All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
It is a favourite network of mine
Relative controversy around where the content comes from, but as a newcomer to network sites – it is all new to me
Downloads of videos go up to 4K and there are multiple resolution downloads
The photograph sets are downloadable as well
The models are exquisite, young (but legal) and I like nearly all of them
The network consists of 29 niche sites |
Cons: |
One reason I avoided networks is the possibility of overwhelming and poor navigation. The navigation is usable, but it is still overwhelming.
The scenes, like most Eastern European porn, lack character and sometimes become generic
The niches could be explored further than they are |
Bottom Line: |
Most of my interest in perusing online porn is for fetishes I have. I like panties content, upskirt, stockings, pubic hair, but I do not like being overwhelmed. This network is not too bad at being overwhelming, but it can be – especially if you do not have a lot of time to spend on browsing through the different niches.
You could say being one of my favourite networks is not that big of a compliment. I rarely join networks. When I first joined 1 Pass For All, I did not know it was a network, nor did I know about 1 Pass For All. I joined it for the site, Old Goes Young. After a few weeks as a member; I noticed all the other included sites. There are 29 sites to explore and what I have learned to do is just focus on certain ones during each membership. I really do not want to download hundreds, even thousands of scenes without truly wanting those scenes.
Not being a fan of networks, it should give me a different perspective compared to others. I do believe many of these sites are similar enough that they should not be separated as different sites “on a network”. There are multiple sites on the network which are all geared towards the “old and young” niche. I do favour that niche, but why separate the sites with nearly the same premise? This is why I do not join networks on a regular basis.
The network offers high resolution video downloads – up to 4K. The photograph sets can be downloaded and are good, but unspectacular photographs. Whilst I do believe, you have to take the good with the bad, you should be able to differentiate the scale of quality vs quantity. The quantity is very high as is the video quality, but the scenes do lack a lot of character I am used to seeing and there is a feeling of generic or ho-hum.
I do like the content enough (models are sexy), to overlook the boring themes and plots. It would be up to each person to decide if the models’ attractiveness is enough for them.
There are no download limits but a common problem I see with networks, only some of the sites seem to be updating. It is like there are multiple trade-offs you have to accept to truly enjoy this network.
I like it and that’s the best compliment I can give a network. I have learned how to get around my own hang-ups with using a network and I would not be able to, if I did not like the content. |
|
11-06-23 03:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Twistys Network
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Beyond all complaints about the way Mind Geek has directed Twistys – it is still one of the best sites available if you’re into beautiful women.
Downloads cost $15 more added to subscription price. It’s a pro to me. The download quality and quality of the content is as high as you’re going to find in softcore, lesbian content.
The picture sets are good enough to download in zips.
The Treat of the Month is a staple in porn and a fitting homage to old porn magazines.
Unquestionably one of the easiest and smoothest sites to navigate.
It is still updating. |
Cons: |
Besides taking downloads away, Mind Geek, has changed the focus from some male-female hardcore to none.
Potentially repetitive in the same ways old porn magazines were repetitive. I’m just not for sure if it’s fair to call beautiful nude women – repetitive. |
Bottom Line: |
Twistys was on my favorites list for nearly 10 years. After they were sold to Mind Geek, I tried to stay away from joining. I was able to justify not joining based on my negative feelings (and warranted) towards Mind Geek.
I do believe time heals nearly everything and it is how I am looking at my recent join of Twistys. The Treat of the Month is one of the best features on any porn site. It is similar to Playboy’s Playmate of the Month and Penthouse’s Pet of the Month. A model is picked as Treat of the Month, then she gets multiple picture sets and videos to show why she was picked as Treat of the Month. This feature alone is enough reason to still join Twistys.
Then there are the beautiful women and 20 years of them! Twistys is one of the only porn sites I would call a “Gentleman’s site”. The women are often wearing too much makeup and the clothing choices often are slutty looking, but you can’t deny the attractiveness of these models.
