Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A different site than you'll usually find on a network.
- Really is a large site considering it's part of a network. Has nearly 1,000 scenes on it.
- Has been around since 2007, but even so, the oldest scenes have a 540p option, 720p and 1080p came soon after.
- DDF's network is easily one of my favorites and it's sites like this one that's easily missed that makes it a great network.
- Despite the content looking to be fairly hardcore to fairly extreme, it's nearly all very accessible to the average viewer.
- Averages one new scene (video + pictures) per week.
- Very good photo sets included with each scene and are downloadable in zips, biggest problem is similar to many other sites, not enough pictures in the sets.
- Around 7-8 MB/s download speed which is on my higher end.
- Excellent navigation, it looks a little cluttered and maybe it is, but it works good.
- Your chance to see some of your favorite softcore models getting a little kinkier than you're used to seeing
Cons:
- DDF's network has had struggles for years now with scene counts. Those are still around. In one place, House of Taboo says it has nearly 1,200 videos, in another it says 990.
- To be honest, if you're looking for something that's a little harder than your average mainstream porn, this will do the trick, but if you're looking for scenes on the level of say kink.com, your expectations will fall short.
Bottom Line:
I admit, when DDF first launched this site I was surprised. I mainly knew DDF for pretty, glam sex, solo girls, pretty clothes, perfect make-up, then out of nowhere came House of Taboo.
I want to stress this point, this is not a good alternative to your favorite BDSM site or your favorite Kink site. That's not to say it's tame, but it is very controlled. One of the biggest selling points is there's models on here that you wouldn't ever see on a Kink site or a BDSM site.
I've wondered if many people even know this site exists. It's never really received a push from DDF, like One By Day, Hot Legs and Feet or even Eve Angel Official have received, but it's sort of a hidden gem on what is already a great network.
Here's some of the things/genres you can expect from this site:
Bondage, both with ropes and wraps.
Somewhat forced insertions, large dildos, sticks.
BDSM-style outfits, rubber suits, rubber masks
Dominatrix (usually only with another woman), including collars, blindfolds, ball gags.
Roleplaying, Doctor exam, jail prisoner.
Spanking and ... peeing.
I know some might consider anal sex to be kinky, but I think in 2016, it's become too much of a norm to be included in the above kinks.
The technical quality is excellent. As mentioned in the pros, the oldest content has 540p videos with 720p becoming standard by 2009 and 1080p becoming standard in early 2011.
I think this site would appeal to anyone that collected the glam Euro models from the mid-2000s. One of the most surprising scenes for me is of Zuzana Zeleznovova. She was one of the most softcore, pretty, almost innocent models I remember from the mid-2000s. On this site, she has a scene where she's bound in chains and pees on herself. Might not sound that extreme, but it was for her. Maybe the most shocking for me is a scene between Eve Angel and Jeny Baby. Eve plays a nurse role, while Jeny is strapped into a straightjacket. Eve proceeds to use a speculum on Jeny, stick various objects, including fingers into Jeny's butt and dominates her. Which if nothing else is funny if you've followed Eve's career as the sweet model who becomes devilish when horny.
The newer scenes don't seem to have as many well-known stars in them and there is a sudden influx of tattooed models, but they still stay true to the different genres.
I consider this a site worth checking out before joining DDF Network since I don't know of any other mainstream network that has anything like House of Taboo. I will say 21 Sextury used to, but after splitting their network into two sites, most of the more extreme sites ended up on a different network, which is why I'm leaning towards preferring DDF's Network. This site adds a nice balance to the network. I mean, we all know we get tired of looking at perfectly made-up, tanned, natural models having sex and need something different ever once in awhile.
My only real complaint is that you can tell some of the scenes are controlled. Sites and networks that specialize in BDSM and the kinkier genres of porn have learned how to make their scenes look less planned.
Great overall site though and one any DDF member should check out, if for no other reason, to see if any of your favorite, usually not too kinky models are doing something you've never seen them do. Would rank it as the third or fourth best site in the DDF Network and one worth joining the network for even if you've got most of the content from the other sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It could probably just be called MILF porn. Very attractive 30-40 year old women having sex.
- It’s a large site with 466 videos and 364 models.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Was updating with 4K scenes up until July 2020, now are starting to update with remasters
- Epoch is the biller.
- Very good photosets for a site like this and are downloadable.
Cons:
- It may be a little too vanilla for some. Some of these scenes are supposed to be a wife and her husband. There’s no stepfamily, paying the plumber twist to the scenes.
- The ads can be annoying since they look like the scenes.
Bottom Line:
You can just imagine a group of porn producers are sitting around and one says, “What if we just shot normal porn?” That’s what you get on this site. I believe that is its biggest selling point and its biggest weakness. It’s not heartcore or lovey porn. I don’t think real couples just have mushy sex. They don’t on this site either. There’s anal and swallowing, all kinds of real kinks you don’t know your next door neighbor does or your sister does.
