An update on my review for anyone interested in particular models. I’ve reviewed the scenes on Sinnistar with known porn chicks and even some unknown to me but listed on IAFD and have a list of some exclusive scenes for anyone who collects specific models.
Keep in mind that if you are interested in any of these, when I say oral, that normally includes throat-fucking. The anal sex can be pretty rough too. Not all models do ATM, but most do.
- Anne Howe (aka Melissa Ashley) – one b/g anal scene, one oral
- Aaliyah Jolie – four scenes, one is only oral, one is a b/g/g (with ATOGM), one is pretty rough b/g oral and anal with her in bondage and one is b/g with an attempt at anal fisting.
- Amber Chase – three scenes, one b/g/g with some bondage and two b/g anal
- Amber Wild – four scenes, two b/g anal and two b/g/g anal (with ATOGM)
- Aurora Snow – one b/g anal scene (appears to be fairly early in her career)
- Jessica Right – oral only
- Liv Wilder – b/g anal (appears to be fairly early in her career)
- Mia Lina – two oral scenes
- Staci Thorn – one b/g anal
There are also some exclusive scenes with models who had very short careers or who at least have little listed at IAFD.
- Julie Ellis – one scene, oral only
- Little Lexis – two b/g anal scenes
- Katie Kross (aka Katie May) – two scenes, one b/g anal, one oral only with bondage
- Sara Sinn – one b/g anal scene
- Sophie Perez (aka Gina Lopez) – one oral scene
- Vanessa Lynn – one oral scene
I hope this information is useful to some of the members here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Simple design (perhaps a bit too simple)
- Just under 200 videos
- Approximately 60-70% of the videos appear to be exclusive
- Updates weekly with two updates added each time
- Good scene descriptions
- Subjectively, files look good
- Many licenced scenes are widely available on DVD sites
- Supports download managers (I use Free Download Manager)
- Costs $30 for the month but rebills at $15 for following months
Cons:
- Different price for non US / Canadian users
- Not all exclusive
- No search function
- Only one file option (wmv)
- No HD offered
- Unknown primary and secondary billing companies
Bottom Line:
Sinnistar is a small but growing site that caters to a fairly narrow niche – rough anal, ATMs and throat fucking. I’m well aware that interest in this niche isn’t shared by everyone or even the majority of PU members.
Currently the site has just under 200 scenes. I estimate that between 60 and 70 percent of the scenes are exclusive and produced by the site with the remaining scenes being licenced material from mainstream porn that features scenes that fit the site’s theme.
The site is very simple in that there are nine pages of scenes with there being just a single column of scenes per page. The scenes have a large thumbnail and a brief description (which adds a lot of value). The file is downloaded right from the thumbnail, which makes things simple, but the downside is that there are no options for file downloads. The only option is wmv. The default resolution is 640x480 at 2000kb/s though there are several older files at lower resolutions. I’m not technically-minded so normally I’d scoff at the low resolution, but subjectively they look pretty good. The video is clear and there is no obvious pixilation. There is, obviously, no HD available.
The exclusive scenes usually feature an unknown (to me anyway) model or models. The models are usually late teens or early twenties and are usually fairly petite. The scenes often boast of it being a girl’s first porn scene, first anal or first ATM, or some combination of those. I have no reason to think that these claims aren’t true. The only well-known model who appears (in several scenes) is Hailey Young. Jamie Elle appears in what looks like an exclusive scene but I’m not certain about that.
One warning for prospective members is that the site has a bit of a sub-niche in that they seem to cater to people who like to see ‘dirty’ anal sex or ATMs. This isn’t a scat site by any reasonable measure, but the site does seem to take some delight in seeing an accidental discharge during anal sex. To each his own, I guess…
Several of the scenes feature deep-throating and face-fucking that are very hardcore. So much so that I suspect Max Hardcore and the guys at Facial Abuse would cringe. There are a few scenes with fisting and watersports too.
The non-exclusive scenes follow the same theme as the exclusive scenes: they prominently feature anal sex and usually deep-throating and ATMs. Well represented are the “Babysitter,” “Naughty Little Nymphos” and Teacher’s Pet series’, all from Notorious and all made around 2000. Subjectively, having these scenes is a plus because these were all great series’, but the negative is that these titles are also widely available on other DVD sites so a member with a large collection and who likes these titles likely already has them in their collection.
While the site is simple, it might be too simple: there is no search function at all. If you’re looking for a particular model or specific thing you’ll be sorting through the entire website manually. While a site this size doesn’t need a high-power search feature, being able to sort and search by star, at least, would be welcome.
