I obviously have not been watching much porn lately. I read the question and thought it was about women eating real pies made of cream, like the WAM sites have on them. I never really was into the creampie porn so I will stick with no interest in even though I originally answered based on thinking it was WAM porn.
I picked other, but only because I have known two bloggers in the past that typed in all caps because they couldn't see well. This isn't near the issue now that it was back then, but the blogging software they used didn't have a WYSIWYG editor so the font they typed in was extremely small though it would format it in larger type.
Other since I kind of got used to it reading their blogs.
Thanks for this information. I had wondered on the DL limit since it reminded me of how Bang Bros and Reality Kings used to list theirs by site and number of "big" videos. My main interest would be Charley and London though I would still check out the others. Charley is a really good, fun live performer, I hadn't noticed much about her until seeing a scene on Asses in Public where she showed a really playful side. Then saw the archived "live" videos of her on Naughty America and really liked those as well.
I'm still going to consider this network, but not until I join a few others that I have been meaning to join. The live shows wouldn't work with my schedule at all. I used to have that same problem when we lived in California since the live shows would air while I was at work. Now on the east coast of the United States, it still will be airing while I'm working, headed home from work. Again, thanks for the information it will be very useful to me.
For about 4 months, I have clicked on this network, considered, re-considered. My original interest in the network is the inclusion of two of my favorites, Charley Chase and London Keyes, but things still seem to be a bit different. I was thinking there was a discount before, but could be wrong. I also notice that they now offer a 5 day trial for $5 instead of the $1 trial, since there seemed to be some confusion over the trial earlier, this makes it more confusing!
I have really started to like watching the webcam shows, but I can't ever see one live since they seem to have them about an hour before I get home from work.
My first question is, does this network include archive videos of the webcam shows? I found that feature really nice on a few other similar network of solo sites.
Second question is, does anyone know if the $5 trial is full access since the $1 one wasn't? I very rarely use trials, but with the $30 price and having been burnt with the last few sites I joined, it would be nice to know what I'm getting into before getting into it.
Third, this download limit that I noticed on Charley's site info. Is that daily limit cumulative across all the sites or is it a limit per site per day?
Mine would have been in the late 80s. I vaguely remember my uncle having a Rubix Cube like object, but instead of colored squares it had female bodyparts. Once you got everything lined up, each side of the cube was of a fully nude woman. Not long after that, the same uncle had a subscription to Playboy and would give me his old issues.
I do, almost too frequently. My wife was interested in pictures when I met her, so it just progressed and while this may not always be the case, it does blend with the porn hobby and makes her more acceptable of it. It also helps with stopping the possibility of the "I can't compete with those girls you look at in porn" complex. It may change in the future, but right now, it works as an alternative method of foreplay.
There is another way to look at it though it's probably not right. There are a lot of men and women that are into sexual self-abuse. This can range from the cuckold fantasy to the dom/sub fantasy.
Where the first problem comes in isn't so much that masturbation is seen as self-abuse, but is instead our subjective views on "abuse". When I see masturbation as self-abuse is when it reaches the point that the person no longer has sexual desire to be with others and is content with their sex life being just based around masturbation. I think from that view, it could be seen as abusive mentally.
Though the physical view of it being self-abuse is quite funny! I'll try that with my wife the next time she gets mad at me, "Stop yelling at me or I'm going to go hurt myself with masturbation!" Sadly, I can see her rolling her eyes.
I'm laughing on this one. First of all, a lot of women wouldn't admit it. I can tell you all from my wife to her circle of friends, all they talk about is sex toys, masturbating and sex. Because of my past as a psychologist, they have no problem talking about it in front of me. One even made the comment, "How many sex toys are there for women? How many for men? Shouldn't that tell you something?" I'm not buying it guys. I would go as far as saying I think it's more than men. They got their little pocket rocket vibrators for in the car on the commute home. They've got the ultra-quiet, tiny thumb vibrators for at work.
Just a random opinion, but I can count over 20 women that are friends with my wife who talk very freely about masturbation and they all say the same things, "I don't talk to my husband/boyfriend about it because I'm afraid it will make him feel like he's inadequate." to "I wouldn't tell most people! I was raised to believe masturbation was nasty and I'm not nasty!"
I could probably put a camera on them talking and sell it as a website! I do think it is also an age thing, most of these women are in their 20s and I think it's an American thing too, as the studies estimate the average American woman owns 2.5 sex toys and as much as most of us hate that damn Hitachi Wand, it is sold in Wal-Marts across the country as a personal massager. I think they got us fooled.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse, but no model, in my opinion, did the tease as well as Eve Angel in her older sets. She's lost most of it now in her newer content, but her content from say 2004-2008, the striptease would last for, on average, half of a video. And you could tell she thoroughly enjoyed it. Having seen some of her newer content, the tease has been cut in about half. I don't know if that's the new producer's fault or if Eve is just getting tired of the business.
Seems to be a growing trend with the Euro models and even worse, the videos that show the picture shoot and the photographer tells the model to give him the orgasm face! It seems to have replaced the finger touching the bottom lip, "I've been naughty" look though I don't know which is worse.