Once you pay the extra $15 for downloads, you receive access to download and own one of the best porn collections available.
Twistys Network is marketed and sold as a network, but that’s mostly a marketing ploy. There is a theme to this review. Yes, Mind Geek charges for downloads and took away most of the character Twistys had as a site, but the beautiful women are still there. My happiness and even giddiness of seeing new Treats offset the bad feelings of paying extra for downloads. The quality of the videos is excellent and it’s one of those sites that caters to photography fans with professional studio quality photo sets. The downloads feel worth $15. I just don’t know why Mind Geek doesn’t offer a membership with downloads. I had to join the site then add downloads after signing in.
The updates are still coming, but not at the pace we used to get from Twistys. I see that as offset by the overall quality of models and the content they are presented in. You’re not going to find many porn sites that make this type of porn.
It’s one of the few sites that doesn’t rely on a niche to make their content hot. Their models do that. You need more kinkiness? Just look at the bodies of those models. You should be having kinky thoughts about what you want to do to them. I believe this type of porn should be marketed as primer porn or shallow porn (like all porn isn’t shallow). This type of porn does want you to use your imagination and own creativity to create your own fantasies for each model. That may be a difficult sell in 2023.
The site also acts a history lesson in porn. You can see the different phases porn has been through over the last 20+ years. It is not all only solo, there is a lot of lesbian content too, but the solo content is why I join Twistys. It is still a veritable treasure trove of incredible looking models, but you may have to do like me and offset some of the “bad” Mind Geek has brought to Twistys to justify being a member.
There are over 5,000 combined videos and photo sets for your downloading pleasure. I doubt I will let it recur for another month, but do find the one month membership upgraded to include downloads to be a very good buy. |
|
06-08-23 01:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
All amateur females, hopeful for a career in porn.
Many established favorites got their start here.
High definition videos with unlimited downloads.
Over 5,000 scenes with 2-3 new ones added each week.
Pictures are downloadable in packs
Easy to navigate and join/cancel through Epoch |
Cons: |
Almost seems like cruel and harsh punishment to some of the younger women.
Should update more than it does. With 30 years of scenes to pull from they should have nearly daily updates.
It’s as close to real casting porn as you will see. That means some of it is nearly unwatchable. |
Bottom Line: |
Casting porn has been popular for a very long time, but Woodman Casting X was the first casting site I knew of. In many ways you can tell it’s an older site and not as planned or protected as newer casting sites. The models often look confused, frustrated and even in pain. There’s a feeling of no hole is sacred with Pierre Woodman as he uses the vagina, anal, oral and even light spanking with rough play with these very young models. Maybe it is best for those looking at a career in porn? They can get the bad parts out of the way and maybe define their limits.
If you are a longtime European porn aficionado you will likely see models you know and love way back early in their careers being a sex-test dummy for Woodman. The site is large with close to 5,500 videos, 2,000 picture sets and 3 updates per week. It really could be larger and have a better update schedule. I found many of the videos to be unwatchanble. It should be pointed out as well. As my first con said it seems like cruel and harsh punishment. If you’re into rougher sex and the females looking like they’re scared or timid, there is a lot of that on Woodman Casting X. It is easily the biggest con for me.
The scenes show a little talking and getting to know. Besides that, it’s hardcore sex and follows a formula of positions that I assume Woodman requires each woman to perform in. You will see some models doing anal with Woodman that never do anal in their newer scenes. I don’t know if that’s viewed as a positive for Woodman, but seems like a negative.
The videos are downloadable and unlimited. The highest resolution is 1080p high definition. The pictures are pretty good quality and can be downloaded in packs. I believe the best reason to be a member is if you like the models in current times. You will see models that you’re used to in 2022, way back in 2005 or 2009 for example. It maybe shows how much a model progresses or regresses in her willingness to perform for a shot at fame and money.
