Glad to have helped on that one. I did give Twistys and Teen Dreams bonus points in their reviews for this feature that makes downloading lots of content much easier than most sites do. Earlier today, I loaded 135 .wmv and .zip files into on Teen Dreams in less than 5 minutes. Laid down and took a nap, got up a few hours later and everything was downloaded perfectly into the folders I had assigned the downloads to, no broken files, Firefox really is a great browser for porn once you get the add-ons and extensions.
Hey Drooler, I stumbled across that Euro Babe Index announcement a few weeks back while checking for any new Eve content. I was really worried at first since the picture showed Eve with Woodman, and I thought he was going to be running her site. That isn't really a bad thing, but his sites are mostly in French.
Then one day while brushing up on my psychology jargon, I somehow typed in Eve Angel on wikipedia and found out about the new DDF site. Gotta love being paid to search for Eve! Anyway, the site is here www.eveangeloffical dot com. Thing is, now I'm worried about it too. I remember what a mess DDF made of that Cherry Jul solo site and who can forget the ill-fated Sandy's Fantasies? I'm hoping his supposed deep love for Eve and what he calls, "A living sculpture of the perfect natural woman" will make him work harder on her site. We all know Eve can handle the daily update schedule, so fingers are crossed on this one. Also wondering if he will slap that DDF standard $35 a month on it right from the start.
Like I told badandy a few weeks ago when I found the new site, my dumbass will be there credit card in hand as soon as it opens, $35 or not. I signed up for the email updates that is on the splash coming soon page, but have only received one email so far and all it says is coming soon, spring 2009. Oh and if you haven't seen the splash page, be sure to go by and check it out, beautiful picture of Eve on her belly, side view of her butt. I would hope DDF runs with her elegant woman look she has in that one and most of her newer sets instead of trying to make her look younger.
Twistys site is very friendly if you work with it a bit. You can change what your left mouse click button does to download on one click. I have mine set to download .zip/.rar and .wmv/.mov/.avi
When you do this on Twistys, you can download movies by clicking the movie you want, then clicking by which part you want or full scene. Only needing two clicks.
The pictures zips are even easier, you don't even have to open the sets up. You can just left click the little zip icon beside of each set and it starts downloading. So those only take 1 click.
Another tip that the webmaster at Teen Dreams gave me awhile back is to use the add-on for Firefox, "DownThemAll"
If you go to a model's page on Twistys, you can list in the extension filter to download only .zip files. One click on the model's page in a blank area of the page, click downthemall in you context menu and it will load up all of the model's zips in that one click.
Twistys and Teen Dreams are two of the few sites that are programmed this way and it really makes downloading very easy. TD takes it a step further by having their movies on the model page already listed as .wmv, so you can also add the extension, .wmv to the filter and it will download all of the zips and movies for that model with one click. Very handy and efficient.
I don't think we have come close to connecting on any of these posts. You say my logic is flawed. Let me show you flawed logic.
McDonalds advertises breakfast on television and on their outdoor menu. If they up and stopped serving it, but was still advertising it, that would be false advertising. NA advertises "regular updates". You said on the worst case scenario week that they could have 8 new updates and 5 remastered updates. That is regular updates.
Moving on, when I said NA isn't a premium site, that is based on price. They are a bargain site. My comparison between regular unleaded gas and premium unleaded gas was, yes, far-reaching, but not flawed. You are expecting a bargain priced site to deliver more than the premium sites do.
You can look at my reviews to see that NA is ranked tied for 15th out of 160ish reviews I've posted. So, I too like their site, but when they lowered the price, I wondered if that would mean less updates.
For example, the original price had been $25 a month, if they gave you 13 new updates a week, which would be 52 in a month, that would be 48 cents per update.
Now they are charging you $15 a month. And using your example numbers of 13 new updates one week, 8 the next, that would be 42 NEW updates a month or 35 cents per new update.
So, there is no rip-off. They are charging less per new update.
