| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
976
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks for your comments.
Has the site been redesigned in the past few days? My membership expired last week and when I went back to the tour pages they look different now.
|
12-31-13 08:59am
|
Reply
977
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree that I'd like to see many of these girls join the business and make more porn. Both this site and Exploited College Girls have some really attractive unknowns.
I find both Back Room Casting Couch and Exploited College Girls to be among the best in this niche. Broke Amateurs could have been a contender but instead of improving file resolution they've actually reduced it.
|
12-30-13 01:53pm
|
Reply
978
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I found the shooting style has improved. The static cameras get repositioned depending on the action and where it's happening in the room, so that helps too. I find that his POV abilities are very good.
The male performer still uses the circle to obscure his face. I don't find that to be a deal breaker because he mostly manages to keep his face out of the shots anyway.
What's the cost of the special offer?
|
12-30-13 01:39pm
|
Review
979
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent site in a relative under-served niche
- 165 scenes
- Updating regularly
- Many good looking models
- Most models are ‘amateur’
- ome porn stars early in their careers
- Now uploading in 1280p
- Packaged with another excellent amateur site
- Male talent who never tries to upstage the models
- Excellent camerawork and editing
- Innovative use of split screen and picture-in-picture
- Supports download managers
- Bills through CCBill |
| Cons: |
- Only the most recent updates are HD. Older scenes can be low resolution |
| Bottom Line: |
Lately I’ve developed an interest in ‘casting’ videos and this is one of the better sites in that niche. A membership here includes a membership to two other sites: Exploited College Girls and Net Video Girls. ECG is a great site and makes a membership here better. NVG isn’t terrible, but, in my opinion, it is the weakest site of the three. I should point out that the TBP review doesn’t say anything about the additional sites but I’ve joined twice now and both times that was the deal. I just checked again and it is still being offered.
The site’s premise is that a guy passes himself off as a porn agent and has women come by to talk about getting into the business. The setting is an office and the scene is recorded using two cameras on tripods and a handheld POV camera. The ‘agent’ explains the business to the model and then she is encouraged to make a demo tape that the agent will then use to get work for her. The demo consists of the model getting naked, masturbating, performing oral on the agent and then getting fucked. Many of the scenes have some anal sex but it is usually short. Even if you aren’t as big a fan of anal as I am, the anal isn’t obtrusive. Some may criticize the site as being too formulaic. It is that, but in my opinion, the formula works so why fix what isn’t broken?
Most of the models are unknown to me, though there are a few who went on to porn careers. Tanner Mayes (as Evangeline), Kacey Jordan, Shawna Lenee (as Kara), Amia Miley and Chastity Lynn are here, early in their careers. While there is no way that the premise could be real (given the paperwork involved to do porn), the models play the role well and really add to the feel of the scene. There is some variety in models with different body types, though the majority are Caucasian and petite. Most of the models are very good looking. There are a few videos with pregnant models if you’re into that.
There have been negative comments about the male ‘agent.’ I don’t share those opinions because I find that he knows that members aren’t joining to see him so he is unobtrusive.
Using two stationary cameras and a POV camera could be the site’s weak point, but it isn’t. The camera work and editing are great and really work well for the atmosphere. One feature that I really like is the use of split screen or picture-in-picture. For example, the model may be bent over the desk in a standing doggy position and one half of the screen is a camera pointing at her face while the other half is the POV camera held above the model’s ass.
There are currently about 165 videos on the site with most being about 30 minutes long. The site does update regularly, but since my membership expired four days ago I can’t confirm the update schedule but my recollection is that it is at least one new scene per week.
The scenes are only available in one file type, WMV, but they are available as clips or as the full scene. There are usually two resolutions available (labelled as high and low). I only downloaded the highest resolution full scenes so I can’t comment on the lower resolution or clips.
Speaking of resolution, there is good news and bad news. The good news is that the site appears to have undergone a re-work and at the same time it looks like the last 12-15 uploads are available in 1280x720 at 3500kb/s and 29 fps. These look great. File sizes are between 500-800MB, though there are a few that hit a gigabyte. The bad news is that before the site started uploading HD the resolutions were lower. With a lot of the older scenes on the site that can be pretty low. Most are 768x432 (which still look good), some are 576x324, some are 640x360 and some 480x360. Obviously the smaller resolution files were uploaded a long time ago and don’t look good by today’s standards.
