Everything is high quality. Just Nubiles Porn without Nubiles.net to me is a 90. Showing the Nubiles.net numbers will probably show why I try to keep them apart when reviewing them. Nubiles.net has 11,208 videos and similar amount of photosets. To me, that shows the overall value, but it also shows why you’re not going to be able to explore Nubiles Porn fully and Nubiles.net fully in one month.
I’m not going to boost the score of Nubiles Porn for including Nubiles.net. I’m sticking with a 90 for Nubiles Porn. I don’t know if I will review Nubiles.net again. It would be between 94-96. As a package, it’s one that you could justify a year subscription to.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that keeps improving. And includes Nubiles.net which is one of the best sites in its genre.
- The most recent content focuses on the "step family" niche. A big departure from Nubiles.net's more focused mostly solo content. It is welcomed as it brings variety.
- The technical quality is high throughout the network.
- Download speeds are very good, 80% my max download speed.
- As a network, I would put them on par with the top networks on the internet (Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros, etc...).
- Nubiles.net is the ace up the sleeve that nudges them ahead of all other networks.
- Bills through Epoch.
- Navigation has improved since my last visit.
- For me, I like the lightheartedness of their stepfamily scenes. Some of the acting, Abella Danger is guilty, makes me laugh in a good way.
- A month isn't long enough to go through this network. I'm not even for sure 6 months is enough.
Cons:
- Just not much to complain about. The lesser-used sites of the network like Driver XXX, which I thought was a good site hasn't updated in 3 years.
- Maybe stick a border at the top that says Nubiles.net is included. It does show up in the little "world/network" tab but other than that I don't see it anywhere else on the site.
Bottom Line:
For many years, Nubiles.net, was one of my favorite sites. I wasn't for sure how I felt about Nubiles adding new sites. I also like their site Anilos as well. The network at first was questionable for me because it was more like they were using it to test different styles of scenes. As mentioned, Driver XXX, would be a perfect example of that. In 2015, they released 13 "episodes" from the Driver XXX series but none since. My concern was fair, in my mind, I thought it would cause Nubiles.net to slow or drop off or even disappear (see Club Sandy after 21 Sextury went to a network).
Instead, Nubiles.net still updates nearly two times a day just by itself. And the network itself updates 4-5 times a week. So, you're getting a network that updates and a premium solo model site that updates twice a day (on average) for the price of one site.
The good part of this arrangement is Nubiles.net retains a mostly amateur feel to the models while Nubiles Porn network has the more known models in hardcore scenes. There's a fine-line for me when it comes to adding hardcore scenes to an otherwise softcore site and Nubiles Porn is now doing it as good as anyone. I think their only real competition is DDF's Network. I think both of those sites would take that as a compliment to both.
One of my favorite (more recent) hardcore scenarios is the one where the stepmom or aunt walks in on a younger couple having sex and joins or "teaches". They have a lot of that in the newer content on Nubiles Porn. You also get the admittedly funny, boyfriend distracted while an older man is seduced by the boyfriend's girlfriend. Nubiles does these types of scenes with what I consider "good taste" in that they make them so outrageous that you don't become too uncomfortable about the scene. I mentioned Abella Danger's funny acting ability and that came up in a recent scene where Abella and stepbrother/stepsister were on vacation when Abella walks in on them having sex. She looked like she had been hit on the head with an anvil! Have to love the corny humor that comes from this niche.
And if you're an imagination porn user you can imagine it as being completely serious if you have a fetish for the niche.
The videos on Nubiles Porn give you five download options from 270p to 1080p. They also have photo sets for download and also screencaps for download.
It's not as easy to find total content counts since some of the scenes appear on more than one site but Nubiles.net offers roughly 10,000 scenes, which is unheard of for a solo model site with the occasional hardcore/lesbian scene.
On the Nubiles Porn scenes they use season/episode for each episode. For example, Mom's Teach Sex is in Season 8, Episode 8. While I'm all for making things more organized, the newest season of Mom's Teach Sex started in April. Each season has 10 episodes and lasts 4 months (2 updates per month). There doesn't seem to be any connection from the episodes to each other or from season to season but it is an interesting way to list your scenes and organize them. It does help some with counting the scenes too. Like Mom's Teach Sex, 7 full seasons at 10 episodes each season is 70 plus the 8 in the current season. But I'm not going to go through all 15 sites and figure that out for each.