Which is also a problem since this doesn’t look like porn to me. It looks like I found someone’s home video stash of them having sex with their spouse. It really makes you think or it does me. I honestly thought the name of the site was “Housewife Next Door” and kind of wish it was. I’ll give an example, I think they’re going for the feeling of you being married to the female. Gianna Dior has a very good scene on here but if I was married to her we would be doing some pubic hair trimming on her. That’s why I don’t think porn like this works. If you’re going to try and put the viewer in the role of the man in the scene then you need to let the viewer select what’s going to happen in the scene. I think ATK Girlfriends does the best job of creating the “this is your girlfriend” porn scenes. It’s not to say this site is bad. I’m just saying they could do more with this niche. The Gianna scene to show what they’re going for is titled, “Your wife Gianna fucks your cock”.
The pictures are very good. It’s rare to find a site/network that is known for hardcore sex but turns around and gives you what is very close to a legitimate photoshoot. They do this on several of their sites and I think it should be mentioned.
You also get very good technical quality. The videos since 2014 have 4K, 1080p, 720p and a few smaller ones to download. They also have a few shorter versions you can download of each scene. The photos are downloadable in zips. The site is a good-sized site with nearly 500 scenes.
I just get hung up on what I call philosophical differences. A lot of the scenes have POV use of the camera to make you feel like you’re part of the scene. Which hasn’t ever worked for me but it shows their goal with this site. I will compliment something I usually don’t, at least not recently, the houses, the settings, do add to the believable part of the scenes. I do like that they don’t film every scene in the bedroom. There are living room couch scenes, on the floor, in the kitchen and that too adds realism. I think I’m just so used to some crazy storyline that this type of porn just reminds me of real life. I still like my porn to be more fantasy than realistic. I’m sure there are people that prefer realistic and if so, you should check this site out.
I have a couple of clips from "wife" sites like the, "Interracial wife bangers". The stories in those are so sad that I just skip them. One, the husband comes in the kitchen, falls, knocks himself out. The ambulance is called. The paramedics run in and take him to the hospital. The wife grabs the one EMS and says, "I will feel sick too, could you take my temperature?"
How sick is that one ha ha? Her husband is dying. Believe it or not though, in my line of work, one of my main objectives is to understand fantasies and why people have them, since some people disturb themselves with their own sexual fantasies. One of the most, I would say top 3 for husbands, is walking in and catching their wife having sex with another man. I've been meaning to check some of those reality sites out, to see how the storylines play out and how believable they are.
I think most porn sites are getting worse these days since they have ran out of scenarios.
Hey Khan, I noticed that as well, but the site facts were updated in 2007, according to the review. It really looks odd, check out the review. Where it says, "videos" it says 320 videos, at the bottom in the "other" section it says picture galleries and over 300 videos. Then Maggie's review says, "No videos" as a con.
I would think that could cause some confusion. Especially when it says the site facts were updated just last month, 4-09-07. The thing is, I would say it is easy to go on the site a few times and miss the videos, I did. I just happened to look up and see the link to "videos".
The videos are of good quality, but they, the site, is saying their videos are exclusive. I don't believe that for one minute. They have an Adrianne Sage masturbation video that I have seen on New Sensations. I don't know if because they are owned by New Sensations, they are saying it is still exclusive if it appears on one of their other sites. They also have a Taylor Ann POV blowjob that I've seen on several of the New Sensations sites in the NS All Access network. Plus the split videos can get annoying. One that I was going to download had 7 parts to it. I just skipped it.
My fascination with Eve Angel was what broke me down to try it out, I had noticed she was on their main page. I did download her one video on the site in 4 parts, it is good quality, and I understand why they split them, but other sites like Club Sandy and Pix and Videos split them, then give you the option to download the whole file as one.
There are videos, but it is a hassle to find what you are looking for. I had noticed that TBP said no videos, but it is right on the first page of the members section, "videos" up at the top of it. I don't know if they just missed it, because I did at first. I kept thinking if I clicked on the model it would bring up videos too. The videos categories are out of whack as well. The one Eve Angel video is a 4 way lesbian movie, it shows up in the blowjob category, the solo category and the Big Movie category. There is no order to the videos either, just 30 or so pages of thumbnails showing each one.
Veronica has no movies, but has 33 picture sets and Olivia de Treville has 14 picture sets, but no videos.
From what I can see a lot of the videos are of New Sensations biggest stars, Adrienne Sage, I even saw Taylor Ann, who I know is not Hungarian. Overall, it looks like if someone spent maybe a week on the site working on it, they could make it a decent join, especially for picture fans. They have around 50 sets of Anetta Keys, no videos though. They have pictures of her that I have never seen, where she had braids when she first started porn. It is kind of like finding an uncle's old magazine stash ha ha.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very intriguing site with close to 400 models.
