| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1776
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
Thanks for your answer. Once the pop up is transparent over the text this will be a useful feature. As I've said before, the only regret I have in joining your site is that I didn't do it long ago.
|
02-08-13 04:01am
|
Comment
1777
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
|
02-07-13 03:22pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
1778
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I can't imagine why I'd ever give up porn. One of my biggest fears is losing my vision and not being able to see beautiful women again...
|
02-07-13 03:20pm
|
Reply
1779
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Thanks for that information DM. I didn't understand at first that the Diamond membership will give access to Diesel Access AND Wow. That is great news!
I understand that bandwidth is only a small part of your costs. I can't complain because you do have some of the best porn available today.
I'm definitely looking forward to your new memberships.
|
02-07-13 03:19pm
|
Reply
1780
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Dieselman - thanks for taking the time to drop in and provide some feedback. I think you will understand that you have a lot of fans and customers here so any good news about your sites is welcome.
Two things:
1) please drop in here and leave a comment when the new pricing structure is active. I'm sure I'm not the only member here who will want to take advantage of it.
2) consider a third loyalty level that drops the price after three months. Join for one month and get one site, get expanded access in month two and then a lower price in month three and onward. By month three members would only be downloading updates so it would be less cost for bandwidth for you and you might see some guys like me just stay forever. If there was a network that I'd join and stay for a long time it would be yours.
|
02-04-13 02:51pm
|
Reply
1781
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
To make things more strange, Wow and Diesel are separate corporate entities too...
I checked my email, but like you I don't have that offer. They must have targeted specific former members.
|
02-03-13 06:45pm
|
Reply
1782
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Roberto281's Comment
Access to those older titles is one of the reasons that I like PSN. My concern about PSN is the opposite of yours - that they'll run out of stuff from the 1990s to upload.
|
02-03-13 05:45am
|
Reply
1783
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Great review. This is one of my regular memberships. I like having access to the older stuff and agree that the quality on those can be pretty bad, but I suspect that's more a reflection of the original than how it gets uploaded.
|
02-03-13 05:41am
|
Reply
1784
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I agree, but wouldn't limit it to just Euro-girl fans. Evil Angel has a lot of scenes with A-list American models too.
|
02-03-13 05:38am
|
Reply
1785
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Great review! (I'll admit to being a bit biased as I think these Wow sites and the Diesel sites are among the best on the 'net.) These sites seem to do everything right.
|
02-03-13 05:37am
|
Reply
1786
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
imasinner's Comment
Hodayathink is correct - many, probably most, but not all.
RustyJ pointed out that they have an offer for former members for $10 for a month and that included the other Evil Angel site. You can find the other one through Milk Enema or Mike Adriano. At that price join both. There is some overlap, but not that much and you'll get better access to their catalogue. If you haven't been a member before you might be able to join a mailing list and get the offer. But since they are part of Fame Digital you may have had a membership at a site before and still have the offer. It's worth checking your inbox.
|
02-02-13 05:21am
|
Reply
1787
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Thanks for pointing this out Rusty. I'm just about at the one-month mark on an Evil Angel membership and was going to cancel but was given the same offer when I tried to cancel, so I took it. I did get the email though, so others should too.
The sites are different though there is some overlap. I've reviewed Evil Angel in the past and still think it is among the best sites on the 'net. I've also reviewed the other one through the Milk Enema site. That review and others may answer more of your questions.
At $10 each though I'd recommend joining both.
|
02-02-13 05:12am
|
Reply
1788
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I like clowning around and agree with hodayathink that it allows a model's personality to show.
I'm not sure, however, that I'd like actual "clown porn." I didn't know that existed until reading about the late Hollie Stevens' career which included work in 'clown porn.'
|
02-02-13 05:01am
|
Reply
1789
|
Microminimus
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
My guess is that the people behind it had no intention to actually create a site and likely no experience either. It may have just grown out of the fan community and then they figured the could charge perverts like me to join. As a site, it really needs a lot of work.
|
02-02-13 04:57am
|
Reply
1790
|
Microminimus
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Reply
Thanks for that info on rebilling.
I read your comment and agreed with all of it. I hope you put up a full review too. P/U members can always benefit from different opinions.
|
02-01-13 05:09pm
|
Review
1791
|
Microminimus
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Broad range of model types
- Logically laid out
- Good mix of amateur and pro models
- High quality photos
- Low annual price |
| Cons: |
- Photos only, no videos
- No zip options
- Multiple clicks to get to high-res pics
- Some overlap with their free site
- Some topless, none nude
- No monthly membership, annual only |
| Bottom Line: |
This isn’t a porn site in the traditional sense. I’m merely stating an objective fact for prospective members rather than making a subjective judgment. Whether the site is worth joining is probably up to how much you like what they have to offer, which, I guess, is one way that this is definitely like a porn site.
Microminimus is the ‘community’ site for Wicked Weasel Bikinis. WW is an Australian swimwear company known for making ‘barely there’ swimwear like micro-thongs. They also offer swimwear made of see-through material. There are also some accessories, but the overall theme of the company is skimpy swimwear. This site offers photos of WW’s professional models as well as submissions from their happy customers.
