Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Was recommened by a Sex Psychologist friend, highly erotic site
- Nearly 800 videos, res is good over 600 on high end, but bitrate is a bit jumpy at 700k on my machine.
- Videos are downloadable in full scenes
- Real women, not models, most are average to above average in looks which is important (will explain)
- Definitely real, probably the most realistic porn site on the internet that I have seen
Cons:
- No photos
- Very little nudity (will explain in BL)
- Average girls can become boring to look at, especially for $30 a month
- Borders on mind-numbingly repititive, get the feeling of seen one, seen them all.
- Sometimes tries to become very artsy with the settings, lighting, example white lace wrapped around the women in a very dark room.
Bottom Line:
A Sex Psychologist, or Therapist for you Politically Correct types that believe the Sex Organs have not a brain of their own, recommended this site to me as a highly erotic site.
The first thing you should know is that the majority of these videos do not show much more than breasts and some don't even show that. Instead, the focus is on the woman's face as she masturbates. The moans are excellent if you like to hear the moaning, racing breathing patterns, this is erotic. But the effect wore off very fast for me. After 3 videos I was saying, "Come on camera, move down".
The women look to range in age from 18 to probably mid-30s. Most are pretty enough or cute enough. But lets face it, not all pretty women make the most desirable faces during masturbation and especially in orgasm. If I could ever recommend anything to the webmaster it would be to make the last 30 seconds more of a full body shot even if at a distance. The body shaking, full body orgasms are not on here since you can't see the whole body. In my opinion this detracts a great deal from the erotic nature of the videos.
Video quality is about all there is to comment on, the resolution is very good, but that bitrate on a high end computer is stuttering a little. Which you can imagine hurts the erotic nature as well. This isn't Eve Angel or Sophie Moone quality masturbation, but it does have a place for those who maybe want to see something different and original. Recommended for those people only!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It doesn't look like a network hub, but it is and it gives a better deal than the network it's on (see bottom line, this is going to get confusing).
- 3,444 videos on just Idols 69.
- Most of the best Japanese fetishes are at least represented here.
- Very good navigation from switching to site to site with one click and not having to sign in on each site to having around 60 categories and over 100 tags.
- Vendo is the biller and they've moved up to the CCBill and Epoch level of good billers.
- Idols 69 has some of Japan's prettiest models.
- Good download speeds (80% of max) and no download limits.
Cons:
- No subtitles.
- Video quality is limited to the DVD source they are taken from.
- Censoring, this is not a con for me, but will be for others.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to start out with the pro that said it would be confusing to explain. Idols 69, years ago, was a standalone site. It was the site you joined to see Maria Ozawa as they have 20 videos of her. All Japanese Pass then launched a few years later and they used to have Idols 69 included with it. The TBP review still lists Idols 69 as coming with the All Japanese Pass. Since my membership was expiring with All-Japanese Pass, I decided to join Idols 69 (it includes all the sites All-Japanese Pass has too).
An easy way to see that Idols 69 is no longer included with All-Japanese Pass is to look at the total network scenes. All-Japanese Pass has 12,931 scenes. Idols 69 and its network has 16,619. If you subtract those you get 3,688 less scenes with the All-Japanese Pass. Idols 69 shows it having 3,444, so that's where the majority of the missing scenes are.
The rest of the included sites are the same as All-Japanese Pass. I'm just going to focus the rest of this review on the Idols 69 content.
The big con most will find is the video quality. It's a questionable con for me just because this content is mostly better than the newer content coming out of Japan. It's not unlike American porn. The older scenes (10 years ago), are more creative, sometimes they are just plain dumb and more importantly, you get the beautiful AV Idol models. I can deal with lesser resolution. It's like choosing between a $100,000 sports car with no engine and nowhere to put an engine and a $25,000 car that will drive for decades. My reviews have been missing analogies. I'm a bit rusty.
Idols 69 covers all the bases with solo, male/female, group and of course, wacky, like the producer that got the bright idea to give a model an ice cream to masturbate with. It was hard to start. The originally draw for me to Idols 69 was Maria Ozawa, but it also has a lot of masturbation scenes. Masturbation and lesbian scenes are not as common in Japanese porn as American porn. My favorite "action" in porn is a female masturbating. That's where the censor/mosaic is a bonus.
Nearly all masturbation scenes start with a model in clothes, skirt, panties and they stay that way for more than 34 seconds like American porn sites do these days. The models tease themselves over their panties, they play around with the leg openings of the panties, hand down panties and this leads to the ever-elusive wet spot forming on the panties. I never claimed to be anything less than a pervert. That's erotic to me. When you consider how many solo porn sites bring out the critics saying the woman is not having an orgasm or is faking it, those wet spots could be faked but you can tell they are not. Not just from the wet spots but the nipples about to bust out of the bra.
I wasn't even into Japanese porn back when I joined Idols 69 in, I think, 2008 but I was into Idols 69.
They do have some scenes with kinkier parts. I think Japanese porn was the first porn I saw that had women rimming men. There are threesome scenes where one man is behind the woman and she's rimming a guy in front of her. There are some light "forced" scenes, like a husband holding his wife's arms while another man has sex with her.
This is one that dates my porn-using age. They have 293 photo sets on Idols 69. These are downloadable and they are some of the best picture sets online. The Japanese style of photos also varies greatly from the American style. Each set could easily be 3-4 sets. About 1/4 way through the set, the model is nude, then dressed in a new outfit and another 1/4 of the way through, she's nude again then another outfit. They could get me to join Idols 69 with zero videos. I would join it just for the photos. There's a lot of teasing in the photos. There's upskirts, panties, public, it just looks like they stopped doing the photos based on the difference in number of videos and photo sets.
I'm going to wrap up by saying I'll lower All-Japanese Pass by a couple points since joining through Idols 69 (same price) gives you everything All-Japanese Pass has and Idols 69 too. While this isn't the top of the Japanese sites, no subtitles hurts more than the video quality, in my opinion.