The site does appear to update, with two scenes being added once per week. While other PU members have criticized this as being too sparse, for a small site that appears to make some pretty good niche porn this seems very reasonable to me.
I use Free Download Manager to queue up the scenes I want and had no trouble with this. The site supports this, and I didn’t experience any timeouts while downloading.
There were a couple of things that caused me some concern when joining. Trashman and bently both scored the site low and Trashman said that there were hidden download limits. I don’t think the low scores are warranted, but there is obviously a degree of subjectivity in both the previous scores and in my score. As for download limits, bently told me in a reply that they were gone and I can confirm they are. The second concern was they use two unknown billers. If I have problems cancelling later I’ll add that as a comment to warn others. (I joined through “paystar” or “paywide.”)
One billing quirk is that there is a link for U.S. customers to join and one for everyone else. That’s no big deal except that the price for non-U.S. members is $5 higher. I’m in Canada but tried the U.S. link and it worked. I can’t report how that might work for others. My suspicion is that this is a flaw imposed on the site by the billers, and not a cash grab by the site.
I’d definitely recommend this site, with the normal caveat that you have to like this niche. The site is small(ish) and somewhat simple, but the basics are well done. The exclusive scenes are very well done and worth the $30 fee (recurring at $15). After coming from a site that was ‘cookie-cutter’ porn, this site was a pleasant surprise in being well done and unique.
Trashman's expired review noted that there was a download quota and they'd start to threaten you with penalties for just downloading what they considered to be too much material. He also said that the videos were DRM protected. Are these still the case or has it been fixed?
I just read the TBP review that Xander wrote and dropped my plans to give this site a try. I'm no fan of daily download limits but I can live with reasonable ones. 5GB per day on a site that offers 1080p material is definitely NOT reasonable.
I've never thought of that, but it makes sense. I prefer b-g hardcore and don't normally download g-g or softcore stuff so I guess I'd normally end up not being interested in a lot of stuff on a network. But that happens a lot anyway since both MILFs and big breasts are common so I lose out on those sites.
But the odd thing for me when it comes to Diesel Access is that I do download the girl-girl and solo softcore stuff because the models are just so stunning.
I suspect that they're referring to scenes on the main site, Young Legal Porn. There are definitely anal scenes on YLP and I doubt that there are any on SSG. When I was a member Gloria hadn't even started doing girl-girl, though she is doing some now. In a reply to a question I aksed, dieselman responded and said that he highly doubted that Gloria would ever do boy-girl. But... if she ever changes her mind and does b-g anal I'll be running to get my credit card immediately.
One of the biggest advantages to having a user-driven review site like this (being affiliated with a commercial review site) is that readers get to read varying opinions. I agree with most of what you wrote but my assessment of all of that still brought me to a much higher score.
I will admit though, that while I tried to be objective I may have been swayed a bit by the fact that SSG was part of a larger AND less expensive network when I joined.
But... I still think that Gloria is one of the most perfect models working today.
Great review, elephant. Gloria is a stunning young woman and doesn't have that typical porn look. You're right to say she looks like a runway model!
When I was a member about six weeks ago there were no girl/girl shoots of Gloria but the webmaster said that there likely would be in the future. Are there any now? There looks like there might be a really softcore one. Can you confirm that?
I'm also glad to see that the site is using the same photo on the main page where she's laying on a bed on her stomach and seductively glancing back at the camera. That is one of my favourite photos ever. It captures both Gloria's incredible beauty and the cameraman's ability to capture it. Both are essential ingredients to this near-perfect site.
If anyone is interested in joining SSG I'd strongly recommend that you do it through Young Legal Porn and pay the additional fee for the full access. If you only buy SSG then you leave too much of Gloria's material inaccessible on Young Legal Porn and 18 Only Girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Incredibly beautiful model
- Can include the site as part of a network
- TBP discount
- Pics and video available
- Pics available as zips
- Videos available in multiple resolutions
- Some pics and video offered in HD
- Supports download managers (I use Free Download Manager)
- Excellent customer support
Cons:
- Small site (but growing regularly)
- Site name could be better – it isn’t really flattering
- If purchased as a stand-alone site the value isn’t great
- Some sharing of material with other company sites
- All softcore
Bottom Line:
This site is a Diesel Access site dedicated to the model Gloria. Gloria started at Young Legal Porn and there is some of her material on that site too.
