| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I had a similar experience recently, both with an issue logging on and getting a quick fix. I think they are trying to unify all the logons, which in the long run will be a good thing, but glitches like this are probably to be expected when they do stuff like this.
|
11-21-18 04:19pm
|
Comment
27
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
11-21-18 04:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Sex Art
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates – usually 3 videos per week and 4 stand-alone photo sets per week
Videos are accompanied by photos from the same shoot – these are not counted in the 4 separate photo sets I mentioned above
Good mix of girl-girl and boy-girl scenes in the videos. Most of the stand-alone photo sets are solo girls.
Very high quality photography, videography, good browsing and downloading speeds – no technical complaints of any kind.
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Lots of content – 1,343 stand-alone photo galleries, 959 videos (most with accompanying photo sets), 564 models, 50 artists (although Andrej Lupin and Alis Locanta are by far the most frequent contributors)
Browsing speeds and download speeds are quite good
Each video has some sort of story associated with it |
| Cons: |
The newer solo videos have almost entirely moved over to the sister site, MetartX. Older ones that were posted here previously have remained here.
Not much else to complain about. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’ve seen another reviewer use the term “heartcore” for this type of site, and I agree it is a good classification for it. And if that is what you are looking for, then this might be the very best place to find it. There is a story with each video, and while a lot are forgettable, when they do get it right, I think it really adds a lot to the scene.
They've been on line since April 2012, so they've accumulated a significant archive. Videos are all in full HD and photos are all hgih resolution, so no worries about quality as you go back in time. Both the photo sets and the videos are shot with excellent production values.
Not surprisingly, the women here are beautiful, and many are even better than that. What might be surprising, if you have only seen them on Met Art before (and a large percentage have been featured there), is how frisky they can get when the restrictions of plain old nude modeling are removed.
Of course, some of the ladies may be a little awkward in their first appearance, but many of them seem to be totally uninhibited.
The scenes are on the softer side of sex. But the sex is real – there is nothing simulated about it. They do occasionally try something a little harder or more oriented towards S&M or other darker stuff, but it is not a lot, and I expect it to stay that way. The members’ comments tend to be more negative on this kind of content. So don’t go in hoping that things will move to a more hard core focus – they almost certainly will not.
Membership costs are $29.99 monthly (the PU discount drops it to $19.99) and $99.99 yearly. I have seen specials where the monthly cost drops to 14.99 or even 9.99. Also, if you are a member of Mr. Skin, you can get an annual membership for $72 by signing up through that site.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
This is an excellent site that executes its particular place in the porn universe very well. I definitely recommend it. |
|
07-22-18 08:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lengthy videos
The casting director is also a starlet and likes to participate as more than just a camera holder
Gorgeous models
No need to subscribe separately to this site it is one of the bonus sites for Nubiles-porn.com
HTTPS is used (TLS)
Very high quality video |
| Cons: |
Stopped updating in December 2015
Total of 67 videos |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one site I had been considering for quite a while, but never got around to joining. Once I joined Nubiles-porn.com, this was one of the bonus sites. I must say I thoroughly enjoy it.
The whole casting video genre can be formulaic, but it also has a certain appeal. Sometimes, this really is the first time this girl has gotten naked on camera, and that always has a special attraction. Other times, it may not be her first ever appearance, just the first visit with this particular site. And I do think that for most of the ladies appearing (but not all), this is not their first rodeo.
The good thing about this formula is there is no attempt to come up with a goofy story, and nine times out of ten, the dumb story really just gets in the way of what we are all here for. In a casting site, there is no pretense of a story. Just come in, introduce yourself, have some banter with the casting director, strip down, masturbate, move on to the blow job portion of our competition, etc.
I enjoy this particular combination of adding a casting director, who also happens to be a hot babe, who also likes to join in on the fun as she herself is aroused by the cavorting being carried out in front of her. The videos are all well-lit, there isnt a lot of artsy-fartsy camera angles really just horny young things enjoying their sexuality and getting paid to do it. Whats not to like?
Its a pity that they stopped updating a few years ago. Id love it if they start up again. |
|
06-10-18 05:51pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
30
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for the nice review. I was a member a few years ago and really liked the site and had been thinking about joining up again, so this is timely for me. One thing back then was they had some pretty strict download limits (per day, and also the number of files you could download at once). Did you encounter anything like that?
|
05-25-18 03:18pm
|
Reply
31
|
Stunning 18
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes, I had assumed that being part of the Met Art network meant they owned the site, but maybe it's more of an outsourcing / management thing. You (the photographer) provide the pics and have editorial control over what gets posted when, and Met Art handles running the web site, marketing, billing, etc.