It still is a very good site and network especially for a newcomer to Japanese porn. It took me several years to get to the point where I, first, didn't mind the mosaic/censoring to now, where I actually prefer the censoring/mosaic. Which is why subtitles would help even more. These are mostly fun or quirky or weird scenes. Knowing what is being said would make them even better.
I've been happy with my membership to All Japanese Pass but the TBP review lists Idols69 as coming with it which is a pretty big deal. Idols69 is the highest rated TBP site in the All Japanese Pass.
If you join through Idols69 instead of All Japanese Pass you get all the same sites as All Japanese Pass AND the 3,000+ scenes on Idols69. It doesn't make much sense since both are owned by the same company and both have the same promo price here on TBP/PU. That is a major difference in the content you receive.
I even went to the Idols69 site and tried to sign in with my All Japanese Pass credentials and it said no account exists. So, if you're thinking about joining, I would recommend joining through Idols69 instead of All Japanese Pass. The bonus sites on both are really good and are the same.
I've been meaning to join a Japanese site for awhile now, but can't seem to make up my mind on which one. My main interest is Maria Ozawa and it looks like this one has a lot of her content. I guess I'm still a little timid based on the blurry thing and am wondering if this site offers the most uncensored content. It's hard to tell by the TBP reviews as it seems to annoy the TBP reviewers as well! Any of our Japanese expert users have any advice?
I think, I'm not positive on this, that Porno Dan used to be a very active member here on PU in the forum. My memory recalls the old version of "Blowpass", can't remember the old name, it was something generic sounding, being one of the sites that let PU have a huge discount (under $5) to get more reviews for their site.
Porno Dan makes me want to cheer him on. He reminds me of that guy that gave up his office job to become a porn star and producer.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An underrated site on a blowjob-focused network. Immoral Live scenes are broadcast live every 2-3 days then placed on the site for downloads.
- Over 2,000 scenes, downloadable photo sets, all 2,000+ scenes have 1080p option.
- Breaks the blowjob theme of the network, Blowpass, the scenes feature masturbation, sex, anal, a little bit of everything and some are even funny.
- 3 new updates per week. There is a counter at the top of the page telling you when the next live show is but I've never caught one live.
- One of those rare situations where one site is better than the overall network.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of my max)
- More sites need to try this live format. It really does at least remove the cookie-cutter feel.
- Navigation is excellent.
Cons:
- Doesn't include access to Adult Time, is a Gamma Entertainment network and site.
- The live filming is at 10 AM EST. You want some porn with your breakfast?
- One big ad at the bottom of the page. It's a minor complaint usually. It reloads to show a different ad. Most of them are just non-moving, regular banner ads but one is from Evil Angel. It it running in full motion and is of a woman's butthole pushing out a huge cum bubble. It's not the most visually pleasing ad.
Bottom Line:
I have been a member at Blowpass for nearly 6 months. I bought a long-term membership to it for very cheap. I think I had a typo in my Blowpass review's score. I would score it in the 87-88 range and will edit it. Immoral Live is a solid 88-90 site by itself.
I still don't understand why this isn't included in the Adult Time membership. Immoral Live is a simple site. They record the scenes live so anything can happen. You get some added humor.
What makes Blowpass and this site good is the navigation. You select the site you want and the model list, the videos, the pictures tabs only show the content from that site. Blowpass is one of the better blowjob networks but one fault I find with it is it tries to sell itself as a network. It has 4 blowjob sites on it. Why do they need 4 sites to sell the exact same theme and genre?
Anyway, Immoral Live takes your average, normal, everyday porn scene and adds the live element to it. The scenes are often long, ranging from 45 minutes to an hour and a half. It makes for some large file sizes to download. One of the newer scenes is almost 7GB for 1080p.
The pornstars are that. You won't see any amateurs or girl next door types. These are pros and that is the reason the live part is so good. I have watched dozens of scenes from Immoral Live that feature a model making a comment like, "This lube sucks. I feel all sticky." To my favorite one, "I'm not ready to orgasm, slow down!" I felt like patting the guy on the back. This site brings a realism to porn we rarely see. It might be a case of "too much content isn't a good thing". There's no way I could go through 2,000+ scenes at nearly an hour on average to find the best ones.
The photo sets to my surprise are not just screencaps. They are real photo sets. It looks like they have a photo studio set, take a hundred or so pictures of the model removing her clothes then 100 or more of the sex. Some of the photo sets are nearing 400 photos in each one.
You could complain about the amount of pro models. You're not going to likely find any new favorites unless their performances show you a different side to them.
The numbers show a little over 2,000 videos and a little over 500 photo sets.
In a rare mention of a male performer, I've always found Porno Dan to be one of the more likable male talents. He has a lot of scenes on Immoral Live and he seems to genuinely enjoy the scenes. I would guess he's in his middle age years and he's one of those male porn stars the women seem to enjoy filming with. A live site like this one is very good for his personality. I'm not going to say he is in every scene but it does seem that way.
The lighting and camerawork for a live scene is also very good. I'm surprised the site doesn't get more attention. The entire Blowpass Network only has around 4,500 scenes, so nearly half of them are coming from Immoral Live. The network is worth joining just for Immoral Live and you get another 2,000 plus blowjob scenes too. It's a good deal.
Hey Denner, was checking out my older folders from Only Cuties. The models have very little overlap with In Focus and the scenes are very similar, softcore-midcore masturbation, strip and some boy/girl. The models are the slimmer, younger style, but I always thought it was really good.
And Denner, don't forget Only Cuties, if you're looking for similar content to In Focus, since it is ran by the same company and uses the same aliases. I always liked all three of their sites, Sapphic Erotica, In Focus Girls and Only Cuties. It's almost hard to believe some of these sites have maintained a high quality and kept churning out quality updates over the years. I always thought it was funny that the parent company Final Whistle changes nearly every model's name and uses those aliases on all 3 of their sites.
