| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2426
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
exotics - I don't think what I'm downloading would qualify as 'big' files. They certainly aren't HD. I was working my way through the newer Captain Stabbin scenes and downloading the only wmv files there. Those are probably larger than the files intended for mobile device users, but they aren't 'big' by today's standards. It may be that you're treated differently because you're a former member. I'm a former member too but I don't think the network was called Reality Kings back when I was there last.
The clause in the terms of membership about the download limit has an awful lot of wiggle room in it for them. They're vague because they say they "may" impose a limit of 10GB per day and up to 15 "big" files. I have no idea what that means. They're also a bit vague on when you get privileges back. I emailed them and asked several questions about what they mean. I was polite and respectful but was looking to have some of the terms clarified. I'll have to admit that sending them an email is also a bit of a test since I think the chances of them actually responding to me are about zero. I suspect that RK is just another faceless mega site with no interest in customer service. But if I'm wrong I'll certainly retract that. And if I get some clarification on how they impose the limit (and on who) I'll report that here for future members.
To top all of this off, I do have to admit to being a little ticked that I got kicked off at just over 9GB when the limit wasn't even triggered. That's a definite breach of the contract on their part.
|
12-18-11 05:42am
|
Comment
2427
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
|
12-17-11 11:02am
Replies (14)
|
Reply
2428
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Comment
I just took out a membership here today and I can't get Free Download Manager to work. I can't say with other managers, but my guess is that if they block one they block them all.
|
12-17-11 10:57am
|
Reply
2429
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Reply
I hate to hear this because there is some material I really want to see here. I literally was on the join page a couple of days ago and thought twice about it. I'll probably join, and I hope I'm not as frustrated as you. Thanks for all the warnings. At least if I do join I'll go in fully informed.
|
11-20-11 06:37am
|
Reply
2430
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Reply
I can understand your frustration. It's bad enough having a download limit, but to have one that a member can't figure out is worse. Then having your membership cancelled on top of that is bizarre.
|
11-20-11 06:35am
|
Reply
2431
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I checked the terms of the contract and they do spell out that there is a daily limit, and it is a bit confusing in that there is a limit of 10GB. I'm not really sure how to interpret the part where you can additionally download 15 big movies.
Here's the exact clause in the contract:
E. Download Limit
As a member in good standing, you may download up to 10 gigabytes of data each day, and additionally up to 15 big movies. Upon reaching this limit, you may be denied access to download any additional data until the beginning of the next day.
|
11-13-11 09:15am
|
Reply
2432
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Reply
I had been a members there many years ago and the network is on my list of sites to join, but I might have to rethink that based on your experience.
|
11-13-11 08:54am
|
Reply
2433
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I can understand why a site might want to impose a download limit - obviously a member with a high-speed connection can download a lot of stuff in a day. But... I'm with you when it comes to hating them. For me, I'd think twice about joining a site that imposed a limit - especially one like RK where the limit doesn't seem logical.
Thanks for the warning on this.
|
11-12-11 05:56am
|
Reply
2434
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Great review... very informative.
I was a member there a long time ago and it may not have even been called Reality Kings then.
The reason I joined was for Captain Stabbin. Can you give me some information on that site? Does it still update? Is it still anal-themed? Does it still take place on a boat? I understand that the original 'Captain Stabbin' retired a while ago, which is probably a bit of a negative because he added a creepy yet fun element to the scenes. The preview pages don't really give me enough information to get the anwers to these questions on my own so any help would be appreciated!
I was also a big fan of In the VIP and VIP Crew. As I recall, back when I was last a member (which was probably more than five years ago) they weren't all about tattoos and fake breasts. That's definitely a negative for me too.
Thanks!
|
08-09-11 08:29am
|
Reply
2435
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I'm liking the entire network. One odd thing is that in a lot of the videos the model names aren't listed.
|
01-30-21 12:13pm
|
Reply
2436
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
Just wanted to say thanks again. I joined through Hunt 4K and got the discount. It includes the whole network, including Rim 4K.