The site supports download managers and I had no issues with links timing out. I didn’t encounter any speed reductions or download limits. The site bills through CCBill.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent site if you like this niche. It’s packaged with another excellent site (and a mediocre one too). The models are good looking and the scenes are fun to watch. The production values are good with good camerawork and editing. While the site has started uploading HD videos that was only recently so most of the videos are of lower resolution. Not only do I highly recommend this site but it is on my list of sites to regularly rejoin to download new scenes. |
|
12-30-13 10:24am
Replies (14)
|
Reply
980
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
I had a membership there up until a couple of days ago. I'll post a review soon. I really liked the site and would recommend it. It comes as an add-on with a membership to Exploited College Girls, which is an excellent site too.
|
12-29-13 08:09am
|
Reply
981
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks again, pat. I know your don't rate these sites too highly, but I think I'll give them a try soon.
|
03-19-12 02:51pm
|
Reply
982
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks pat. I see the price is listed as $35 at TBP but they don't say that includes an addition site. It makes sense that it does because otherwise that seems like a high price for ECG.
|
03-16-12 10:05am
|
Reply
983
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Pat - I normally follow your advice and I'd probably avoid this site but it is a niche I'm interested in. You say that you got a deal through your membership at Exploited College Girls. What is the deal and does it look like it is something offered all the time?
Thanks
Excellent review!
|
03-16-12 08:30am
|
Reply
984
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the useful information. The site looks good to browse through, but I wouldn't be able to tell if the camera work was poor without being tipped off.
|
12-12-10 01:47pm
|
Reply
985
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Great review. I hadn't stumbled on this site before. Based on your review, and the peek at the site I had, I'll probably join at some point. The site owner seems to say that there is a fair bit of anal here. Is that the case?
|
12-12-10 10:33am
|
Reply
986
|
Bad Daddy POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Thanks for mentioning this. They did seems to improve a lot and it's good to hear that improvement is continuing.
|
07-06-20 03:04pm
|
Comment
987
|
Bad Daddy POV
(0)
|
|
01-26-20 10:29am
Replies (2)
|
Review
988
|
Bad Daddy POV
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- 20 videos
- Updates with one new scene per week
- Mainstream porn with a little kink
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- Scenes start streaming automatically
- Deceptive tour pages
- Expensive for what’s currently offered
- No TBP discount |
| Bottom Line: |
Recently there have been several new sites available that feature porn in the step-father / step-daughter niche. Among those are Daughter Swap and Dad Crush, both of which are great sites. Add to this list Bad Daddy POV.
The site only started back in January so it’s still pretty small with only 20 videos currently uploaded. The good news is that it is growing, albeit slowly, with one new scene being added weekly. (A mark against the site is that the tour page is set up to make it look like there are a lot more videos than there actually are. With 15 videos on the first page and four pages you’d think that there could be up to 60 videos. Clicking on any other page on the tour brings you to the join page. But there are only 20 videos as of this review.)
The scenes are similar to what you’d find on most other sites in this niche. The step-dad and step-daughter find themselves home alone and some scenario is concocted to get them in a compromising position. If you’re a porn writer you can come up with dozens of short plots and you’ll find those here. The most common plot here seems to be that the daughter wants something (money, car, etc.) and barters with Daddy for it. After that most scenes turn into a normal hardcore scene.
This is an entirely subjective opinion, but it seems to me that this niche is best done by using models who are younger, as in 18-22 or at least look younger by being petite. Part of this is because this niche usually relies on some power imbalance to drive the plot and the heat. If you agree with me on this, then some of the models on this site aren't a great fit. Are they beautiful? Definitely. But Romi Rain is 29 and it’s hard for the viewer to see her as a step-daughter to someone only 10 years her senior. Likewise with models like Jessa Rhodes. She is obviously beautiful but I think the fact that she has a seriously augmented chest detracts from the viewer seeing her as a naïve step-daughter.
I’m not generally a fan of any POV scenes so I may be a bit biased, but the POV camerawork here isn't as good as it is on some other sites. I found that when the action really gets going the camera can become a bit too shaky.
The scenes are all available in three resolutions, all of which are in MP4 format. They are 854x480 (3000 kb/s), 1280x720 (5000 kb/s) and 1929x1080 (8000 kb/s). Most of the scenes are quite short by typical standards with the average length being around 12 minutes. There are several scenes that are under 10 minutes but that also means that most members can download the 1080p scenes since the file size isn't huge given the scene length.
The site is logically laid out and simple to use, but on a site this small that’s what you’d expect. There are tags on the scenes for some of the more common porn searches but there is no specific search function. But given that this is relatively standard porn that’s not really an issue: you’ll find oral and vaginal sex and not anything kinkier than that. (Apparently step-daughters don’t do anal with their step-fathers…)
Screencaps are available but only as singles. It’s fair to say, however, that this is a video site and not a photo site.