What you are seeing is most likely because the sites with photo shoots and videos in the same setting and clothes are exclusive to their site. I'm not positive on how sites go about booking these models, if it is an per hour basis or per shoot basis. I know that the site ATK Premium has a lot of behind of the scenes videos that are actually pretty good about explaining how they do their shoots. The model could have say 5 outfits there, usually brought from their own closets/homes and they in turn will shoot 5 different sets, one for each outfit. I've seen Eve Angel complain several times that her members on her old site were wanting new outfits in every set. A problem for her since she had over 250 sets on that site. She was really joking about it more than anything, even saying she had started making her own clothes and jewelry since the stores didn't have anything different than what she already had.
I might be able to help in one way and that is to say don't necessarily look for sites that have 100% exclusive content. This will get you more photo sets that are in different outfits than the videos. Take a look sometime at Eve Angel's old site. Every outfit and setting had a photo set and video set. Where as on say Twistys, I don't think any of her videos have the same outfits as her picture sets on there. And they have 53 picture sets and 10 videos of her, but none are the same outfit/setting.
There is a downfall to exclusive content and it goes into cost for the site more than anything. I think the reason that Panther and I responded to the exclusive part is because we are probably using the word differently than you are. Generally speaking when you see exclusive in porn it means that the content cannot be seen on any other site. If you are still interested in Twistys, based on wanting different outfits from set to set, it could be your best bet of all sites.
Nice review GCode, just don't get those model names too embedded in your brain. This site along with its sister sites, Sapphic Erotica and Only Cuties has a very odd, different naming system than nearly all other sites. Not for sure if anyone had mentioned it, but you can usually go to euro babe index and put the name in that you know them by and they will list all of her aliases.
On the discussion of stills or photos. There are a couple of ways to tell the difference. I know this from being a member at Give Me Pink off and on for a couple of years now. They offer stills, photos and video for each set.
Here is how you can tell if it is a still or picture. Look late in the sets for the masturbation ones. If those were stills you could see a slight motion blur around the girl's hand/toy/fingers. A good site to see how this works is ALS Scan. They have the Photoshoot videos, where a videographer films while the photographer takes pictures.
These border on major boredom, though the girl will have a dildo in her, she will be sitting there, talking and laughing. Then the photographer says, "Ready" she closes her eyes and opens her mouth like she is moaning. I think this is a pretty normal practice for Euro models, same setting/outfit for pictures and videos.
Just look for the motion blur. Hope that was clear. You have a whole world of Euro models out there now!
Hey Pink Panther, yeah, I was surprised by In Focus Girls because there seemed to be such a varied scoring range from members on here. I ended up downloading almost 50 GB from In Focus, so I think I got my money's worth!
Thanks for the reminder about ALS Angels. I hadn't been there in awhile, but am a member at ALS Scan for the last 2 or 3 months and had been meaning to rejoin Angels, since I have loved all of their Eve content and do that new set as well. The only other newer content I am finding of her is on Viv Thomas' site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another extremely high quality site from the company that also runs Sapphic Erotica and Only Cuties.
- The $19.95 TBP discount is well worth it!
- Pictures can be viewed in 3 sizes, downloaded in zips, high end resolution in zips is 2000.
- Videos have several viewing options, HD WMV 1280 high end 4,000 bitrate, also has a WMV smaller resolution at 825 high end 2,000 bitrate, also has Quicktime videos and MPEG as well.
- Models range on 1 to 10 scale from 7 to 10, no uglies here
- Download speeds are right around average for me.
Cons:
- I guess you could say not enough hardcore, but I wasn't expecting any.
- Lets nitpick, model names are same as Sapphic Erotica, but different from most major Euro sites.
- A good portion of the content is filmed in the same locations.
Bottom Line:
As you can see, my cons are hardly cons, just little nitpicks. I had different feelings about joining this site. For one, they have some exclusive content of Eve Angel that I don't have, so it was inevitable that I would join eventually, and two, some of the reviews aren't as positive as I had expected.
I guess this goes into different strokes for different folks. This site has blown me away. The model selection is outstanding, Eve, Eufrat, Stracy, and from what I can see, most are all videos also have picture sets, and these are not vidcaps.
The videos are crystal clear for me, even the lower quality 825 high end are very good and clear. The 1280 ones are exceptionally clear. There have been mentions of the site doesn't seem to have a lot of content, but this isn't true.
Most of the models have at least 3 videos and 3 picture sets, Eufrat and Stracy have around 10 of each. I'm going to say there are over 500 videos and 500 picture sets.
The picture quality is very good, 2,000 high end, and really, they have the quality covered in videos and pictures, they have the quantity covered, they update with a picture set one day, video the next day. All exclusive content. Top tier models, plus some models that probably will be top tier models in the future. This really is a great site and I would recommend it to anyone who likes solo girls, there is some fetish content, fisting, peeing, g/g as well. All in all, it has quickly became a favorite of mine. Recommended!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s my most consistent highly-rated site and it does not disappoint
Six updates per month and the last few months have included lesbian scenes
Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
Tags are accurate and the site is still one of the easest to use
4K downloadable videos if you pay the premium price, I pay $34.95 and get 720p and 1080p downloads
Downloadable picture zips only included if you pay at least for the $34.95 membership
The sexiest models in porn
Cons:
It’s not difficult for me but I imagine a new user would be frustrated with the membership tiers
Knowing if anything ever happens to my In The Crack external hard drive, I’ll have to pay at least $80 to download it all again.
Bottom Line:
It’s In The Crack, in this day of mega networks and cookie cutter porn content, In The Crack continues to just do what they do best. They have a simple equation, it goes like this get a top tier looking model, make her look pretty and even down to earth, then have her show how flexible and kinky she is. Sounds like my idea of a perfect date. In The Crack isn’t going to impress you with deep, psychological plots that revolve around the same half-dozen premises you’re used to. They’re going to impress you with gorgeous women doing the most kinky poses.
It says a lot for In The Crack when I say my favorite picture sets are from In The Crack. That’s probably the last thing they are known for, but their colors, settings and the way they dress and present the models is top-notch. I’m never disappointed with any of their picture sets.
