Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (0)  

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569)

Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 876-900 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
876
Visit Passion HD

Passion HD
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large site
- Top models
- Some variation in model type
- Updates regularly
- Bills through Epoch
- Streaming and downloads
- Screencaps and photos available
- Many exclusive scenes
- No obvious download limits
- TBP discount
Cons: - Some inconsistency in video quality
- Downloads time out
- Not many download options
- Search function not accurate
- Generic file names
- Misleading file resolution labels
- Ads for sister sites
Bottom Line: Passion HD (PHD) is a site that is affiliated with Porn Pros (they share the same parent company) but they aren't part of the Porn Pros network. In fact, PHD itself isn't part of a network at all. A membership to this site just gives you this one site.

But at least the site is large and offers some good porn. The site currently has just under 220 videos and will continue to grow at a decent pace with a new video being added every two to three days. There have been comments before that PHD may be uploading some renamed Porn Pros scenes but without a PP membership I can’t confirm that. If you’re reading this and know that answer please post a comment with the information. TBP says that some of the scenes are exclusive.

Most of the models on the site are new, fresh and likely destined for stardom. While a vast majority are white there is some variation in body type, though I wouldn’t recommend you join if you have a thing for big breasts or fuller-figured women. Because the site has been around a while (since 2011) and books the top new talent available this site can be a great chance to see some of your favorites in some of their earliest scenes.

What’s the porn like? For better or worse it’s the kind of porn you’d expect to see at a site like this. This isn't a fetish site and doesn’t target just one group. The porn is good if a bit generic in that you’ll find all the major porn niches available here. (Though for anal fans like me, there isn't much of that.)

Where the site has some shortcomings is in the videos themselves, both in how the videos are presented and how they look once you download them. Each main page shows 12 large thumbnails and lists the star and gives a scene name and upload date. Clicking on the thumbnail brings you to a separate page with all the options to stream or download the video. Most videos offer three download choices: a WMV and an MPG in 1080p and a MP4 in 480p. This seems like an odd choice to only offer a low-resolution MP4. I’ve been an active porn collector for many years and it seems like MP4 is becoming the standard. And I can’t think of the last time I saw MPG files offered.

I downloaded the WMV files because I found that the MPG versions crashed often in both WMP and VLC. But that could be my problem alone.

To make matters worse, I found that a vast majority of the scenes labelled as 1080p, which I’d expect to be 1920x1080, were actually only 1280x720. And with bitrates between 2500 and 5000 kb/s the scenes could look a bit pixilated and clunky. Not always, but sometimes. I think the best way to describe the quality of a collection of scenes from PHD would be as ‘inconsistent.’

To be fair, there are some scenes where there is a true 1080p MP4 file, but they are rare.

Streaming is also available but it appears to be only available in one resolution.

Photos are also available in both screencaps and pictures. The pictures are available as singles or zips and are 1000x1500.

Pro or con, Passion HD is one site in a large group of sites and if you’re interested in a specific model you can see other scenes with her at the bottom of the scene page you’re on. The problem with that is that if you don’t have a subscription to that site you’re out of luck.

I used a download manager (IDM) and found the download speeds to be on par with what I get on similar sites. There was no obvious download limit and I specifically went looking for one on a lazy Saturday so if there is one, it’s more than reasonable. I did find that download links timed-out after about 15 minutes so you won’t be able to queue-up a bunch of scenes and have a nap.

The site bills through Epoch so you can be assured of good billing support and an easy cancellation when you want to do so.

A couple of minor negatives are that the search function isn't all that accurate. I searched for ‘anal’ scenes and got a few, but as I went through the site in more detail I found a few others. Also, the files names are generic and meaningless. That will require you to rename them as you go along.

Passion HD certainly merits a recommendation with a couple of caveats. On the plus side the site has some of the freshest models in the business and it’s a large and growing site. The downsides are that the video quality isn't up to what the competition offers. But if you’re looking for some mainstream porn with some hot models you owe it to yourself to at least consider a membership here. And a TBP discount certainly doesn’t hurt!

(I should note that once I had joined I was given an offer to add on several other sites for approximately $60USD which gave me an annual membership to each of them. The sites are Casting Couch X, Exotic4K, Fantasy HD, Lubed, My Very First Time, POVD, Pure Mature and Tiny 4K. That price for annual memberships seems like a good deal but they may not offer it all the time.)

11-07-16  04:41pm

Replies (4)
Reply
877
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

You're right... I have been a member there. It's a great site too but I like to follow specific models and Russian models change their names so often they don't make that easy. I guess I'll just have to be happy with the flood of old/young videos studios are putting out as stepdaughter /stepfather.