It's a pity that the updates slowed so suddenly, because I like the site a lot and would have considered a longer membership if the updates stayed at every-other-day.
|
05-05-18 06:48pm
|
Review
32
|
Stunning 18
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many gorgeous models
A handful of models appear to be exclusive
Had been on a schedule of every-other-day updates (see cons)
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Very high quality photography
MetArt Network support is responsive
Good site layout, search, comments, features, etc.
Good browsing and download speeds |
| Cons: |
Without warning or explanation, only 5 updates posted in April
Since this is from a single photographer, less variety than you would see at a multi-artist site |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the blurb about how the website describes itself:
Antonio Clemens is one of the most innovative, accomplished, and popular contributors of erotic art photography to the MetArt Network. With the creation of Stunning18.com Clemens now has an exclusive showcase for his unique style of meticulously crafted digital erotica. Working with gorgeous young models from around the world, Clemens uses his camera to capture every aspect of their natural beauty. At Stunning 18 you'll find the girls of your wildest dreams in the most beautiful nude art photos you've ever seen.
The site started in January of 2013, so it has a pretty extensive collection of beauties to look at. The vast majority consists of soft core, glamour type photos and videos. There are also a handful of masturbation videos, and also a couple of boy-girl sets. The photographer has been a prolific contributor to Met Art, where there are several hundred of his sets listed. And while this site is part of the Met Art network, the subscription to either site does not grant you access to the other site.
There are 176 Models, 244 Videos, and several hundred photo sets.
Updates are typically every-other-day. For instance, in 2018, in January there were 15 updates, in February 14 updates, and in March 15 updates. But in April there were only 5 updates, and there was no warning or explanation that the schedule was changing. As of the time of this posting on 5/4, the most recent update was on 4/21.
When it was 2 weeks since the last update, I emailed support and this is what Met Art Network Support replied: (there has been one update posted since I received this response, but only one).
My sincere apologies that the Stunning 18 site has not updated on a regular basis. We are sorry but we do not own the site. The updates are dependent upon the photographer to maintain his update schedule. I do expect the updates will resume soon.
If there will be no update in a certain time frame what we can do is to
Cancel your remaining prepaid time and credit it to another site within our network
OR
Cancel the subscription and we can do pro-rated refund.
We are still hoping that there will be updates soon but that will solely depend on the photographer of the site. If you would like to take further actions with the option outlined above, please let us know.
If you need assistance with anything else, please let us know.
The standard price is $29.99 per month, the PU discount takes it to $19.99 per month. Occasionally you will see bigger discounts to $14.99 or even $9.99, but these dont appear very often or last very long. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
If you are a fan of sites like Femjoy or MetArt, you will find a lot to like here, and plenty to occupy yourself for a month or two. But given the suddenly infrequent updates, I would not recommend a longer term membership unless some suitable explanation is given or an extended period of regular updates resumes. So while annual memberships are offered, I would not recommend one at this time. |
|
05-04-18 07:57pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
33
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the suggestion - I will check out that site.
|
02-14-18 06:02pm
|
Review
34
|
Hegre
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
268 models so a lot of the models have a ton of content
The models range from beautiful to impossibly beautiful
On line since 2002 with regular updates since the opening
Daily Updates
Massage videos
Sometimes actually achieves real art (in the true sense of the word)
Extremely high resolution photography
Browsing and download speeds are very good
The site is well organized and easy to use |
| Cons: |
The attempts at art dont always work for me, so Id say the percentage of shoots that I like is lower than I would expect, especially given how beautiful the model is and how technically adept the photographer is. I cant put my finger on what I dont like, just something isnt clicking. |
| Bottom Line: |
Content is updated daily, and there is a lot of it. In 2017, the new content included 313 photo galleries, 33 regular films, and 18 massage films featuring 17 different models. In 2016, there were 314 galleries, 31 regular films, and 21 massage films featuring 12 different models. Overall there are 4680 galleries totaling 285,015 photos.
