| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2076
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
Triple's Reply
I didn't know this company had other sites. I'd be interested in some of it if it could be downloaded.
|
08-08-12 05:55pm
|
Reply
2077
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I vote for skinny. Mmmmmmm... skinny...
|
08-08-12 05:54pm
|
Reply
2078
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
For what's it's worth Drooler, I think Wow Girls is a great value. I'm probably a bit biased because it's a site full of women who look like they came directly from my fantasies...
|
08-07-12 04:12pm
|
Reply
2079
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
If either of us should feel guilty it should be me - and trust me, I'm as interested in the answer as you are!
|
08-07-12 04:10pm
|
Reply
2080
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm indifferent to interracial simply because I see the male talent as part of the furniture so I would neither seek out nor avoid interracial stuff merely because it happens to be interracial. But DFN, mostly on the strength of Blacks on Blondes (and several other sites too, as you mention) is a pretty good network. I'm amazed at what some petite models can take.
As for Meatholes, please disregard my comment about possible credit card issues. There's no mention of it here on the site's page so it has to be another site. Sorry for any confusion.
|
08-07-12 04:09pm
|
Reply
2081
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks pat. I alos liked Blacks on Blondes. That's probably the best site on the network. They've remastered a lot of the older scenes with some of the models I really like and they have a fair bit of anal too.
I was thinking of a Meatholes membership since it's been years since I had one but I recall a PU member saying he had serious credit card issues with them. That's what I recall reading but that may be incorrect.
|
08-06-12 05:51pm
|
Reply
2082
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thanks for the comments. I do like the site, but I just wish it had a more sinister feel to it.
I don't know of any other sites that do this, but Jim Powers has some of it in his movies but that's hit-and-miss and a lot of his titles aren't available on the internet except through the JM Productions site which is pretty crappy. Max Hardcore did a bit of it too. I've asked resident porn expert pat362 for some advice. He may know of other sites.
|
08-06-12 04:35pm
|
Reply
2083
|
Wife Writing
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Now that you mention it I do recall reading that the site will re-issue videos and give them new dates so that might be happening here. I did think it odd that some of the models who's scenes are dated from 2010 were some who really hadn't been in the business for a while.
This site alone definitely isn't worth the price but the entire network is pretty good.
And pat, with your encyclopedic knowledge of porn, are you aware of any other sites with this theme?
|
08-06-12 04:31pm
|
Reply
2084
|
In The VIP
(0)
|
Reply of
VT71's Review
Welcome to the site. I hope you stick around and become a regular.
I've been a member to In the VIP several times and I have to say that you nailed the one really annoying thing on the site: the men. Actually, calling them 'men' isn't really correct because they all seem to be the kind of guys so prevalent these days who are stuck in some unending adolescence. I think that the male talent in porn is, in essence, just part of the set. The guy's job is to be unobtrusive and show the woman off as best as he can. The jack-asses on this site do the opposite.
|
08-06-12 10:32am
|
Review
2085
|
Wife Writing
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Interesting and under-served niche
- Part of the Dog Fart Network
- Many options to view / download scenes
- Photos available
- Streaming video available
- Still updating – but slowly with usually just one scene per month
- Many popular porn stars
- Supports download managers (I use Internet Download Manager) |
| Cons: |
- Small site
- Scenes are mostly just oral
- Could play the BDSM role more |
| Bottom Line: |
This review might be best served if I define the niche first. The focus on the site is that in the course of the scene the male uses a marker to write on the female’s nude body. I’m guessing that the ‘wife’ part of the title is only for alliteration.
I joined Dog Fart Network specifically to get access to this site. This is a very small niche and my interest in it stems mostly from its use as part of BDSM. While the site is interesting and reasonably well done, I was a bit disappointed with the theme since the ‘writing’ is done to highlight the fact that the scenes are interracial rather than specifically as part of BDSM. (So instead of having “Whore” written on her forehead the model might have “Black Cock Lover” instead. I’m probably really splitting hairs here but for anyone into this niche it can make a difference. Still, I’ll take what I can get.)