The site supports download managers and I found download speeds at what I see at most porn sites, which is to say it’s good. I didn’t encounter any links timing out or hit a download limit but given that there are only 20 scenes and the file sizes are reasonable I wouldn’t have expected any issues like that.
A minor quibble is that when you open a page for a scene it starts streaming automatically. I really wish sites would stop doing that.
I wouldn’t ordinarily do this, but while I like this site there are better choices out there for anyone interested in this niche. You can get a better value with Dad Crush which has more scenes and has an introductory price that’s half what Bad Daddy POV charges. If you agree with my opinion above that this niche requires models with a certain look then Dad Crush is also the better choice. My personal favourite in (sort of) this niche is Daughter Swap. But it isn't strictly step-father / step-daughter porn. Instead, there are two father/daughter couples where the fathers swap their daughter to the other guy.
I’m really on the fence as to whether I can recommend this site or not. The porn is generally good and site is well thought-out and easy to use. If you really like this niche (or really like POV) then this site may be worth a look. But at the full price of $30 USD for a small site it might be best waiting until the site grows a bit more, lowers the price to reflect the site size before joining or offers a TBP discount. Or you can follow one of my above recommendations and join a competing site until things improve at Bad Daddy. |
|
05-26-17 04:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
989
|
Bam Visions
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- High quality porn
- A-list studio
- A-list models
- High production values
- High-energy scenes
- Lots of anal (yeah, that may be a con to some)
- 163 full scenes
- Updates regularly
- Lots of BTS (if you’re into that)
- Photosets available
- Fast download speeds
- Supports download managers
- Bills through Epoch |
| Cons: |
- File sizes may be too big for some
- Some overlap with Evil Angel (but see explanation below)
- Scenes play automatically on loading
- No TBP/PU discount |
| Bottom Line: |
Bam Visions is a site that is a little difficult to describe. It is definitely not a site for everyone since the scenes are very hardcore but not misogynistic. There is a lot of energy and enthusiasm brought to the scenes but it’s obvious that the models are enjoying themselves.
The site, and the studio by the same name, is the work of a collaboration between Mick Blue and Maestro Claudio. Mick performs in front of the camera while Claudio captures all of the action. Mick is a well-known performer and Maestro Claudio is a well-known producer and cameraman. Together they make a powerful team. Certainly one reflection of the reputations that both of these men have is that they are able to bring in the absolute best female talent working and are usually able to get them early in their career just as fans are really taking notice.
The scenes may come across to some as being a bit formulaic because many of the same positions are used but I don’t find that to be a detriment since the scenes all tend to be very hot. Like most gonzo porn the scenes usually start with the woman posing for the camera and showing off her body. The clothes tend to be sexy and even slutty in some cases, but unlike other sites that turn off prospective members with having models dressed in ‘girly’ clothes at this site the clothes are age-appropriate.
There is the usual foreplay and when actual sex starts it is always high-energy. Mick always gives a good pounding! I admit this is my opinion and yours may differ but it certainly appears that Mick clearly understands his role as a male porn performer. That role is to showcase the female talent and to not upstage her.
This could either be a pro or con for a prospective member so it is fair to note to that many of the scenes feature anal sex. The anal scenes are just as vigorous and energetic as the vaginal scenes. The anal scenes also contain ATM for those into that.
For those who like female on male rimming, approximately 25% of the scenes feature that.
There are currently 163 sex scenes and 151 BTS scenes on the site. The update schedule is a new scene added every two days. While that’s great, keep in mind that every second update is a BTS. The pattern is that a model’s BTS will be added and then two days later her scene will be available.
Prospective members should be warned that there is a lot of overlap between the scenes offered here and those offered at Evil Angel. Bam Visions is a featured studio at EA. But the scenes at Bam are different from the ones offered at EA in that they are released months earlier and they are edited differently at Bam. In one scene I noted that it was 15 minutes longer at Bam. A Charlotte Sartre scene was only a few minutes longer at Bam but it featured some toy play and Charlotte fisting her own ass at Bam. Obviously since EA also releases on DVD the internet-only Bam can show more.
One other difference between the scenes at Bam and the same scene at EA is that the file sizes at Bam are usually substantially larger than what is offered at EA. For example, I compared a scene where the lengths were very close. The 720p scene at Bam was 4.84GB while the same scene at EA was 1.33GB. The difference was in the bitrate. The bitrate was 12,000 at Bam and 3100 at EA.
