| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Quite a difficult question. For example, if I review site with lesbianism and I like it, but I don't like the way it's shot, should I lower the rating? Probably yes. Moreover, even if EVERYBODY does it "wrong" (from my point of view), but there is one site that does it "right" - should I make the ratings different? Probably yes too. But this is exactly the case which we're discussing - there are tons of sites with "mosaics", but there are a few without; should I put higher rating for those without if I hate mosaics? I think so.
PS Not that I personally will ever knowingly join the site which has mosaics - that's what PU is for :-); the main thing is to make it clear in review, and the rest is not THAT important.
|
12-13-07 06:31am
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Voted and was really surprised with current results: 4 out of 4 said "twenties" :-).
|
12-13-07 03:53am
|
Reply
353
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> I guess for the genitally obsessed, this would not be a good site.
For me it's not about genital obsession, it is about distraction and feeling that something is "f****ng censored". If there won't be any genitals from the very beginning (for example, using only angles with no genitals in sight) it wouldn't be a problem for me, but this mosaic drives me nuts (I hate censorship in any form; for me it's even worth than DRM :-) ).
> Material such as you mention, if produced in Japan, is a crime.
As far as I've heard, it is a crime NOT to produce, but to PUBLISH it in Japan (otherwise nobody would be able to shoot any porn or even erotic there as genitals aren't covered with mosaic when the actual thing happens :-) ).
If it is really the case, then it is perfectly legal to sell some uncensored footage to US company (maybe with a restriction "not to show/sell to Japanese users") which will be able to sell uncensored thing to the rest of the world. I've personally bought several uncensored Japanese DVDs in US (or was it in UK? I don't remember) shops (not Internet shops, but "real" adult shops), and I don't think real adult shops will deal with anything illegal when there are tons of perfectly legal things out there.
|
12-13-07 03:51am
|
Reply
354
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
On the other hand, there is pretty decent amount of Japanese-style anime out there without mosaic; to do it they just need to sell non-mosaic originals to non-Japanese company which isn't bound by Japanese publishing laws (another option is to produce Japanese-style anime outside of Japan). So from my point of view it is a definite and BIG minus (why I should be hit by Japanese laws? especially if there are perfectly legal ways to avoid it).
|
12-12-07 04:52am
|
Reply
355
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Not going into discussion on personal tastes (personally I don't care much about A2M), I want to comment on "clang of iron". There were times when producing (and even watching) of ANY porn would have caused to hear the clang of iron; for some reason I don't really miss that times :-). So my personal motto is: "I don't care as long as all the activity is consensual activity between consenting adults". If somebody wants to see eating shit and somebody wants to produce this kind of stuff - I don't care though I think it's REALLY disgusting; it is outlawed in certain places, but I think laws prohibiting it should be thrown away (which already happened in many - but not all - places to other laws outlawing such things as anal sex or being gay). Why somebody (especially government) should care about things that happen between consenting adults?
|
12-11-07 06:20am
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
For me it's a pity to end such an inspiring conversation. Anyway, obviously is up to you :-).
|
12-07-07 04:27am
|
Comment
357
|
Big Sister
(0)
|
|
12-06-07 05:25am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
358
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Thanks for explanation; that's the way I've already answered :-).
|
12-06-07 05:17am
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
> But chasing gold has never made for a better human being.
Sometimes gold comes out as a nice side effect of efforts to change this world. As you're RagingBuddhist, changing the world is probably contrary to your principles too, but sometimes it changes the world to the better :-). Moreover, someone chasing gold can change the world to the better even without aiming it. I think Bill Gates is one such example; despite my negative (to put it mildly) opinion on him (his business practices back 10 years ago were really atrocious), I should admit that he has made substantial contribution towards Internet culture and associated freedom of communication and knowledge.
|
12-06-07 05:15am
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
giants, did you mean "to watch" or "to do"? These are different things for me :-).
|
12-05-07 02:53am
|
Reply
361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
+1
|
12-05-07 02:50am
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
What THEY say is that it is not a wallet, but something that the guy has achieved in life (with money being one of achievements - if they're not inherited but earned). The bad thing is that they don't know themselves how much of it is about achievements and how much is about hard cash :-).
|
12-05-07 02:46am
|
Reply
363
|
Public Invasion
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Comment
> Hopefully that happens one day, because that would be
incredibly hot. We can all hope.
Fat chance :-((. The closest thing to "real reality" I've ever seen is on UltimateSurrender and DareRing (on both sites they're hired models but action seems to be unscripted, though in different way), or on NudeInPublic / NudeInPublic.tv (girls are hired models in real environment with onlookers). If you know of any other site which doesn't have scripts, please let me know :-).
|
12-04-07 11:07am
|
Reply
364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> Uhhhhh, size of what? My wallet?
In certain cases size of wallet can be a good substitute :-).
|
12-04-07 04:07am
|
Comment
365
|
Big Sister
(0)
|
|
12-03-07 10:32am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
366
|
I Am Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
nige1960's Comment
And what billing company it was? We need to know not only Bad Guys, but Good Guys too :-).
|
12-03-07 09:46am
|
Reply
367
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
> trying to convince women that this |-----------------------------------| is seven inches.
No problem to convince them about it - you just need a font (or monitor) big enough :-).
|
12-03-07 09:44am
|
Reply
368
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I don't think it will happen this way. IMHO it is driven mostly by customer's opinion and models won't be able to change anything :-(. For each one going condom-only there will be ten willing to do condomless.
|
11-30-07 01:44am
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TheViking's Poll
I've put 'Epoch' because of BlacksOnBlondes form with 2 pre-checked "free 1 day trial auto-renewable at $20/month" checkboxes (see my comment on BlacksOnBlondes for details). No other negative experiences with processors (it's funny, but my experiences with non-adult CC processors are MUCH worse than with adult ones).
|
11-29-07 02:36am
|
Reply
370
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Reply
> Well, LOL, you are obviously correct.
:-)
> At least I occasionally like the illusion of reality.
Me either, but I prefer "real reality" sites like UltimateSurrender, where it is known that they're models (well, no way around it), but the action is unscripted, or like NudeInPublic, where action is scripted but not completely (at least onlookers aren't scripted). Unfortunately, there are very few decent sites like this (not much besides UltimateSurrender) :-(.
|
11-28-07 06:04am
|
Reply
371
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Comment
Real women? In porn? Are you serious? Professional models in more or less real situations, that's the most we can expect IMHO, and all the b/s from BangBus and other "reality" sites along the lines of "we've met this girl on street and made her fuck us in 15 minutes" is just as it is - s**t that comes from a bull.
|
11-28-07 01:46am
|
Reply
372
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'd still say that it is necessary to start doing something. Unfortunately, I have no idea what exactly can be done :-((.
|
11-28-07 01:40am
|
Reply
373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
> I guess it starts with you, me and others out there to suggest that porn movies should be all condom.
The problem is to bring this message to the public and producers :-(.
|
11-27-07 02:38am
|
Comment
374
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
|
11-27-07 02:35am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> Anyway one down, one to go.
:-). Thanks a lot, it will help.
Question to admins: given this discussion, don't you think it is a good idea to have separate (from sites) rating/comments of credit card processors? Might be difficult to implement, but should be very useful for this community. Or at least to make another type of "rating" poll (with ratings) and make the first such poll about credit card processors?
|
11-27-07 02:04am
|