11-07-16  03:47pm

Reply
878
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Very thorough review. Thanks for posting it.

It's disappointing that Jurassic Cock no longer updates as it was among the best old/young sites on the 'net when it was active. I know it isn't a niche that most people are interested in but old/young sites that feature top U.S. talent are few and far between.


11-06-16  06:15am

Reply
879
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Wait... you mean that some people use 'dirty old man' as something other than a compliment?

11-06-16  06:12am

Review
880
Visit Mormon Girlz

Mormon Girlz
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Unique porn concept
- Site works hard to play up the fantasy
- Good mix of models and scene types
- 4 resolutions available for download
- Streaming available
- Some photos available
- Supports download managers (with some limitations)
- Bills through CC Bill
Cons: - Site has some flaws
- Navigation is difficult
- Models aren't identified (see comments below)
- Streams at low resolution only
- Occasional delays in downloads
Bottom Line: This site needs some explanation because it isn't like anything else I’ve seen and it really doesn’t lend itself well to any categories. It’s fair to say that the sex itself is fairly standard; this isn't a fetish site in the true sense. The porn is what you’d get in any mainstream site: boy/girl, girl/girl, 18-22, MILF and groups. What makes the site unique is the setup for the scenes and how much effort the site puts into making that setup seem real.

The site is, as the name makes clear, about Mormons. Sure, there are sites that play up a conceit and allow the viewer to imagine that the scene is what it says it is. A good example is the recent use of incest in porn. But unless you’ve just arrived on this planet you know that the actors are just acting – they aren't really related. To further illustrate my point, you’d have to believe, for example, that Megan Rain and Brandon Iron are related in real life when any avid porn collector knows they are professional porn stars.

But Mormon Girlz does things differently. The scenes attempt to make things seem much more realistic, with the locations, clothes and even setup being realistic. One thing that makes it easier for the site to do this is that given the secrecy of the Mormon Church to outsiders any of this could be true. How do I know that they don’t have these sexually charged anointings of women when they hit 18 or 19? The use of traditional Mormon undergarments is a way that the site blurs the line between fantasy and reality too. For those of us with little or no knowledge of the inner workings of the Church all of this could be real. (The rituals, not the scenes.)

Another way that the site helps create the feeling that these scenes could be real is by the use of just-off-mainstream stars. Don’t get me wrong – the site has beautiful women but they aren't the big stars of the day. Using the biggest stars like Jillian Janson or Jada Stevens would make it immediately clear that this is all fantasy. So to help maintain that they have models who for whatever reason haven’t wanted to be big stars. The site has models such as Lily Cade, Bethany Skye, Gwen Stark and Cadence Lux. These are all stunning porn stars but to the average viewer who steals more porn than he buys they may be unknowns. To keep the fantasy going, the models are listed by names different from their stage names. So, for example, Cadence Lux is called “Sister Kara” on the site.

The site doesn’t have the models perform just one scene. All of the models have a series of scenes with various rituals and those usually include b/g and g/g. It seems that a group of models will be signed on to do multiple scenes and then after those scenes are done a new group is signed up.

So what are the scenes like? This is subjective, but given the setup, which usually has some power imbalance within a ritual, I think they are hot bordering on incendiary.

The site itself is what you’d expect in any porn site. The videos are available for streaming or download. The streaming is only in one resolution and it seems much lower than you’d expect. Downloads are available in four resolutions: 640x360 (600kb/s), 960x540 (1300kb/s), 1280x720 (2200kb/s) and 1920x1080 (5000kb/s). All scenes are 23fps. I downloaded the 1080p scenes and they look good. Not great, but good.

There are currently 135 scenes available and the site updates with the addition of one new scene per week.

The site has some annoying flaws in how it’s laid out. For one thing, selecting the video tab and then trying to advance through the pages shows those links don’t work. If you go to the “Girls” tab, though, there is a separate tab at the top of the page that allows you to access all updates. But you have to click “more” many times to get to the earliest scenes. This isn't a deal-breaker, but it’s annoying.

The site supports download managers but only seems to allow a limited number of scenes (8 or so) to be queued up at one time. I also noticed on several occasions that rather than the download starting I got a message that the download was waiting for an available socket. I’m not sure what that means, but I’m guessing that since this is a small site in a rare niche that they can’t handle a large amount of traffic at once.

