Evelyn's videos and even photos on her site were really great, much better even than some of the videos I've seen of her on other sites. I had just mentioned to Messmer that Eve as well, really gave her all in her videos on her site, more so than her videos on other sites. I just hate that Eve's site has gone down so badly and can't wait for that new DDF solo site of Eve to open. Though I am starting to be skeptical of it since I first about it back in March and here it is May and they are still showing the Coming Soon splash page.
You know, I had completely missed Bambi, think it was the hair color change that threw me off, but have picked up a bunch of sets of her from the 21st Sextury sites and I was surprised at how good her content is. The little UK model Sasha/Sara also is quite good solo, mainly because of her dirty mouth ha ha. I have always believed that models like Eve and Evelyn, both could be super models if taller, are much more comfortable by themselves or in Eve's case, with another woman than man. I remember saying one time before that Eve does more with her fingers than most models do with a male model! I picked up an Eve video, believe it is from Digital Desires, but not positive on that. It is almost true POV, a guy holding the camera very close. Believe it is called, "Sex with Eve". She purrs at one point, with a grin on her face and eyes closed, "It is cumming". Broken English be damned! That was one of the hottest moments I've ever seen of her since she rarely speaks in English.
Don't worry too much about forgetting if you replied to that thread, I had the same concerns when I asked since if you did reply to it, that would mean I forgot if you replied or not!
I am making more comments than reviews these days. It is hard to believe that I only have 17 reviews since October 2008, which means I had 142 before then. I had been averaging around 12 reviews per month, now I've been reduced to not quite 3 per month.
My problem, and Drooler has talked about this too, it could also be what you are running into is that I know exactly what I want and expect from a site. I can join a new site and within 2 hours can tell you whether I love it or hate it.
Then I run into a member like GCode and he is just now getting into the Euro models and I find myself thinking I should review more based on the technical, numbers, part of the site, and like with you, my frustration with the same ol', same ol' tries to creep in and tell me to ignore those HD videos.
I've felt this way about one site especially and that is Brazzers. I joined it in January, believe it was my 5th time over the years and I honestly signed in one time and didn't go back. Even some of my favorite actresses are becoming stale to me. Kind of feels like a bad marriage in that sense!
I really wish Eve Angel's solo site hadn't become a recycling site and dropped their TBP discount of $15. I would highly recommended it to you for the eroticism she presents on that site. Some of her content on other sites isn't nearly as good. To this day, I still watch her videos from her original site more than all other videos combined. She is just playful enough, just tease enough to make her different than the majority of models and most of all, she somehow was able to produce over 250 videos on that site of her having real orgasms, the last few months were questionable, but before that she really gave her all. I think that shows by DDF picking her up to start a new solo site, which I check 2-3 times a day to see if it is open yet ha ha!
Messmer, I wonder if you replied to or read my thread awhile back about re-review dilemmas? The further I go into porn, the years pass, and many of the sites that I have scored high in the past, wouldn't be as high now simply because it is all the same as it was 2 years ago. That thread was about the dilemma I was in, in my re-reviews because I could review them from a pure technical view, saying they have X amount of content, high resolution videos, etc...
Or should I start adding a more personal feeling that this or that site just doesn't do anything for me anymore. I couldn't figure out what was the right way to go about that since I felt like those reading my reviews may or may not think 300th straight facial was boring, and that is why re-reviews or even reviews have become much harder for me to do.
My point being, I agree that the b/g scenes these days are downright boring. I would guess it is the biggest reason that I prefer solo. Not to overhype my favorite model, but Eve Angel and her fingers or dildo is more erotic than 99.9% of hardcore on the internet. She has the full tease, strip, eye contact with the camera, tongue licking her lips and her masturbation causes her to have full body jerks and spasms.
Great first review Monty, this is also one of my favorite network sites and the glasses was my original attraction to the network. I also preferred this network to the comparable ones since they weren't stuck on the big fake boobs models only. I've noticed that to get good lesbian content, you just about have to go to a lesbian only site, some of the DVD sites also won't post many lesbian clips since their members aren't as interested.
I don't know about solo content, I don't think there is any, from what I remember from a few months ago. There is lesbian content though, it is scattered throughout the network. I know there is some on the "My First Sex Teacher" which is a MILF site where the MILF teaches a younger woman about lesbian sex, not the whole site, but there is some. Also, there was at least a few on the Naughty Athletics site that is included, mostly girls in showers together and in locker rooms.