I did notice that Nubiles Unscripted hasn't updated recently and that was one of my favorites in this network. A couple of others don't have July scenes but there's still 7 days left in July, as I write this. The overall update number probably explains more than listing each site. There's 15 sites besides Nubiles.net and they update roughly 16 times a month. Most of the updating sites do 2 updates per month so I think it would be safe to say 8 of the network sites are updating.
The models at Nubiles have always been a major selling point. On Nubiles.net you get the amateur-style models and they don't cake a pound of makeup on the models. The models vary from average, plain-looking to very pretty. Nubiles Porn's models are mostly porn stars but are from the younger models unless it's a site like Mom's Teach Sex.
I like it well-enough and the content well-enough that I'm planning on rejoining once this membership runs out, to a longer-term membership just because I don't feel like I'm coming close to downloading all the content I want.
Highly recommended especially for those who like to use their imagination or those who don't insist on the scenes to be 100% authentic in what it advertises itself as.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network centered mostly around the great nubiles.net site.
- Fairly good mixture of solo, b/g, g/g, threesomes.
- Download speeds are very good and more importantly, are consistent from day to day.
- Network itself has excellent navigation, but there is a con on this one too.
- Still considers pictures to be an important part of porn and that's a big plus in my book.
- Newer picture sets can compare in technical quality to Met-Art, ALS, etc...
- There's a lot of porn on this network, but it's going to be mentioned again in the cons.
- Some interesting niches like the DriverXXX site and I really like the TeenBallerinasFucked scenes.
- I think it's a fair price through TPB/PU. The content is all exclusive.
- Update schedule is good overall, but the network and the 8 sites included, only update a couple times a week. But it's very important to note that Nubiles.net comes with this network and it updates multiple times per day.
Cons:
- Damn networks. No offense is meant, but for whatever reason, Nubiles.net has become the feeder for Nubiles Network. I'll explain it in the bottom line.
- Navigation is really good on the 8 network sites. For whatever reason (I'll probably say that a lot), nubiles.net isn't listed within the network even though it is included. This means you have to sign in each time you want to access it and the username/password is one of those randomly generated ones.
- I don't know what percentage, but I've downloaded scenes from network sites that are from Nubiles.net. They're just more focused videos, removing the 3-5 minutes strip, build-up and jumping to the sex instead. I've already got many of these scenes and I have a fast forward button.
Bottom Line:
I felt really strange about reviewing this network because I'm not scoring it higher than I will be scoring Nubiles.net. That's a problem since Nubiles.net comes with this network. Then I noticed that TBP scored Nubiles higher so I don't feel as strange about it now.
Nubiles.net needs very little introduction. It's one of the best teen porn sites ever. We can all find faults with it at times, but if you're looking for cute, teen girls doing porn, it's probably the most consistent site you'll find. This network it is now a part of is a good idea. My biggest complaint with Nubiles has always been based around the scenes being too similar. This network allows them to add more niches and themes.
First problem, much like other networks, there are sites here that have just stopped updating. It makes me feel like these networks are just chasing the newest trend in porn. I remember casting sites being very popular a little while back and there's one on this network, but it hasn't updated since December 2015. The interesting and intriguing DriverXXX site is also on this network, but it hasn't updated since December 2015. I live near a big tourist area in the Appalachian Mountains. We go up there every few months and it reminds me of porn networks. They'll be building the newest, hottest trend themed park. We'll go back and they'll be building something else, completely giving up and forgetting the once hottest trend.
Just like those two sites no longer updating, they're now updating stepsiblingscaught and teacherfucksteens, two of the more popular genres in porn these days.
Can't complain about the technical quality. Scenes from 2008 and on have 720p option and 1080p option since 2012. I've said before their videos are some of the clearest, smoothest, I've seen, but you should know the 1080p newer ones can be very large. I've seen as high as close to 3 GB for one scene. Their pictures are real standouts. They have downloads in 3 different sizes with the biggest size being in the 5600 long end range.
