| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1126
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Even if I don't see a lot of preview material your interests are a lot like mine so it would still be worth checking out.
|
12-01-11 03:15pm
|
Reply
1127
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for clarifying that pat. It makes sense that if you have a site with thousands of scenes then you'll have many with implants and tattoos.
I might continue to browse through the site and eventually take a membership.
|
11-29-11 03:37pm
|
Reply
1128
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Interesting review pat. You and I seem to have a lot of common porn interests but I don't think I'd enjoy a Brazzers membership. Because it is such a large network it's been on my mental list of possible sites to join, but never on my actual list. The problem for me is that most PU members (and one real life porn buddy) reported that there is a high percentage of women with implants and tattoos. That's pretty much a deal breaker for me, But I can understand why you'd score them so high. Most reviews mention that they get all the technical bits just about perfect, so if you like what they have to offer then this site is great. I think I once gave a Kink.com site a 99 and justified it by the fact that they really did everything well, but that obviously only matters if you like that material. And for me, a guy who like petite, natural models, while I can appreciate the effort of the folks at Brazzers, their material likely isn't for me.
|
11-28-11 02:23pm
|
Reply
1129
|
Brick Yates
(0)
|
Reply of
Jackthecommon's Review
Interesting site and a good review of it. From the preview pages it does seem that some of this is just what it says it is.
Welcome to Pornusers too. This is a great network and I hope to see more of your reviews in the future.
|
05-29-13 05:01pm
|
Reply
1130
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
itsjustme's Reply
This pretty much reflects my thinking about this site, except this was my first time joining. I'm new to the amateur thing and it sounds like we like the same things, so I hope someone suggests some other sites.
|
10-18-13 07:34am
|
Reply
1131
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
softspoken's Reply
Interesting information. Thanks for adding it. This is my first membership here and among my first forays into amateur porn and I was really impressed with some of the scenes, but they really need to make key improvements in how the scenes are made available to paying members.
I have a mixed reaction to hearing that your emails weren't replied to either. On one hand, it means that it wasn't just my questions that were being ignored, but on the other hand, it's sad that a small site like this can't even be bothered to reply to member's questions.
|
10-16-13 02:19pm
|
Reply
1132
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I can say for certain that unless there is a download option that exceeds that I certainly won't be back.
|
10-07-13 02:41pm
|
Reply
1133
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Good point about the quality issue. If you offer HD for sale then more people will buy it. I'll confess to occasionally visiting tube sites to scout out material from a site I might be interested in. Tube sites have led me to join several pay sites but I only use them when planning a membership.
The thing about this site is that I really like the scenes and would gladly become a repeat customer if the video quality was better. Honestly, I could even live with the 720x480 stuff, but if the site is reverting to 320x240 I won't rejoin.
And as I've said probably a dozen times here already, an answer to my emails from the site would be helpful in clarifying what's going on.
|
10-06-13 12:59pm
|
Reply
1134
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks for the comments.
The worst part is that I don't think the site has been left to die. It is still updating with new material but the site owner seems to have made a decision to drop the semi-good quality downloads in favour of what might have been state-of-the-art in 1995. And all to thwart piracy. I get that piracy is a big problem, I get that it must be one of the most frustrating things a small site has to deal with, and I get that the site can't tell someone like me from a person intending to upload the material to a torrent site, but this move seems to penalize me for doing nothing wrong.
That's the frustrating part for me. That and the fact that the webmaster doesn't respond to emails.
|
10-05-13 01:24pm
|
Review
1135
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Decent sized site (135 scenes)
- Some attractive women
- Supports download managers
- Streaming available
- Lots of rimming (yes, I consider this a pro)
- Scenes are hard without being abusive
- Updates |
| Cons: |
- No HD
- Highest resolution is barely industry standard
- Seems to be using even lower resolution now
- Many broken links
- Some scenes are streaming only
- No customer support
- Some women not attractive |
| Bottom Line: |
I recently discovered that I like ‘amateur’ porn. The qualifier for that is that I like porn that uses models that obviously have some interest in the adult industry and are now trying video, as opposed to a couple who record themselves and post it on the ‘net.
The setup here is pretty much the same as used on similar sites like Exploited College Girls: the scene begins with an interview of the model, she gets naked, there is oral and then sex. I think this formula works so I don’t find it repetitive, but I can see that some might. Most of the sex is vaginal, but there are several scenes that feature anal too, but not enough that I’d consider this an anal site. One controversial sex act that does occur often is female on male rimming, which occurs in a majority of the scenes. I like watching that, so I find it a positive, but I understand that I’m probably in a minority.