Petter Hegre is the photographer for whom the site is named, and he has long been noted as having some of the highest pixel counts on the net and the sharpest photography. Recent photo sets are checking in at 100 megapixels.
One thing that sets this site apart is the relatively small number of models appearing here. Hegre clearly has chosen to focus on building a relationship with a select group of models rather than try photograph as many different women as possible. This means that for the regulars, there is a huge quantity of that one girl which is wonderful if you really like that girl. For example, Dominika C has 83 galleries and 23 films, Emily has 106 galleries and 26 films, and Anna S has 175 galleries and 30 films.
There are a lot of shots in a studio, with a plain white or gray background (probably more than 50% are done this way). But there are also exotic locales, including some shots in front of the Eiffel Tower that are must-see material. There is also a huge variety in the explicitness of the sets. Some models have never opened their legs once for an intimate shot, while for others, you can see a pussy filling the entire 100 Megapixels.
Hegre clearly aims to produce art. For me, a lot of the stuff doesnt work. It seems too stilted. But when it does work, it is amazing. Its kind of like a baseball player that is always trying to hit a homer regardless of the score, the pitch count, the men on base or anything else. You will get a lot of wild swings that do nothing but generate wind. But when he does make contact, it doesnt just clear the outfield fence it goes sailing for miles outside the stadium.
The massage videos are something pretty unique to this site they can be quite lengthy, but are well worth the time.
The site has been running a 50% off special for quite a while. The discounted monthly price of $19.95 is good if fairly standard, but the longer running subscriptions are real bargains. 6 months go for $49.95, 12 months for $75, and lifetime for $399. I dont know how long this discount will remain in effect. You can get the same discount by signing up via PU, which of course is what I recommend.
Given the wide variety of styles, explicitness, the superb technical quality, the frequent updates it is extremely easy to recommend this site. |
|
02-12-18 07:02pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
35
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates
4701 Photo Sets, 1979 Models, 186 Artists there is a lot of content here
Generally high quality photography
Many of the models are gorgeous
Wide variety of settings and styles
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
No videos at all
Considerable overlap with DOMAI
Most models have only one or two sets
Occasional clunkers in the sets
Suffers the same occasional logon glitches as all the sites in the Met Art network. Maybe once or twice a month that can last for a couple of hours. |
| Bottom Line: |
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
It generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isnt good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models youd rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called pretty than gorgeous. But then, A Pretty Girl is Like a Melody, so pretty is nothing to sneeze at, especially if shes naked.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, also in the Met Art network. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 50 pics from one shoot, and then later 50 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes. And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
Ive seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like page01 at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. |
|
01-31-18 08:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Eternal Desire
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Regular updates typically every-other-day
Very high quality photography
The girls are gorgeous
Good variety of settings for the photo shoots
Does use HTTPS (TLS 1.2)
A little more explicit than Met Art
For new users, billing is with ccBill if joining from within the Met Art network, the processor is Rocket Pay |
| Cons: |
Daily updates would be nice
Susceptible to the same occasional logon glitches that hit the Met Art network. Averages a couple times a month. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site, part of the Met Art network, features the work of a single artist, Arkisi. (Although some sets and videos are from other artists, the vast majority are from Arkisi). The site started in February 2013, and this is their front page statement of purpose: The artist known simply as Arkisi possesses a keen eye for the feminine form, unmatched technical skills, and the ability to capture the beauty of female sexuality in dazzling digital images. And his considerable talents with a camera combine with a knack for bringing out the inner, usually hidden, sensuality of his subjects. Whether she's shy and demure or bold and uninhibited, Arkisi knows exactly how to present each model for maximum erotic impact. Welcome to the world of Arkisi. Welcome to Eternal Desire.
Updates are usually every-other-day, with 19 updates posted in November and 19 posted in December 2017. There are currently 193 models with sets on the site. I wasnt able to get a count on the total updates on the site, but there are certainly over 700, most of which are photo galleries.
There are 127 videos, almost all of which are solo pieces, but a handful of boy-girl sets. They range from the simple nude girl moving around to masturbation. All are very well done.
One thing Ive wondered about for artists that contribute heavily to a site like Met Art but also have their own site which place gets their best work? Ive checked out a number of sets by Arkisi on Met Art and on Eternal Desire, and they seem very comparable to me, so Id say in this case, the overall quality is about equal.
