I'm going to take into consideration that English is not your native language.
You say that "with your membership get access to lots of fresh content weekly". In all fairness, I am just reviewing Regan's site. The score would be higher if I reviewed the whole network as one site, however, all of your sites are not updating weekly either. Tanya's site last update was 4/25/11, that was 4 months ago. Then Regan's isn't updating, so 2 of 5 are not updating. I'm not trying to be too rough there, but I do want you to understand that as a whole network, I would be nicer with my score.
On Regan, I'm not for sure why her leaving the business two years is relevant. I'm not complaining about the lack of updates. I had already read from The Best Porn that the site had not updated since 2009. So that's a non-issue.
Where I do take an issue is with you saying I should appreciate the content that is still there on Regan's website. I complimented the content, I complimented the site's navigation and setup, ease of use. So I did appreciate the content, but your wording of it says, "we had to delete some of the content" you all went from having 83 photo sets to 22. That means you all deleted 73% of the photo sets. That's not some, that's most. The only way I know to show you this is to say would you be happy if your subscribers only paid 27% of the price of your site? You wouldn't appreciate that or else you would lower your price 73%.
I'm not fully believing the non-recycling comment and I will explain why. On Freeones, I can pull up the old version of "Cake Friends". The only difference in the watermark is it moved from the left top corner to the bottom right corner and is a different logo, removing Capalli from Capri's name and adding XXX. Where you hurt yourself here is that you're telling me that Capri also has sets being re-released with a different watermark.
If I go look into Capri's updates I see that all of her updates that had the old watermark on them were re-released on 8/7/11. In photos, Capri has a total of 17 photosets and 11 of those 17 were re-released on 8/7/11. In videos, the newest released video is 8/7/11. You just told me that these 8/7/11 releases were due to a change in the watermark. If I look back before these re-releases, the newest video on Capri's site was 7/15/10. The newest picture set before the re-releases was 7/14/10 and her newest webcam archive video was 11/29/09. So, by this theory, Capri's site is not updating either unless it's recycled content.
That one new Capri photoset has 33 photos in it, all the previous ones had well over 100, some over 200. So that update looks questionable too. If I had the time, I could go through all of the sites and check this, but I now believe 3 of 5 sites are not updating with new content.
Edit: In all fairness, this webmaster seems genuinely honest. Some of the content is recycled, I'm sure there is a fine line between what is dishonest and what is just a difference in subjective definitions. I'm removing the dishonest part with the thought that maybe future members will read the review and see that it doesn't have as much content as expected.
I think I've caught the messmer-bug! I've always collected by favorite models, but my favorite models are either disappearing or they are calling in their performances based on their names selling a set, Eve Angel and Sophie Moone, on that one. There's something about this Zulfija though. The sets I have found of her so far wouldn't really be to my usual liking except for the one on Met-Art, which is now one of my favorite photo sets I've ever seen, but only one set on Met. It's like she's teasing me! The sets on Domai and Goddess Nudes would not be to my normal liking. The one on Met-Art she starts dressed in a dress and at least poses several times with her clothes still on. The sets on Domai and Goddess Nudes start nude. So my thinking when I saw Teen Dreams had her content was based on the knowledge I have of Teen Dreams sets in the past, they rarely start the model out nude in a photo set.
Oh, here's the link to the other preview page they have of her.
http://tour.teendreams.com/featured/zulfija.php
The TBP/PU screencap of Teen Dreams actually shows the top of her head as the front page featured model. When she pops up there that one says the five sets, 500 photos, 2250px. It just seems like as good of a site as Teen Dreams has been that making fairly big errors on two different pages isn't that likely.
What has happened, I've become once-bitten recently with another site removing content. I normally wouldn't post a review of a site I would score as low as I'm going to score this one, but I think the amount of content removed needs to be reviewed for future warnings to others. As you will see in that review, Club Regan Reese, I seem to be running into more and more problems with sites these days, two billing issues, one site removing content, in just the last few weeks and then not knowing if Teen Dreams has made two big errors or has maybe removed content too. I seem to be more on a photo kick lately, but I'm not finding much to try since, as mentioned at the first, I can be picky about photos because I like the model dressed to begin the set. It's kind of funny as I have laughed through most of this post because I always aggravate messmer about being picky, now I've seemed to become the same way. Oh and yes, I've been a member of TD more than 10 times over the years, but not since 2009 or so. Now to go write my first negative review in years.