If I were to put an estimation, just based on memory, I would say maybe 15% is lesbian content, if lucky, might be closer to 10%. Still don't remember any solo content though.
Funny story, I just re-joined Naughty America a few days ago. I really think you all are doing a great job, unlike other sites that are raising prices and putting download limits on the members. I will do a follow-up review in a few weeks that will reflect my latest time as a member. Of course, if you were to send Angelina Valentine or Gianna Lynn to my house while my wife was out shopping...just kidding around, Angelina is incredible though!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Really nice network with somewhat original material, all exclusive as well.
- Has now combined Tier 1 and Tier 2 sites for $24.95, excellent value
- Quality from site to site varies, but most of it is well above average
- Plenty of Latina action for those who love the Latinas
- Download speeds on 10M connection are in the 950-1100 kb/s range, which is just a little above average.
Cons:
- The varying quality from site to site, a few of the sites, the older movies are split into parts.
- The ever-annoying have to sign in on each site the first time you visit
- Usually won't let you download more than 2 clips at a time.
- I'm nitpicking here, would like a model directory that covers entire network
Bottom Line:
This may be a negative for some, but I like the very basic website design. You go onto the site you want, the episodes come up on a page, you scroll down until you see one you like. Click it, from there you can look at the pictures or download in zip file, then download the movie. A vast majority, I'm taking over 75% are available in full length WMV and/or MPEG versions. Which isn't a big deal by format, just use VLC or WMP Classic.
The movies I have downloaded, a new one, Eva Angelina, on My Sister's Hot Friend is 2000kbps bitrate and 720x540 in resolution. An older one I checked was a Daisy Marie clip on My Naughty Latina Maid, 1100kbps and 320x240 in resolution. Which isn't very good in resolution, but the 1100 speed at least makes it average in full screen mode.
With the basic design, which I would call a "clean" design, it has really no room for navigation problems, no clutter either. That part of the site is a definite thumbs up. I like simple and easy. Kind of like Eva Angelina!
The women on all of their sites, are top shelf quality, from the seductive Sativa Rose to the good girl gone bad looks of Eva Angelina. I'm really happy I joined this because I thought it was one of the smack the woman's face, spit in her mouth networks, but I was wrong. No DL limit either. It says they have some class, and I would agree. I Will review a few sites separately. This network lowers my opinion of Reality Kings, a little. High recommendation!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Geeky, nerdy, librarian, teacher-type porn.
- Very large site with 556 scenes on it.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Nearly 500 models.
- Bills through Epoch.
- Remastered updates are bringing life to some of their oldest and best scenes.
Cons:
- The new updates stopped in 2017 but they have released remastered scenes since then.
- They don’t do the best job of meeting the niche.
- The downside of being a site that’s been around a long time. The oldest scenes are far below the newer scenes in technical quality.
Bottom Line:
I think this is one of the most common niches in porn. They do switch it up some. It’s not always an older male teacher with a younger female student. They have some older female teachers with younger guys. There are some scenes that are supposed to be two bookworks/nerds and they could both be older or they both could be younger. The part that doesn’t change much is the scenes are filmed in a classroom setting.
As much as I like the remasters they can make a porn collector like me get over-excited like seeing a “new” update from Gracie Glam, then realizing it’s a remastered version of her 2005 scene. I thought, “She hasn’t aged a bit”.
The production values on this site could be higher than they are. Nearly every scene features sex on the teacher’s desk. They at least do have multiple classroom sets so it doesn’t look like every scene is filmed in the same classroom. The stories in the scenes are mostly the same. Student does something bad, stays after class, the teacher spanks her then bends her across his desk. I do think there is a positive to this site. The outfits. The attitudes. The women usually have on something like a schoolgirl outfit and their attitudes vary between bratty to more horny than the teacher. It’s a lot like the site Innocent High except the women on this site don’t wear the same outfit like they do on Innocent High.
They have 556 scenes with all scenes between 2014-2017 having a 4K download option along with 1080p and 720p. The pictures could be better quality and some don’t even have a zip download option. It’s an older site but in this day and age of cookie-cutter porn, it’s sometimes better to go back and find good old scenes, especially when they’re remastered to 1080p or 720p quality.