On the cd part, you didn't even start to understand that part. I was not comparing having to buy a cd that was remastered. I was showing that it is NOT unusual for remasters to be sold as NEW. The DSotM remaster is identical to the others before it, same songs, no bonus songs, no bonus DVD clips of the band, yet they legally sell it at the same price as brand new never before released cds.
See what I mean? My first problem was what you have now said was a copy and paste error, so you can understand why I questioned that part. My second problem is why you have a problem with a site doing what the majority of members wanted and still giving you new updates, averaging more than 1 per day, for a bargain price. Let me add, 100% exclusive updates that they have to shoot themselves.
And don't look at it as so much a problem as it was me saying what more do you expect from them? You can see the price per new update above with the new price factored in. There is no false advertising and no rip-off.
I guess you don't think I understand because I don't agree with you? I understand completely. See the site 1byday, they are releasing remasters, or as they call them, "reloaded" sets as new updates. You can even look at their tour and see some of those. So, I'm quite aware of the practice and have been on sites that do it.
The first thing I would say is NA's tour nor join page says 13 updates per day. As a matter of fact, it only promises, "Regular updates" no exact number. So, I don't see why you are saying false advertising.
The second thing, a remaster is technically new. I don't really agree with it, but just go look on a site that sells CDs. Pink Floyd's Darkside of the Moon has been re-released and remastered, I believe 5 official times, just on cd. Same songs, same length, same order of songs and each one costs $12. Nothing new except better sound, just like the NA remasters have better video resolution and bitrates.
Third, I don't understand why you consider NA a premium level site. I'll use 1byday again, $35 a month, NA is $15 a month. To make a far-reaching comparison, that is like buying a tank of regular unleaded gas and expecting super unleaded performance.
On a side note for reference, very few sites can guarantee what they are going to do in the future days, weeks, months. Give Me Pink was easily one of the best premium sites on the internet, 1920 BR DVD quality videos, three different types of picture zips to download for each set, then one day a few months ago, they just quit updating and disappeared completely.
Going by NA's tour pages as long as they are updating, that very vague, "Regular updates" can't really be challenged or counted on.
Last, in your review, I had left a comment to another member Monahan and am interested in why your review is reviewed as you being a constant member over the last 3 or more months on NA, but in your cons you question a DL Limit since you hadn't been a member in about 6 months. You're throwing some pretty hard words out there about NA, false advertising, saying their DL limit is annoying, even though they haven't had a DL limit since October 2007.
I understood what you meant. The thing is, it is becoming fairly normal for sites to remaster and re-release old sets as new updates. I know of at least 3 major sites that are doing it. It goes into the problem I've talked about with those sites. Some members, especially with larger monitors and high end computers are complaining about the old videos. So, the sites can either let that old content die off, even though I think we all know that the older content on most sites these days is much better than the newer content or they can re-release the remasters. Similar to buying cds, when I first bought cds, I bought most of the Pink Floyd cds. A few years later, they released new remastered versions of those discs and by now, they seem to be up to 3rd or 4th remastering.
The main point that I was making is that they lowered their price nearly in half with the TBP discount from $24.95 to $14.95, they are still releasing new content, so I don't see how one can complain about the few remasters they release. I could understand if they didn't continue to release new content or if they were just recycling the content. I can understand why someone would get bored with their content though.
It wasn't so much that I disagreed with the score as it was that I noticed a few things that are odd.
Naughty America made a big move in Fall 2007, they merged their tier 1 sites with tier 2 sites and removed the DL limit. My review of the site in October 2007 talks about no download limit, since it had been a big deal up until then and had stopped me from joining. So, at least by October 2007, the DL limit was removed.
Now, look at the top where it says "how long have you been a member" the review says, "More than 3 months". In the review, the reviewer says, "I THINK there is a daily download limit? There was about 6 months ago when I was last a member". So, which is it? Reviewer is a current member for the last 3 months or hasn't been a member in 6 months?
October 2007 would be 18 months ago and there was no DL limit then either. DL limit is right up there with DRM when it comes to making or breaking a site. I just found the inconsistencies to make the review a little questionable.
On the part about download limits, I also think there was a download limit at one time, but I was just on NA last week and there is no download limit now.