One neat thing is that Arkisi does read the comments, and will occasionally respond to them, especially to constructive criticism and suggestions. (Ive also seen him do this for his sets on Met Art). Interaction with the site owner is always a plus.
The content here is usually more explicit than on Met Art, but not always. Its still more on the soft core side of things, but can include insertions, spreading, and masturbation.
Some of the models have made a large number of appearances here, such as Mila with 37 sets, Loretta A with 27, Serena Wood with 26, Aislin with 25, Zsannett Tormay with 23, and Nancy A with 34.
The regular price is $29.99 monthly, but the PU discount brings it to $19.99. Annual subscriptions are $99.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
The models are all gorgeous, the photography is very high quality, web site navigation is very good, download and browsing speeds are good. There is a lot to like here. Id definitely recommend giving this site a look. |
|
01-14-18 07:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
37
|
Naked News
(0)
|
|
01-01-18 05:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
38
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
|
11-25-17 03:58pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
39
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content over 1.7 million photos, over 2,700 videos, over 2,800 models
Big variety of content solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, multi-girl
Some real gems in the archives
Picture and video quality is decent, but not quite as good as the best sites. |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Download speeds are a little sluggish, but not awful
Streaming of videos at higher resolutions really doesnt work at all for me lots of fits and starts
Despite the sites name, few of the models were still in their teens when appearing on here. Its not quite a MILF site but the average age is well above teenager.
Has a captcha when logging in a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
Some strange glitches here and there, like no thumbnails being present for a few days.
Somewhat irregular update schedule there were 13 updates in September. |
| Bottom Line: |
There is a lot of good content here, although it is not as easy to find as it could be. The thumbnails are a little on the small side when browsing the sets, so its kind of hard to tell how much you like a girl without going into the actual set.
For me, the archives held more interest than the current stuff, but YMMV. It looks like back in the day this would have been one of my favorite sites, but more recent stuff is just OK. Although they have picked up a few sets of some of the stars you see on other sites, like Nancy A, Gina Gerson, Mila Azul, and Sapphira, and as expected, those are all quite enjoyable.
Picture and video quality is decent, but there are other sites that are better.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the models name, hair color, and breast size.
The schedule for September had 6 videos on 9/6, 9/12, 9/13, 9/19, 9/25, 9/28. The schedule for September had 7 photos on 9/7, 9/11, 9/14, 9/18, 9/20, 9/21, 9/23.
About the gems I mentioned in the pros section. If you are a collector of Ariel Piper Fawn (she goes by Gabriella on this site) or Eufrat Mai, this site has some of the earliest sets Ive ever seen of these two super stars. Like fresh out of high school. Demi A also has some early sets here.
Billing is PureWebPower.net. I havent used them before. Seems OK so far.
Bottom line, I am glad I signed up for this site, although I wont be a long term member. The gems I found (mentioned above) make it worth it just on that basis alone, and there is plenty of other stuff here to keep you occupied for at least a month. |
|
10-02-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
40
|
Met Art X
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
that's definitely true. I think for some models this is the "next step" before trying a twosome. And some never move beyond the solo sets.
|
09-20-17 03:34pm
|
Review
41
|
Met Art X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily Updates, either a photo set or video, with about a 3:2 ratio of videos to photos
Excellent technical quality
Wide variety of locales
Gorgeous girls, including many favorites from Met Art
Excellent navigation and web design
Good browsing, streaming, and downloading speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
Occasional logon problems that have been plaguing the entire Met Art network recently maybe once or twice a month
Has the feeling of girls putting on a show, rather than girls enjoying themselves |
| Bottom Line: |
Solo masturbation photo sets and videos are the raison detre for this site, and they do these very well. The technical implementation of the sets are everything you would expect from a Met Art network site.
The site only started up in March 2016, and there are currently over 330+ videos and 220+ photo sets on the site. They have adhered to a daily update schedule since their inception, and they show no sign of slowing down, so there is plenty of content here.
Maybe its just me, but I did not find this site to be among my favorites. Theres nothing to complain about from a technical or quality aspect. The girls are gorgeous. So why is my reaction kind of meh?
For one thing, from a story telling aspect, theres a lot less that can be done with one person in the video instead of two, so there is a repetitiveness that is inevitable in this kind of site.