For this genre, it’s a good site and I think most fans of the genre would be happy with it. There are some big name models on here too. One of the new remasters is the Alexis Texas scene and Amia Miley has a very good scene on this site. The remasters are a selling point to me since they are remastering their best and most popular scenes first. Good site on an even better network.
One thing I wanted to mention on this bonus site of the Naughty America network is that the TBP review has 19 videos listed of 6-26-07, well, as of today, October 29th, they have 19 videos on the site. Some are listed as being released this month. Yeah, kind of fudging a little there. I would imagine this site didn't take off as well as planned, and it seems to be one they put a lot of money into with stage props and trying to create plots to the episodes. Overall, the women are great, especially if you are just there for the sex. Including the lovely, freaky, Rebecca Linares. Nice bonus site, but there is no way this site could stand on its own. Just for the site alone, it might be worth $5, as the quality 720x540 is nice on all 19 videos, and the women are sexy.
I agree on this. The set that intrigued me about Sandy is on ALS Angels, then when I saw her on Twistys, a bell went off on in my head that she would probably start slowing on her solo site. I've noticed that nearly all the successful solo girl sites are models who have already done lots of work on other sites before starting their own.
I know one thing, Eve must be the hardest working woman in porn. In July, 30 out of 31 updates are of Eve on her site. On the other hand and to keep it on topic of solo sites, Eve has started working in two part pic sets on two different days, first time I've seen her do that, though part 1 that came out yesterday has 150 or so pics in it, and is a very interesting/different setting for her, outdoors by small waterfalls, looks to be in the wilderness somewhere.
Sandy reminds me of when Amy Reid first started in porn. Became very popular right from the start, now Amy finds herself in hardcore porn just a few years later after.
Hey, do you think it could have anything to do with her possibly going deeper into porn? She has had some really amazing sets on Twistys over the last few weeks as the Twistys Treat of the Month. I remember when Amy Reid used her status as Twistys Treat of the Month to go into hardcore porn. Sandy has 4 or 5 pic sets this month on Twistys and 4 videos, the videos are some of the best I've seen of her. She is very much into the masturbation. If you haven't seen it, check out Twistys tour, I'm pretty sure that you can at least see the sets in preview and maybe even download trailers.
I've been considering joining this site, but now think I may hold off another month or so. The amount of content wouldn't be too bad if they were updating more, but I had seen another review that said updates are not very consistent on the site. I know she has been on Twisty's, but I don't remember if she had any videos on it. Thanks for the honest review!
A model I had found on a very few sites, Sasha Bleu, seems to go by several variations of aliases, all starting with Sasha. I've seen several preview sets of her that have this Naughty Mag watermark on them. I'm not real familiar with the Score Group except that I know they usually are focused on big boobs. TBP review looks pretty good on it, but no recent reviews or comments, so I'm just curious if anyone has tried it recently. Not being a huge fan of big boobs, I don't know if it's worth a membership just to get the Sasha content or not.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Sex in the office, what’s better than that?
- Very large site for such a small niche.
- 773 scenes as of 11/3/2020.
- The clothing fetishists know office sex means upskirts, downblouses, hose, stockings.
- The site is updating with a mix of VR scenes, remasters and a few other newer standard scenes.
- Very good download speeds (85% of max)
- Uses Epoch as biller and has a good 3 month offer here on PU.
- Very good photo sets that are downloadable and are good since they show pre-sex teasing and show off the clothing.
Cons:
- The wasted VR scenes. I don’t understand why sites throw in VR scenes without a non-VR version. I can’t watch the VR scenes. The fisheye camera view reminds me of porn from 15 years ago.
- It must be an advertising office the scenes are shot in since they have a lot of ads on the site.
Bottom Line:
Some of my favorite sites are ones of women wearing office or professional clothing. It’s even better if they tease while wearing those clothes. They do that on this site. It’s not the level of tease you would expect from a tease site but there’s enough of it to give the site some depth. It needs it like any office sex site. There’s not a lot of reason for the sex other than not wasting those cameras.
This is one of the biggest office sex sites I have been on. They have 773 scenes, of those scenes, dating all the way back to 2014, they have 4K available for download. They also offer 1080p, 720p and 480p downloads. At one time this site was updating weekly with a new 4K scene. I’m not going to get over the VR part. They have a scene I would like to keep of Abella Danger but it’s VR and that bouncing ass of hers makes me motion sick in VR. They tell you how to view the VR scenes (if you don’t have a VR headset) with something you can download but I’m not wasting my time on gimmicky shit.