- Has bonus sites, Honey School and Honey Index, which is a fast access portal to the models.
- Has feeds to other sites, looks to be over 20 or so
- Some older picture sets that I have not seen anywhere, as old as 2000.
- Quality of pics is decent, while videos are well above average
Cons:
- Horrible navigation, you can tell it's a New Sensations site.
- Most of the content can be found on other sites, especially pictures in much bigger resolutions
- Site feels incomplete, like the tech guys went home and forgot to finish it
- The major one for me, all videos that I found were cut into sections, 3-7 sections.
Bottom Line:
I liked a lot of things about this site. It is unusual when you find one part of the navigation to be perfect, only to find that it is horribly flawed. As you probably know I am an Eve Angel fan, so I went straight to her section, 1 video that I had never seen, but it was cut into 4 parts. The pictures of her included many that I have seen and maybe 5 sets that I hadn't. Most of the ones I hadn't were older sets back when Eve was nearing skinny levels.
On the other hand, I found many pictures of Sandra Shine that I hadn't seen before. See what I mean? For every good thing, there was a bad thing. Which is why it feels incomplete. The videos are fine quality in the 700x500 range, the pics are not near as good, I saw a few nearing 2,000, but many were under 1,000.
I don't like the way the actual Hungarian Honey's part is just pictures, then you click on "videos" and it takes you to that section. I would rather click on the model and have her videos and pics together. They are advertising 300-400 movies, maybe I'm missing them or just haven't went through them enough. Most of the movies don't list who the models are, instead, a catchy title like, "Two hot girls in the rain".
The only word I can come up with is incomplete. It's not a bad site by any means, the content is nice, but I keep waiting for this magic button to pop up and say, "Click here". I can recommend it only if you have never been on a Euro site. Otherwise, take the trial for $9.99, fully featured trial.
I wish it had been a lot better. I'll sometimes look over those smaller sites, newer sites that wouldn't rate very good, but one with the Hustler name has to draw a lot of attention just from the name. I sometimes forget we're into a whole new generation of porn users.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hustler, in my mind, the greatest name in hardcore porn.
- Huge site/network. I've seen some content as far back as the 80s, including the legendary, "Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio".
- Hustler magazine pictorials to look at or download.
- Updates once or twice per week with a full DVD, it varies, so there's no way to put a set number on it or set frequency.
- Beaver Hunt category! My favorite section of Hustler magazine.
- Good download speeds, roughly 70% of my max speed.
Cons:
- A couple of my pros are actually not what they claim to be. Trust me, I'll go into in the BL.
- Video quality is below average at best.
- I once rated this "network" an 80, in 2007, here on PU. My average score is an 85.
- I thought, based on many of the professional reviews, that Hustler had got their site together and improved it. I thought wrong and wonder why it scored so highly in professional reviews. Not looking at that can of worms with a can opener.
- It's not a network. It's a DVD site that puts content, based on category, into a separate category that they so happen to call a different site.
Bottom Line:
Back when I first discovered porn it was a random VHS tape belonging to my uncle. I later found a whole stack of Playboy magazines under his bed. I'm sure I liked them and thought I had found a gold mine. Then, one day, I found a Hustler magazine in his room. I used multiple loud adjectives as I looked through the pages. So much nakedness, girls with fingers stuck in places, it was far greater than anything I had seen before.
When I turned 18, I had been psyching myself up to go to the local gas station and buy a brand new copy of Hustler. It then became a monthly habit. The rush, as I've told a few times, was maybe even greater than the magazine. This made Hustler my absolute favorite name in hardcore porn. And like most men who bought Playboy or Penthouse, I also read every story in Hustler. The jokes were tasteless and hilarious. Then there was the "Beaver Hunt" section of the magazine. It had used-submitted photos in it. Hustler would then pick the best one and give them a money prize. It had the dirty stories in it. Some seriously interesting political stories.
So, a few weeks ago, I thought I would join Hustler's website. It had been 9 years since I joined it. From everything I've read it's improved greatly since then. I joined ... and reality hit, buyer's remorse hit and my first "bad" review in a long time is now being posted.
First, in the categories is "Beaver Hunt". I click on it, it's DVDs from the Barely Legal series. It's not a bad series. It's also not "Beaver Hunt". I was honestly expecting user-submitted photos.
I then clicked on "Magz". I'm going to get to view all the digital issues of all Hustler magazines, right? Wrong. They only go back to 2007. Now hell, if you can put 1986's Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio DVD on here, you can damn sure put the old magazines on here. It gets worse. No Beaver Hunt in the magazines that I could access. No joke section. No articles. Instead, a handful of pictorials from each magazine with 12-15 photos from each pictorial.