I think the other thing that disappointed me is that I hoped for more feeling of intimacy. As I said in the cons above, it has the feeling of girls putting on a show. And yeah, I know, duh, that is exactly what they are doing. But at their other network sites like Viv Thomas and Sex Art, they do achieve that suspension of disbelief where you feel like you are watching a genuine story of some kind.
The videos have a rote aspect to them in most cases. The first part is the girl teasing for the camera to get the guys aroused. Then its time to go masturbate. This one-two formula is quite common.
What I am hoping they can achieve is a feeling of getting closer to the models. For my favorite example, Id offer up Michaela Isizzu in Alone over at Sex Art. Ive watched that video 50 times and it never gets old. So they do have it in them.
Standard membership rates are $29.99 per month and $99.99 per year. The PU discount brings the monthly charge down to 19.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
One other thing I recently joined one of the sites for a single month, and after completing the purchase, they gave me the chance to purchase a monthly membership to any other network site for a 50% discount and also the lifetime memberships are available for $400 each (for any site) so this would be a great way to get a lifetime membership to a site if you are so inclined. The catch is that this discount is available for only 1 hour though. So this can be a good way to get a lifetime membership for a bit of a discount to any network site, or else pick up a monthly or annual discount for some second site. But the time limit on the discount makes it very helpful for you to know ahead of time that it is being offered, so you can think about it a little before hitting the join button.
The Bottom Line is this is a very well executed site. For me, some of the artistry isnt quite there yet. But if you are really into masturbation photos and videos, this site is definitely worth a look. |
|
09-14-17 07:54pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
42
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I struggled with the score to give, could have gone as low as 85. But the number one job of a nude photography site is to post great pictures of beautiful nude women - and this site does succeed at that.
I'd love for them to read this review, fix the problems, and earn high praise from me in response.
|
08-14-17 04:52pm
|
Review
43
|
Femjoy
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the most beautiful women you will find anywhere on planet Earth
Daily updates, with about 9 to 11 total updates each week. Almost every week, one of the updates is a video.
Extremely high quality production values.
Some of the models have A LOT of content Ariel has 73 photo sets and 40 videos, Lorena G has 78 photo sets and 27 videos. Rena has been appearing very frequently recently she now has 26 photo sets and 1 video.
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
12 years worth of content, and a lot of the older stuff is stellar |
| Cons: |
Still a number of technical quirks / glitches. They dont interfere with the main task you are here for looking at pictures/videos and downloading the same. But they make searching, tagging, favoriting, etc. a lot less useful than they should be.
Very little striptease action here in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
Tech support is a joke. |
| Bottom Line: |
Back in the day, Femjoy and Met Art were very close competitors, and I tended to prefer Femjoy. Then at some point Met Art really stepped up their game while Femjoy seemed a little stagnant. The models on Femjoy were always quite attractive, but not spectacular. In the past year or two, this seems to have changed there are a number of models on Femjoy that are stunningly beautiful, and I have not seen many of these models on other sites.
And when I say stunningly beautiful, I mean I am actually stunned. Several times a month there will be a photoset where I just stop and stare at the cover photo before clicking into the photo set. My jaw will quite literally drop on some of these. That doesnt happen very often on most other sites.
The new design of the site (implemented in January 2017) is a huge improvement over the older Femjoy, but it still has many quirks and other issues. (If you prefer the older layout, that is still available at old.femjoy.com). The new version has been up long enough that these quirks should be fixed by now, so it seems likely that there will be slow or no progress on fixing the issues.
For example, if you go to the Models page, there are filter buttons across the top of the page for Sort By, Bra Size, Hair Color, Ethnicity, or Shaved. However, if you click on these buttons in Firefox or IE 11, nothing happens. If you do it in Chrome, The Sort By allows you to choose Recent, Views, or Rating, but the other buttons dont do anything.
You can save Favorites for Photo Sets, Videos, or individual pictures, but not for Models. You can save as many Photo Sets as you want as Favorites, but your Favorites page will only display 20 of them theres no next page to see the other ones.
If you want to change your password, you have to do it through the billing site (ccBill in my case) rather than on the site itself.
Tech support is a joke. If you post a request for help via the FAQ/Support Page, you get no response. (I tried several times). If you try to send feedback, the page just hangs and never sends your feedback in. Luckily my requests were fairly minor, but it would be nice to actually have at least a response, even if its not possible to fix the issue. But when you make it impossible for complaints to ever reach you, you also make it impossible to improve the site. If they are assuming that the lack of complaints reaching their ears indicates all is well, then I guess ignorance really is bliss.