Somehow I have completely missed the model, Zulfija. Happened to see her on Met-Art and decided to see if I could find any other content of her. I found some on Domai and Domai's sister site Goddess Nudes, then found a thread on a forum that said she was on Teen Dreams. I go to Teen Dreams and see her in the featured models section, click it and it says, "We have 4 exclusive series of Zulfija inside our members area!"
Since I knew they had a preview members area I clicked it just to make sure it's not sets I already have. When I go to her model page, she has ONE set. This becomes further confusing when she happens to be the feature model on the main page. It says they have five sets, 500 photos, 2250px of her. Right now, in my porn rut, she's a deal breaker. What I'm wondering, since Teen Dreams is known for the use of quite a few aliases for models, is she maybe listed under a different name? I've never known Teen Dreams to be a dishonest site, so I want to believe it's explainable, but as said above, it's a deal breaker. Does anyone know how much content there is of Zulfija on Teen Dreams?
Well, considering how many times I've seen Eve Angel and Sophie Moone naked, I kind of feel like I know them personally!
Similar to the above Californians, I know of at least 3 pornstars that went to the middle, high schools I did, but didn't really know them. It usually works the other way for me. I've met them after they become porn stars since they blend in with everyone else in California.
I do believe I made an error on my first ticket. I submitted a second one and you replied to it in less than a day, so the cancel went through. I will edit the original comment here to say that the problem was resolved. As I was saying above, the last thing I wanted to do was give you all negative, undeserved feedback based on something that wasn't your site's fault, but on the other hand, I try to give our members here a heads up of any potential problems in case they then run into them too. It's always appreciated by most of our members here to see a webmaster doing their best, like you have here, to be active with your members and helpful. Thanks again.
I do understand that problems like this will happen and I'm fairly well-known around this site for being really laid-back and easygoing. I'm not going to be one of those customers that panics and goes into a cussing frenzy, though it probably would humor the members here!
As I told the others above, I believe you all are a honest company and honest mistakes happen. I do see where the cancel page for netbilling customers has been changed to send potential canceling customers to a support ticket system, but I opened a ticket, estimating around 32 hours ago, still haven't received a ticket number so I can't check the status of the ticket and don't have any type of cancel confirmation. At this point, I feel like I'm being the annoying one since I'm accepting that maybe I did something wrong in the opening a support ticket part. It's entirely possible that I used my work email instead of my personal email address in opening the support ticket. Though the account is registered to my personal email address.
I'll blame those damn auto-fill in the blanks settings on that since my wife and I both use the computer and four possible emails pop up when I come upon an area to fill in email.
So my question now is, should I open another ticket just in case I did use the wrong email? That's me trying to be respectful of your staff by not opening more than one support ticket. It did hit me though that it's possible I could have clicked on the wrong email address. And thanks for the fast reply and working on this issue. It says more for your site's support than the majority of sites these days.
The worst part, I've sent the email/support ticket, but still haven't gotten it canceled or any confirmation of it. I don't understand these sites either. I know that it costs them more to have the top billers, but like with this site, they have ccbill and epoch listed, why not just let everyone join through those? Would make it much easier for us customers. I'm still holding onto the fact that I believe this site is a reputable one and we're just having crossed-up communication, tech problems maybe with their site, etc...
Heck, at this rate, I can probably cook a meal, eat it, sleep, go to work, take a weekend getaway and it will be still be trying to cancel! I really hate to be this negative with a site that seems to work hard on delivering what they promise their site has, but it's getting harder by the day.
Getting ready to reply to their webmaster below because I opened a support ticket on Monday morning. The cancel option takes you directly to the open a support ticket area now, but here it is 5 PM EST on Tuesday and I have yet to receive a ticket #, check both email inbox and spam box. This ticket # is required to access their reply to my ticket. The only thing that's stopping me from being too infuriated is that the subscription still has 10-11 days on it, so surely they will get something worked out by then. If the problem persists the scoring will continue to go down.
Edit: Just wanted to edit to say the webmaster helped me get canceled, but will leave the rest of the comment in case it happens to a future member so they can reference it.
Going to take a few points off my review for the frustrating cancellation process. Here's the steps and mind you, I still have NOT been able to cancel my account.
First, they have four different billing processors, netbilling, ccbill, epoch and netcash. I don't know if certain ones are used based on the country you are in, but my account was processed by netbilling, who I have used a time or two in the past.