The scenes at Bam are offered in six resolutions: 144, 240, 360, 480, 720 and 1080. The site makes sure there is something for everyone.
The site does offer some photosets. There are currently 84 photo sets available as zips in three different resolutions. The photosets were being uploaded regularly until this summer. It is fair to say, though, that this site is really a video site.
Two other great things about the site: the download speeds were great and it allows download managers.
There aren’t a lot of negatives. The search and tag functions work but aren’t perfect. I searched ‘rimming,’ for example, and only two scenes came up. There are definitely a lot more than that here. The functions work, but they may not be entirely accurate. The other minor negative, and this may not bother everyone, but I don’t like it when you load a scene page and it starts playing automatically. Bam does that.
More bad news is that the low price listed at PU/TBP is no longer valid. The monthly price is now $24.94. I was billed through Epoch.
The bottom line is that this is a high-quality site created by two men who have a lot of experience in the porn business. The models are amazing, the porn is class-leading, and the production values are high. Some may prefer to get the same scenes at a lower price on a larger site by joining Evil Angel and the fact that the (differently edited) scenes are available there means that there are even more options available. The site has very few flaws and, in my opinion, offers a great value for your porn dollar. I highly recommend checking it out. |
|
10-11-18 05:12pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
990
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I didn't know that Bang Bros was in any way affiliated with Bang and the Vixen Group.
I've joined Bang multiple times and I recall that Epoch is their usual biller, but I can't say for certain that they use Epoch all the time.
Vixen Group (Vixen, deeper, Tushy, Tushy Raw, Blacked and Blacked Raw) are some great sites but if you've been lured into a subscription you don't want then it doesn't matter how good they are. The usually use their own biller, VXN Bill. It's not a preferred biller for me, but I don't think I've ever had a serious issue with them.
I'm glad you got this resolved.
|
02-22-21 05:39pm
|
Reply
991
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
My experience turned out like your - Bang stepped in quickly and solved the problem. They determined that a third party had hacked my previous account and took out a new membership. They cancelled that account and refunded the charges. I have to say that I'm pretty happy with the customer service they provided.
I hope that my issue is solved but since I'm tangled up with ECHST too it may not be over yet.
Good luck with getting your refund.
|
08-30-18 08:53am
|
Comment
992
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
|
08-28-18 06:15pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
993
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I think I may have spoken too soon when you reported problems with your Bang.com account. I seem to have the same problem now.
|
08-28-18 06:08pm
|
Reply
994
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I'm glad to hear it worked out for you. Like you, I was pleasantly surprised at the high quality of service when I called to get these issues resolved. But I'm still sheepish about saying to a young woman on the phone that I have a problem with my membership at 'Tiny Schoolgirls Take It Up the Ass." :-(
|
07-29-18 08:47am
|
Reply
995
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That sounds different from the issue I've had a few times. Please let us know how you make out. Bang.com seems like a good corporate citizen and I recall that they bill through Epoch so you should be fine. The bigger issue is whether just your account got hacked or whether they got credit card information too. If the biller was Epoch my guess is that you CC information is secure.
Good luck!
|
07-25-18 01:12pm
|
Reply
996
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I've had this problem occur several times on other sites. It hasn't happened to me at Bang.com, but I suspect the cause of it is the same as what has happened to me. I end up with some live chat membership with charges run up on it. According to the person I was dealing with on the phone what happened is that some unscrupulous person somewhere in the chain used your membership to set up a chat account that they then can chat with friends and family around the world on my dime. Each time it happened the person I dealt with figured it out quickly and a refund was offered. In none of the cases was my credit card information compromised. It was just the membership.
(Interestingly, it seems that staff are able to check the chat logs. One guys said to me that there was no way this was me chatting. I took that as a compliment... I guess.)
|
07-23-18 05:19pm
|
Reply
997
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I have to confess that I joined Bang.com as a three-day upsell on another membership a few of times to get the original content. I really like a lot of their original stuff. I think I was on my third three-day membership when I 'discovered' their massive library on non-original stuff. I signed up for a full membership then. This is a great site. It's a great review too, as always!
|
06-11-18 04:30pm
|
Reply
998
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Jakker100's Reply
Agreed. I downloaded some older stuff from JM Productions and what is offered at Bang is better quality than what JM offers at its own site.
Thanks for the comments and welcome to PornUsers. I hope you hang around and become a regular.
|
11-01-17 02:04pm
|
Reply
999
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Thanks for the comment. Yeah, 97 is high for me. I think some of that may be subjective. I try really hard to limit any subjective influence but I was hung over this morning when I finished the review...