Thanks!
|
01-29-21 10:49am
|
Reply
2437
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
Thanks! I will.
|
01-28-21 07:54am
|
Reply
2438
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
Thank you Sir! I prefer to subscribe through TBP/PU but if I can't, I can't.
|
01-26-21 12:30pm
|
Reply
2439
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Excellent and informative review. I am a huge fan of rimming content and this site has been on my radar since it was listed here in May of 2020. But, as with many new sites I'm a bit hesitant. Your review removes that hesitation.
It does appear that the TBP/PU discount is gone. I don't see that now and when I go through to the site I see a full price $30 USD price. Let's hope they reoffer that as I don't think I'll join at full price.
|
01-26-21 05:50am
|
Reply
2440
|
Rock Star Porn Star
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I'm with Denner on this. Your review was great, and this would normally be a theme that I'd be interested in too, but the male 'talent' is just too weird for me. Men in straight porn should never be the centre of attention. They're just props and shouldn't detract from the real talent.
|
10-03-10 10:04am
|
Reply
2441
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
I like some of Rodney's work but given how old much of his stuff is I guessed that the site would still reflect a ten year old design. Thanks for confirming that. Surely they could put some effort into the site and improve it to make this classic porn better. JM Productions has the same problem.
|
09-24-12 06:17pm
|
Reply
2442
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
Excellent review! "...hairy, hirsute women..." that gave me a good laugh!
I like some of Rodney's stuff, but very little of it. One title I do have is a video called "Rodney's Blastrovan 2" which has scenes with Haley Paige and Kylie Rochelle. Rodney shoots them POV style and plays himself as a pervert trying to get get Haley to pose in a wet t-shirt for a fake cable show and in the scene with Kylie his schtick is asking her to model shoes. The girls play their roles well and the scenes are hot. The scenes are shot in the back of a Dodge minivan, which had to be somewhat risky back when they were shot. I bought other Rodney titles based on the strength of that one and was disappointed. 'Hairy, hirsute women' aren't my thing.
Another thing about Rodney that I like is that in the scenes I've seen him in he realizes that he's not the reason guys are watching the video. Too many younger and newer guys seem to forget that.
|
08-08-12 06:06pm
|
Reply
2443
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Thanks for the comments.
I doubt that anyone has ever joined a site I've reviewed only to find out that it is far more extreme than they prefer. I'm sure most people do more research than reading just one review. But I can imagine that some members here who prefer glamcore definitely wouldn't like a site like this.
And I definitely disagree with one thing you said: I think that an apple in Roxy's ass provides a lot of excitement! :-)
|
02-12-14 05:18pm
|
Review
2444
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Provides photos and videos in an under-served niche
- Wide variety of anal-themed videos
- 235 videos
- 185 photo sets
- Updates with a new video every three days or so
- Has live cam shows regularly
- All but a few videos are exclusive
- Part of a small network
- Supports DL managers
- Active webmaster |
| Cons: |
- 50GB daily download limit, but there is also a 10GB / hour limit.
- Probably a bit too extreme for many porn viewers
- Streaming begins on opening a scene link |
| Bottom Line: |
I seem to start off a lot of reviews with this statement: this site is definitely NOT for everyone. A regional brewery near here used to have a tag line: “Those who like it, like it a lot.” The same might be said of this extreme anal play. Roxy Raye exists in a very narrow niche of extreme anal play. The only other site I know of that is similar is hotkinkyjo, the site featuring the Russian model with an expandable colon. The big difference is that with Roxy Raye you can download the scenes while with HKJ they are streaming only.
I know that any reader who either has no interest in this niche or finds it abhorrent will wonder how I can describe this site as having a broad range of scenes within the extreme anal niche. But Roxy really does cover a broad range of activities, albeit with the common theme of something large going into her ass. There are sex scenes (b/g and g/g), there are IR scenes, there are the large toy insertions, there are pissing videos, there are speculum videos (vaginal and anal), there is fruit and vegetable insertion (hey, she’s looking after her health), there is fisting (vaginal and anal, by self, men and women), there are regular camshows (with downloads available shortly after broadcast), there is some public nudity and there are even rosebuds. And don’t ask what that last thing is. If you don’t know, do yourself a favor and don’t bother learning about it.
