Reality Kings (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Outstanding models and hardcore action
I paid extra for downloads and have not had any problems downloading
The network navigation works as it should
There are videos and image sets to download
Reality style scenes but you will need some fantasy to see the reality
Good production values, would not call it the top of professionalism, but it is good |
| Cons: |
A questionable past almost made me skip Reality Kings, but so far – I have had no problems
Production would be rated higher, but here’s why it is not; some of the scenes seemed doomed from the start |
| Bottom Line: |
Paying extra for downloads is becoming a norm not an exception and because the total price of a site and downloads is still within a reasonable range, I do not see a reason to be negative about the sites who practice this.
Reality Kings is one of those networks that could get just about any man’s, maybe even woman’s attention. Their female models are what we see in America as “hot”. There does not seem to be any apologies for that, The models are beautiful to look at and look like they would cost me or you, a year’s salary to date for a week. There is a blinginess about the models. The best part of that is when you find one who is more down to Earth, you have likely found your new favourite.
The scenes across the network rely on a basic sexual fetish to work. They have Latina sites, MILFs, anal, attempted game shows, reality shows, it is everything we are tired of seeing on mainstream television, but it is a little different when there is a beautiful nude woman in the scene.
With downloads, I have not run into any limits, but admittedly – only download 4-5 scenes a day. There is still a newness for me. I am still hunting and pecking, so to speak. The network’s navigation is good. I like that I can click on a model’s names and see all of her scenes, as long as those are accurate, but I do not know the network or models well-enough to know if these search by name results are accurate. I do know the model’s name I clicked on was featured in all the scenes the results brought up.
Images are an important part of porn for me, but probably not as important as they are to image collectors. I have noticed older scenes often have way more images than newer scenes. The images offered are of high quality and are zippered.
I have used the streaming feature despite having downloads enabled. I have gotten to the point that I stream a little of a scene before I download it. See con two, I found 15-20% of their scenes seem to be miscasted and you have a female model who is not into the niche or theme. I am surprised we do not see more of that even though I am not a big collector of hardcore so it’s possible I just have not watched enough hardcore to see this problem.
The other knock against the production is when the scenes have a set theme, but within 4 minutes of starting, the theme is completely lost. While I like spontaneous and even unscripted porn, if I am expecting a theme, I want to see that theme.
The models are what they are supposed to be. The models will draw in customers. Most of them are excellent at doing whatever the set theme is and give great performances. The male models are stereotypical porn star males. That is not a negative. The network as a whole puts an emphasis on the attractiveness of the female models and that could be my favorite part about it.
That leaves me with the question of if I would recommend it? I do. I experienced no problems downloading, canceling and found a good amount of high quality porn. I am still relatively new to American porn models and think Reality Kings does an exceptional job of showcasing the various ethnicities of America in all their hardcore glory. |
Reply To Review Add Review to Favorites
|