The oldest material on the site is dated from June 2011 so the site is quite new. The downside to that is that it is also still quite small, but it is growing. Currently there 34 videos and 34 photo sets posted. The site appears to update every three days with the update alternating between a video and a photo set.
The site can be purchased as a stand-alone site at $30 ($20 price with TBP/PU discount) or as part of the Diesel Access network at $40 ($30 price with TBP/PU discount). As a stand-alone site at full price it isn’t a very good value yet, but as the site grows that will obviously improve. My recommendation is to pay the extra $10 to get the network access. I did that but didn’t immediately get the full network access and customer support wasn’t all that helpful even after I sent them a screenshot of the TBP discount page. The webmaster stepped in and resolved the issue so there should be no problems now. And no other PU members reported the same problem.
Video quality varies from good to excellent. About half of the videos posted are true HD at 1920x1080. Bitrates (which I don’t fully understand) are the highest I’ve ever seen with rates hitting over 15,000kbps on some videos. The other half of the videos are available at 1280x720 with bitrates around 10,000. All videos are offered in multiple sizes and two formats. Wmv files (codec 9) are offered at either the 1080p or 720p, and mp4 files are offered in multiple sizes ranging from HD to lower resolutions for mobile devices. Download speeds are slightly above the average that I usually see with porn sites. I use Free Download Manger and it worked well with the site: there were no timeout issues.
The picture quality also ranges from good to excellent. Most sets are at 1000x556 but there are several that are 2666x4000. The quality of the lower resolution photos is good, but they pale in comparison to the higher res photos. The hi-res photos are amazing quality.
The site certainly does the technical bits right, and they do the artistic things well too. The lighting is always good and the photographer and videographer are obviously professionals. There is definitely NOT an amateur effort.
The site is pure softcore – mostly solo girl posing and some masturbation. There are a couple of girl/girl shoots but these are non-sexual. The girls may rub or touch each other a bit but there is very little contact. Kissing is even rare. There are no boy/girl shoots at all.
The model, Gloria, also appears on the Young Legal Porn site where she has 8 videos and 12 photo sets. My preference would be to see all her stuff migrated to SSG just to have it all in one place, but that isn’t a deal breaker and not really even an issue if you have full network access.
One issue that would be solved by having all Gloria’s material on one site is that there is some sharing of material between SSG and YLP. It isn’t sharing in the sense that the same videos or photos are on both sites, but the video of a shoot may be posted on YLP and the photos of the same shoot may be posted on SSG. Again, this isn’t that big a deal if you get network access.
This is nitpicking, but I really don’t like the site name. To me, calling a girl skinny is a negative. It’s criticizing her. Yes, Gloria is petite, but she’s wonderfully proportioned and definitely not malnourished like models posted on sites that feature truly skinny, even anorexic, models. Gloria is definitely not malnourished or anorexic. But at least the ‘super’ part is accurate.
From a technical viewpoint, the site is great. There is a search function, but none is needed while the site is small. You can sort by photos or videos, and each set has tags that can help sort further.
The value of the site, then, really comes down to your subjective opinion of Gloria. I’m not normally given to hyperbole and flowery language, but my life as a porn user can now be marked in BG and AG. Up to September 30, 2011 is the “Before Gloria” era, and October 1, 2011 marks the “After Gloria” era. You may not share my opinion, but I now have a new #1 model. Gloria is absolutely stunning – a beautiful face with incredible eyes (that the professional staff show off well) and an incredible body. I don’t know why she started doing nude shoots, but I’m sure grateful that she did.
I’ve scored the site high, which some may question considering that it might be relying too much on my subjective reaction to Gloria. But I think the score is warranted because the only flaw on the site is that it is new and needs to grow. It is updating so that flaw will fix itself. Otherwise, the site is really well done and has some great material. If you like Gloria’s look, I’d highly recommend getting a network membership.
like2fireone - thanks for the quick and detailed answer. This is exactly what I was looking for. I think a membership to this network has been bumped to the head of the line.
Sorry to ask what may be stupid question, but I think I lost the thread of the discussion. You and the others have talked about joining this site versus joining a network that includes this site. Which network is it that includes this site? TBP doesn't make that clear.
When I clicked join on SSG I saw a price of $29.95. Is that for the site or the network?