Thank you Pat, I will have some more low score reviews. I spent the last month or two taking some risks on sites that I had always been curious about and most turned out to be not near as good as I hoped. As I was saying in my other reply on this review, a lot of my lack of poor scoring sites has been me just playing it safe by joining sites I had been a member of before, but the same models are starting to bore me so I've had to expand my view of sites and take some risks.
And I agree about Regan. I don't mind tattoos, but I'm not drawn to them either. She just seems to have that little something extra that most models don't have these days. The other Regan Reese site that I left a comment on is really good for pictures as long as you have an image downloader since it doesn't have any zips. And as bad as I hate to say it, the best source for her videos is Videobox with a channel subscription to Vivid and Evil Angel, that combination has around 23 videos of her.
Thank you, there are all kinds of pitfalls to watch out for in the porn world. Besides the ones you named off, there's the "lets change this model's name and sell her as a new model" this one is so bad that one of the more respected sites, Nubiles, actually still has one model listed under two names, meaning if a member didn't know her other name, they would miss half of her content they have. In this particular case, the model, now very commonly known as Cindy Hope, was originally known as Klaudia. She had a pretty big transformation in her look, going from an average, girl next door, cute, flat-chested model to a glamorous, very pro looking model with implants. And even though Nubiles is a good site with a very good webmaster, they still haven't put her content under one name despite me posting a comment about it here. One of the other reasons I haven't had a lot of bad sites, I have learned which sites deliver what I'm looking for and join those multiple times per year. Meaning I'm kind of playing it safe, but when I saw this Regan Reese, I was drawn in by her uniqueness and willing to take a risk.
A lot of times, you will notice that the members who like photos more than videos are older. I'm not quite into the older group, but am old enough to say the first 5-6 years I saw porn, it was in magazines, Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler. Photos also seem to be favored by those that like using their imagination. I seem to go back and forth. I'll have months where I just join DVD sites, no photos at all, then I will jump to a site that has photos and videos, then find myself on the more artistic very softcore sites. Which most have videos, but they are usually extremely boring. I may be trying to find some kind of balance too. My wife "almost" hates hardcore, she loves softcore, so I find myself trying to balance them out, but I do think the nostalgic, remembering old magazines and the photos, does play a big role in these photo only sites surviving.
At first, I wasn't too happy with the new design at Bang Bros. It worked really good, makes the site less cluttered, but the screenshot sips and part of the photo zips were not downloading. In their defense, they did have a note up that they knew everything wasn't working right and it would be fixed shortly. It was fixed within 24 hours. So now, they have really improved the functionality of their site.
The other good news, may just be for me, the model some of us know as Abella Anderson, one of the few models I have recommended to other members on here, once had a solo site called Living with Anna.
I don't know when Bang Bros added it to their network, it is just an archive site now, but this is some really great content of her with some of it coming before her implants. The amount of content of her on it isn't that great, but the totals are: 35 videos, 35 photo sets, 35 screenshot zips.
Up until now I had only been able to find 1-2 scenes of her on different sites and only had a total of 18 scenes, so this site being thrown in to the Bangbros Network, added a big boost for me since it nearly doubled my entire collection of her content.
A few other sites I hadn't seen on here before. Ava Spice. This is a tiny site with only 5 videos, 5 photo sets, 5 screencap sets, but this is yet another site where it looks like Bang Bros adds these no longer updating solo sites to their network as a nice little bonus.
Also there is a Bang Bros Remastered site that has 15-20 remastered sets from the early days of the Bang Bus.
I had first noticed Bang Bros doing this adding of sites that had gone out of business when they added the archived content from The Penny Show. Considering they are still adding new updates to their regular sites and with the much improved navigation in the new site design, it's still easily recommended and even more so if you like finding content like the Living With Anna content.
As the others have said Sandy's Fantasies dates back several years. I actually complained about them removing it from their network a few years ago since it has a lot of good, older content of some of the bigger Euro stars.
You can also see here on PU that I have a review of it on here from 3 years ago.
In my attempt to find more content of Regan Reese, I stumbled across this site, this is an update to the information.
There's not a lot of content of Regan still. There are only 7 videos, but there is a good collection of photos, over 4,000 total. My main interest in Regan's content are the photos since it's not that hard to find videos of her on the usual DVD sites like Videobox.
The problem with the photo sets, they are not very big photos. I think the biggest I've seen is 1200 long end and there are no zips. I used an image downloader, which worked well since there are 90 photos on each page. Regan gives off the artsy vibe and these picture sets are artsy, but explicit as well. That's not that common to see those two combined.
After downloading all the Regan content, I noticed a link for "bonus sites". There are 19 other sites that comes with Regan's site! These sites are all very similar to Regan's. Mostly well-known porn stars solo sites, Jenaveve Jolie, Eva Angelina, Alexis Amore, Daisy Marie, Nautica Thorn, 11 others also have these solo sites on here and there are 2-3 sites that are more into the hardcore genre, may be licensed content.