Also, I noticed that you liked the $24.95 price, look up at the TBP price you get if you join NA from the TBP link. You can now get a month for $14.95. TBP made that deal just a month or two ago.
I don't really agree with remastering of old sets as being a dupe. Most people won't even fool with downloading old videos that are poor quality and split into parts, instead of full scenes in one file. Once it is converted to a higher quality and pieced together into a full scene, then it becomes all but new to the vast majority of members. A dupe is better represented by the sites that remove old sets, don't improve them, then re-release them as new. For example, say you have scene "1982.mpg" and it is in 7 parts and is only 320 high end with 400 bitrate. If they remaster it to 720 high with 2000 bitrate and the whole thing is in one part, well that isn't technically the same as the set they removed.
Also touched on a few parts in your review, mainly on the price and daily limit.
I checked out the review you posted on the previous version of this site, thanks for the tip of it switching to this new name. I had cheated on TBP a little and read Rabbit's Review of it, it looks like they didn't carry all of the content over from the original version that you reviewed. Rabbit has the numbers as 19 pic sets, 11 videos, review date was May 2008, but Rabbit has the site listed as updating twice per week. That makes me skeptical since I'm wondering if they are just releasing the content they removed from the original version of the site as new content. Oh and the genre at Rabbit's is listed as "Fetish". So I guess it is going to be mostly these strange settings and sets that the previews show.
I think that one listed update that has her in the Blue Nike bikini is the one thing pulling me back ha ha. What a stomach and curves in that one! I just noticed that it says "65 updates and counting" I didn't understand the whole reason though for only 30 photos per update that Rabbit lists, that is a terribly small set of pictures. Thanks for the info on the original version.
I'm still debating whether to try it. I'm trying to cover a few sites that I have never tried before and at least, I know Susana is on this one! I don't want to get too risky in my search for sites I haven't joined.
Hey GCode, yeah those samples worried me. Susana reminds me of a woman who would have made a great actress in movies. That could be an idea for a thread that could be useful, have the members list their best 10 models, that way everyone could maybe find at least one or two they hadn't seen before. If you are interested in Susana's content, Twistys has a lot, including a video of her in a gym, stripping her workout clothes off that is really good. Teen Dreams has a nice collection of her work too, 1byday also has a good collection of her. She fits the mold of the type of models I usually prefer, just like Eve Angel does, beyond a teen, not quite a mature. There is a whole group of those models that I collect.
Hey Panther, I used to love Action Girls because every woman on there seemed to be in perfect shape, I had forgotten all about that site. Susana seems to enjoy the dress-up, heavy dramatic scenes. The best sets I have of her came from a site that is still up, but haven't updated in over a year called The Next Girl. The sets she has there were taking outside, looks like some kind of festival and the photographer gets some great shots of her coming from under the trees, completely nude and she seems very playful in these. She even has a hat on in one set and is eating ice cream. I wish that site had kept going, they also have some really good sets of Eve Angel and one of the best masturbation videos of Anetta Keys that I've seen. Looks completely natural, cuts in on her masturbating, no tease, and I've never seen her act that turned on in a video.
Susana just doesn't seem to have a lot of masturbation videos. I was checking my hard drive and would say less than half of the videos I have of her are masturbation. Though I will say the video Twistys has where she is in workout attire and rolling around in a gym is very hot, no masturbation, but she is very erotic in it.
Are you kidding me? The beautiful hardbody of Susana Spears being turned into an 80 year old woman, ala Mama's Family? Has anyone been a member here before? I really am a huge fan of Susana, love the 8 pack abs set with the Nike bikini on, but there seems to be as many overly dramatic sets as nice, nude, look at her beautiful body sets. I had heard about this site last year sometime from a friend and a lover of Susana's modeling. Recession is easing, hopefully, and I thought I would check it out.
I'm not too worried about the price that looks way too high, as long as they have some great nude sets of Susana that are exclusive, but some of the samples made me cry. Why would you cover her body in bandages? No, not bondage, that would be hot with Susana, I'm talking hospital bandages. And yeah, the Mama's Family Susana set supposed to be Susana when she gets older is just not very appealing. I don't understand why someone can't just make a nice basic site with Susana as the star, beautiful natural boobs, great curvy butt, one of the best back arches this side of Nautica Thorn. Anybody tried it?