I have also never been disappointed by their model selections. White, black, Latina, Asian, they’re all great. It’s also worth mentioning, over the last few months, In The Crack has added a few lesbian sets. Their lesbian sets are often considered the best in porn and I agree.
Here is the easy way to use In The Crack, look at the top of the page and click, “Collections”. That’s how I do it. The scenes are listed in descending order from the newest to oldest. I just go through and download every scene, every photoset and there’s no hesitation. The content is that good and it’s that consistent. I guess you could call it Simplified Porn.
Of course, while the content is simple to know what to download, joining isn’t as simple. I’ll help you out again, the $34.95 tier is the lowest priced option to receive downloadable zips for the photos. That’s the one I join. You also have downloadable videos and a monthly download limit of 300GB. You can go up to $39.95 tier and will receive the 4K downloads on top of everything included at $34.95 and the $39.95 tier includes a monthly download limit of 500GB. For those that want completely unlimited and access to 4K, too, there is the $69.95 tier. It has everything included and no monthly limit.
In The Crack makes some of the most explicit and kinky masturbation porn look classy. You don’t need a plot with their content. It’s all right there on the screen. The plot is all the things your mind is thinking about doing to the model. The models even move a little slower, smoother and are somehow 100% feminine, even with something up their butt. It’s sites like In The Crack that remind me of how much I enjoy porn but sadly, In The Crack also reminds me of how overproduced and glossy the mainstream is in porn.
I have tried finding faults. I have inspected the photos in their highest quality state but no faults. Oh, there is that one lesbian video from the early years of In The Crack’s life that has the sound muted. They even point it out before you download it. It’s as good of a site as I have ever joined.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No site has flirted with 100 more than In the Crack but I have still yet to give it a 100. I think the average for In the Crack from me has been around 96 for about 12 years.
- This review is based on the In The Crack Plus membership which is $34.95/mo. It has everything I want and “need” with a membership. Bottom Line will have details.
- One of the few sites that will leave you torn between wanting a hot model and a nice vacation.
- In my opinion, the best quality photos and videos available from any site.
- Though there are lesbian scenes here and there, the majority of the site is solo content and that’s why it doesn’t get a 100 from me. Solo is my favorite. I may be a little biased. It is the best solo site on the internet.
- Fast downloads (see bottom lin
Cons:
- The tiered pricing is sure to bother some people. I admit, the first time I joined with the tiered pricing, I received the membership that doesn’t include zip downloads for pictures and was quite annoyed.
- Let’s nitpick, the site itself still looks like it did in 2012 and maybe 2007. Does that bother me? Not at all.
Bottom Line:
I have talked about the greatest compliments I can pay a site, and In the Crack has several of those distinctions. I was first a member when they were still having audio problems. The videos, the close-ups, the ways the models are presented, have all been copycatted. But none can fool me into thinking I’m looking at an In the Crack photo or video set. Take a look at their scenes. Tell me a site that has those colors in their scenes, those backdrops, those angles, those shadows, those what are they called? Women? It’s the prettiest porn site in the history of internet porn. Don’t shy away. This is not some run of the mill artsy, glam site. With all the prettiness and perfect colors, one could assume the action is safe and glam. Then you see a model do a split across a bathtub and see how many bathroom objects she can shove in herself. No hole is sacred. No emotion is either. Happiness, sexiness, arrogance maybe, and writhing, pulsating orgasms.
In the Crack hasn’t made it this long without being good at something. Count the years, over 20, and they were always at the top of the industry in quality. It's that unique, it’s that high of quality. And the models put on their best performances. I have a whole list of models that had their best performance on In the Crack. I said it in a previous review. Once you join In the Crack, you may not ever join another site.
I don’t remember when the tiered pricing started but I will say it’s not like the tiers or add-on prices that other sites use. In the Crack played it ethically and to help the potential members. Before the tiered pricing, In the Crack, was $34.95/month. They don’t do promos or coupons. They don’t need to. Their content speaks for itself. The tiered pricing was a move to help potential members. I’m sure they knew that the $34.95 price was steep to the average porn site member. They came out with the basic membership. It’s like a trial and it’s $9.95 for a full month. You can stream any of the videos in SD. You can also view the “small” resolution pictures. Not many sites do that. They’re giving people a chance to experience their content without spending $35. The next step up is a logical one, it’s called Stream. It’s $19.95 and you can stream in SD and 720p. You also can view the large pictures. The next step up was the one that got me awhile back. It’s called Standard. It lets you view all sizes of pictures; stream all sizes AND you can download the 720p videos. That’s where they got me. I didn’t realize you can’t download the pictures. The standard is $24.95. There’s something else to add to this. Starting with Standard, there are download limits. Those are listed on their site. They’re very upfront about it.
For me, since my one mistake of joining Standard, I don’t even fool with looking at the tiers. I want downloads on pictures and videos. You have to jump up to the Plus membership. It’s $34.95 the same price their site was before the tiered pricing. The Plus gets me everything I want. It has 720p and 1080p downloads. The big pictures can be downloaded in zips and it is the membership that will give the non 4K fans, the best experience. They have two more steps up, the 4K and the Ultimate. The 4K explains what it adds and it’s $39.95. The difference between 4K membership and Ultimate is the download limit. I don’t find their limits to be a problem. The Plus equals out to 300 GB per month. I usually hit about 80-150 GB per month on it. I do think the only way the limits really matter is if you have to have 4K. In that case, it’s probably best to join the Ultimate. It’s unlimited and you get 4K. The cost of it may make you decide you don’t have to have 4K. It’s $69.95/mo. If you have a fast internet connection and want 4K, I would do the Ultimate. Set aside a month per year just for In the Crack. It’s what I do.