Epoch is used to sign up and cancel, they are fast and easy at both, and the navigation is also easy to use. It is tough that the biggest con involves every scene and could be a problem for some. I just skip over the harder scenes. Great site if you like casting porn or “before they were stars” scenes. |
|
11-07-22 05:33pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
29
|
Scoreland
(0)
86.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Nostalgia is my biggest reason for joining Scoreland
You really could just type the word “boobs” over and over and it would describe the site well
There is a combined 10,000 photo sets and videos you can download
A lot of the videos are now available in 4K downloads
Nearly 1,500 busty models
Promo prices are easy to find including on Porn Users |
Cons: |
The Score Group has over 60 sites and the majority of those are standalone sites that you must pay a separate membership for. They are in desperate need of a super network with all their sites included
Big boobs, as a boob-fan knows, often includes chubby and even BBW women. |
Bottom Line: |
As I near my 40s, I finally can say that boobs are no longer my top interest of the female anatomy. Go back 10 years ago and I almost always had a subscription to this site. Despite its age, it is over 25 years old, the navigation, the looks, the search tools, have all been updated to a more modern website. Boobs are greatly glorified and represented by the Score Group. Jiggling, bouncing, heaving, it’s all here and the women are often very pretty, too.
It is for lack of better word, a glamourous site, meaning: the women are usually a little over “made up”. Makeup is flowing by the gallon. The outfits are typically low-cut tops and tight tops. I really don’t agree with the style of dress. Women that are this endowed, do not need clothing to make them look busty. I am going to go even further by saying, I would be happier with this site if the women started out in more clothes.
It is interesting to notice the difference in number of photo sets and videos. There are right at twice as many photo sets and videos, and logic and common sense answers that: The older content was more picture focused due to the internet of that time period being dialup.
Every video, not most or almost all, every single video is in at least HD download resolution. Nearly a third of the videos have the 4K download option.
On the negatives: Score has over 60 sites, but only a few of their sites come with multi-site access. You can tell the site is old with their section called “friends”. That was a popular feature around 20 years ago. I can say after being a member of at least 50 times,, the content feels less inspired than if you just discovered it. There could be and should be improvements that show the models evolving. Instead, you really could look at a video from 2003 and not be able to tell it’s 20 years older than the newest scenes. It's the style of dress. The “look” of the models, their makeup and their hairstyles.
The site does have a high appeal factor. These type of women are the women I grew up wanting to marry, even the BBW ones. If you like women that are chubby or BBW, you’ll find a lot to like on this site.
The navigation is excellent. The site has steadily improved and updated the user functions and features. Thee is a chance new members won’t even notice those changes, but I definitely see the changes. It is still a very good site and value, but for me, the site needs more variety. |
|
07-11-23 09:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
AT Kingdom Network
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
An excellent network covering all major niches in glamour and softcore porn
6 ATK sites are included
Each site focuses on a niche
Thousands of teen to mid-twenties models
You can download videos and zipped photos
There are new updates |
Cons: |
The different sites feature different navigation and can be difficult
Favourites are stored, but it’s not easy to find them. |
Bottom Line: |
Coming into joining this network, I had experience with three of the ATK sites, Natural and Hairy, Galleria and Premium. All three of those come with this network package and you also have access to ATK’s Exotics, Petites, Archives and Girlfriends.
ATK at its most basic level is a softcore, natural site. There are models ranging from 18-30 and most of the scenes (videos) are softcore, masturbation and teasing. The models are almost exclusively European though a few Americans and more exotic locales show up once you look at ATK Exotics. It is very traditional porn in the sense someone is going to get naked. Someone likely will masturbate. There are some hardcore scenes, but those are few are far between. The pictures are just as important as the videos.
One possible con is the inclusion of ATK Girlfriends. When I joined the network it included Girlfriends, but I have noticed the join screen no longer advertises including Girlfriends. ATK Girlfriends is one of the best all-around sites on the network and does make a difference in the network package.