I joined this site a few days ago, trying to broaden my site memberships and try some new ones while I have some extra change on me.
Lets start with the good, cute, exotic, beautiful young women. Look to be a lot of Brazilian ladies here. Impressive quality on this site, 1920 high end video, 6000 bitrate, very nice to look at the very cute exotic Brazilian ladies.
Now the problems, it comes with 50+ solo sites, I don't recognize any of these models, which I'm saying is a good thing, but no picture zips! How can a site that has true HD, Blue-Ray quality HD, not have freaking zips for the photos? The quality of the pictures isn't very high either 1280 high end. I don't know if they want to just be known as a video site and are just throwing the pictures in for good measure, but those zips sure would be nice. The girls range from cute to beautiful to plain to well, not so good-looking.
Now for the headache. I understand that this site is pulling off a huge amount of high quality updates, advertises 150 updates per month and that is Blue Ray 1920 high end updates. But as you can see below, that is their pricing chart.
I took the 5 days for $25 option. Monthly, nearly $50! I wouldn't say a thing if it wasn't for the fact that they offer a YEAR subscription for $85! They are either severely discounting themselves and their worth or they're getting rich off of dumbasses like me!
Why not throw a $20 for one month price on it? If the quality is as good as the ones I've seen, and the updates keep coming and they keep finding these cute models, then after a month, I would go for the $85 per year deal, but who knows? Either way, I wasn't really ready to review it and I doubt I will be even after my 5 days is up. It isn't giving me enough time to really check out the content and update schedule. Still, worth checking out if you are looking for some seriously high quality porn with cute girls. By the way, my rating was going to be an 80 based on the confusing pricing system, the navigation isn't very good and things can get very confusing when you have 50 sites to go through. I will say the sky is the limit when it comes to potential, but that price is going to have to be lower to get new members to try it out. Price plans below.
G18 discounted monthly $48.18
G18 discounted 50 days $55.45
G18 One Full Year $85.45
G18 weekend break - 2 days $11.26
G18 5 days break $25.00
I joined that Party Hardcore site back a few years ago. It was 34 Euros at the time, so it ended up being over $41. I still will pay the higher prices, 1byday for $35 for example, but most that I join are under $25.
I have been told I have had mine shared with others by Teen Dreams and Club Sandy. Sadly, most sites start out like this, "We have suspended your account for sharing your login info with others."
So they automatically accuse you. Both of those sites, at the time I was supposedly hacked, had non-secure signups, not your payment information, but the username and password you sign up for. Similar to most sites on the internet, if you put information across a non-secure connection, there is a chance someone is going to be able to get it. To make matters worse, don't we all know those who do steal/hack others porn login are just sitting there on those sites with non-secure signups waiting to steal the login and password?
I remember years ago when yahoo had non-secure sign-in and sign-up, seemed like daily, I would have emails missing, even had one that left me a note to say hi. As of right now, I have updated AV, run super anti-spyware and malware byte's anti-malware daily, two-way firewall, and also use an external firewall that blocks even me from using my PC at times ha ha.
I just can't see how a computer with that much protection is more prone to being hacked than a simple non-secure signup page is.
I still have some of the content from this site and it seems that most of it, he jerks himself, which is kind of strange since he is also holding the camera. Back before I joined it, I checked out Tiave dot com and did a search for the site name. They had 10+ pages of samples from it, if you wanted to check out the content that way.
Have to agree Denner, I've kept a membership at Twistys now for nearly a year and have 5 more months left of my current one and plan to renew it to a 6 month membership again when it runs out.
Can't say I've tried these. Really can't say I would either. I remember one of the porn stars, can't remember which one was promoting a video of her using a Fleshlight on a man. My first thought when I saw the video and the Fleshlight was, "What if the son of a bitch doesn't let me go?" Too much concern of bodily harm to a very sensitive area! It makes me have a trip down memory lane to the Porky's movie where the one guy sticks his dick in the hole in the wall and the old woman teacher pulls it and won't let go.