Seriously though, this is a great site.
|
08-05-17 01:09pm
|
Review
1000
|
Bang.com
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge site
- Hundreds of Studios
- Thousands of Videos (non-exclusive)
- Original material is very good
- Four distinct original sub-sites
- Full trial
- Bills through Epoch
- Photos available
- Allows download managers |
| Cons: |
- Bitrates are a bit lower than standard |
| Bottom Line: |
It’s difficult to write a review of this site in 5000 characters because it is so large and so broad. Because of that I’ll make some general comments on the overall site and then address the original material specifically.
The overall site is huge and appears to be either a clone of or at least affiliated with Videosz. Videosz is one of the largest mega sites on the ‘net and Bang is no exception in that regard. A membership to Bang will give you access to thousands of videos from hundreds of studios ranging from recent to 20+ years old. Sites like these are an excellent source for finding older videos for collectors. For example, Bang offers many older titles from JM Productions and many of the scenes are higher resolution than what is offered at JM’s own site.
It’s fair to say that access to the non-exclusive stuff is worth the price of admission here but, in my opinion, the real value is original material. I’ll focus on that for the rest of the review.
Bang.com is a studio in its own right, producing some top-quality original porn and they make it available here as well as on DVD.
There are four sub-sites offering original material. These are, in no particular order:
Bang Real Teens
This is, in my opinion, one of the best ‘casting’ style sites available. If you’re a fan of casting style videos this is worth checking out. The scenes all feature known A-list porn models so in that sense they aren't true ‘casting’ videos but the style of having an interview followed by a sex scene aligns them with that genre. What sets this site apart is that in many of the videos the interview takes place outdoors or in a public place and often features public nudity. I’m a big fan of public nudity and really appreciate that this site does it well. It isn't on the same scale as FTV Girls but it is very well done. The sex scene follows and is shot in a hotel.
There are currently 32 video available with streaming and downloads. The site updates with a new scene weekly.
Bang Gonzo
This sub-site offers truth in labelling: it’s a purely gonzo site with A-list models in hot sex scenes with Manuel Ferrara in all of them. Manuel brings his usual intensity to the scenes and, as is his style, he showcases the beautiful women he is with. True to the title, there is little or no scene set-up – Manuel and his co-star are on the set and the sex begins.
There are currently 32 video available with streaming and downloads. The site updates with a new scene weekly.
Bang Confessions
This site is difficult to categorize. It isn't an interview; it isn't really gonzo; it’s a combination of both. The scenes have some interviews with the models and we get a sense of their personality and then there is a gonzo sex scene thrown in for good measure. As with all Bang originals, the models are current A-list.
The site currently has 11 videos and update irregularly. Lately the updates have been approximately once per month.
Bang Casting
This sub-site is apt to be the most polarizing since it follows a casting theme but tends to be very rough. The scenes see the model (an A-list as usual) getting roughed up by one or multiple men. The scenes often have rough anal sex and sometimes have the model being spat on. There are a few scenes with the model being urinated on. All of this is clearly consensual.
There are currently 32 scenes available. The site updates at least monthly but some updates have been added more frequently.
Overall the original sites offer streaming (no resolution options) and downloads. The downloads are all mp4 and are available in 360p, 540p, 720p, 1080p, 2160p (4K). The notable exception is that Bang Real Teens does not have the 4K option. I downloaded the 720p scenes and found that the bitrates (at just over 2000 kbps) are a bit low but the scenes look good.
Photos are available as zips only but it is fair to say that this isn't a photo site. Photo size is 1735x2600.
The site allows download managers for queuing scenes and I had no issues using one for that. I found the download speeds slightly slower than I normally see on similar sites but nothing that is worth complaining about.
The site offers a full trial and that may be worth trying just to see the site or download a few scenes but my advice is that if you are a true collector you won’t be satisfied with a trial. Even without a discount this site offers excellent value. The trial (and full membership) bill through Epoch so cancelling is easy.
This site deserves a deeper dive but I’m running out of space. The bottom line? At the risk of trademark infringement the easy answer to the question of should you join this site is ‘Just Do It.’ I’ve been an avid and active porn collector for more than 20 years and I can say without reservation that this is one of the best sites I’ve encountered in the past few years. I will rejoin again and again and if they offered a better deal for recurring memberships I wouldn’t leave.
Just Do It |
|
08-05-17 06:53am
Replies (4)
|