So, why score Nubiles.net higher than Nubiles.net's network? Less hassle. When I sign in to Nubiles-Porn which is a hub for the network, there's 8 sites listed at the top. Each of those sites can be accessed with a click. No need to login again either. There's a problem. Nubiles.net isn't up there in the toolbar. You can find it over in a dropdown box and you have to sign back in to access it. I got over that. After downloading many new Nubiles.net scenes, I decided to download some of the network site scenes. My apologies to those who had posted a comment about this problem. I join Nubiles without looking at comments. This is my 23rd time as a member in the last 8 years.
So I see a scene on the network's hub page that looks good. Download it. Start watching it. I've seen it before. It's a scene from Nubiles.net with the stripping removed, straight to the sex. Now see, I got over the signing back in part and Nubiles.net not being listed in the toolbar, but edited Nubiles.net scenes? That throws a monkeywrench into my organizing of scenes.
I'll stop what's turning into a negative rant. The site/network is still very good, but I found myself going to the Nubiles.net site and not fooling with the network. I don't understand why those scenes can't just be put on Nubiles.net. I enjoyed the DriverXXX scenes and really like the TeenBallerinasFucked scenes. I don't see the difference in them and anything I would normally see on Nubiles.
It's still highly recommended and if I get the time I'll post a separate review about Nubiles.net, which I will rate in the 90s.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the greatest and most consistent porn sites I have ever joined.
- Generally, very pretty or cute models.
- You can download the videos and photosets (which are the some of the best). I haven’t hit a limit.
- Good download speeds around 80% of my max.
- Navigation is close to perfect.
- CCBill is the biller.
- The numbers are so large I will have to put those in the bottom line.
- Updates more than once per day and I will have to explain that in the bottom line.
Cons:
- This is a real con to me. I don’t find a small percentage of the models that pretty or cute. One is a current model. I won’t name her.
- It’s mainly innocent amateurs. That’s not Nubiles fault. You won’t get the best performances out of some of these models.
Bottom Line:
I have a lot of extensions from the pros and cons to explain. I’m going to start with the second con. I think the first con is just subjective. The second one could be a major pro for you. It’s not a major pro for me. Some of the models are genuinely shy and innocent. You can tell it. It hurts the performances for me. I know that some love the shy and innocent models. It’s not a dealbreaker. I may be showing my age. If you’re going to be naked, why not enjoy it and show the world what a budding star you are?
The updates are hard to number. Yesterday, they had 3 updates. The day before they had 1 update. The day before that they had 2 updates. From the first of March to the eighth of March, they had 15 updates. Just below two per day. I haven’t seen a day that they didn’t have at least one. It’s possible you could complain that the updates are of the same model. I don’t see the complaint. They release 3-5 updates of one model. I would rather them do it this way.
The video resolution on the videos includes downloads at 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p and 270p. The older scenes are lower quality. This site has been around a long time. The photosets are downloadable in three sizes. The highest is near 4000 long end, the medium is 2400 long end, the small is 1200 long end. Some of their other sites have higher photo resolutions. As much as I like their photos on Nubiles.net, I would like to see those resolutions a little higher. That’s another it’s not a dealbreaker. It’s not even a con.
This site comes with Nubiles Porn and it is directly accessible with the link at the bottom of the Nubiles Porn main page. I’m glad to see they integrated it. A warning, you will be on this site for awhile and may forget your Nubiles Porn sites. Nubiles.net has over 2,600 models. That’s a big site. You see more numbers with 11,254 videos and 12,236 photosets. That’s bigger than the entire rest of Nubiles Porn combined times 10. It will remind you of Met-Art in that regard. You’re sure to find something you don’t like. It is one of the few sites that does quantity and quality. The navigation is as simple as a site of this size can have.
The part I want to talk a little more about is their tagging system. I don’t know if this is new or not. I don’t believe I would miss this. They have tags for their videos. They have tags for their photos. They have tags for Public Photosets and Public Videos. I don’t ever remember these public tags. I checked them. That picks at me. The public photo tags have scenes in the bedroom. I was ready to give bonus points for that. I’m looking at one page of 18 photosets with the public tag. My eyes see two in public. I’m wondering if those tags are connected to the model. I see mainly the same models in multiple sets. That new tag category is not accurate.