At least the speed is good for browsing, streaming and downloading. Picture and video quality is uniformly excellent.
Monthly memberships go for $29.95, with a PU discount to $149.5 for the first month. Annual memberships are $119.50.
There are 8151 photo galleries, 632 videos, and 577 models appearing on the site. The oldest content dates back to 2005.
If you like looking at outrageously gorgeous women who have no clothes on, this is the site for you. Based on the quality of the photos and the models, this should be ranked as one of the top sites in the world. Unfortunately the annoying technical stuff knocks several points off the score. |
|
08-13-17 07:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I have 4 at the moment and would love to add more. I like the freedom it gives me to not have to download like mad, piling up a huge number of zip files that I never open. I do have the concern that the site might go belly up shortly after joining - after all, it is called a "life of the site" membership. I assume they take the cash and plow it into cigars and booze rather than putting it in escrow. So there's definitely a risk there. Plus it gives me motivation to live forever.
|
08-10-17 04:44pm
|
Reply
45
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes, I would agree with that assessment. But I am already a lifetime member at Met Art, so was looking to expand the horizons. There is a lot of overlap with Met Art in terms of the models, but there are photo sets and videos for these models that do appear on only Errotica Archives. So if you're looking to add some sets for a favorite model, this can be a good place to look. But if I was to join only one or the other, then Met Art would be my choice too.
|
07-31-17 03:49pm
|
Review
46
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates, either photosets or videos (vids are one or two per week).
Excellent photo and video quality
Good download and browsing speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Beautiful girls |
| Cons: |
Site layout is not quite as good as Met Art, but still better than a lot of sites on the interwebs.
Limited Model Information measurements and home country
Very little striptease action here in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
No sexual activity of any kind the emphasis is on beauty. |
| Bottom Line: |
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it has evolved to be more of a multi-photographer site. Erro continues to contribute, but only a few times per month.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. For example, Iveta has 41 galleries posted from 2007 to 2013, with a handful after that. Nikky has 43 galleries posted from 2006 to 2013. Belle (aka Indiana A) has 37 sets from 2011 to 2015. Antea appears in 204 galleries (!) from 2006 to 2017.
Lately, it has started to feel a lot more like its sister site, Erotic Beauty. It seems like just one more place for various models to post a set or two that didnt get posted at Met Art. There is still a lot of high quality content here, but Errotica Archives no longer feels as unique as it once did.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near another no sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
The site boasts 319 Models. Its hard to get a good count on the total number of photo galleries, but the main site goes back to 2005, and the archives contain some sets from 2004. There are over 600 videos.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot. |
|
07-30-17 06:39pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
47
|
Girlsway
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good update schedule (recently increased to 5 updates per week)
Good back catalog of stuff too
Many of the shoots produce both videos and photo sets
Excellent picture and video quality
Good speeds for browsing, streaming and downloading
Pretty good model info pages, plus they have some behind-the-scenes videos with short interviews, so thats another way to get to know the ladies.
Very attractive ladies |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Captchas required when logging in
I think some of the stories can get kind of weird |
| Bottom Line: |
Girlsway is basically a network that includes access to several lesbian sites: Mommys Girl, Web Young, Girls Try Anal, Sex Tape Lesbians, and Girlsway Originals.
In early July, they announced that they will now be posting 5 updates per week on the network, by adding a Girlsway Originals scene every Sunday.
Here are the updates for Mommys Girl for June 2017 Videos on the 3, 10, 13, 17, and 24th. Photos on the 3rd (2 sets), 10th (2 sets), 13th (2 sets), 17th, and 24th.
Here are the updates for Web Young for June 2017 Videos on the 4, 9, 18, and 23rd. Photos on the 4, 9th (2 sets), and 18th (2 sets).
Here are the updates for Girlsway Originals for June 2017 Videos on the 1st, 2nd, 5th, 8th, 11th, 12th, 15th, 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 29th, and 30th. Photos on the 1st (3 sets), 2nd, 5th (2 sets), 8th, 11th, 12th, 15th (2 sets), 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 29th, and 30th.
Here is the update for Girls Try Anal last update was 9/17/2015
Here is the update for Sex Tape Lesbians last update was 6/22/2015
Theyve recently produced a number of squirting videos, which seems to be a trend in the industry right now, but its not something I personally enjoy.