I cleared my head and decided to make the most out of what was quickly becoming the most disappointing porn site I have joined in years. I downloaded a few videos featuring models I like. They were okay, but were a bit blurry/fuzzy. Now these are newer models (Nicole Aniston, Veronica Rodriguez), maybe not "newer", but newer than Vanessa Del Rio. I look at the properties on the videos and see 960x540 resolution. These were downloaded from the "super quality" link. I go back to the available sites and enter "Hustler HD". Download the newest video available, it's 960x540. What the hell? It says HD in the name! I admit, I don't follow the resolution wars of porn, I prefer 720p and consider it the lowest level of HD. So my standards aren't the problem here. I can't imagine what someone wanting 1080p or 4K would think of 960x540 being listed as HD.
Disappointment continued, I went through every site on their "network" and downloaded the newest video they have. Not a single one had a video over 960x540. I stand slightly corrected by myself. I just found one DVD with 720p scenes on it, it's of Asa Akira.
Here's my roundup at this point: Beaver Hunt "site" is not Beaver Hunt. It's Barely Legal DVDs.
The magazines aren't magazines. They are 4-5 pictorials from each magazine.
The high quality videos are below average 960x540 quality. Including the ones on the "site" Hustler HD.
But wait... there is a hustlermagazine site that says it has all of the magazines in digital form. How do I know? It's advertised on every page of this Hustler site. Now back to the layout. You enter the site into a sort of hub. It shows 19 available sites in the network. A few examples of the names, Beaver Hunt, Daddy Gets Lucky, Asian Fever, those sound like real standalone sites that are part of a network, but in reality, those three are in order ... Barely Legal series, the Daughter series of DVDs, (including Barely Legal again), Asian Fever is their commonly-known DVD series' Teen Thailand and random scenes taken from DVDs that feature Asian models.
The further I looked into this Hustler site I started noticing chances to "upgrade" my membership. There's a problem there, why would I upgrade something that hasn't been the least bit entertaining?
The site needs a complete overhaul. Advertising as Hustler with "magz" should include all magazines and every part of those magazines. Advertising HD video should result in HD video. Neither of those said on the membership join pages, "Must upgrade to receive HD video and full magazines". A new search engine would help. Surely there's some 720p videos on here, but I've yet to find them. A simple search engine with an HD filter would do. It receives a 60 simply because it works and has porn on it with many big name stars. I'm guessing the higher def videos are included in the upgraded membership, again, the upgraded membership is not mentioned or offered when you join. Not recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Ah the memories of opening my first Hustler!
- I'm downloading the clips from the site, someone else mentioned this and how TBP lists the videos as streaming or in browser only.
- Some of the best models in the world on here!
- Tons of pictures available
- 3 Updates per week
- Cheaper than renting them!
Cons:
- Higher prices than most sites, especially considering the smaller library when compared to videobox, vixeo, pornstarxs.
- I am almost positive that I joined this site last year for $9.95, now it is $34.95. Maybe the trade off is being able to keep the videos?
- Too many anal movies
Bottom Line:
I like the way Hustler has pushed the envelope over the years and for once, actually mean it when I say that when it was magazines instead of online, I really did read the articles and jokes!
The videos are downloading just fine for me, and the majority are of average quality. I'm really thinking the raise in price and not great quality is because they are letting us download and keep the videos.
The preview section of the site is another great one, as it lets you see how the site works, navigation on here is top-notch. I really like the site, but it isn't going to be one that I visit often. Even with 3 updates per week, I can download a full DVD in probably 15-20 minutes, so it isn't worth much more than a join, download everything you want, come back 6 months later.
The big question for me is, is the site worth that high price? Yes, if it is your first time joining it. Upwards of 200 full DVDs from Hustler would cost thousands of dollars to buy. After that, I don't think it would be worth anything more than stopping by once a year.
I'm not really into anal, they have loads of anal, nearly every scene ends in anal and they have full series' with the word anal in the title. This would be another negative for me when considering joining. I've heard a lot of the porn models these days are more into the anal than vaginal because it pays more.
Bottom line, if you haven't been a member, I recommend it for one month, otherwise, can't say I recommend it.
I was hoping that you wouldn't take my post as anything more than a continuation to the discussion, and I think you picked up on that. I think, I could be wrong, but the way I take it is similar to Chris Rock's "Negro" skit. He would mimic a rich stereotypical rich stuck-up white guy. He would say, "Oh great thanks to Tiger another negro is on the golf course" and "Oh look at that negro with his white girlfriend, she must be a whore". I really didn't take it that way until I read the the little stories with each preview video and saw, "Gated community". I think one of their other sites is also based on a comedy routine, the "I fucked your stupid face" one. I'm thinking that is an old Will Farrell comedy routine where he is acting like a non-English speaking person and says, "Shut your stupid face or I'll fuck your stupid face".
I guess more than anything, it is another reminder to how unoriginal porn has become.