Most of the scenes are around 45-50 minutes long. While the female models are asked to do things they probably wouldn’t do in real life, the scenes are in no way abusive as can occur on other sites. There is no face fucking or other extreme acts like that.
Most of the models are quite attractive and there is a decent variety among body types so that most members can say they found a lot of models that suit their tastes. As with ‘amateur’ sites though, there can be some models who are questionable. I swear that one of the models looks like a younger Geddy Lee. And as a Rush fan, it pains me to say that. It could have been worse though: the model could have looked like Neil Peart or Alex Lifeson.
Unfortunately the bad outweighs the good on this site. The material itself is well shot (while there is a lot of POV it is well done), lighted and edited. Most of the women are attractive and most of the sex is fun to watch. The site is let down by the web design itself and what is actually made available to members.
The site is simple and I have no problem with that. It is a small site with 135 scenes available so there is no need for a fancy layout and powerful search function. It would be nice to see some tags but I can live without those. Of the problems on the site, one of them is that the 135 scenes are only theoretically available. I didn’t count them, but there are many dead links for pages and more for downloads.
Speaking of downloads, this is the biggest problem with the site: all of the older material is offered in only 320x240 resolution. (Only one download choice is offered per scene. Or, if you prefer, the only option is take it or leave it.) I can’t be convinced that they were anywhere near state-of-the-art even when they were uploaded. The site did improve that when they upgraded the downloads to 720x480. Those are passable and look pretty good on a 24” monitor, but get pretty grainy on a large TV. More options would be better, including an HD download choice.
But wait! It gets worse!
It appears that the site may have made a choice to actually revert back to the 320x240 size. I say this for three reasons: 1) the newest update is low resolution, 2) a blog update in late August reported that the site would be only using low resolution downloads to thwart theft, and 3) a couple of emails to the site to ask if my suspicions were true went unanswered.
If it’s true that the site has reverted to low res for downloads, this alone will cause me to not recommend the site and not rejoin. I get that piracy is hurting porn, and probably hurting smaller sites more than big sites, but surely there is a better way to curb piracy than kicking your customers in the balls. I’m an active porn buyer and I frequently rejoin sites, but if this is what I get, I won’t be back.
Two relatively minor issues too: 1) if you have an option for members to contact you, you should read your email and respond. If you don’t respond, then don’t make the option available, and 2) the third most recent update features a stunning young lass who puts on a great performance, but for some reason it is only offered in streaming. This really cheesed me off, and my reasonable question on future availability went unanswered.
As for some technical stuff, the site updates with approximately one new scene being added weekly. It also supports download managers with no obvious timeouts or download limits.
This is some decent amateur porn that is let down by a too-amateur site. I could live with that but if my suspicions are correct that they are making things even worse for members I can’t recommend the site. If the site responds to this review or to my email with some information on better downloads then I’ll reconsider my refusal to recommend and the score. |
|
10-03-13 06:39pm
Replies (10)
|
Reply
1136
|
Broke Model
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Yes, and I'm sure that this site will be around to post those scenes in 2026! I can hardly wait!
|
11-01-20 11:45am
|
Comment
1137
|
Broke Model
(0)
|
|
10-28-20 10:56am
Replies (2)
|
Review
1138
|
Broke Model
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good mix of models
- Appears to update regularly
- Videos and photos available
- Streaming and downloads
- Options available for streaming and downloads
- A few pregnant models (if you’re into that)
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- Model treatment leans to Misogynist side of scale
- Six-hour download limit (but reasonable)
- Some recent uploads are full scenes of older segments
- Some models have only photos |
| Bottom Line: |
This site follows the same formula used by several other sites where it appears to be a small operation. The scenes are shot by a mix of POV and tripod mounted cameras and the models are relative unknowns or are at least in the beginning of their career. This style is used successfully by sites like Exploited College Girls and Amateur Allure and with less success by sites like Broke Amateurs. Unfortunately I have to add Broke Models to the lower end of the scale for the same reason that Broke Models is there: while the porn itself is decent the site is flawed. As an armchair critic I’ll never understand why site owners make some of the choices that they do.
First the good news: the site does offer some good porn if you like this niche. I like that the models are relative unknowns and range from nervous to confident. Their looks and body types exist on a range but all are relatively petite. If you like some color in your models you won’t find it here as they are almost all Caucasian with a few Latina women thrown in. For those of you who like pregnant models you’ll find a couple here. (Dani Jensen and Jodi Taylor seem to be this only A-list models here.)