Once you are beyond ATK Girlfriends, it becomes a hodgepodge of sites with varying interest from the viewer based on their preferences. Luckily for me, I like all the niches covered. I could do without ATK Archives, but only because I am so familiar with the ATK content.
One of the cons is also responsible for exposing another problem. The sites are all signed into separately. This is unlike most networks where you sign in the network and then click from site to site to visit the different available sites. This does show the different navigation featured on each site. I do believe that is something that could be fixed, but would probably be a massive undertaking of resources.
I try to approach this network with a simple mindset of there will be thousands of pretty models and that works.
The downloads are unlimited and quality is very good to great. There are older sets and videos mixed in so the quality can drop off, but overall, the quality is good.
I do believe the network may be overwhelming for anyone not familiar with the ATK sites.
That problem could be alleviated with a more uniform navigational style on all the sites.
To my surprise, I would rank the 6 sites in this order: ATK Petites, ATK Galleria, ATK Exotics, ATK Natural and Hairy, ATK Premium and ATK Archives. Which may very well be the true strength of this network. Joining these sites one by one does limit the differences you’re going to see, but joining as a network, gives you a full spectrum of different types of models and niches. ATK Petites may well be my new favorite site and I had not joined it before joining the network.
You do receive a lot of content by joining the network, but I do believe it may be more efficient to join each site. The different navigation plays a role in that thinking.
It’s a network that gives you access to at least 5 great sites, but sorting through 6 sites can present a problem. I would recommend joining the network especially for those not familiar with ATK. It gives a great, albeit difficult to navigate view of each ATK site. |
|
02-11-25 05:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
VIP 4K
(0)
84.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Excellent value for those who demand 4K
There are 18 “4K” sites included for one price
Photograph sets are my favourite part of the downloads
Amount of sites included doubled from the original 8
Some of the sites represent unique niches we rarely see |
Cons: |
Download limit is both frustrating and restrictive. Only 5 videos downloads per day.
Price is high if you do not find a promo
Would theoretically require a 3 month membership just to download all the videos |
Bottom Line: |
The network VIP 4K has a lot of good going for it. I will start with the photographs. Every photograph set can be downloaded and does not count towards the download limit. The photographs, besides being downloadable, are 5300x3800 resolution. An impressive show of high quality photographs and each set comes with around 200 photographs.
Those are enough reasons for me to join and enjoy the network. If you are mostly interested in videos, you may be in for an unpleasant surprise. There is the mega pro of every video on the entire network being available to download in 4K. That’s when you see the download limit of 5 videos per day. I can understand why. The videos are large and in 4K quality, but when you are limited to 5 per day and there are nearly 500 videos on the network; I cannot say I fully support this download limit. This is exacerbated by the non-promo price of $40 per month. If you do not find a promo, you will have to fork over $120 to try and download all the videos in 3 months.
It does show the importance of such high quality photographs and being able to download those without them counting against your download limit.
I feel like making a decision to limit downloads, causes me to need to be more critical of the content. The scenes have some very unique niches and fetishes. Though most of the scenes lack story or direction, and are devoid of any sense of humour. That means to me, the photograph sets can be acceptable replacements for the videos. Once I make that decision, the fact that all the videos are in 4K, really doesn’t seem as big of a deal.
The models in the scenes are typical porn models. Very attractive until they start acting and talking. All in all, the network presents a chance to see some rarely touched-upon niches and to do so in magnificent 4K resolution. The photographs have to be of interest to you for this network to rate as high as it does for me. I download only the videos of rare niches and spend the rest of my time, downloading photograph sets.
I recommend it, but be aware of the download limit. I see it as counter-intuitive since the most obvious selling point is the 4K downloads. If you enjoy photographs as much as videos you could also find a possible saving grace in the high definition downloadable photographs. All of that is only possible if you find a promo and don’t pay the full $40 price per month. If all that comes together, you have a good, well above-average network. |
|
11-06-23 03:31pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Adult Prime
(0)
84.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Very large hodgepodge network of European porn.