I don't know if I would call it racism. Racism is a form of hatred. Looking at the preview, it actually looks more like reverse-racism shrouded under an offensive name. The site mentions "watch powerlessly as your wife feasts on black cock" Later it says "The scandalous white wives"
More importantly once you get beyond the main page, you get one video description from one of the husband's that is titled, "Don't tell them about my baby cock" and the white wife is showing the sub-one inch size with her fingers while giving the black guy a blowjob, the husband's response is, "I'm sorry I can't satisfy you and that I'm fat and lazy. I love you. Why did you bring home this scumbag and why are you sucking his dick on my sofa, laughing at me? I'd never hurt you like this, you fucking bitch. I wish I could leave you, but I'm too weak. I guess I'll just endure this humiliation. Fuck."
Each of the other samples has another supposed response from the white husband and here those are, "Look at that smug look on his black face. Why did she bring him here? She had to know you'd come home and catch her with this degenerate. God, look at his giant black balls. Why the fuck is his dick so big? What's the point of that. She won't stop sucking it, and there's nothing I can do about it. Fucking bitch!"
Another, "I did everthing I could. I live in a gated community. I have a top notch security system. How did this hoodlum get in my house? My fucking whore wife let him in. And now she's going to suck his giant smelly cock why I watch in shame. I wonder what we're having for dinner tonight."
Another, "I can't believe she's doing this to me. Where the fuck did she find this guy? I tried to be a good husband, but nothing I do is good enough for her. And now she's humiliating me by letting this black scumbag defile her mouth and rub his black ass juices all over my couch. Marvelous."
So in the big picture you have an offensive site name towards blacks, but inside, the black guys are getting all the women and the white guys are amazed and blown away by how endowed the black men are while they have sex with their wives. If there is hatred, it is towards white men. There also is the assumption that the white man couldn't physically stop the black man, "Watch powerlessly as your wife feasts on black cock".
I don't know whether to laugh at this point or slap myself on the head for even wasting another reply. I can see now that English isn't your first language since most of what you're saying to me doesn't make much sense so I will give you a break there.
Where I won't give you a break is on your reasoning for not listing the technical numbers of the site. What if someone doesn't know there is a The Best Porn review for I Dream of Jo and just reads your review here on Porn Users? Think the numbers might be useful to them? It's not like it's time consuming to add those. Those also add credibility to your review. I can promise you, putting the numbers is more likely to help others want to join the site than saying, "Jo loves animals and when she plays with them, its wonderful".
And please spare me on telling me what Porn Users reviews are for. You've been a member here for 1 week and have 1 review. I've been a member here for 6.5 years and have 233 reviews. While it's true that the reviews should show each person's different perspective, it's also true that 90% of your pros could be things that no one else cares about. Which is why putting the numbers would help. Here's an example that should be able to get beyond our language barrier.
You're going to buy a new vehicle. You want cupholders, air conditioning, leather seats, cd player, power windows and automatic transmission.
You read user reviews on the exact car you're wanting. The first one says, "It's a great car!!! I love it!!! It has everything I need!!!" Did that review help you decide if you want the car?
It also should be noted that not all sites have updated facts from The Best Porn and those facts that you linked to will be somewhat out of date in 6 months. If someone writes a review for I Dream of Jo in 6 months should they too leave out the facts, even though they've changed?
Agree completely on all of this. I especially love her scenes with Eve. The only model I've seen with better chemistry with Eve was Sandra Shine. Jo also seems to become a bit more kinky with Eve than the other models.
Hey Pat, I'll probably give it a try since I too like Jo and especially if it has new Eve Angel content. The webmaster seems pretty genuine in what he's saying. The reviewers seem like nearly all other fly by night reviewers, looking for or getting a discount.
I did think that was funny about the November 2013 updates. Someone defended it somewhere on one of these as a "typo". Looking at my keyboard, I don't see how Nov could be a typo from May, maybe on the first letter since those are right beside each other, but the a-o keys are on separate sides. The future date bothered me mainly because Eveangel.com used a similar method when Eve left their site. They just mass removed the sets from 2004 and listed them as 2007 (which was the current year at the time). Maybe Khan at least gets a chuckle out of all this mess!
thaavi, I never said it's a rip off site. I was asking if the content had been used on Viv's other sites, then reused here. It's a common thing for sites to do. Since I have the majority of the content for Eve from Viv's sites, I wanted to know if I was going to sign-up for I Dream of Jo and end up with a bunch of scenes I already had.
Nick, on this reply, you're saying the point I was making. I honestly had never seen this I Dream of Jo site. And if Eve and Jo are only or mostly only shooting on it or Viv's other sites, then it would be hard for most of us not to question if it's new since they're hardly around on sites like 21 Sextury where Eve has roughly 200 scenes and DDF where Eve has nearly 300 scenes. I do apologize if I was wrong.
I do appreciate the offer of a review account, but one of the rules here has always been we aren't supposed to review a site unless we pay for it. I will still join it and review it since I do like both Eve and Jo a great deal and have huge collections of each. I would like to see new content of them.