The scenes are structured in the same way used by many of these sites (and I should add that the male’s voice is familiar so he may be behind other sites too). The scene usually starts with the model fully dressed on a bed while she is interviewed. Eventually her clothes come off and the fun begins. The camera work isn't bad, but POV and tripods have limitations so don’t expect award-winning camera work here.
A trait I don’t like in my porn is common here, namely rude treatment of the models. This could be staged though. I contrast the written scene descriptions at Amateur Allure, which may say something like “Here today is a stunningly beautiful model from Florida…” to the written descriptions here which tend to be more like “Today’s skanky whore is from Florida…” The same goes for their on-screen treatment. Admittedly, AA and BM aren't really competitors but I used this for a comparison. I also have to admit that for comparison choosing AA may be unfair as they do use some stunningly beautiful models whereas sites like this seem to recruit from a lower strata in the model hierarchy.
Another trait I don’t like (mostly because it adds nothing to the scene for me) is the use of the ‘surprise’ creampie. This is used a lot at Back Room Casting Couch too. These may be staged, but the premise is that the models aren't expecting to have the guy come in them and some of them aren't happy about it. I think the intended effect is further debasing the models and that isn't something I’m into (unless it’s part of a BDSM scene where it fits into the context).
I can’t say for sure how many actual scenes are available on the site through its safe to say there are about 65 scenes. The reason I can’t say for sure is because of a bit of a fast one the site pulls. With older uploads (and they’re not dated so it isn't easy to give specific details) the scenes were broken into segments. But in some cases the more recent uploads are simply those segments joined together as the complete scene. Apart from passing off an older scene as a new one, I downloaded duplicates without realizing it. Several times I was pleased to see more by a model I liked only to be disappointed that it wasn’t different. The other problem with this practice is that the site has a download cap of approximately 15GB per six hour period. I’m no fan of download limits but I can live with reasonable ones like this. But when there are duplicate scenes that aren't labelled as such that eats into your allotment.
Another problem with the download limit is that while it is supposed to reset automatically after six hours on one occasion it didn’t. Given that there is a message telling the user how to contact support for this very problem I assume it occurs fairly frequently.
I can’t give an exact update schedule but it looks like a new scene is added weekly. The most recent update is a new scene and not one stitched together from older segments.
There are three listed download resolutions though for some reason two of them are the same. I downloaded the highest available (WMV) which came in at 1280x720 and 5000kb/s. They look good on a 24” monitor.
The site offers photos too, and while I’d normally consider that a good thing in this case I was disappointed to see that many of the models only have photos and no videos. The photos are 1800x1200 and are available in zips.
I had no trouble using a download manager.
The bottom line is that this is some good (but not great) porn that’s let down by the site. If you like scenes like this with relatively unknown models in well-shot amateur scenes then this may be worth a look. The price makes it a fair value but I suspect that this will be a one-time-only membership for me. |
|
01-02-15 12:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1139
|
Broke Straight Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Reply
Agreed. This place has saved me money and allowed me to more confident that I know exactly what I'm getting when I join a site. I like the 'professional' reviews but it is usually a site member who is able to drill deep into a site and find the quirks. That's the real value here. That and the civilized tone.
|
04-21-16 05:23pm
|
Reply
1140
|
Broke Straight Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
Welcome to Pornusers merc77. I think you'll find that this is a pretty open community and it is definitely the most friendly porn forum I've ever encountered. I hope you stick around and continue to contribute. LGBT members are under-represented here so you're viewpoints will be welcomed.
|
04-18-16 03:35pm
|
Comment
1141
|
Brooke Skye
(0)
|
|
01-05-09 04:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1142
|
Brooke Skye
(0)
|
|
08-31-07 05:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1143
|
Bruce And Morgan
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
I'm glad I could help. To be fair, I should say that I had no problem cancelling my membership here even though it billed through Centrobill. It seems that German Goo Girls and 666 Bukkake may be the only sites where cancelling is almost impossible.
|
03-13-18 01:39pm
|
Comment
1144
|
Bruce And Morgan
(0)
|
|
02-28-18 03:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1145
|
Bruce And Morgan
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Thanks for commenting. I'm glad you liked the site. I'd definitely love to see more of Morgan!
I'm not sure about their dry cleaning bill, but I'd definitely be a bit reluctant to sit on any of their furniture if I visited their house!