At least 50 sites comprise the Adult Prime network.
Up to 4K downloadable videos
All content is exclusive and downloads are unlimited.
Over 50,000 videos and photo sets
Great value if you can get beyond the hodgepodgery |
Cons: |
Hodgepodge is a strange word for a porn network, but I believe it fits perfectly. There does not seem to be any logical flow in the various sites that include in a membership.
Much of the fetish content is close to not being porn and instead, informational and promotional of whichever said fetish |
Bottom Line: |
Adult Prime proves to be a good value especially for those with varied taste in porn. You will receive over 50 sites/niches for $19.95. All the videos and photo sets are downloadable and those downloads are unlimited.
Quality is high with up to 4K downloads on videos, but hopefully, you are not a stickler for a network following a set theme. The sites included with this subscription include Plumpered, many slim teen niches, old and young, BDSM, CFNM and no other word fits that better than – hodgepodgery. The question is if that is a positive or negative? I believe it would vary between two viewers. It does break up the monotony many networks fall into, but if there is a niche you like and it doesn’t have more than 30-40 scenes, you may feel like you would prefer a more focused network.
There also is a con with the fetish content. With fetish content being instantly non-accessible except to those who have the fetish, it seems like to me the fetishists would work harder on making the fetish more accessible to the average person. Instead, the fetish content is basic, I would say plodding and inaccessible to those not versed in the fetish.
The good news is that the network offers over 25,000 videos, over 50 different sites or niches and it’s all available for unlimited downloads. The niches that receive the most focus include Young and Old and various fetish or BDSM niches. The network is self-explanatory in usage, and everything loads fast and fully.
If I could score the network higher, I would, but as it is, the fetish content should be much more accessible to offer more variety. The Old and Young niche is a solid one, but the same guy is in many of those scenes and he’s not that good of a performer. It just feels like someone had an idea for a network but didn’t put enough importance on casting or producing.
Club Seventeen, Digital Desire, Jim Slip and Sinful Raw are all top of their class sites, but after those four, there is a bigger drop with their other sites. Submissed is something like a Kink-Lite but doesn’t come close to the performance quality Kink puts out. The Old and Young sites are not comparable, in quality, to sites like Oldje, but there is the bonus of you get all these different, not-related niches with one membership. It has a lot of room to improve, but also has a lot more going for it, including the foundation of Club Seventeen, Digital Desire, Jim Slip and Sinful Raw, than most networks lacking a common niche have. |
|
11-23-22 12:53pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
33
|
5K Porn
(0)
83.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Extraordinary video quality (2704p) with 60 FPS
Includes access to the equally as impressive 5K Teens
Features bonus videos from Kelly Madison, Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity
Pictures are included and can be downloaded
Drop dead gorgeous models
Just over 200 scenes between 5K Porn and 5K Teens
Reputable company owned by the same people who own Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity |
Cons: |
Download limit. You are limited to downloading 15 videos per week
Not breaking any new ground other than technically
Should update faster |
Bottom Line: |
5K Porn and 5K Teens are like a higher technical quality version of Porn Fidelity and Teen Fidelity. The action is hardcore and oftentimes is rough. Anal, oral, 69, cum play are all regular and featured. I would have liked to have seen them add some originality to go along with the 5K video quality. The scenes literally could be from Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity. It asks the question of if these sites should be merged with Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity. That is what you’re getting. Updated, higher technical quality versions of those sites.
The video quality is the biggest positive. If you don’t have a monitor to take advantage of the quality, none of this review, may even matter to you. If you do have a monitor that can run 2700p and 60 Frames Per Second, you can use this site’s scenes to showcase your monitor. I’m just not for sure video quality is enough to justify a membership to a site with a relative low number of scenes, slow updates and download limits.