You will see models’ prettiest content and possibly dirtiest content on this site. You don’t like pictures? Try the pictures from In the Crack. The only thing that stops the 100 is I know the price combined with tiers is just not going to set well with some people. The content itself is an easy 100. I wouldn’t even suggest them to change their tiers or price. It’s something you have to try and see for yourself that if (enter site name) is worth $19.95/mo, In the Crack is worth $34.95 or more per month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Arguably the most consistent and at this point, possibly the best non-hardcore, solo with some lesbian scenes, site on the internet.
- Updating roughly twice per week.
- CCBill is the billing processor.
- One of the better ranges of races in models. Just in the last month they've had Asian, black, Indian, Latina and white models.
- Premier models, you rarely if ever see an unattractive model on this site.
- I personally like the tiered pricing. I do the $34.95 option and am always satisfied with the content I get with it.
- Video quality is crystal clear even on 720p, photo sets are just as good. Videos go up to 4K, but you have to choose that tier to get those (costs more).
- Production values, settings, outfits, lighting, camerawork, the models performances are all top-notch.
- Navigation is excellent and very easy to use.
- Will have to explain this one in the bottom line, will call it a "hard drive of their own".
Cons:
- Some won't like the tiered memberships. I will try to explain them with examples of what you can get with them.
- Videos are in parts, this is something I've gotten used to and don't mind since there are some parts I wouldn't watch anyway.
Bottom Line:
In the Crack has consistently scored over 95 for me. I just don't know of a site that makes one great scene after another and it's something I've mentioned before, there are models here that I never paid much attention to on other sites. Their content here is much better. Ashley Fires is the best example.
The tiered pricing. The first thing to know is the first time I joined In the Crack, I want to say 2007 or 2008, it was $34.95. I don't remember if they had download limits back then or not. The $34.95 option is what I still join. It gives you all photos, view and download (small and large sizes), it gives you all video download options except 4K. The download limit with it is 10GB per hour, 30GB per day and 300GB per month.
Since the videos are split into parts, I'll use the newest Cindy Starfall, I download the 720p versions. All four parts that make up the full scene are a combined 1.1GB. That's for right at 40 minutes of video. If I went up to 1080p it would be around 2.3GB for those 4 parts.
If you're content with 720p, you can realistically download 250 or so models scenes in a month. Which goes back to the pro I call, "hard drive of their own". I have every In the Crack scene up to January 2019 that I want. I join once a year and can easily get the all of that year's scenes and stay under the download limit. I actually think I could do the 1080p versions and stay under it.
What it amounts to is if you have no In the Crack collection, you might as well take the plunge and join the unlimited for a month. It's $69.95 and you can download all you want including 4K. Their scenes date back to 2001. Once you're caught up, you can easily get by with the $34.95 membership once per year and get caught up.
The models here are not only some of the prettiest on any site they do more here, there's anal play from models that normally don't. There's very hard masturbation from models that normally don't. There are flexibility poses, sexy outfits, there's so little to complain about, I had to find two cons that other people might be bothered by.
I wouldn't call this a glam site since the actions within the site are not what you see on glam sites. But the models are typically made up very nicely and many of them look like they're about to go on a really nice date. The photo sets are a big part of my enjoyment. The Cindy Starfall photo set has around 80 pictures. Of the first 10 photos she's fully dressed, looking really cute and sexy, the next 15-20 have her sexually provocative poses with only her hose stopping you from seeing her fully nude ass and pussy, then the rest of the set she's removed the hose and eventually is fully nude and masturbating. That is a lost art in today's porn. There's posing, teasing, fully clothed, and everything that made pre-tube site "nude, nude, nude" hardcore porn, great.
They have 1,591 scenes, usually a minimum of 30-40 minutes of video in each of those and a photo set with each.
The one change that I have noticed is the scenes continue to go away from the gynecological style the site was known for in the earlier days. They still live up to their name of In the Crack with some extreme close-ups, including during masturbation but you spend more time looking at the outside of the model's orifices than than the inside of them. It's like taking a very artsy site with all the beauty those bring and deciding to suddenly make it a hardcore masturbation site.
Very few sites can pull this style off and I'm certain at this point that none have been doing it longer than In the Crack. On those tiered prices, something I always thought was a nice option for those that haven't been a member is the $9.95 option. You can view the small pictures and stream the SD versions of the videos. That's better than most sites trials and it's 30 days with no limitations on how much you stream. They also have a $24.95 option that lets you download up to the 720p versions, but you can't download the pictures. I do think the $44.95 tier is a problem. It adds 4K downloads but you still have a download limit and those files are huge. I think if you have to have 4K, you might as well join the unlimited plan. I'm completely fine and content with the 720p version and downloadable photo zips so the $34.95 one works fine for me.
They have over 1,000 models and the top models have more than one scene. I think Jynx Maze has 4 and I would rate those 4 scenes in her top 10 scenes of her entire career. Cindy Starfall is another, you could look over my reviews and see where I've mentioned her over the years. Her scenes here at In the Crack are the best of her career. They work some kind of magic there.
I'll end by saying this is one of 3 sites that I could see scoring 100. I haven't ever done that but while not perfect for everyone, they're very close to perfect for me. Highly recommended for those that love to see beautiful, naked women in their most spread open and bent over poses.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, in 2018, one of the top 3 porn sites on the internet.
- Tiered memberships let you pick your level of quality and what all you can download.
- A fair but limited "cheap" option of $9.95, will go over the options in BL.
- If you're on this site it's for the models. Few if any sites regularly, consistently come up with so many high level models.
- Picture sets here are some of the best you'll find, including the production qualities with settings, clothing, even the colors.
- Updates every 3 days, each update includes videos, pictures and streaming "mini-vids".
- Download speeds are very high for me (90% and up of my max).
- A big site considering it's mostly solo models.
- CCBill is the biller.
- I join once a year for 1-2 months and download the content that has been released since my last join. I download and keep every set.
Cons:
- The tiered membership options won't be a favorite of some. Be sure to read in the BL to avoid a mistake I made last year.
- The older content had more of the gyno-style of porn but the newer isn't as bad, though it's still "In the Crack".