If you don’t know what Nubiles.net specializes in, it’s solo and some hardcore with a guy that I don’t even fool with. They have a hardcore tab at the top of the members area. It looks like they only update the hardcore scenes every few months. The hardcore is not a major part of the site. I always felt like the Nubiles Porn sites should be more focused on the hardcore. They have the solo part figured out. That’s if ain’t broke.
You will get a combination of teasing, stripping, giggling, blushing and masturbation. The masturbation is where you will see that most of these models are amateurs. That could be good or bad. Some of the models look like they are only that experienced masturbating in one position. There is an innocence to the scenes. You will find some pro-amateur models that are more known, and they are very good at the masturbation. The more innocent acting models are only so-so on their performances, to me and solo porn has been my favorite genre of porn since 2005. The masturbation scenes are not their strongest feature. That’s why I like the photos so much.
This site’s first update was in 2004. That Is an interesting thing to know. That was 18 years ago. That means it’s possible some of the new models weren’t even born when this site started. I was reading about Lebron James wanting to play pro basketball with his son. I have watched so much family porn that I am now wondering if a site that has been around as long as this one would consider bringing a model back from 2004 with her daughter in a split scene. That would be marketable. I used that to lead into the closing. That is something I can’t talk myself into listing as a con. Some of these models are so young and innocent acting. I believe that is either a very big pro or a potential con for people that join the site. Either way, it’s as good as you will get for teen porn. I have always said I prefer the mid-20s to mid-30s models. If you’re really into teens and younger looking and acting models, you could add some points to my score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A longtime favorite in the softcore niche, still going strong.
- 9,989 scenes, includes video and pictures.
- 2,307 models, all are teens or at least look like teens.
- Downloads are unlimited.
- 11 new models in the last week. The schedule seems to follow that pace.
- Long forgotten bonus content that I'll mention in bottom line.
- Comes with the Nubiles Porn Network, but is a strong, standalone site as well.
- Good download speeds (80% of max).
- Is one of the better values in porn, especially on the yearly deals.
- Navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I've always been between 88 - 97 on this site. The content at times does feel too repetitive and that's what I'm running into in this current membership.
- Shy and innocent can be attractive depending on the model but it can also be frustrating and feels fake with some.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those reviews where I feel bad that I've lowered it to a 90. I've been a member of Nubiles off and on for at least 10 years. It's one of the best tease, solo, masturbation sites on the internet but those types of scenes can become repetitive if the models aren't standout performers in the genre.
Technically, the site is superior to 98% of sites. While they don't have 4K videos they offer 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p and 270p. Their picture sets are comparable to the big photo sites with downloadable zips in small 1200x800, medium 2400x1600 and large 3600x2400. With an average of more than one new model per day you can see that this site really doesn't need a network with it.
I mentioned the bonus content as I had forgot it even has bonus content. One of my favorite teen tease models is one of those, Katrina18, who I think had a lot more content on her solo bonus site than it shows now but she was a very popular model years ago. They have a bonus girls section and several other videos in the bonus section. They also show Sweet Kandie and Vicky Vane as being bonus sites you receive if you stay for 2 months or more.
Their navigation helps them even more. They have over 100 tags and each tag tells you exactly how many scenes they have with the tagged action. They have separate tag lists for videos and photos. They also have public tags for videos and photos.
There's a full, easy to use model list and something you don't see as much these days, an upcoming list of models that shows their next 3 models.
They also use CCBill for their billing.
You really can't find anything wrong with any of that. The content, really it's the videos, can be very hit or miss. I have watched 4-5 videos in a row without feeling anything that sexual about them outside of them being naked and cute. I think I have defended this in the past and will here too. A lot of these models are new to the porn world or at least in their earliest days, so there is some nervousness. I think from past comments, some viewers enjoy that, others don't. I fall into the don't group as I like to see the models looking confident and enjoying themselves. The ones that are not as confident don't look like they're enjoying themselves and look like their main goal is to get finished with the scene.
They do still film some hardcore scenes and it looks like they've dropped that to once per month. I don't usually download those as it's usually an experienced male model with an inexperienced female model and that usually doesn't do anything for me.
A feature I like in their navigation is the search by month and year. It works well here, I've seen other sites try it and between wonky dropdown boxes and bad clicks, it doesn't work well. It works exactly as it should here and the advantage to this is Nubiles has had their better years. Like most porn sites there are years or months where the content just doesn't feel as strong as previous months and years.