Two things that any future member may want to know: the male talent is all black. That shouldn’t make a difference, but some may prefer to see a Caucasian male once in a while. The other thing is that actual intercourse is rare; most of the scenes are only oral. I didn’t see any anal in the few scenes where intercourse occurs. The female talent ranges from relative unknowns to popular porn stars.
The site is quite small with only 43 scenes available. It is one of the DFN sites that is still updating though, but the updates are fairly slow only coming in approximately once a month.
The site layout is simple: you open onto a page where six scenes are listed. Each scene has a large screen-cap of the model. One thing I particularly like is that the video and photo options are available right below the model’s name and screen-cap. There’s no need to open a second page just to access the scene. I also like that there is a brief description of the scene too which can provide more information for you to consider before downloading.
Speaking of video download options, the site offers two: WMV and MP4. WMV files are usually offered in two sizes. Interestingly, both sizes come in at 640x480 but the difference in that the larger ones are 4500kb/s while the smaller ones are 1500kb/s. Both play at 30fps. MP4s are usually offered in three sizes. I use WMV so I don’t have the specs on the MP4s. Some of the older videos (but not all) come in at 640x360.
This seems odd in 2012, but the WMV files are also offered in segments for both the lower and higher resolutions. I can’t imagine there are many people out there who would prefer segments when the full video is available too.
The site supports download managers and I had no problem with links dying on me.
I didn’t view the site on a mobile device but there is a separate link for those users where various viewing and downloading options are also available. Surely no member could complain about a lack of viewing options here.
Streaming is also available, but I don’t use that so I can’t really comment on it. The scenes I tested looked okay on a monitor. The resolution of the two available streams seems to be close to the WMV downloads. The streams open in a new page and play on the site’s player.
While the site is really a video site they do offer photos. In keeping with the various options for videos there are options for the photos too. There are separate photos taken of the model during the scene. These are available as singles or zips. The resolution is pretty good at 1067x1600. There are also lower resolution screen-caps available. Then there are “panels” which is a photo made up of four screen-caps fitted per page. Neither the screen-caps nor the panels are available as zips.
As BDSM goes, this site is fairly weak. I think they could improve by playing the Dom/sub roles a bit more. Still, sites that cater to this niche are rare. This is the only one I know of, so if another PU member has some recommendations I’d appreciate getting them.
Even though the site is small and the videos aren’t exactly what I was hoping for, I’d definitely recommend the site for anyone with an interest in this niche. And I’m not just saying that because there is nothing else out there. This site could stand alone and still be a good value at the right price. Admittedly though, unless you’re into this obscure niche like I am the real value of the site is the access to the rest of the Dog Fart Network. |
|
08-06-12 10:26am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
2086
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I'm no fan of download limits either, but I guess a site can choose to do what it wants. Same with streaming-only sites. But I will say that a limit this low (the terms of service indicate a 1.5GB limit) makes no sense and would only serve to annoy customers and deter potential customers.
|
08-06-12 09:45am
|
Reply
2087
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Height isn't an issue for me but I do remember being surprised at how small stars like Gauge and Little Cinderella are. It's amazing that both did a fair bit of anal too.
|
08-06-12 09:42am
|
Reply
2088
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I should probably point out that the problems I had (they seem to be fixed now) seemed to be mostly associated with VB3 and the add-on channels that require VB3.
And I sure agree with you on the content issues. I stand by my position that VB could improve by offering one or two good updates per day rather than five crappy ones. And the constant use of repackaged and reposted scenes in a major annoyance. The only good news is that the other users will usually point out a repost.
|
08-06-12 09:39am
|
Reply
2089
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
I've found VB a little unstable for the past couple of days. It seems to take pages long to load. I've also had links die on me which I've never seen with VB. But I wouldn't go so far as to denigrate the whole site for a couple of technical glitches. I'm sure they get any problems fixed soon.
|
08-03-12 01:05pm
|
Reply
2090
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
This is odd. I wondered why they included Wow Girls when I heard it was added because while Wow Girls is obviously owned by the same group they list it under an American company rather than Diesel. When I reviewed Wow Girls I noted that it probably didn't make sense for them to include it as part of Diesel since they'd lose revenue.