In my subscription confirmation email there is no link to cancel. I go to netbilling's homepage, have a member ID, but there is nowhere on netbilling's homepage to cancel. Went to Yanks support, clicked "cancel" it asked which biller I used. Clicked on netbilling. It tells me to put my username and password in. I do this and click "cancel account".
Well, the browser sits there with a working spinner going, "Connecting..." I go outside, take the trash out, come back and still is working and saying, "connecting". It finally pops up and says, "Cannot find account". I'll never understand why a biller gives a customer a "member ID number" but doesn't have a place to enter that when canceling.
I'll never understand why a site would hire a biller that doesn't allow direct cancel on the biller's homepage. You're just asking for dissatisfied customers.
And this is not just a one-time thing. I've tried it 3 nights in a row. There is an option to email the site's support with any cancellation problems, so I guess I'm going to have to do that. Whether fast reply or not, I don't think I should have to email the site to cancel when they have a cancellation system in place. It goes back to, I didn't have to email the site to JOIN the site so why should I have to email the site to cancel it? Go back to my review and see the part about my main frustration with the site itself being that it could be much better than it is if some time and effort was put into updating the way the site itself works. Looks like that carried right over into the billing too.
And here I was thinking I would never use 5,000 character limit, but ended up cutting a line or two out just to fit everything in. I at least wanted to get something up for anyone that maybe wants to try it out. The expired reviews seemed to be before they merged their sites together so it made a huge difference in the amount of content.
The male site worked for me since my wife likes porn too, but not the real hardcore sets. She did say the videos she watched were okay, but said the camera was too far away in them, in her words, "making the dicks all look tiny". I think from reading the forum on their site that's kind of what they were aiming for by having a male and female site. A few sites have tried this in the past that I can remember. Though I do want to mention that I still don't know what all I have access to. Things become really confusing once away from the Yanks main site since they list "our sites" but have a "join" page on them. It could just be that the sites are older in design and require a join verification instead of going straight to them, but it's confusing nonetheless.
I wasn't for sure I wanted Golden Girls to be too believable! I remember really liking the show, but don't remember too much arousal factor. The one I noticed most was That 70s Show since I always thought Mila Kunis was really sexy and it looks like they pulled it off pretty well. Really, I'm surprised more sites don't try the celebrity look-a-like sets more often.
I tried it out, but not getting the offer. The only options I got besides the standard join is to join for long-term. The worst part, I never can get my card approved through their billing system so it ends up sending me to ccbill. Maybe I'll send them an email and ask what's going on with both problems. I wouldn't have ever complained about it if Angels updated more frequently. I still really like their content, but my subscriptions have dropped off since I usually prefer Angels. At one time, maybe 2007, I was joining both about every 3 months. As of right now, I don't think I've been a member this year of either. Just like Monahan's post below shows.
Very good review RearAdmiral. I've been a big fan of both ALS sites for a good while. The main thing I'm going to comment on is the ALS Angels site being available for $9.95 with ALS Scan. This originally was the only major problem I had with the ALS sites.
The difference between the two. ALS Angels are models, ALS' webmaster Alex felt were "too curvy" for ALS Scan. If he has made Angels available for $9.95 to Scan members then I probably wouldn't complain too much, but for years, including up to the last membership I had, Scan was $29.95, Angels was $24.95 no matter whether you joined them both or not and it had me almost saying "scam". Various reasons for it, my favorite Euro model, Eve Angel is on Angels only, she is listed as 5'6" 115. not really for sure on what world a 115 pound woman is "too curvy". I think my most recent reviews of the two scored Angels higher than Scan just because I preferred the models, though Angels only updates 7-10 times a month, compared to Scan's much more frequent updates.
It became such a frustrating point for me that I stopped joining either site. Don't remember how I exactly worded it, either in a review or comment, but at one point, it cost nearly $55 to join both and the only bonus from joining both was receiving all the models all other sites offer for one price. This became more frustrating when I signed up for both sites with the same username/password and sure enough, they were going through the same server. I think I've even posted I would be willing to join both for $39.95 combo price, so it at least shows how much I liked the content. I'll have to make a note to join both if Alex keeps giving a discount to Angels for Scan members.