I'd really like to give this site a try but I'm not sure the best way to do it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique concept with creative scenes
- Beautiful models in extreme hardcore oral scenes
- Many mainstream porn models
- 47 scenes
- Downloads and streaming
- Downloads in multiple resolutions
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- May not be updating
- Slow downloads
- Definitely not for everyone
Bottom Line:
Slave Mouth is a unique oral-only BDSM site that started several years ago. It’s affiliated with the same people who have Assylum, a unique, anal-themed BDSM site. Much of what makes Slave Mouth worth checking out is paralleled with Assylum. I recommend checking out the reviews of Assylum if you are considering a Slave Mouth membership.
Calling Slave Mouth unique is deliberate on my part. I’m choosing that word even though I know it is often overused. But, in this case, it is accurate and applies.
The site uses the same underlying premise as its sister-site, Assylum, which is that women with sexual depravity, in this case some sort of an oral-fixation, come to be treated by the male talent, Dr. Mercies. Dr. Mercies uses all manner of bondage, insertions, suspensions and oral sex to help cure his patients. For fans of rimming, as I am, this is a commonly used treatment tool here as well.
The sad news is that I think Dr. Mercies’ success rate is quite low. I suspect that after all of the depravity that his patients remain with their oral-fixation.
Slave Mouth is anything but vanilla. As much as I like this site, and I have put my money where my mouth is many times since it was created, I recognize that it isn’t for everyone. The scenes are rough, and in some cases extremely rough, they involve restraint, sometimes in stress positions, sometimes in suspended positions and the scenes all feature rough face-fucking.
One of the many things that has always impressed me about this site from its beginning is that regardless of how extreme it is they do bring in some mainstream models. Admittedly, some of the models that they bring in such as Anastasia Rose and Rebel Rhyder, are known for pushing their limits even as mainstream stars. But what I really appreciate about Slave Mouth is that they do attract known models and not just fetish models.
The site currently has 47 scenes available. These are available as downloads in 480p, 720p or 1080p. 4K is available but requires an upgraded premium membership. Streaming is only available in one resolution. While it certainly open to anyone to see this as a cash-grab just to get 4K downloads, I see it differently. As someone who is happy with less than 4K, I get a price break.
All of the scenes have excellent production values. While many of them use stationary cameras, there are enough of them and they are moved frequently enough that the video never becomes repetitive.
When I last reviewed Slave Mouth, I noted that the download speeds were significantly slower than what I experience on other sites. This issue remains. In fact, while my personal Internet connection has increased and I see lightning-fast download speeds on many sites, Slave Mouth continues to have much slower speeds which are even more prominent now in contrast. I suspect this has something to do with the technology behind the site and unless that is upgraded then the slow speeds will remain. For me, this is certainly not a deal-breaker but I mention it so that any prospective subscriber is aware of it.
The biggest concern I have about Slave Mouth now is that it appears to be in decline. Over the past couple of years, the frequency of updates had been reduced and as of this writing, the last update was three months ago. The lockdowns during the pandemic certainly contributed here. However, while this is bad news, and I can’t say otherwise, I suspect the decline is attributable to the site owners opening another unique BDSM site called Dom the Nation.
If Slave Mouth does not continue updating, I think it will remain a good value for first-time subscribers. Getting access to 47 unique scenes involving creativity like almost no one else does is well worth the price of a monthly subscription.
As I’ve said with Assylum, perhaps the biggest reason to discourage someone from not joining Slave Mouth is simply because of how extreme it is. This is not a site for somebody who wants to dabble in oral-themed BDSM. This site is for someone with a specific interest and who knows what they’re getting into. Luckily, Slave Mouth puts up excellent trailers for each of their scenes so a prospective subscriber can watch some or all of these to get a sense of whether they are comfortable taking a membership here.
While last time I gave an unequivocal recommendation to join this site, even though it was relatively new and small, I’m going to scale that recommendation back just a bit. Until it appears that the site is updating again it isn’t going to be worth a membership for someone who has been there just recently and downloaded scenes, unless of course, there is a recently uploaded must-have seen that someone wants. But, for the first-time member, or for someone who has not had a membership in a while, and who knows what they’re getting into, then I still highly recommend subscribing to Slave Mouth.
I'm not sure how I missed reading your review when you posted it. This is a site I like and I'm always interested to see how others respond to it.