Evelyn's videos and even photos on her site were really great, much better even than some of the videos I've seen of her on other sites. I had just mentioned to Messmer that Eve as well, really gave her all in her videos on her site, more so than her videos on other sites. I just hate that Eve's site has gone down so badly and can't wait for that new DDF solo site of Eve to open. Though I am starting to be skeptical of it since I first about it back in March and here it is May and they are still showing the Coming Soon splash page.
You know, I had completely missed Bambi, think it was the hair color change that threw me off, but have picked up a bunch of sets of her from the 21st Sextury sites and I was surprised at how good her content is. The little UK model Sasha/Sara also is quite good solo, mainly because of her dirty mouth ha ha. I have always believed that models like Eve and Evelyn, both could be super models if taller, are much more comfortable by themselves or in Eve's case, with another woman than man. I remember saying one time before that Eve does more with her fingers than most models do with a male model! I picked up an Eve video, believe it is from Digital Desires, but not positive on that. It is almost true POV, a guy holding the camera very close. Believe it is called, "Sex with Eve". She purrs at one point, with a grin on her face and eyes closed, "It is cumming". Broken English be damned! That was one of the hottest moments I've ever seen of her since she rarely speaks in English.
Don't worry too much about forgetting if you replied to that thread, I had the same concerns when I asked since if you did reply to it, that would mean I forgot if you replied or not!
I am making more comments than reviews these days. It is hard to believe that I only have 17 reviews since October 2008, which means I had 142 before then. I had been averaging around 12 reviews per month, now I've been reduced to not quite 3 per month.
My problem, and Drooler has talked about this too, it could also be what you are running into is that I know exactly what I want and expect from a site. I can join a new site and within 2 hours can tell you whether I love it or hate it.
Then I run into a member like GCode and he is just now getting into the Euro models and I find myself thinking I should review more based on the technical, numbers, part of the site, and like with you, my frustration with the same ol', same ol' tries to creep in and tell me to ignore those HD videos.
I've felt this way about one site especially and that is Brazzers. I joined it in January, believe it was my 5th time over the years and I honestly signed in one time and didn't go back. Even some of my favorite actresses are becoming stale to me. Kind of feels like a bad marriage in that sense!
I really wish Eve Angel's solo site hadn't become a recycling site and dropped their TBP discount of $15. I would highly recommended it to you for the eroticism she presents on that site. Some of her content on other sites isn't nearly as good. To this day, I still watch her videos from her original site more than all other videos combined. She is just playful enough, just tease enough to make her different than the majority of models and most of all, she somehow was able to produce over 250 videos on that site of her having real orgasms, the last few months were questionable, but before that she really gave her all. I think that shows by DDF picking her up to start a new solo site, which I check 2-3 times a day to see if it is open yet ha ha!
Messmer, I wonder if you replied to or read my thread awhile back about re-review dilemmas? The further I go into porn, the years pass, and many of the sites that I have scored high in the past, wouldn't be as high now simply because it is all the same as it was 2 years ago. That thread was about the dilemma I was in, in my re-reviews because I could review them from a pure technical view, saying they have X amount of content, high resolution videos, etc...
Or should I start adding a more personal feeling that this or that site just doesn't do anything for me anymore. I couldn't figure out what was the right way to go about that since I felt like those reading my reviews may or may not think 300th straight facial was boring, and that is why re-reviews or even reviews have become much harder for me to do.
My point being, I agree that the b/g scenes these days are downright boring. I would guess it is the biggest reason that I prefer solo. Not to overhype my favorite model, but Eve Angel and her fingers or dildo is more erotic than 99.9% of hardcore on the internet. She has the full tease, strip, eye contact with the camera, tongue licking her lips and her masturbation causes her to have full body jerks and spasms.
Best way to reach them is "support@21sextury dot com"
They have a lot of problems with hackers and one of their webmasters had left that email address here for anyone needing support with their sites. Hope that helps.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