A model I had found on a very few sites, Sasha Bleu, seems to go by several variations of aliases, all starting with Sasha. I've seen several preview sets of her that have this Naughty Mag watermark on them. I'm not real familiar with the Score Group except that I know they usually are focused on big boobs. TBP review looks pretty good on it, but no recent reviews or comments, so I'm just curious if anyone has tried it recently. Not being a huge fan of big boobs, I don't know if it's worth a membership just to get the Sasha content or not.
I don't watch a lot of tv these days, but got a promo special offer in email for this site from New Sensations. Thought I would take a look and have to say, while I don't know a few of these shows in their real form, the ones I do are pretty impressive when it comes to finding porn stars that resemble the real cast of these shows. I noticed though on the TBP facts that there are no downloads for the videos. Still worth a preview visit to see the similarities.
Hey GCode, got good news, bad news and more good news. The good news is, I was a member here about a year ago and the content was better than I Feel Myself, in the sense that it was more pornographic, but kept the real, erotic feel. The bad news, I was only on it for 3-4 days before we moved and ended up not really digging into the site. Also don't think it came with the other sites it does now. Looks like they have combined them all into one now, which would be a big plus. The "more" good news, I had forgotten all about this site and am in a serious site rut right now. So, since I don't have any of the content after the move, I'll give it a shot. I'll get a fairly quick review up of it since I do have a good idea of what the content was like when I was there before. I'll try to list as many of the numbers as possible.
This network, not really for sure what the name of it is, but it has 14 sites included in it, all but one are solo models sites. I joined for Ashley Fires after seeing her content on In the Crack. There are some very good sites on this network including a medium sized solo site for Aaliyah Love. The network works well too and nice to see the sites each having zip files for the photo sets.
So the number of overall sites have changed since the TBP review, was listed as 9 included with each. The other difference between now and the TBP review, a large amount of this content is not exclusive. Nineteen of the last 22 photo sets have been from other sites that shot Ashley, mostly Kink.com sites. Still checkout the models with small to medium sized sites here. It's really not a bad deal at all when taking into consideration the TBP discount.
Thanks slutty, I didn't even know about the renew price. I have a cycle I use with types of sites and usually am joining the reality networks each year in June-August, so that may be why we're having the similar subscriptions. Which is also why I didn't know about the renew price. I rarely stay with a reality network for more than a month at a time because I know I will get bored with the same theme. On the models with the fake boobs, I'm with the anti-fake boobs beliefs as much as anyone is and while I do agree that the sites do choose which models they hire, there is still another side to that too. Not all natural models do hardcore. There are so many twists to sites hiring models that I do think they are still limited under the "damned if we do, damned if we don't" position.
Some Extra Info, # of scenes and possible DVD boredom solution
I gave this network a very high score and wanted to go back and add some things to the review. I had a lot of questions about this network because of the varying information I have read on it. Here are the numbers by site and a triple asterisk (***) will be beside the name of the sites if it is not updating any longer.
Not Exclusive bonus content:
Now this goes into something I don't know if any of us has the time to figure out.
The numbers according to the site.
12,302 DVDs, 104,910 scenes
For those that get bored with Videobox and the other common DVD sites, this section of MOFOs is filled with DVDs I've never seen. By the numbers, it is a bigger DVD section than Videobox has.
The one downfall, the quality of the videos varies, I've downloaded a few that were 480x320 and others that are 640x480.
There are lots of DVDs that I wouldn't expect to see on DVD sites like 200 or so DVDs in the "granny" category. There is bondage, gay, tranny, hairy, teens, group, it may not be the best quality, but I think this really adds to the already impressive 711 exclusive scenes. Wouldn't drop my score any based on the time that has passed for the "newness" to wear off.
I had a Chow-Chow dog growing up, had him for about 13 years before he passed away. Haven't had a pet since. I do like dogs, big dogs at that, but my wife and I live in and had lived in low-maintenance condos since we both work so much. Adding a pet now wouldn't be good for the pet or us. Maybe when we get older and can work less though. Wouldn't mind to have another Chow, loved the loyalty of the breed.
This has some interesting results for sure. I also don't really care for thongs. Went with other, but if I had to pick one of those it would probably be something lace.
I think one of the sexier ones that rarely gets mentioned or used in porn is the mesh hipsters. One model that wore these some was Susanna Spears, it may be more of an athletic thing since she was usually in a set about working out. I still like my imagination to do the work at least at first!
Looks like you're right, that's one of the more natural sets of implants I've seen. I wasn't familiar with her work on Living With Anna, but see on Google that she did get implants. I would call those similar to Sandra Shine's.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