Another favorite part is the inclusion of major future stars before they were stars. Everyone from Eve Angel to Veronica Rodriguez to Valerie Rios has content here early in their careers.
It's very good content especially for those newer to porn and because I have heard this several times, for female viewers. I believe the perceived innocence is a big attraction for female viewers.
It's still a top-tier site in its niche, one of the best even but I just found myself a little bored with the content. I could also mention there's not a lot of variety in the races of the models which might hurt my enjoyment of it since I do like a variation in models. I would compare that to me not being as positive about ALS Scan as I used to be for the same reason. For most everyone else this is a site you should join at least once and give it a try as it's easy to use, easy to find what you're looking for and you're going to see a lot of naked, innocent, young women.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the biggest, best, longest-running teen sites on the internet.
- Going to put this in because it's rare these days, very responsive webmaster who helps with any and everything you ask.
- Very good quality videos and photo sets.
- TBP/PU price is good, especially if you've never been a member.
- Four updates per day, two videos and two picture sets. Can't beat that these days.
- Over 1,700 models. Will mention there's lots of eventual hardcore models who shot softer sets here on Nubiles in the beginning of their careers.
- They seem to be tinkering with the idea of becoming a network, though I actually rate this site Nubiles.net better than the network and it includes this site.
- Search engine on site is comprehensive and I believe it's very accurate based on my years of collecting Nubiles videos.
- Download speeds are very good (7.2 MB/sec), I can reach a little over 8 MB/sec, but many sites won't even reach 5 MB/sec.
- Navigation works well (See bottom line)
Cons:
- I know I never would have believed this, but seeing pretty young women getting naked then masturbating or having sex with another girl or even guy can become repetitive.
- You'll run into some naming/alias issues with some of the Euro models, but that's pretty common.
I reached on those two. Crickets are now out.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying this is one of the sites that once made me say, "I think they have a hot teen factory in their studio." I don't know how they do it, but it's as if Nubiles just churns out hot teens everyday. I have a lot of single male friends! Where do they get these young women?
I've had a long-running complaint with nearly every site that has Euro models from the mid-2000s forward. I'm obsessive about my filing of model content. Like every other site featuring these models, there's some odd names/aliases. I will say Nubiles has gotten a lot better about this one.
My other complaint is one I'm sure they've heard before. Sometimes the scenes lack passion or believable interest from the model. The scenes being in similar locations and doing similar actions, only leads to more problems with it becoming repetitive, but ...
In their defense, many of these models are shooting their first porn scenes or are in the very early stages of their career. It's a trade-off I think we have to accept as porn users. The girls show genuine shyness. To some that might make the scenes even hotter, but to some it's going to make the scene not as hot as we thought it would be. It's a fine-line and I've chose not to take off points for it this time.
What you do get is a staggering collection of young women, teasing, naked, masturbating. There's some girl/girl scenes and boy/girl scenes, but I mostly like the solo scenes. It's hard for me to even comprehend "over 1700 models". Most of you know I'm one of those numbers people. That 1,700 models number means if you wanted to you could see a new model everyday for 4.5 years. I ran out of characters in the pros, but I'll add it here, all this content is exclusive too.
I reviewed the Nubiles Porn network a month or so ago and didn't like it as good as Nubiles.net, even though Nubiles.net is included with it. I just didn't like the slight navigational differences. The network has a new, cleaner navigational interface so it makes Nubiles.net feel outdated. I've always had trouble deciding how important one aspect of porn sites is in comparison to a different aspect.
I feel comfortable after reviewing over 250 sites to say the same thing I said way back in 2008, "The models and content makes a site". That's why I scored the network lower. It has good content, good models, but I see no use for it. I don't want to turn this into a business rant, but my general way of thinking was, "Why not spend that money on upgrading on Nubiles.net?" That's why I'm not a webmaster. I'm also in no position to question Nubiles webmaster. He's one of the best and has been for years. I think he moved up into a class by himself when Shap sold Twistys.
The bonus sites included with Nubiles.net are the very sites that comprise the Nubiles Porn network. They are scenes with a common theme. Most of which were obviously created to break the formulaic style of Nubiles.net. I can appreciate it and like all of the content.