What could make these sites interesting is the collectible factor. Most of the models on here also double as exotic dancers and there are videos and photos of their exotic dancing performances. This stuff looks very rare. It looks like all of these sites were probably trying to run as standalone sites, stopped updating and someone put them all together in one package.
Since I don't mind digging around for rare content, this made this site/network pretty good for me. I don't like having to use an image downloader software, but it's better than the sites that put programming in that won't even let you do that. As a collector of Jenaveve Jolie videos, I can say that of the 30ish videos I downloaded from her site that none look familiar and it should be noted that most are trademarked, Club Jenaveve Jolie, which the Club sites were sort of a fad in porn a few years ago where a hardcore star would have a solo site showing her in more softcore videos and photo sets. The video quality from all the sites is around average. I consider DVD quality to be average, the ones I have checked are 640 high end but they are watchable. I think Jenaveve's exotic dance video at a club in Texas may be worth the price alone.
A warning, the sites are moody. I've clicked sign in with my sign in info saved only to see it reject the sign in, click it again and it opens. These sites do look old and plain in design, but overall, I thought it was a good join for $20 for all the sites. Some of the models, Jenaveve comes to mind, looks to have upwards of 10,000 photos.
If I were scoring just this site of Regan, I would go with an 80 just for the photos, she's very photogenic. Add another 5 points for the bonus sites. If someone took all this content, added zips, this would be a very good join for collectors.
The two I don't like are the, "I've been a naughty girl and you just caught me with my finger in my mouth" expression.
And the, mouth open, "Can you tell I'm faking an orgasm" expression.
I prefer to pick my own, but I'm noticing more and more sites are going to assigning you a username and password. The last four sites I joined all assigned me a username and password. Hey, at least it's giving us reason to use our computer for something besides porn, who knew I had a software on my PC that lets me save usernames and passwords in doc files? Now if I could find a software to find the damn things!
No need to ignore it. I have always had slight problems enjoying any of the non-explicit sites, I mean, it could be just one explicit picture out of 60 and I would be happier with the site as a whole. My use of artsy, I noticed that the main guy behind this site allows members to send a few pictures to friends and I also found an entire site where aspiring photographers talk about these pictures and aspiring artists, charcoal, watercolors, reproduce the photos in charcoal and paintings. That's a little more complex than I like my porn. In my porn brain, there are two types of porn sites, sexual and artistic and I'm not expanding that view lol!
Goddess Nudes does have some clothed pictures, but I wouldn't call them stripteases. You know the kind, there will be five completely clothed pictures then in the 6th picture the model is completely nude. Not much in-between clothed and nude. I'm like you, I like the progression, anticipation and tease then the nudity. I do at least like that they have some clothed since that at least let me know what the model looks like clothed. The other thing Goddess Nudes adds is that some of the pictures show more pink, more provocative poses. On Domai, the provocative poses are often planned out not to show everything. Like one model, believe it is Victoria, has a great body, curves and there is a picture of her in doggystyle, but the photo is taken looking at her face so you don't get to see the other side of the pose. Another of this Zulfija, she's in rushing water, two photos in this pose, legs spread open and the water is rushing right between her legs blocking any explicit view. I guess that could be considered a tease in a way, but teases that don't ever let me see what was being teased frustrate me!
But it is hard to beat that Goddess Nudes price at $4.95 a month. I'm not going to post a review on it since Drooler's review covers most of it, but I am going to post a comment with updated content numbers.
Thanks for this info. This model must have had a very short career and everything she does seems to start out nude. I had wondered about Teen Dreams, noticed that they were updating a lot or what appeared to be more than they used to, but didn't see many models that caught my eye. It does look an error on the Zulfija content since the front feature model says 5 sets, the other I linked says 4, but there's only 1. Another thought, all of Zulfija's sets I have are very short on the picture count. The ones from Domai and Goddess Nude have around 20 photos in each only, so maybe Teen Dreams once had 4-5 small sets and just combined them into one regular sized one. Again, thanks, I will keep looking elsewhere.
I do think part of the problem is our language difference, but I do understand the points you are making and appreciate you doing your best to explain them in a language that isn't your native language.
What I'm going to do, to be fair to you and to the members here, potential members of your sites is review each of your sites with updated information. I'm afraid if the information doesn't get updated you're going to have more upset customers and hopefully, I've at least been friendly about it. I know others won't be if they are expecting more.
I also understand about the price. My comment about worth $5 was based solely on the amount of Regan content, not the whole network. I'm going to leave the recycle comment because some of it is recycled, not exclusive, but I am going to remove the part about you running a dishonest company. Maybe that was unfair of me to say without an explanation. I will review your other sites over the next week, some of the scores may not be that high, but I will also be fair in those.
That is a shame about Tonya. I found her and Regan both to be excellent performers. Thanks for working around the language barrier and just to add, I think the Capri site is one of the best looking sites I've seen. I did think it looked like a new site with the clean design menus in the sidebar.
I used to, grew up about 10 minutes from Dodger Stadium, loved pro baseball as a kid. Never really liked pro football, but loved college football. I guess growing up I liked almost all sports, but I don't follow any now.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