Bottom Line:
When I first started reviewing porn sites, I had standards, criteria but that was 12 years ago. I'm older now and probably dumber! What I do know though, every year around the American holidays, I join In the Crack. I do that because I'm always off some of December and it let's me download more than in other months. I won't call this the best site but I will say it's one of the top 2-3.
Porn, like so many other things, has tried to adapt to the consumers wants. Not In the Crack. They are still shooting the same porn they shot in 2001. It's 90% or more solo. The models look better here than on any site. The settings on this site are better than any other site. And every scene starts with the model fully dressed in appropriate clothes. Their makeup is near perfect and natural looking. The lighting is even top-notch. The only thing I could complain about with the content is it can be gynecological. But tell me, if you were told you were going to be a beautiful models gynecologist would you or I really complain?
One of my favorite parts is ITC is generally very selective of their models. And the ones that do good have multiple sets. An example of a model that they have multiple sets of who I think is fairly popular in mainstream porn, Gina Valentina, I've looked her content up on other sites but never downloaded and kept it. Her sets on ITC are some of the best on the site. I've always mentioned sites that make the models happy and how they seem to get better performances from the models. ITC does that.
The tiered memberships can be confusing, they have 6 tiers. I'll try to separate them:
Basic, Streaming and Standard all have major restrictions. The first two have no downloads of photos or videos. Standard has no photo downloads but does offer 360p and 720p video downloads.
Plus, 4K and Ultimate offer downloads of everything with Plus being my choice ($34.95), 4K just gives 4K videos on top of the Plus options. Ultimate ($69.95) brings in the next limits. It's completely unlimited. Standard, Plus and 4K have DL Limits (hourly, daily, monthly). Years ago, that was a major no-no but I have no problem staying within the limits. I download the 720p versions of the videos, most files average 450MB. I could easily run through 10GB (Hourly limit on Plus) in 15 minutes but because I am only downloading the last year's content, I only need to average about 4 sets/models per day, about 6GB. If I had never been a member and wanted to get all the content, I would pay for the Ultimate.
This content is unique because it's solo porn that starts out with the models looking very pretty, feminine even, lady-like and ends with them shoving their fist in themselves or a huge dildo. They cover everything in-between from teasing in their clothes (upskirts, bending over) to light touching and masturbation to the more "hardcore" masturbation. They're not in a rush like most 2018 porn seems to be.
It kind of makes me feel old as I start to tell about having to walk through 12 inches of snow to get to watch nicely-paced, erotic porn.
Not only are they the best at what they do but I'm not even for sure they have much competition these days. I wouldn't compare them to FTV since this is a little more personal than FTV. It's you and the model.
Navigation is as easy as possible. Coming up with a content count is a little harder. They've been releasing roughly 10 scenes per month since 2008. Before then they released usually 1 set per month and that goes back to 2001. It's well-over 1,200 scenes.
It's worth mentioning that I did not take points off for the split videos. They, like FTV, shoot each video with an action in it, then they split the video for the next action. It does allow you to download your favorite parts that way. I really don't know if I would prefer full videos but I'm okay with the split videos now.
I kept looking for 1 point to take off and found it while working on the review. The site logs me off about every 20 minutes. How is that for nitpicking?
This is very much a premium site. I know to some it's not premium, some will even hate it because they want hardcore or they want something ITC doesn't do but for me, a person who is rarely that happy with porn sites in 2018, it's perfect because it does what it says. It does it better than anyone else does. It reminds me of when you buy a music album and you don't have to skip one or two songs. For me, they get everything right. Except logging me off every 20 minutes.
In a few weeks, I'll have all of the 2018 content downloaded from ITC and this speaks to how much I like their content, I'll still be stopping by their site monthly to see who the new models are. I don't get that with other sites. I used to but now there's only 3-4 sites that get my attention throughout the year and ITC is one. I was due a 99 and honestly can only think of one other site that I would score this high.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that doesn't do a lot of things, but does the things it does, better than any other site.
- Updates 3 times per week and the back catalog is older than 10 years.
- Feels like they're selling me a house, the locations, colors, brightness, contrast, are all exactly how I like them.
- New pricing plan, which I'll go into in the bottom line.
- In my opinion, the best photosets available.
- Videos are very good, but are sometimes gynecological.
- Every model on here looks better here than on any other site.
- 100% exclusive content.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Navigation is good as soon as you figure out "collections" means models.
Cons:
- A blunt one, it can become redundant.
- Another blunt one, some of the older videos have various problems, audio, video clarity, etc...
- Though in the pros, it has a con to it, the new pricing system
Bottom Line:
There's really not much to find wrong with In The Crack. Though I can completely understand those who don't like the extreme closeups.
It would be hard to pick out even one model who isn't worth checking out. The photosets are shot in a very realistic style, almost all sets start with the model fully clothed with plenty of clothing teases, up skirts, up shorts, panties sliding over and so on. Which is where there's a sharp contrast in the content. The later content in each set is the complete opposite. There's no teasing, it's up-close, in-your-face nudity. Fairly extreme or hardcore masturbation, if that's possible, and it's shot professionally.
This is one of the few sites I'll talk about having production values and great locations. It's like they dropped each model into a perfect environment. It's hard to believe this is a porn review. The woman's clothes often blends perfectly with the backgrounds (beaches, houses).
The new(er) pricing system allows a cheaper membership for those who don't download anything over 720p, it's $24.95/mo. and is perfect for me. Not that it's a huge difference, but I used to pay $34.95 for the site and only download the 720p versions of the videos.
They have multiple options including streaming only video, which also makes the site more accessible to those who are interested, but don't want to pay the premium price.
The main con of the site is you can and probably will get a little bored with it. It isn't because the content is boring, it's that the content is very similar from scene to scene.
The other con about audio and video issues is just based on maybe 8-12 scenes from the earliest years of the site (early 2000s).
Then there's the new pricing system's one con. It's $24.95 for 720p max download videos, BUT you cannot download the photo sets. My exact words were, "Are you fucking kidding me?" I like the photos as much, if not more than the videos, so I had to pay $10 more to receive zip downloads on the photos. That's frustrating. All of the payment options above the $24.95 price are based on being able to download larger video files.
