| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Reply
> But think it would be great if you submited yours too, you might have a better angle on it with "the WORST" processor.
Submitted, let's see if it comes out.
|
11-26-07 12:09pm
|
Comment
377
|
Big Sister Live Sex
(0)
|
|
11-26-07 04:41am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
378
|
Big Sister
(0)
|
|
11-26-07 04:37am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Reply
> That would be an interesting topic for next poll.
You're right; will you submit it yourself or want me to do it? (to fit it into current poll system, I'll probably make it something like "Which CC processor do you think is the WORST?")
> Myself, I allways see it as a big plus if a site is ccbill caus i never had any problems with them
Ditto.
|
11-26-07 04:12am
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Please shout LOUDLY if you recognize them (maybe in site comments?). It's really important to know who's who in this business.
|
11-26-07 04:08am
|
Reply
381
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> This technique has nabbed two "unscrupulous" sites that rebilled after I cancelled a subscription (it was not ccBill, by the way)
Wow, and can you tell which processors were involved (it is processor which is of interest here)?
|
11-26-07 02:39am
|
Comment
382
|
Nude In Public.tv
(0)
|
|
11-26-07 02:35am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Completely agree. Plus condom-only porn would play an important role in educating people (especially young ones) to use condoms in their private lives. The only minor thing left is to make it happen :-(.
|
11-26-07 02:25am
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> I think you'd agree that none of us eat it straight from the source
It's not exactly "straight from the source" either; IMHO, getting it from other guy's poorly washed hands via handshake differs only in quantity, and I have no idea if this difference in quantity makes difference from medical point of view.
> The industry probably doesn't want this kind of information made public.
Come on, this is not the industry where I'd expect conspiracy (they're not tobacco companies after all :-)). More likely doctors just cannot imagine that somebody in sane mind will do it (unlike A2P, which they warn about).
|
11-26-07 02:20am
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
And about condoms and STDs - here I agree that it is definitely a risk, but... that's the way people like to see it and until it changes, I don't think industry will go for condomless porn.
|
11-24-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> To them I say you eat shit and then tell me you feel OK
Strictly speaking, some very small amounts of shit get into people mouths all the time (it's not sterile world after all), and the only difference between this and eating shit is that of amounts, with A2M somewhere in between (don't forget that models wash themselves very thoroughly before doing it). So without any medical opinion (doctors don't rush to advise on it, unlike A2P) I still have no idea if it's really dangerous.
|
11-24-07 07:17pm
|
Reply
387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> he fact is that wearing one would be beneficial to the male performer's health only, since he'd be proctected but the female would still be doing atm.
Most of A2M on the market is "ass to the same girl mouth", so it would indeed help with STDs, and I don't know if A2M itself poses any risk (A2P does, but no idea about A2M).
> Far too many performers catch a variety of STD's
Do you have any statistics on it? I've heard about one quite big case somewhere in US, that's it.
> I'm actually curious to know how many people have a problem between condom and bareback sex. That might be an interesting poll.
There was such a poll back in March; only 25% of people have said "I have no issue with condoms".
|
11-24-07 10:14am
|
Reply
388
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Distant Lover's Reply
I've tried to make a distinction between photo content and photo quality. And while content can be different (which I've mentioned), technical photo quality (focus, lighting, color balance etc.) just plain sucks (I'm not sure that I've seen one picture with a good technical quality except for those obviously stolen from porno sites).
|
11-24-07 08:51am
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> anything that puts a performers life in danger, is simply unaceptable to me.
Hm, I'd say that condomless porn puts performers life in danger more than A2M (not sure about A2P). Not that I'm a big fan of A2M myself, but your argument doesn't look too viable to me.
> What's the next fetish???
I agree that there should be a line drawn somewhere. And about the next fetish: I think that from softer to harder it goes like this:
softcore - oral - vaginal - anal - a2m - 'golden showers' - ...
So I've just submitted another poll asking the same questions about 'golden showers'; if it's accepted, we'll see how many people are into it (I don't think there will be much, but let's see).
|
11-24-07 02:03am
|
Reply
390
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Good idea, but it can possibly help only if somebody really reads e-mails (which is not guaranteed :-( ).
|
11-22-07 03:28am
|
Reply
391
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
You really think that you'll get better support for $10 site? I REALLY doubt it. Adult site support stinks regardless of price, that's it :-(.
|
11-21-07 08:47am
|
Reply
392
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
!#*!&^@!*&^! I hate sites with non-existing support :-(. Unfortunately, in adult most of the sites are like that :-((.
|
11-21-07 07:50am
|
Reply
393
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
And what does their support say?
|
11-21-07 06:04am
|
Reply
394
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Reply
I see, thanks. But in such videos girls don't talk much anyway, do they? And Seventeen has always been an European company, and they had never used US models (originally used Dutch, now East European - what's the big difference?) Or you mean that Dutch models did know English well, and East European don't? - that I can confirm, and that is indeed a problem in Seventeen chatroom, but IMHO not the biggest problem there.
|
11-21-07 06:03am
|
Reply
395
|
Sexy Goa
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
> The worst is the file-sizes. Some 1.3 Gb others up to 2,0 Gb for 20-25 minutes video.
Ouch, what is the bitrate then? 2G for 25 minute video should be around 10MBit/s, shouldn't it?
|
11-20-07 03:42pm
|
Reply
396
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Apple's Reply
Maybe it makes sense to leave a comment (but NOT review) titled like "Anybody wants to review this site (membership is FREE)?" - it would allow for unbiased review by somebody from this site (even better - by some known and trusted member of this community). I hope it won't be against PornUsers policies.
|
11-20-07 03:04pm
|
Comment
397
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
|
11-20-07 08:46am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
398
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
Wait, what site you're talking about? :-) ClubSeventeen or OnlyCuties?
|
11-19-07 04:36pm
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
TBP "Search niche" feature is a nice one (and it's a pity it doesn't exist in PU). Still, IMHO the very need for it illustrates that plain list of 94 items is useless, as it is very difficult to look through it to find what the user needs.
And disbalance is a bad thing exactly for this reason: the more garbage (which almost nobody's is interested in - see 'Balloons') you have at top level, the less useful it becomes for everybody else.
On the other hand, I don't think it makes sense to argue as you're already sure that it is done the best possible way, so could you please just add 'Search niche' feature to PU?
|
11-19-07 02:39pm
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Ok, it's just another argument for subcategories: probably it should be like:
- Solo models
--- Masturbation
--- Dildos
--- Naked only
- Legs&Nylon
--- Pantyhose
--- Stockings
--- Foot fetish
...
Deal? :-)
|
11-19-07 05:25am
|