The site is logically laid out. Photos can be sorted by newly added, updated, popular and wallpapers. Also on offer are photo sets from ‘competitions.’ These are set around a theme, Christmas, for example, and users submit photos and members vote on them. I find these are a great mix and so far I’ve spent a lot of my time on the site here. There are also archives for Cover Girls (seems that this can be a pro or amateur) and contributor archives. Another advantage is that they offer archives of the photos of their professional models that they use at their main site where they sell their bikinis.
There does appear to be some overlap between what is available for free at the commercial site and this ‘community’ site though I really have no idea how extensive that overlap is. There is a difference though: on the free site you only get lower-res photos while on the paid site you get access to higher-res photos. That may not be such a big deal though as the low-res photos on the free site are close and in some cases larger than the low-res photos on the paid site. (The low-res on both free and pay are approximately 950x663.) The higher resolution photos come in at 853x1280. That’s not much of a difference and it might not be a big enough difference to counter the work you have to go through to get the higher-res photos. The only lure for spending the $25 annual fee to join will probably be access to more photos, not higher-res photos.
The way the site is laid out and the overlap among how the galleries are organized it is pretty much impossible for me to say with any certainty how many galleries and photos there are here. There are certainly hundreds of photos, and more likely well over a thousand. Ten thousand? I doubt it.
Because the site relies so much on user-submitted photos there are a broad range of model types here. There are models who look like they could easily get modelling work at legitimate fashion shoots, models who could easily get work on adult sets, and models who probably shouldn’t model. I realize that may seem harsh, but some women shouldn’t wear WW bikinis. You don’t see me flaunting my 46-year-old body in a speedo. (Photos available upon request…)
The photo types themselves vary, but there is one certainty: this site doesn’t have full nudity. Some of the models go topless, some don’t. Some of the photo competitions specifically prohibit topless submissions. I find this very odd. Why make that choice? My guess is that the photos can then be used as marketing on their public site to drive sales. Even with the ban on nudity many of the photos can be pretty risqué. We are, after all, seeing photos of women in micro-mini bikinis that are often made out of translucent material. Some of us older guys can still draw on the days when our imaginations played a role in arousal.
If the site has a major flaw (and it DOES have a major flaw) it is that there are no gallery zips offered. So if you like a particular model or theme then be prepared to work to get what you want. To make matters worse, clicking on a photo opens the lower-res version. To get the higher-res version you have to go near the upper-left corner of the screen a click an icon which will then open the high-res photo in a new window. Then you can save it. And close the new window. And go back on the original page to click on another photo to start the labourious process all over again. If I wanted a hobby that required work I’d take up cabinetry.
So can I recommend this site? No, I can’t, but I don’t feel too bad about that since this really isn’t a site that fits well here either. I think the target market for this site is someone who’s girlfriend posts pics here and you want to show those off. If they offered zips I might lean to recommending it (but probably still wouldn’t). If they offered video I might think about recommending it, but they don’t. The good news is that it isn’t expensive at $25 per year. The bad news is that I now have to remember to cancel the membership in 11 months. |
|
02-01-13 04:01pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1792
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I disagree (but really agree with your intention) with one point you make, namely that the sites are so similar. I don't think they're similar - they're really the same site just cut up into three separate pieces with no common theme. I could see if they grouped models, or put all anal on one site. But it seems like they just randomly choose where to upload each new scene. That adds to the frustration.
I really hope the webmaster rethinks his approach.
|
02-01-13 03:58pm
|
Reply
1793
|
Butt Plays
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Interesting review... I think it might be time that I finally join this network...
|
02-01-13 02:39pm
|
Reply
1794
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for finding that. I appreciate the info.
|
02-01-13 02:37pm
|
Reply
1795
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I agree with you that their business model may actually be hurting them. I LOVE these sites but I haven't been back to any of them because as much as I love them they aren't a good value. And, as you say, they change so often that I don't have as much confidence that I'm getting what I think I'm getting.
To make matters worse, the way they spread scenes across all the sites is a problem. There are several models I really like but just joining one site means I don't get access to all their stuff. Even with Gloria, who is one of my favourites, I can get the bonus site that features her (Skinny Super Girl) but then there is so much more on the other sites that I don't get. Like you, I find it so frustrating that so far my approach has just been to avoid it.
|
02-01-13 02:36pm
|
Reply
1796
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Based on your information I might take a risk and join. I looked for the comment on getting network access after two months but I can't find it. I also can't find any 'contact us' link on the sites - not that they'd be likely to answer anyway...
|
01-31-13 04:01pm
|
Reply
1797
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I really hope the site rethinks this and bundles a better package. I realize that the access and price they used to give us was probably too good to last, but the current structure can't help them either. I wouldn't give it a second thought except that they make some of the best porn available today.
|
01-31-13 03:59pm
|
Comment
1798
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
|
01-30-13 06:35pm
Replies (20)
|
Reply
1799
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Yes, I remember that from the last time I was there. But I still wish that EA wouldn't put DVD covers up for DVDs not yet on the site. The good news is that like Evil Angel, Elegant Angel seems to put new titles up pretty quick.
|
01-30-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
1800
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm a regular and will likely continue to be.
|
01-29-13 01:37pm
|