I don't know if I'm crossing any lines by saying this, but we have a forum here on Porn Users and also an announcement section where you could have maybe talked to our admins here, Khan or Rick and offered a discounted reviewer price to get some fair reviews. I don't guarantee that though since it would be Khan and/or Rick's call.
Most of the negativity you're seeing here right now is based on several sites in the past giving members free memberships if they come here and score their site high. I've always thought our members here are a unique bunch of porn fans who try to help each other by reviewing sites so others will know what to expect.
No offense is meant to the reviewers who have posted over the last few days, but I really think those high 90s reviews will hurt more than they will help. It may be hard to believe, but I'm generally considered one of the more forgiving and optimistic reviewers here, but out of 200+ reviews, I've only had 8 that are rated 95 or higher. While there has been already 4 reviews of 95 or higher on Jo's site in less than a week.
A few examples of why these reviews are getting a lot of negativity.
There's no mention of picture size in any of them which is a key selling point.
There's no mention about whether the photo sets are zipped for download.
There's no mention of the video resolution. We have members here who won't join a site that doesn't have HD resolution.
There's no total picture sets count or no total video count. Or even more specific ones like, "There's X amount of solo videos, X amount of girl/girl videos.
These all can be a huge factor in creating believability since these all show that the member really is a member and not just someone paid to write a high scoring review.
thaavi, if I could offer some friendly advice. You're starting to sound like you work in the porn industry to know who Eve only works with these days. I do know she isn't with DDF though and made note of it in my review of DDF's Network since they are still listing her site as having new updates.
On the date one Nick, I didn't so much think it was meant to mislead as it is that I think it makes the site look poorly put together. I really couldn't even come up with a reason why a site would list an update that far ahead of time outside of sloppiness during the programming.
Glad to hear that about Jo. I hadn't seen new content of her anywhere.
I linked to Viv's video site to show that I wasn't just being negative about the reunited set. I'll put the link here too so you can see why I questioned it as a mid-2000s set. Bottom left hand corner. http://www.vivthomasvideo.com/modelConte...pe=videos&page=6
Looks nearly identical to the vidcap of reunited on I Dream of Jo. As I told the other person, I'm one of the biggest collectors of Eve's content and was genuinely interested in knowing if it was just an old set that had been re-released/recycled. Not to get on Viv's regular site too much, but when they went to the new look and started putting more videos on the regular site, the dates did change a great deal. I used the example in the above reply of one scene that shows as released in 2003 on Viv's video site and shows as released in 2010 on his regular site.
It's also worth mentioning, as you all at Viv's sites probably know, Eve is one of the most recycled models in porn. Her first solo site recycled for nearly 3 years. DDF is still recycling her content on the Eve Angel Official site.
First thing to know is I have collected Eve content since 2003. I have an external with over 1 TB of Eve's content including the rarest of rare scenes like the gangbang scene, her interracial boy/girl scene, her Bubblegirls scenes and everything I've found from 21 Sextury to DDF to her first solo site eveangel.com to her last solo site eveangelofficial.com
Second thing to know is I'm a huge supporter and fan of Viv Thomas as can be seen by mid-90s score on his video site. I have no malicious reason to question if these scenes are recycled. If you need a link or proof of the scene I was talking about, see here at Viv's video site. http://www.vivthomasvideo.com/modelConte...pe=videos&page=6
Bottom left hand corner with Jo in a lightly colored bed, just like the scene on the front page of I Dream of Jo, in the updates. Eve nor Jo have changed that much and it's based simply on one small vidcap on the new one. I asked on that one based on curiosity since I do collect Eve content and if there's some I don't have, I would like to have it.
Lastly and I mean nothing negative towards Viv's site with this, but his sites and content has become confusing. If you would like to see this, look at this link from his video site, http://www.vivthomasvideo.com/modelConte...pe=videos&page=6
Bottom right hand corner is a scene with Eve, Jo and a guy from the DVD Bubblegum Babes 5. It is dated on Viv Thomas Video - July 3rd, 2003. Now look on Viv's regular site, http://www.vivthomas.com/model/eve-angel/, click load more until 2010 scenes open and there is the same scene from Bubblegum Babes 5 listed as February 18, 2010.
I have every reason and right to question if it's new content since his other sites have changed formats and as you can see, Bubblegum Babes 5 has a 7 year gap on when it was released between his video site and his regular site. As for when Eve and Jo did scenes together in the mid 2000s, I have at least 9.
I was suspicious because:
#1 In the new updates there is a scene with Eve Angel. I haven't seen a new solo or girl/girl Eve Angel set in quite a long time. The one's being posted on Eve Angel Official are scenes that are 3-4 years old.
#2 Each and every review I've found of this site rate it between 70-83. Three near perfect reviews pop up over a day or two period for a site that had never had a user review on here before.