Nubiles.net has four updates per day. It's nearly unheard of in 2016. Their picture sets are excellent in quality, always start with the model dressed, strip down, to spreading their legs fully nude. The videos are your standard young woman gets naked, teases a little, then masturbates. Formulaic? Sure. But it works. I'm starting to think our complaining about the scenes being too similar might turn into a "don't fix what isn't broke" situation. I'm not saying the network will cause Nubiles to fail, but I've seen it happen with other top-tier sites that try the network route.
Despite preferring the network's navigation, I don't think Nubiles is at all bad. The search engine alone is worth a few visits just to see how many combinations you can come up with. There are 15 attributes (age, boob size) you can choose from. There are 15 outfits (thong, skirt) to choose from. There are 9 actions (Sybian, lesbian) to choose from and finally 3 environments to choose from. There's even a button to select "girls only" to remove any scenes with males in them. There's an alphabetical model list. An option to pick what the most sexual action the model does (topless to sex).
So, why am I still holding out on a perfect 100 rating? Personal preferences. I do like curvy models. There's not many here and I don't think curvy is Nubiles audience so it's understandable. If you don't mind that you'll be very happy with this site. It's a little like Met-Art, but more sexual. It's a little like Twistys, but has more character and less glam. And it's a lot like Nubiles from 10 years ago. Even when I felt I had valid complaints in previous reviews, it's been in my top sites. And that's because of the content and quality of models. They're consistently very good as long as you're able to see around the shyness of some of the models and able to realize you're watching a young woman get naked on camera for one of the very first times in her career.
Thanks Captain, I like the sound of the Nubiles + SapphicErotica deal too. I haven't been a member on SapphicErotica in years and it used to be one of my favorite sites.
I haven't been seeing as many combo offers from Nubiles in my email inbox lately.
I've been waiting for that Nubiles + Anilos offer that Nubiles webmaster talked about trying to do in the future. Anyone seen that one or if their webmaster is around, any news on when that combo will be available?
What does 20 years older matter? More importantly, what is the purpose of any of these posts you've made? You say it isn't a defense, but when you say that a webmaster "isn't perfect" and say he was "tricked", that looks very much like a defense to me. The worst part, I've reviewed around 170 sites on here and have Nubiles around the top 10. Do you think the Captain would be happy with a friend of his possibly pushing longtime customers away from his site? You also had a problem with something Denner said about Nubiles. I end up with the feeling that if the Captain is offended or upset with something we've said, he should be here discussing it with us. See, you've cast a negative vibe towards him now.
The alias lists and explanation are not needed. The reason for the different aliases would be a better discussion. As sites try to re-name a model to promote her as new or exclusive to their site. The majority of those aliases you list were used once and have now been merged in with the more commonly known name of the model. It happens early in the model's career, once a name has been established or sticks with the model, the other aliases merge together or the more commonly known name is listed in parenthesis.
Still, I have no idea why this discussion is even happening.
No need in defending Nubiles or their webmaster. The comment I made was not based in criticism, it was a tip for fellow members who like Cindy/Klaudia, since they may have missed her other content. Those different aliases aren't mistakes. And there are more on Nubiles than the ones you mentioned. Jujana on Nubiles has never used that name except on Nubiles, her name everywhere else is Susane or Zuzanna. Alena on Nubiles has never used that name anywhere except on Nubiles, her name everywhere else is Lucky or Lucie. Andrea on Nubiles has only once used that name, using Adrienn a few times, but is much more known as Jenny Sanders. Also and maybe the worst is Dana. She is a model that I've collected for years and never seen her listed as Dana, known much more commonly as Monika Jo or just Monika or Jo.
Still, those aren't really huge mistakes as long as the thumb picture is clear. The Captain is more than welcome to reply and or use the ones I listed above as well if he feels those should be corrected, but my whole purpose is to help members find the models they are looking for, not to down the webmasters.
A fellow member here, Denner, has a thread in the forum about how to handle the different currencies being charged by some sites. I believe that he said he would send the website an email and most would give him the US Dollar rate. You could try that. Nubiles has really good customer support and a pretty nice webmaster to boot.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