The more noticeable cons are the download limit which limits you to 60 downloaded videos per month. You would need to be a member for 3-4 months just to download all the videos from 5K Porn and 5K Teens. Just the sameness from the scenes compared to Porn Fidelity and Teen Fidelity. It does feel like driving an old car with a new paintjob, not a fully revamped look and style. The updates are painfully slow once you have all the scenes.
While the pros outweigh the cons, it becomes a question of preference. It is why I believe they need to add something new or original to their scenes and stories. I have been a member of Kelly Madison/Teen Fidelity/Porn Fidelity for over 10 years and the 5K Porn and 5K Teens scenes are just too much alike the scenes on their other sites. I believe combining the 5K sites with the Kelly Madison sites would counter the realization of how similar the sites are.
The Porn 5K site is recommended, but only if you can maximize the video quality and video quality matters to you. The scenes do require long downloads and eat up hard drive space. Most of the files are in excess of 10GB each. I don’t think those will be deterrents to those who want the highest quality and know and understand the file sizes are large due to the quality. If you can’t maximize the video quality, you would get a better deal by joining the Kelly Madison site and sifting through the thousands of hardcore porn scenes they offer. |
|
11-05-22 05:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
UK-based panty fetish content
Videos are downloadable up to 2160p
Over 5,000 scenes
All the models are amateurs
The navigation is good |
Cons: |
The price is high for a niche site
There are no pictures
There is a download limit, but I have not hit it |
Bottom Line: |
Panty fetish is my favourite fetish. This site should score higher for me, but there are a few glaring flaws that make it come up short. Starting with the price of nearly $30 a month. I personally don’t have a problem with paying $30 a month for my favourite fetish, but I expect premium quality and features when I pay a premium price. The videos are downloadable and the quality goes up to 4K, but there are no pictures. For me, that’s a glaring flaw. At least for me, the pictures on a panty fetish site are as important or even more important than videos. That’s just disappointing for me. That’s not even close to premium.
The landscape of porn has changed – for better or worse – is not up to me to say, but Panty Amateur is a site that does not particularly fit in with mainstream hardcore sites. The content is softcore. It’s directed towards people who like to see a young, pretty woman in her panties. There is little to no chance you’re going to see much more than you would see in a risqué R or AO movie.
The videos are sharp on a 4K monitor and nearly half of their 5,000+ videos are available to download in 4K resolution. The video action is primarily focused on showing the female in panties. It’s not masturbation or sex. There is some touching and flashing shown, but it’s very timid.
The pictures are a different story. There are no pictures and therefore, no downloadable zips. Watching Panty Fetish in pictures, is really just as effective as videos. Some would even say there’s more to see in pictures than videos. I agree with that, too. Without pictures, this is just an average site to me.
I can’t complain much about anything else. The navigation works well and the site is fast to load. You get to use CCBill for billing and everything on the site works as it should.
My final thought is this site could be much better and should be much better based on the subscription price. There is no reason for a softcore porn site to omit pictures. The videos are good, but I spend more time using VLC to take snapshots. It’s a solid site, but far from best in class. |
|
09-17-23 08:06am
Replies (1)
|
Review
35
|
Morey Studio
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
This is my guilty pleasures site
Exceptional photography site
Lovely models throughout, and all three of my favourite models
Easy to use site
Fantastic yearly price of $49.95 |
Cons: |
Daily download limit of 7.5 GB, but I have never reached it
It’s not for video lovers. There are videos, but those are not the focus of the site
Other photography sites have bigger collections and better resolution photos |
Bottom Line: |
It’s not often that a site provides all three of my favourite models, but Morey Studios does. With that said, admittedly, I seem to still mainly focus on those three models. It’s not that the other models are unattractive, quite the contrary, I don’t think there’s an unattractive model on Morey. It’s just my favourite models have some truly scrumptious photo sets on Morey.