The pictures at least make up for those wasted VR scenes. In the newest scene featuring Khloe Kapri the photoset is a good example of why I see them as a major pro. The resolution could be better but it’s not terrible at 2500 long end and the first 30 photos are of Khloe teasing, stripping, starting at photo 31 the guy enters the photos.
I will share the same tip I did on another site from this network. If you can’t find the downloads they are in the “more info” box. I am almost positive we had someone posting about the network (Naughty America) no longer having downloads and I would bet anything they didn’t realize the downloads are hidden in the more info box. When you click a scene the streaming player comes up and there’s no clear “download” section. I did take a few points off for the combination of a lot of large ads in the members area while the downloads are tucked out of the way. That’s an unusual way to go about using your website space.
The models on this site are more in the 25-35 year old age range which also helps the site in my eyes.
You could fill your office sex folder with just scenes from here and be satisfied. The remasters are worth looking into. They have a remaster of a scene I remember featuring the very sexy Jayna Oso having anal sex in her office. The search feature works pretty well on the site as long as you know what you’re looking for. The different sites are found by typing the name in the search box, otherwise, you have to dig through all the new scenes to find ones you’re specifically looking for.
As a whole, I think Naughty America is one of the best networks but it’s not perfect. This site is a good example of the type of porn they are good at filming. There are good production values with some of the scenes even being in front of floor to ceiling windows. The offices look real and I think they are. These do not look like office sets or props. It’s one of the biggest and best office porn sites.
I don't think there is a huge improvement in pictures, the hi-res are 610x1000 or vice versa depending on the shot. For me, I am more into this site for the movies, but the pictures definitely aren't bad. They just won't make you think of Met Art's high quality pictures. The picture downloads as a zip are around 10 MB. I have downloaded each of the picture sets for the movies I have downloaded.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Sexy pornstars playing like secretaries, some are even believable!
- Part of the Naughty America network
- Videos vary, best quality is in the last 35 clips, 720x540 on those
- Pictures are pretty nice quality and are in zips...see con
- I have the dress clothes/glasses fetish, so this site really gets a plus there from me!
Cons:
- Older sets have no pictures
- Older movies are available in MPEG 320x240, as the highest.
- Trying to figure out why none of these women work in my office!
- Nitpicking, site design could be jazzed up a little, but I personally like the basic navigation.
Bottom Line:
I have had this discussion with Snowdude about the believability of the glasses/nerdy sites. My fetish is more about the dress clothes, kind of a librarian look. Maybe this isn't a real believable site, but most of these models could easily be a secretary! I'd hire any of them!
This is a fun site that, the women are of course the man's secretary, they get him his coffee and offer him sex, whatever happened to donuts? The quality on about 1/4th of the videos is very high, 720x540 and 2000+ bitrate, the rest are the 320x240 resolution, 1000 bitrate, MPEGS.
The pictures are surprisingly good, nice quality and they use the right shots for the most part. I'm not experiencing any slowdown on downloads or on navigating the site. If anything, for me, it is running above average. Just like their other sites there are plenty of well known pornstars on this one too. A good portion are Latina and are on their other sites as well.
My biggest complaint with all of their sites is that they don't have a way to put name in and find the content of a particular actress. That is a very minor quibble on my part. I would imagine that some really would be let down by the site design, it comes off as 90ish. Don't let that stop you from joining, easy navigation is the reward for a plain site, no DL limit, the only problem I have found in downloading is that you can't connect to more than 2 movies at a time to download. This one could get me for a month, by itself. Highly recommended.
Did you get the whole Brazzers network with it? Are all the sites pretty high quality if you did? I had seen where Eva Angelina has a lot of content on their network and might join.
Nayara Blue, even her name sounds sexy. I joined her site despite the high price $30 and low amount of content just because I find her that attractive.
I should have read the TBP review first. I get on the site to find out the pictures are 1000 at max on the high end and they don't come in zips. The movies are split into sections too. Out of boredom, maybe frustration, I went ahead and downloaded all of the videos and pieced together some of the picture sets to make one big folder of pictures.
So, I thought the videos would at least make up for it, but no. Seems Nayara doesn't understand the art of being a solo model. I'm not going to write a full review about it. The only way I would recommend this site is if they put zips in. And even then $30 for pictures would be pushing it. Just can't say much positive about the site except Nayara is sexy.