Sorry to hear that this happened. Let's hope that the Diesel people sort this out.
(And I didn't know you could join sites directly from the biller. i'll have to check that out. The only potential problem I see with that is that may mean that TBP / PU wouldn't get a fee for members who click through these sites to join.)
|
07-31-12 04:04pm
|
Reply
2091
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm okay with POV as long as it is done well. I don't actively seek it out as a niche, but I do like it.
|
07-31-12 04:19am
|
Reply
2092
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Reply
I prefer WMV because I've yet to find a player that I like better than WM Player. I find the Apple player to be less useful and I find that VMC tends to pixilate a bit when you move the slider. But it does seem that more sites only offer HD is formats other than WMV.
I'm okay with the size - for now. My ISP doesn't have a download cap yet. I'm hoping that as time goes on and more and more users have increased downloads due to movies and TV that there will be pushback against download caps. But, ISP download caps appear to be only a Canadian problem.
|
07-31-12 04:18am
|
Reply
2093
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Review
Interesting review. I haven't been a member at this site in a while but i intend to go back. I had joined Wow Girls recently (which has been added to the Diesel Access network now) and I did notice that they seem to be shooting a more artsy, couples-oriented style of porn. I do like their quality so I will still rejoin, but like you I'd prefer harder-edged porn.
|
07-29-12 06:09pm
|
Reply
2094
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
Great review. I'm an active porn downloader and I've never joined this site. My reason was usually the fact that the membership was confusing but they've fixed that. Now I don't have a good reason to join. And learning from your review that the offer HD in WMV format makes it more likely that I'll join soon. So many sites seem to offer HD in mp4 format. Thanks for the information.
|
07-29-12 12:25pm
|
Reply
2095
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
The good thing is that you'll likely find re-mastered versions of what you downloaded back then. The site posts new material regularly but also re-masters older stuff. I was first a member maybe three or four years ago but I still like seeing models from the 90s.
|
07-29-12 12:21pm
|
Reply
2096
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I always check out the TBP page. I read the reviews and scour the technical information so I can make an informed choice.
|
07-28-12 01:16pm
|
Reply
2097
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Moleman2040's Comment
I'm pretty sure I know the frustration that you're feeling. When I joined I faced a similar situation: my 10GB download limit would kick in at anywhere between 7 and 9GB and to completely reset it I'd need to wait 48 hours. But, as you point out, adding to the frustration was the fact that there are PU members who said they had no limits imposed on them. I recall that at the time of my membership when I was complaining about limits there was another PU member with an RK membership who said he could download all day with no limits. The icing on the cake was that the clause in the Terms of Service is so vague that I couldn't make out what it meant and RK never bothered to reply to my email asking for clarification.
I liked RK but I doubt I'll ever rejoin. I'm okay with a download limit as long as it is clearly stated and applies to everyone.
|
07-26-12 04:25am
|
Reply
2098
|
Dirty Doctor
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the tip. Information like that is what make PU an amazing site.
|
07-26-12 04:20am
|
Reply
2099
|
Dirty Doctor
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Interesting site... thanks for the review. While I don't like videos where I can't understand the set-up (the set-up is at least as important for me as the sex) I do like the look of most of the models and I do like the older guy / younger woman thing too. I might put this on my list as a possible visit.
|
07-24-12 07:48am
|
Reply
2100
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I have nothing to go on but reason here, but it seems to me that smaller niche sites like these would be more impacted by piracy. This is exclusive material and there isn't anything else like it out there so having it stolen would be a real disappointment. I contrast that with a site that makes porn where a girl gets picked up by some guys in a van and talked into sex. Those are a dime a dozen so I suspect that even pirates tire of those. Having said that, I still feel penalized for something that I've never done nor would do.
While this stuff would certainly even push my limits, I don't have to dig too deep in the collection for evidence of how I really, really need counselling... ;-)
|
07-24-12 07:45am
|