So, if you prefer videos, but don't mind 720p resolution, the $24.95 option is a great deal. If you prefer pictures, you're going to have to pay the old regular price of $34.95. It lowered my score a bit. Still, I think they do their niche better than anyone and would recommend it to anyone.
Try the "collections" buttons, it lets you see all the models. Pretty sure it even lets you see how many sets and how each set looks from there. Never understood why they listed it as collections.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- This site continues to push the technical quality boundaries and probably has the highest production value of any site.
- Numbers will be broken down in the bottom line. The video quality is and has been at 1920x1080 for a good while. The picture quality also is an impressive 2400x1800 in "large" quality and come zipped.
- While the update frequency may not be comparable to some of the big networks, they average between 10-11 updates per month.
- The settings on this site are different from most sites you will join. From tropical locations to indoors at large houses to farms and lush fields. The outfits are also fitting of the settings. The only site I know of that goes through this much setup is ALS Scan.
- You'll be hard-pressed to find a model who isn't attractive.
- Download speeds are excellent (95% of max)
- Navigation is easy to use and also gives you the options to search by year, model name, age, nationality and location.
- Will further these in the BL.
Cons:
- Probably the only real valid con. I think there should be more pictures in the photo sets. Maybe 300 even. It's a con that's a compliment. The pictures are some of the best I've seen, but they skip a lot of the teasing seen in the videos.
- I'm still going to complain about the price, but I only join it once per year so it's not a very big complaint. I use it as my Christmas present to myself.
- This one was more frustration than anything. There was a few days where the site would open, models could be viewed, but when you clicked on a model, it wouldn't let me go into the download section. Lasted 3-4 hours each time. It only happened twice though.
Bottom Line:
This re-review started out as one of the harder ones I've done. I have mostly joined networks the past year and at first found myself frustrated with the update frequency of In The Crack. Keeping in mind, I had all the content I wanted coming into 2011's updates. It almost was enough of an initial letdown to stop me from rejoining this year, but they had 4 Jinx/Jynx Maze updates and that pushed me to join. As the subscription has went on, my respect and enjoyment from this site keeps growing. This will be slightly different than most reviews I write.
Production values of this site have made me notice production values. I wanted to bitch and gripe about the "only" 11 or so average of updates per month, but when I started looking at the sets, I realized it wouldn't be possible to make that many updates. They have settings ranging from tropical beaches to large houses to country/farm settings and the models' outfits fit the settings accordingly. When I compare this to the majority of sites I have joined in the last year where the setting is almost always the same, the outfits are almost always the same or similar at least, it made me look at this site differently.
On August 13th, 2007, ITC had their first 1920x1080 video, ironically, featuring the model August. Considering this site has been around since 2001, it may sound like half their content would be lesser quality, but it's not true. ITC's original problem was lack of updates. So for once, a lack of updates in the early years of a site's life is going to really help here. An example of this: For the year 2002, they had a total of 11 updates...for the whole year. In May of 2011, they had 13 updates just for May.
As of February 20th, 2012, they have 622 scenes. Of those, 509 have the 1920x1080 option. Those 509 have three video options, 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 640x360. The earlier 113 scenes have two video options of 640x480 and 320x240. This made me re-think complaining about updates since they are releasing 100+ updates per year now, combined with the high production value and high technical quality. Another thing I have noticed about their content is if they have a model I collect or consider a favorite, their content of her will be near or at the top of my list of her content. This is especially true of the pictures. Now I have a complaint.
If I could change one thing about this site it is that I would add more pictures to the sets. With all the time and probably money spent on the best models, settings, outfits, why not bump those picture sets up to 300 or more photos? It would flesh out the updates too.
Possible con for some and I originally listed it as a con in my last review, but I think there is a reason for this. The videos do not have a full scene download option, they are each broken into parts and the parts represent a certain action you're going to see in each part. One part is pissing, one part is stripping, one part is masturbation, one part is close-ups and you get the drift. I would guess these different actions require moving to different locations in the setting and also think it gives the members a choice of what they want to see since I know some are disgusted by pissing, even the close-ups, so you can pick and choose what you want. A full scene option would be nice, since if I like a model, I'm going to download all parts anyway, but I'm more neutral on it than calling it a pro or con.
You will occasionally get the feeling of the scenes being formulaic, but I'm thinking that's what they're going for. You're going to get what you expect from each scene. This is again where I think more photos in the sets would make an improvement.
Another thing I think could help here is more girl/girl scenes. By my count, out of the 622 scenes, they have 17 girl/girl scenes with at least one being girl/girl/girl. Their lesbian scenes are easily some of the best I've seen. I don't even think it needs to become a regular part of the site, but maybe 1 or 2 per month just to break the monotony of the formulaic solo scenes.
With all this being said, I think they suceed at creating a different and unique porn site. I would estimate after this last membership that I have around 90% of their content and have yet to delete one scene. That far outweighs giving me 1,000s of scenes that I will only keep a handful of. It's one of those that I can't recommend highly enough. I do think viewing the content with an open mind, noticing the production value, the work that is put into the sets, adds even more to its value. I still won't join more than once per year though. In a way though, maybe that's a positive too? Instead of joining every 3 months and sifting through the tons of updates, I know I'm downloading most everything new for the past year.
This has become one of my favorite sites, but I'm having a frustrating time with the staying signed in part. A few examples and how the site's quality works against the user experience.
I was downloading a couple of Emy Reyes videos. Two downloads going at a time with the browser's (Firefox) download manager. These scenes were large, one was file "assshowilikedat" which is 1.14 GB and the other was file "ohmygood" which is 1.08 GB. By the time these files were finished downloading, I clicked on the pictures to download the zip and got the message I had to be a member to see the gallery to join the site or login if already a member.