I'm pleasantly surprised that you didn't have an issue with cancelling with Centrobill. I have three memberships currently through them (all with a pre-paid card) and I'm currently trying to cancel one of them (German Goo Girls) and it isn't going well. I go to the Centrobill site and they do have a place to cancel your membership there but it still isn't automated like CC Bill or Epoch. For Centrobill you go through the cancellation form and when you send it you get a notice that someone will action it and get back to you. It's been two days and my membership hasn't been cancelled.
But... I have to admit that it seems that all the complaints about Centrobill are focused on German Goo Girls and 666 Bukkake. Those are related sites. Maybe those sites are the problem and not Centrobill. But it seems odd that a biller would have a different cancellation protocol with individual sites.
Anyway, I'm glad you liked the site.
|
02-25-18 05:37am
|
Reply
1146
|
Bruce And Morgan
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
I found the thread I was thinking of. It turns out that I started it. I wrote that at the time I was having problems so there is more detail. I forgot about the bots and the non-functioning toll-free number.
Here's a link to that thread:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=4680
|
02-20-18 04:48pm
|
Reply
1147
|
Bruce And Morgan
(0)
|
Reply of
Kody's Reply
Multiple members here (including me) have reported problems with them. Similar comments can be found on other forums. Googling them reveals more problems. The common experience is finding it almost impossible to cancel a membership. There was no self-serve method when I used them and the email they provided for contact didn't work. You got caught in an endless loop of automated emails. Many people report being charged for an additional month or two until they finally got the charges stopped. Several people reported needing help from their bank and more than one just cancelled the card.
They used to have a 'secret' email that would actually get answered. One of the members here found that and posted it in a thread in the forum. A search for 'Centrobill' should turn it up. That thread probably has a lot more detail too. Due to Centrobill's practices TBP/PU even stopped listing a few sites.
While I used a pre-paid card and have no need to do so, I am planning to try to cancel my membership in 10 days or so mostly to see if there have been any improvements. I'll report what I find.
Welcome to Pornusers. This is a great resource for collectors.
|
02-20-18 04:28pm
|
Reply
1148
|
Bruce And Morgan
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
That's great news. I'm glad it worked out for you. The good news is that I don't think that anyone has ever complained of Centrobill making unauthorized charges on cards. If they have your current card number you're probably fine. You were obviously able to cancel a past membership and that seems to be the biggest issue with them. Even though I used a card that is no longer valid I still plan to try to cancel my membership just to see if they've improved things. I'll report on that when I do it.
Enjoy the site. One negative that I just noticed today is that Morgan almost never gets naked. We get to see her bottomless a few times and topless a few times, but never completely naked. That's a shame because she is a truly beautiful woman. I think part of the reason for the lack of nudity is because her clothes get wet when she is peed on and that's probably easier to see that way. Still, I'd love to see her nude.
|
02-19-18 04:33pm
|
Reply
1149
|
Bruce And Morgan
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
The site I was looking at that seemed to sell pre-paid, one-time-use online cards is https://www.giftcards.com/ I can't vouch for them since I couldn't use them. They may have what you're looking for.
Keep me posted on how you make out. If you join Bruce and Morgan I'll be interested in hearing what you think.
|
02-19-18 06:04am
|
Reply
1150
|
Bruce And Morgan
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Part 2
My recommendation for you for both security and ease of use is to see if you can find an online pre-paid card that expires when the balance is gone. I really think for security reasons you want a card that expires and not one you can reload. When the balance is gone you can sign up for another one with a different card number. I did sign up for an American site that seemed to offer these. I can’t find it now but if I think of it I’ll post the information here. You’re set up to receive emails here so I could send the site to you directly too. The only downside that I can think of to doing it this way is that you are still giving your credit card information when you buy the virtual card online. That’s probably not an issue but for me it definitely isn't because I bought the physical card through a retailer I trust so the card company doesn’t have any of my information. But the US site I’m thinking of seemed above-board. I’ll really try to remember what that was…
For my purposes, and given that this isn't something I’ll do regularly, it isn't a big hassle to stop by a store and buy a $50 card.
Some people reading this may wonder why I’d go through the hassle of going to a store to buy a physical card with a set limit and facing fees for the privilege. But keep in mind that I buy a lot of subscriptions and there are many sites and billers that I have done business with a lot and I trust them. I’m only using this complex and (slightly) more expensive method when I know I can’t trust the biller or site. The advantage is that even if the cost was a few more dollars and a bit of logistics, I was able to sign up for three sites so far that I really wanted to join but couldn’t because of the biller. For me, the hassle and small additional cost was worth it.
|
02-18-18 12:13pm
|