The site currently has around 235 videos with a new video being uploaded about every three days. A vast majority of these are exclusive, though there are a few uploads of scenes that she’s done for Evil Angel. Approximately 30 of the scenes are downloadable files of the live camshows that she does regularly. I didn’t have an opportunity to take in a live show so I can’t comment on those. The only drawback to the live shows is that prior to mid-2012 they are very low resolution. I suspect that this is dictated partly due to file size because the newer ones aren’t great resolution (640x480 with some at 960x540) but are still as large as 1.5GB.
Most scenes have some download options with files being offered as both WMV and MP4 formats. More than one resolution is usually offered too. Obviously the options and resolutions improved as the site kept up with evolving industry standards. The newer MP4s come in at 1920x1080, 3000kb/s and 29fps. That seems like a low bitrate, but the scenes look crisp. The other most common resolution for older, non-HD scenes is 960x540, 2500kb/s. These look fine on a 24” monitor.
Photos are also offered, with most of the sets being taken as part of the video shoots. Resolutions vary here too, but most are decent at 1225x816. Photos are updated with a new set being added once every ten days or so.
The site layout is relatively simple, and that’s not a bad thing. If you’re familiar with how Hustler looks, it is pretty much the same as that. I can’t find any link between Hustler and this site, but they look a lot alike. While there is no search function there are tags that help sort some things out.
The site commits one sin that is too common these days. I may be the only person who dislikes it, but I dislike it a lot: when you open the link to a scene it starts streaming automatically. I really wish that sites would stop this.
There is a download limit of 50GB per day, which is reasonable for a site with so much exclusive material. But there is another limit that is easier to hit. If at any time in a one hour period you exceed 10GB you’ll be shut down for a while. I don’t know how long, but it seems to be an hour or so.
The site supports download managers for queuing up scenes and I had no obvious problems with links timing out.
The membership includes access to ten sites in total. Normally I’d provide some information on the other sites but in this case most of them are MILF-oriented and therefore not something I have a lot of interest in, so I didn’t spend any time there.
Of note too is that there is an active webmaster who responds to questions here and by email. That’s rare and appreciated.
The bottom line (pun not intended) is that this is a very good site offering some videos and photos in a rare niche. The site is easy to navigate, the videos are available with some choices, streaming is offered, there are a lot of variations on the main theme and the price is right. The biggest caveat to anyone considering a membership is to make sure you have an interest in this niche. If your porn experience is glamcore then this isn’t the site to dabble in something new. This site is an excellent value and I’d recommend it for anyone interested in the niche.
Maybe the whole site can be summed up in something that Roxy says during a scene. How often do you hear an attractive young lady say “I think this is the biggest apple I’ve ever put up my ass”? If you’ve ever heard those words spoken for real before, I need to hang out with you. |
|
02-11-14 08:24am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2445
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
|
Reply of
NaughtyAlysha's Reply
Thanks for responding with that information. Based on that I suspect I'll be joining in the next day or two.
|
01-31-14 10:04am
|
Comment
2446
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
|
|
01-01-14 07:49am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
2447
|
Rub A Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I haven't yet, but as i see from marvin at TMW and you that is likely the way to join.
|
11-20-12 01:18pm
|
Reply
2448
|
Rub A Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
marvin's Reply
Thanks for the clarification marvin. I know that piracy and costs are a big issue but it seems that a lot of the ways sites try to combat those only hurt people who are glad to pay to support sites who work hard to make a great site. I'll definitely be joining here in the near future.
|
11-20-12 01:17pm
|
Reply
2449
|
Rub A Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the concern, lk2fireone, but when it comes to petite lasses in massage scenarios I'm like an addict. I hope you're right and the site isn't too bad... But I haven't joined yet...
|
11-17-12 07:38pm
|
Comment
2450
|
Rub A Teen
(0)
|
|
11-17-12 04:07pm
Replies (8)
|