I agree with you that the humiliation here is nothing like what is found on sites like Facial Abuse. The problem with that statement is that there are a lot of people who don't like any kind of BDSM porn and don't see the difference. I'm glad to hear from someone who sees that difference too. (As an aside, I recall engaging in a bit of a one-sided debate with a relatively new member after I reviewed a Kink site several years ago. He had made it clear that he was into softer hardcore and glamcore sites. He took a strong objection to my description in a review that Kink followed their protocol and had a pre- or post-scene interview to make it clear that the model both consented to what happened in the scene and enjoyed it. I recall that this newer member took offence to my stating this and held the opinion that these interviews were staged. After explaining to him that it made no sense to criticize porn you don't like - as long as it is legal and ethical - he seemed to have stopped posting here not long after that. That's too bad for all of us though because if he could have been a bit less dogmatic then he may have become a long-time member here...)
I guess I rambled a bit... Oops...
When I reviewed the site last year it was adding one site per week but now it appears to be closer to one new scene per month. Given the unique porn on offer here I still think this is a decent value. (I should also add that Assylum also seems to be updating once per month. Both of these sites look like they have a small crew and the scenes probably take a lot of work so the limited updates isn't too surprising.)
Hard to say since they are all so different. If pressed, I like the Violet Sky scene most but I can't really say why. Also, this answer could change by tomorrow.
Thanks for the comment. I'm glad you found the review useful. If you have any specific questions my membership is still active so I should be able to answer them.
- Slow download speeds
- Small (but growing) site
- Likely too extreme for many
Bottom Line:
Let me be abundantly clear: this is definitely NOT a mainstream porn site that will appeal to a broad audience. This site is about roleplay Master/slave hardcore oral.
The scenes here are difficult to describe but they are all oral-themed. If you’re familiar with Assylum (the sister site to this one) you’ll have a good idea what to expect here. But where Assylum is focused on anal play and rough anal sex Slave Mouth focuses on the other end of the body. The scenes all feature some level of bondage, domination, humiliation and S+M. It’s fair to say that Slave Mouth is harder-edged than most Kink.com sites because Kink scenes always have an element of play about them. Slave Mouth and Assylum come across as being more authentic and this is evident in how pain is used. At Slave Mouth and Assylum there are some very intense caning sessions. So be warned!
Some may also be inclined to compare Slave Mouth with another polarizing site, Face Fucking (formerly Facial Abuse) but I don’t think that is a fair comparison. This may be just how I perceive it, but Face Fucking has a sinister, ominous feeling to it and it seems that the male talent are purposely degrading the women. Slave Mouth doesn’t have that same sinister feeling to it even though it is arguably a harder site.
Two things that drew some criticism of Assylum are also present here. First, if there is a term ‘circus porn’ then that term could aptly describe what is offered here. I like the zaniness of the scenes though I can understand why others may not. The second concern that some others have expressed is that the primary male talent, Dr. Mercies, wears a mask. I have no issue with this and I don’t find that it detracts from the scenes at all.
One thing that I found unusual is that not all of the scenes have a post-scene interview to establish that there was full consent. I’m not suggesting that some of the scenes didn’t have consent but only that these interviews are almost universal in BDSM porn and they are noticeable by their absence in some of the scenes.
Also absent, for now at least, are A-list models. Given the theme here it isn't surprising that most of the models are more known for their fetish work but Assylum did attract some A-list models who were also known to dabble in harder-edged scenes. Casey Calvert and Penny Pax are examples. I’m hoping to see some more mainstream models get the Slave Mouth treatment as the site grows.
The site went live only recently and is still quite small. There are currently just 12 scenes but one of those scenes (Felicity Feline) is a duplicate of a Slave Mouth preview that was uploaded to Assylum a while back. The site adds one scene per week. Some may see having 12 scenes for a monthly cost of $27USD as a poor value but I’ll always choose quality over quantity and I find the site to be a good value. As it grows it will only become a better value.
The scenes are available in three resolutions: 480p, 720p and 1080p. I downloaded the 1080p scenes and those have a bitrate of 9000kb/s. A 4K resolution is also available but that requires paying for a premium membership.
The only complaint I have about the site is that the download speeds are quite slow. I usually see speeds of 35-45 MB/s with Internet Download Manager but only got 3MB/s here. If someone wanted the 4K scenes those would take a long time to download.
The bottom line is that while the unique theme here means that this site isn't for everyone, it is a good value for those interested in this niche. As the site grows it will become a much better value though I think it currently offers good value. I highly recommend checking the site out if you like this kind of porn. I’ll definitely return to the site many times as it grows.
Thanks for this Picky. This is a big help and I really appreciate it. Without this ability to ask questions of other users I would have passed based on the initial view and price. I think based on what I've read here I'll get a membership sometime in the near future.