I do think they know this could be a problem since when you log back in, it takes you directly back to where you were, but because I don't download all the scenes, I have to scan across them again, open hard drive to see which I have and don't have and go from there. Also, it's not only on the largest files. Had two in the 600 MB range going and still was signed out when those finished. I'm downloading at a combined 1.7 MB/sec, so that only looks like 10-15 minutes, of no activity, before being logged out.
Is there a way to get around this? Won't really change my high opinion of the site since I have enjoyed everything I have downloaded from it, but it does seem to be a bit of a hassle.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the highest quality technical sites on the internet. Breakdown in bottom line.
- Updates started slow in 2001, but are now coming at a rate of roughly 3 per week, includes photos and videos per update.
- Several models you won't see on many other sites and some I've never seen on other sites, the positive to that, also has most of the usual stars.
- Picture sets are zipped and can be downloaded in small or large sizes.
- Plenty of tease, plenty of masturbation and plenty of close-ups.
- Locations are usually almost as beautiful as the models.
- Models, for me, are as close to 100% downloads. Very few if any models that aren't stunningly attractive.
- Navigation is good once you get the hang of it.
- Download speed hasn't been a problem am downloading at 95% of my max speed.
Cons:
- Videos are split into parts. Almost didn't put this here in cons since there is a pattern to the splits. One may be the lead-in/tease. The next pissing. The next masturbation. The splits don't so much overlap as older split videos did.
- Video quality on older sets pales in comparison to the newer videos.
- Photo sets could be bigger. Seeing that the scenes as a whole total nearly an hour on average, anything less than 100 photos seems to be shorting the photo fans.
Bottom Line:
I thought I would try to review this site a little differently than normal. The reason being, early in the site's life the updates were sporadic and the quality was okay. They've picked up the pace quite a bit while improving the technical quality a great deal.
From March 2001 to August 5, 2007 the site had a total of only 113 updates. That's less than 2 per month. The quality on these videos tops out at 640x480 and the lower quality option is 320x240.
The photos during this time ranged from 758 high end to 1800 high end.
Starting on August 13th, 2007 the videos top quality jumped to 1920x1080, there also is a 1280x720 option and a 640x360 option.
Besides the big upgrade in quality, the updates started coming more often. Since August 2007 through November 2010, there has been 367 updates or an average of roughly 10 updates per month and all have been with the 1920x1080 option.
The pictures got another boost in late 2007 to 2000 high end and later in 2008 went up to 2400 high end.
I just found that worth mentioning since not only have they increased their updates around 400%, but tripled the technical quality too. That makes the price (35 USD) not a con. It's nice to see a site changing everything for the better.
Problems with the site, there are speculum parts, pissing parts and the close-ups may be a bit much for some. The good thing here, these are usually separated by part so if you would have fast-forwarded those parts, you can just save the hassle by not downloading the parts you don't like.
No problems with the models at all. A very good blend of models from all around the world and a good mix of ethnic backgrounds.
Navigation is broken down for you. You can search by model name. Model nationality. Model age. Year released. And a few bonus points here for naming the videos whatever the scene is named. Instead of some generic number name that no one but their programmer understands.
Unless I missed something there are no boy/girl scenes, but there are some girl/girl scenes with the vast majority being solo. I'm thinking I'm going to need to ask Santa Claus for a new hard drive just for the content I get from this site.
By percent, 76% of the sets are available in 1920x1080. I'm almost positive no other site can say that. My biggest surprise was the diversity of models. It looks to have started out with more Euro models, but it has balanced out with Hispanic, Asian, American (white and black) models showing up too.
I guess if I had to pick something to change it would be to offer a full scene download for those of us that have fast connections. Oh and it signs me out too often. A download had finished, maybe 5 minutes passed and I clicked the next scene to download and was signed out.
That's minor though when you consider the overall quality of this site. Would push the score even higher if the photo sets had more photos in them. Highly recommended especially for tech quality lovers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 13 site network for $19.95
- Several of the sites are very good, The Boss XXX, Latin Booty Girls, Bit Tits and Curvy Asses were my favorites.
- There are video caps, so you can preview before downloading, but no pictures that I have found
- Download speed above average, getting 1000kb/s on 10M connection
- Nice diverse content from Arab to Latina to interracial
Cons:
- No pictures, so I can't comment much about those, the vid caps are ok to look at
- Video quality is below average 320 on high end
- Navigation is something next to driving a 1968 car without power steering, it just seems clunky
- Site names are misleading, Cum Brushers? Human Toilet Bowls? These names have nothing to do with the content for you really twisted fetish types
- Content becomes very boring as does the sites
Bottom Line:
Everything started out fine when I joined. The videos could be improved or better be improved or else they are going to fall way behind. No pictures is frustrating these days, since most networks are now including pictures.
The Boss XXX is a great site. I really enjoyed nearly all of the movies on it. I also liked the Latin Booty Girls and Big Tits and Curvy Asses, moreso for the curvy asses. Having said that, this is another network that could just throw all their material onto one site and save us the trouble of having to go from site to site trying to find the content we are looking for.
This is why I mentioned the misleading names. Cum Brushers is a boneheaded attempt to show women brushing their teeth with cum. Why not just call it swallowing? Human toilet bowl would imply that someone is about to get really messy, but that isn't it. They have the woman parade around a toilet bowl, then treat her like shit. I think I'm burnt out on the abuse sites, and this one doesn't help matters.
I'm putting that as a warning to those reading this. There are several sites on here that involve spitting, writing on the girls faces and your typical Lee Stone type garbage.
Movie quality is below average throughout the network, when you look at HD specs that most sites are offering, you see a 1240, the high end on these is a 340.
Because of this and the abuse factor, I can't recommend it based on my experience with it. If you like abuse, you may enjoy it.
You can sign up on Innocent High through Epoch. On the sign-up page, you click "Backup credit card" and it is Epoch. The cross sales are all gone and you even get a discounted price offer to stay when canceling of $14.95/month.
From the ones I have downloaded, including the newest updates, the long end is still only 1050. They do have huge sets though, one had over 300 photos in it.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