#3 Because you just admitted the admin told you about the possibility of writing your opinion here. Now, if you really believe that the sites is a 95+, that's fine, it really is, but why isn't that admin who told you all of this possibility, defending against what I posted in my comment? You've made it clear he/she knows about this site. He/she has replied to one of your "great" reviews. Would seem like instead of replying to a 100 scored review, he/she would be replying and defending his site from recycling old content as new.
The #2 one shows why anyone would have a reason to be skeptical. The site has been listed on here since May 2011, so 0 reviews in roughly 2 years, then 3 (perfect and near perfect scores) reviews come in, in 2 days. That wouldn't make you skeptical?
I see this listed as being owned by Viv Thomas, and to be honest, looking at the preview page, that does not look anything like new content. Even worse, one of the new videos says it was released in November 2013. Just a friendly warning to those seeing the high reviews pop up.
I'm not saying it isn't new content, but that "reunited" set with Eve Angel in the preview looks like a set I have from the mid-2000s.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the most realistic, most believable and most natural porn site on the internet.
- 5,408 scenes of mostly solo masturbation but also has lesbian and some male/female.
- I've been a member here off and on for over 10 years.
- Uses GMBill, a lesser known biller but I've never had any problems with them.
- Updates daily, sometimes twice.
- Women of nearly all shapes, size and looks.
- Navigation takes some getting used to but I've been a member enough that it's pretty easy to use and find what you're looking for.
- Scenes vary from closeups of the model's face to more explicit scenes that show everything.
- Defines the word erotic in the porn world better than any other site.
- Very high technical quality on videos, see bottom line.
- Categories that make it easy to find what you're looking for once you get used to the names of the categories.
- Very good download speeds (85% of my max)
Cons:
- It can be overwhelming. The model list is next to impossible to use to count the models.
- Will apply to any and everyone that joins it, there will be some models you won't find attractive.
Bottom Line:
A long time ago, I gave this site an 85. That was also when most of the content just focused on the model's face and showed very little nudity. I enjoyed some of those scenes but thought it was too soft which is unheard of from me. I even like non-nude "porn".
The scenes have become more explicit though nowhere near as explicit as most sites. There's a connection, for me, between the model and her willingness to be more explicit, to be more vocal and that's a selling point for me. It's women enjoying themselves naturally and most look very comfortable doing it. I don't even know if that's true. Maybe the ones that just show their face/expressions/moans just aren't in the mood to show more on that day.
I do lean towards and favor the ones that show more. Some of them will pull up porn on their laptop and masturbate while watching it. Which kind of makes me laugh a little since I think it shows us men are more impatient than women. You never see them fast forwarding. I also like the minimal production, the lighting, I have bad eyesight and it gets worse when looking at bright lights. The scenes are very good for those into voyeurism.
The numbers can be a little confusing. With 5,408 videos, I'm using their number on that, this is a very large site. They have 2,269 scenes listed as studio. 1,208 listed as fantasy and adventure. 898 listed as homemade. 411 as close-up. 377 as video diary. 157 as lucubrations and 88 as loose ends.
Most of those are self-explanatory. The loose ends ones are shorter, there's outdoor pissing, talking, and as shown by the number this is a very small part of the site. The video diary ones once fooled me into thinking they were interviews but they're not. All that I've watched are masturbation including some exhibitionism.
The video quality on the newest scenes tops out at 1080p, there's also a 540p version and a 270p version. The scenes are short enough that most of the 1080p versions are at or around 500MB each.
Graphic descriptions usually aren't needed for porn but one of my biggest fetishes is hard nipples. You can watch scenes here where you can see the models nipples getting harder. This content is now very appealing to me. My last review of it was during a period of my porn journey that favored and preferred hardcore content. Now, I can see, hear and enjoy this porn possibly the way it's supposed to be.
I didn't list this as a con only because I think it would detract from the scenes, there are no pictures. Most of these models look like they've got themselves ready to go and perform, so throwing in "how about we take 150 photos real quick" might break that momentum.
It's also one of the few sites that has bios for the models that seem real. They list their favorite books, movies and music. Depending on your own taste in those, you can pick up on one for example, saying she's an ABBA fan.
I do like the girl/girl scenes as these seem to be very believable, a major selling point in lesbian porn but really don't care for the male/female scenes.
I think it would be easy for some to miss the model search feature. I know it's right there but it is very in-depth. I use the nationality filter to look for models that fit a look I usually prefer like Brazil where I found Ana B who might be one of the most expressive and active models on the site. Even giving the view of her masturbating on her stomach. If you're patient with the model search you find out it's very useful. You can pick nationality, type of scene (solo, friends), even age range.
If you're going to complain about anything on it I would say the layout, having 513 pages of 10 scenes per page is overwhelming. Use the model search. They do list the model's name and if you click it you can see all of the model's scenes which at least lets you focus on the models you like best.