Thanks for the review Picky. This is one of the many advantages of this site - I didn't know Slaves existed until you reviewed it. BDSM is my favourite genre so its great to have another site to check out.
Are you familiar with the material from Kink.com? They have sites like The Training of O, Sex and Submission and Water Bondage. If you are familiar with Kink, how does Slaves compare to what Kink has? If you aren't familiar with Kink, disregard my question, but do yourself a favour and check them out.
And I just gotta add - OUCH! That price! If it is a good site I'll happily pay it though.
The site currently has 242 videos but updates infrequently and irregularly. One update a month is about the best they offer.
A membership here gives you a membership to three other massage-themed sites with over 730 massage videos and regular updates. If you’re interested, what I wrote when reviewing Nuru Massage applies to this site too.
If you haven't had a membership to any of the sites at Kink.com I can't recommend those enough. For BDSM stuff they are easily the best on the internet. They are pricey, but worth it. Once you join one site at full price I think you get a discount on others. Society SM and the other sites are excellent too, and definitely cheaper than the Kink stuff.
With the one membership (and I presume that you can join through any of the sites) you get all five sites. This includes Society SM, Fucking Dungeon, Perfect Slave, Cum Bots and Strict Restraint. I've added a mini-review under each of those titles to give specific details about each site. Most of the sites aren't all that different, with the exception of Fucking Dungeon which is BDSM (obviously...) with hardcore sex. The others feature a mix of bondage and forced masturbation, usually with a toy.
You will see some anal sex, but very rarely. The odd thing, I think, is that they have some models who are well known for doing anal who don't do much here. It does occur, just not often. It occurs on the bondage sites too, but again only rarely, and most often in the form of an anal hook.
I don't know your tastes, but if you're into BDSM I think you'll like these sites. Yes, they can get repetitive, but that's mostly because there is just so much material here. And there is no way that I'd call THAT as serious criticism!
If you have any more questions I'd be happy to answer them.
And thanks for pointing out that I didn't name the sites in my review. I've edited it so that people can see the sites I mean.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership in 5 sites for the price of 1
- Huge amount of material
- Download speeds (1MB/s and 1.5MB/s) as advertised
- Many big-name porn stars
- Many beautiful models
- No over-emphasis on one body type – most people will find models they like
- Pictures and video available
- Pictures are available zipped
- No download limits
- One of the best BDSM sites available
Cons:
- Videos are broken up into segments (the segments mark a different part of the scene, but no full download is available)
- Video links are hidden within picture galleries, not readily available
- Can get repetitive – same settings, same equipment used frequently
- Older videos are smaller and play in Quick Time
Bottom Line:
Society SM (SSM) is one of five sites available through a membership to any one of those five sites. (This includes Society SM, Fucking Dungeon, Cum Bots, Perfect Slave and Strict Restraint.) This bundling seems to be new, and creates an amazing value for BDSM fans. This review will look at SSM specifically, though much of it will also be applicable for the other sites.
SSM is a large site, having been in existence since about 2004. They have over 200 models, and many of those models have multiple scenes on the site. For quantity, this site is a great value.
For quality, this site is also an excellent value. The video is available in two formats, though I only downloaded the .wmv format. Download speeds are advertised at 1MB/s and I achieved those speeds consistently. I’m not a technical guy so I can’t really translate the video into technical specs, but I can say that it is comparable to what is available on other sites.
If SSM has one failing, it can be blamed on an embarrassment of riches. The site is so large that the number of models and scenes using the same settings, equipment and techniques actually starts to become a bit boring. The number of settings is limited, and the equipment used (even though it is innovative and creative) remains a constant throughout many of the scenes. For many scenes, the only variable is the model herself. Don’t read this as me saying “one negative aspect to this site is that it offers too much porn,” since that isn’t possible. But they could use different settings. The scene with Julie Night, for example, is shot outdoors and has a completely different feel to it. More outdoor work, or more in a setting other than the dungeon would be great.
As for the models, they are top notch. Many popular porn stars seem to have passed through SSM’s dungeon. I’m a big BDSM fan and always appreciate seeing a mainstream porn star on a BDSM site to see their reactions. One important thing to note is that this isn’t a site that degrades women. There is nothing inherently degrading about being a sub, and these Doms know this. It is fun and interesting to watch some of these women explore a unique sexual interest.
If you’re a fan of BDSM my recommendation is that you get a membership to SSM. You won’t be disappointed. Maybe a bit bored eventually, but not disappointed.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.