Photo and video clarity is outstanding. Performance for browsing, streaming and downloading is quite good.
A percentage of the videos in the Girlsway Originals are consumer driven dream pairings where the members vote on which two girls should shoot together, or maybe pick the type of scene they are in. This can be a fun way for members to interact with the promoters of the site. This often results in some fetish oriented stuff you may like it, but its usually not for me.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like youre thinking about it but not sure). Eventually youll get a pop-up chat window where youll be offered a discount code. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $119.40 for annual.
Also, definitely check out the specials they offer on other sites once you have joined Girlsway. I was able to pick up a 1 month membership to Errotica Archives for only $5 a great deal.
There is a lot to like at this site, and it is definitely worth at least a one month subscription to check it out. I ended up getting the annual subscription and I don't regret it. |
|
07-17-17 08:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
48
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
6 updates per week 3 videos and 3 photo sets
Very high quality production values
1,017 Models, 23 Artists, 2.882 Photo Sets, 1,598 Films there is A LOT of content
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
The Behind the Scenes videos give you a good chance to get to know the models better.
PU price of $19.99 is quite reasonable. Annual memberships are $100, and lifetime memberships are available if you already belong to some other Met Art site.
Speeds of browsing, downloading, etc. are quite good. Navigation mirrors that on Met Art, which is excellent. |
| Cons: |
For me, sometimes all the artistry gets in the way. I like simpler stories and less makeup. Although the makeup is rarely garish, its not the more natural look that I prefer.
Many of the photo sets are simply pictures taken from the video session, as opposed to separately conceived sessions. They are not screen caps however.
The Behind the Scenes videos tend to be quite short less than 10 minutes
Except for the Behind the Scenes videos, there is very little model information |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas was originally founded by its namesake, but Mr. Thomas has since retired in 2014. He does make occasional cameo appearances in some recent videos, but is not the director for any new material that I have seen.
Unlike some sites where the primary content is the photographs while the videos are an add-on, here the focus is on the videos. The photo shoots are frequently (but not always) just photos of the video session. But they are still high quality photos in their own right.
The video collection includes almost everything that was posted to the site since 2009, with a small collection of earlier stuff, some dating back to 1999. So if youre looking for stuff prior to 2009, it will be pretty hit or miss. Older videos are available in 360p. Starting around 2010 the stuff starts to become available in 720p. From 2012 on there is 1080p. Newer stuff is available in 4K, although I am not equipped to take advantage of that myself, so cant comment on how good that is.
The site is mostly lesbian content, with some solo, and occasional boy-girl content up until about 2013. After 2013 it seems to be all female, which is fine by me.
Production values, in terms of clarity, lighting, sound quality, are all state of the art for the time they were filmed. The people behind the cameras here know what they are doing.
I tend to find the story lines to be not that interesting. The love making however, that does hold my attention.
The women are supremely sexy, with many of your favorites from Met Art or Sex Art also appearing here. For some, like Tracy Lindsay (who is amazing), this is her main site, with less frequent appearances elsewhere in the MA network.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
The bottom line is this is an excellent site, and if you are interested in girl-girl photos and videos, you definitely want to consider this site. |
|
07-03-17 09:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
49
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I definitely agree all pay sites should use HTTPS. I've been noting whether or not it is in use in my reviews. It was the firefox pop-up that caused me to be aware of it in the first place.
Especially since some people use the same user ID and password in multiple locations, it's important to have encrypted logons everywhere, not just on banking sites.
|
04-19-17 03:31pm
|
Reply
50
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
regarding: "-NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
THERE IS A POP-UP WARNING ON THE LOGIN PAGE (WHERE YOU ENTER YOUR LOGIN DETAILS TO ENTER THE SITE) THAT STATES:
THIS CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE. LOGINS ENTERED HERE COULD BE COMPROMISED."
This is because the site does not use HTTPS. Your browser (not the site) is popping that up to warn you. (Firefox started doing this a couple of months ago on their browser, when they detect you are being prompted for a login with only HTTP). This will be true for any site that does not use HTTPS. If you are using cookies to log in to sites you may find that more sites than just this one are leaving you vulnerable in this regard (not because cookies are inherently vulnerable, but because you aren't noticing the warning message when being automatically logged on).
|
04-18-17 04:34pm
|
|