Besides TBP not doing business with this company, I can say I won't be anymore. I joined it from an email promo and had to jump through hoops to cancel. I really don't remember being a past member, but that's what the promo email said. If I was a past member I hadn't kept any of their content and can say with confidence that I probably won't keep more than 4-5 scenes max from this recent join.
I know this looks to be the same page you listed, but this one has "cancel" in the url instead of "member". http://www.untbill.com/cancel.html
A few other tips. Do not copy and paste your user id and password in. It seems some sites put a space at the first or end of the user id or password if copy/pasted and causes the word(s) to be wrong.
If that doesn't work you could always try Epoch, NetCash and Segpay's sites by trying to cancel through them. At worst, it will be a waste of a few minutes. If this still isn't working, do the lost password feature and change your password. Then try to cancel with the new password. If none of this works, I would put their number on my phone and call them as often as possible. If after a few days you're not getting through, I would then resort to calling your credit/debit card and telling them you signed up for a recurring membership (don't have to tell them to a porn site if you don't want) and tell them the site isn't letting you cancel. They should be able to do something to stop another charge from these sites.
Agree 100%, I married a woman who was a bookworm, a very sexy bookworm, but she never was a cheerleader or anything like that. I remember a friend telling me when I married her, "Well, you do have to have someone to talk to other 90% of the day that you aren't having sex". I think a big part of my attraction to Aria is that she was supposedly such a geek in school. As a Psychologist, I can easily recommend those shy, sweet, types because they have years of sexual energy built up! I might check this site out. The Naughty Bookworms isn't very believable, especially when they have Eva Angelina, and I know for a fact that she was not a bookworm in school!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Many amateur models looking for their big break
- One new video/model per week
- Download speeds are good (80% my max)
- Navigation is good enough considering the large size of the site
- Models of all races and body types and all are attractive
- Around 1,200 models
Cons:
- A big con, no pictures and of course, no picture zips
- You used to receive more bonus sites with this membership. Now, you only receive Casting Couch - HD.
- One new video/model per week is good enough but it would be a lot better if that included a photoset
Bottom Line:
Casting porn is one of the easiest forms of hardcore porn for newcomers to get into. That is essentially what Net Video Girls is. A casting pornsite, but the same company that owns it also owns Casting Couch - HD and at one time included access to Backroom Casting Couch, Exploited College Girls and Black Ambush. That was one of those networks that was almost too good to be true and well, they broke it up into two sites or networks. I don’t know why and don’t need to know why. I just know this was a much better value and deal when all the sites were included.
These types of casting sites are filming with their hands tied … so to speak. These casting scenes almost always need to show the female as innocent but horny and desperate for money to make the scenes seem realistic. I don’t know how much, if any, that hampers the performance by the ladies. It makes joining this site a hit or miss, mixed bag. It seems like every model I am really attracted to, has a terrible or average at best, performance. That’s not the site’s fault, I don’t think, but when you’re only getting one new video a week, a dud really hurts the site. It’s why I would have pictures available and downloadable. Pictures aren’t as easy to mess up in as videos.
Even saying that and missing those other sites that used to come with Net Video Girls, this is still a good to very good site. It helps that I don’t join it more than once a year. That balances out the dud videos/models. I get 52 new ones to offset any poor performances.
They do a good job of presenting the models as amateurs. The clothing choices are trendy for the time period the scenes are filmed in. It isn’t a site that is heavy on the makeup. The scenes need very little description. The woman talks a little, she tries to usually convince the camera of her innocence. The sex is predictable and I think it has to be. These are auditions. Each position receives X amount of time.
I do give them credit for their models. I like seeing the different body types, races and they have a good blend. It’s interesting to see if the different body size models react differently to certain positions. The one thing that’s not interesting is wondering if the model is going to be willing to accept the offer she receives. You already know the answer. That is one of the weaknesses of casting sites.
It’s a good site that can be and has been available in a bigger and better package deal.
I enjoyed this network quite a bit. Overall, I liked most all of the content. I think I had Exploited College Girls mixed up with So Cal Coeds from the Naughty America network. I've developed an interest in the casting sites. I at least didn't give up on NVG and just started naming the scenes with numbers. I think there's a lot of lazy webmasters/programmers out there.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