My three favorite models include Tea aka Tea Jul/Tea Mint. She was the first porn model, I remember seeing a lot of content of and it was love at first sight. She has 28 photo sets and 7 videos on this site. I believe that is the largest collection of Tea, especially sexually explicit content.
Second is Billy aka Billie Raise, pretty well-known from other photography sites. It’s not as big of a collection as Tea, but still 10 photo sets and 10 videos.
Last but certainly not least is Wildy aka Wildy A at Met Art and others. She has over 150 photo sets and 60 videos. Much like Tea, Wildy was love at first sight for me.
I feel my score is unbiased. I know those three models make this site a lot better for me than it may for someone who isn’t familiar with the models. If, however, you do like those three, this really is a great site.
I see Morey as a site for those who are used to, burned out on sites like Met-Art and similar sites. The models on Morey are regularly on Met and its family of sites, but there is a different style to these shoots.
Which is why it matters that the content is 100% exclusive.
The resolution needs to improve, it’s 2000x3000. The videos need to be longer and more provocative or even sexual. The sets are more like you may remember photography sites being. There is and has always been sexual parts and a more sexual style than a lot of the other softcore photography sites, but Morey hasn’t changed much. While others are going all the way to showing more spread legs, Morey is more focused on showing the artistic view of women.
I feel a wee bit of a hankering to admit I hadn’t been a member of Morey since 2019 and can tell you that I “think” it is updating, not recycling, but cannot guarantee it. I was so happy to rejoin my once favorite site at a cheap yearly price, I didn’t look into if the new updates really are new.
But and it’s why I shared this review. It has been worth the cost of the subscription to see and download all my favorites. |
|
02-12-24 09:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Nubiles Porn
(0)
78.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Good extension to the Nubiles family of sites.
Hardcore sex featuring barely legal women.
Top-level photo and video quality.
Regular updates
Includes 3 no longer updating sites.
Good promo prices are available |
Cons: |
I joined this thinking it was the site that has Nubiles.net on it. It does not.
Barely legal European women are often shy or inexperienced.
The bonus sites are no longer updating and fairly small |
Bottom Line: |
Nubiles offers some of the best teen porn in the industry. Giving my review away very early on, I’m just not really a fan of this network of Nubiles. The bonus sites were once good or at least interesting ideas: Girls Only Porn, Hot Crazy Mess and That Sitcom Show. Hot Crazy Mess is a pretty good site even without updates The other two are interchangeable with Nubiles regular scenes. There’s a problem with not living up to the potential of the niche or genre.
I can’t complain about the quality of the videos or photos. Those are all downloadable and unlimited. It is just that the majority of the scenes are formulaic. I am sure having these very young, likely inexperienced women does not help in that regard. I prefer my barely legal models to be in solo or at most – lesbian scenes. It retains their innocence.
The bonus sites are mostly a waste. Hot Crazy Mess is good enough if you like it, but the other two bonus sites are throwaway sites for me. It feels beyond greedy to say Nubile Films needs more content and variety, but it is my exact feeling. The scenes are just too similar and whether 500 or 5,000, repetitive means the scene count is not as impressive as the numbers say.
Other than personal biases, there’s not much to dislike. Video quality is very high. Picture sets are well above-average and downloadable. The models are cute and sexy, but once in the scenes they have trouble maintaining the sexy part. I don’t mind that I accidentally joined the wrong Nubiles network, but it does make me wonder why they have multiple networks.
This content would be better with more lesbian scenes instead of sticking to the hardcore boy/girl scenes. The site does work well. There are just problems with me viewing their hardcore scenes. It’s very similar to the hardcore scenes on Nubiles. When I’m a member of Nubiles, I do not download or watch any of the hardcore scenes and sadly for me, that’’s what Nubile Films is. It’s like a whole site of Nubiles hardcore scees. You mileage may vary based on that. |
|
01-10-23 07:52pm
Replies (2)
|
|