I don't think this is a site you can really take in over one month. I'm thinking it's going to take me 3 months to get everything I want.
It's a good example of why it's so hard to score a site a 100. There are just minor problems that stop it from being perfect. On a personal note, I would like to see a few more Asians. And looking for them showed another minor problem, the older, I would even say oldest scenes are 480p. I found that when I found a Japanese model from 2008.
Beyond those minor complaints this is a site that does erotic better than all the sites I see promoting themselves as erotic. I also want to mention I haven't hit any download limits but haven't download more than 10GB or so in any of my days as a member.
Great site, now if I can just get myself to cancel it after another month or two.
On the third con, "No option to download". Are you sure about that? I have been a member here multiple times and they have downloads available for their videos. They are known to have a download limit after you've downloaded so much in a day but that would be a major con if they've removed the download feature. When I click on a preview scene there it says, "Login or Join to Download High-Res Versions"
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that sells itself as being different from the normal, mainstream porn site ... and for the most part it succeeds.
- Daily updates, right at 2,302 videos in HD. If you accept 1280x720 as HD.
- Amateur content, some girl/girl, including some with 3+ girls and some boy/girl. Mostly solo and that's their strength.
- I think the price is fair for unique, exclusive content.
- Would think women who are into watching other women masturbating would be a big market here.
- There's no cameraman asking a million stupid questions...
Cons:
- Continuing from pros is the first con: Things are mostly artsy and tame here. I don't doubt the authenticity of the masturbation we see on this site, but I do wish the girls were more into the masturbation. (Further in BL)
- There's no pictures. If there are pictures I can't find them.
- I'm mostly positive on this site, but the navigation is terrible. I was last a member on here in 2007 (review in my history here). I honestly don't think they've changed anything about the navigation since then.
Bottom Line:
You would think my score might be lower than it is since there's some pretty big cons, but the quality of the content outweighs the downfalls.
This is a fairly straightforward website that promotes enjoyment for their performers/submitter and their audience alike. It's a good take on porn in today's cookie-cutter porn world, but that navigation is really bad. I would go as far as saying that I took off 10 points for the navigation.
The good parts: The girls seem like normal, average girls. Some are playful, some are even silly and many are shy. I like the dark-style of videos since it gives the viewer a little of a voyeur feel like you're peeping in on the masturbation. There's a fairly broad selection of model body types and ages. There are the occasional girl/girl (or even more than 2 girls) scenes and a few boy/girl scenes that sometimes just includes the guy giving the girl oral.
As with any site like this one, there will be models that aren't generally looked at as attractive, but I personally haven't seen any that I would call ugly.
Video quality is good and has been for a long time. They've been making HD videos long enough to have nearly 2,500 HD videos. Another mention that there are no photos. I really wouldn't want photos of the masturbation, but a few (maybe 5-10) in clothes would be nice.
Then there's the navigation:
Going to the home page opens up a scrolling page with the most recent 10 videos. Below those 10 are numbers, 370 (as of 3/15/2016) to be exact. If you're on the home page you are on page 1. You then click on page 2 and there's 10 more videos and the 369 other pages below them. Click on page 3 and you're getting 10 more videos with the numbers below them.
I have to keep a running tab on what page I was last on.
I will give them credit for at least renaming their scenes to whatever name they gave it on the website so you at least can look to see if you've downloaded a scene already.
Over in the left margin there's a group of categories, which I have no clue what they mean. Lucrabations is one. I didn't misspell that. It's how they have it spelled. Sure, I can click on it and find out what type of scene a Lucrabation is, but why should I have to do that?
It gets worse. If you go to the search function you have these options:
Categories (Home Made, Up Close, Etc)
Attribute (Solo, Friends, HD, Full HD)
Display Mode
Date
To show why it frustrates me:
I searched for "all categories, Full HD, Anytime"
0 results.
Which is understandable since they don't have any Full 1080p videos, but why even put the option in there? I already don't know what the categories stand for since they're mostly non-descriptive. Here those are just in case you're curious:
Studio, Home Made, Up Close, Fantasy and Adventures, Lucrabations, Loose Ends.
Fantasy and Adventures seems to be based around location, some are outside, some are in front of an open window, some are in the shower, etc...
With that being said, whose fantasy and adventures are we talking about?
Despite my complaints, I believe they do exactly what they say do. It's a site with a lot of amateur girls masturbating. They do the close-up camera on the face of the model at times, then between the legs, then between the boobs, it's different. I just wish they would make the site a little easier to use or I should say less time-consuming since you have to click through page after page to decide on what to download.
A tip I've been using to make the navigation a little more tolerable is to go into the search, mark all the boxes then enter a from date and a to date. Use a date that is easy to remember and make it a year period. This makes the scroll, click task a little less frustrating and makes it easier to use. I would still say it's the top in its genre. And would recommend it to those who like amateur solo and girl/girl videos, but have no interest in pictures.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