This is a personal preference and I understand that the site tries to maintain the fantasy that this is real, but as a collector who catalogues my collection by models I would like to know the stage names of all the models.

The bottom line is that the pros of the site far outweigh the cons. The pros are a unique site with some hot porn featuring a variety of models. The scenes go beyond what you’d expect to create the air of reality and they seem so real as to be a bit creepy – in the sexy sense. The cons are minor and could be easily fixed. I highly recommend giving the site some serious consideration.

10-27-16  04:45pm

Replies (0)
Reply
881
Visit Vixen.com

Vixen.com
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

Agreed. I wish other new sites would price their memberships to account for the small size they start out with.

10-25-16  05:03pm

Reply
882
Visit Vixen.com

Vixen.com
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Thanks for the comment. Keep in mind that as the site grows they are likely to increase the price so it may be worth considering a membership now or in the near future to take advantage of the $10 price.

10-20-16  04:21pm

Reply
883
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

So what are you using the other hand for pat??? :-)

10-19-16  11:56am

Review
884
Visit Vixen.com

Vixen.com
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - High production values
- Top models
- 26 scenes
- Updates regularly and frequently
- Affiliated with two quality sites
- Lots of options to stream or download the scenes
- Great value for the subscription fee
- Pictures are available
Cons: - Limited tags
- Search function lacks accuracy
- Small site, but growing
Bottom Line: Vixen is a high-quality site from the same people that give us Blacked and Tushy. Being associated with those sites should give a clear indication of the quality that a subscriber can expect.

The site is relatively new, having started in June 2016. It currently has 26 videos available and a new video is uploaded every five days. The fact that the site is affiliated with two popular and reputable sites gives me hope that it will be around for a while and continue to offer great porn.

The scenes all have high production values: the lighting, sound, editing and such are all top quality. The models are all A-list popular models. The drawback for some may be that there isn't a lot of variety in the models. They’re all young (18-22), fit and petite. That’s exactly what I like so I have no complaints! The list of models on the site is a who’s who of top models working today.

The scene plots vary but you won’t find much variation from other similar sites. While I like a plot that sets some sexual tension I’m willing to trade some of that off in a site like this that has such beautiful models in some amazing scenes.

Two groups that may be a bit disappointed are those who like anal and those who like lesbian scenes. There are only three anal scenes available and while there are two listed lesbian scenes those are actually g/g/b. But since the site doesn’t market itself as an anal or lesbian site that isn't a big deal.

Opening a scene brings you to a separate page where the scene, pictures and a trailer are available. The scenes can me streamed in 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p. Downloads are available in six resolutions: 480x270 (650kb/s), 640x360 (1000kb/s), 854x480 (1000kb/s), 854x480 (2000kb/s), 1280x720 (8200kb/s) and 1920x1080 (12000kb/s). All of these are in MP4 format and are at 23fps. I don’t understand the technical bits but it seems odd to have some of the specs grouped so closely together.

The site does offer pictures but it’s fair to say that it really is a video site. The pictures are available as singles and as zips with a good resolution of 3000x2000.

The site itself is reasonably well-laid out and logical. There is a search function, but for now the site is small enough that it isn't really necessary. There are tags for some popular niches. The scenes can be sorted by videos (descending order) and by model. As the site grows I hope the functionality grows too. There aren't that many tags yet and I found the search function wasn’t accurate. I searched for anal scenes and it found one when the tag revealed all three available. I’ll chalk that up to the site being new and still growing.

What really adds to the value of the site is that they offer it at $10 per month. Even if the site wasn’t updating that is great value for scenes of this caliber. Other new sites start out small and charge full subscription fees of $30 per month. I can understand that a site needs some cash flow but I think the business model that Vixen is using makes more sense. I’m assuming, of course, that when the site is bigger they’ll start charging a fee in line with the size and quality offered.

The bottom line is that Vixen offers good value for the money. The scenes are well shot, the models are amazing, the sex is hot and the site is logical. Sure, it has a few minor issues but the good far outweighs the bad here. I’d recommend signing up at this price and seeing what they have to offer.

10-19-16  11:55am

Replies (4)
Reply
885
Visit Mormon Girlz

Mormon Girlz
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

Wow! This site looks great. I don't know how I missed the review that A.K. posted at TBP a while back. This site has a lot of what I like: redheads and a bit of the creepy factor to name a couple. I'll definitely be joining this site soon.

Thanks for telling us all about this.


10-17-16  09:06am

Review
886
Visit Pretty Dirty

Pretty Dirty
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Fame group of porn sites.
- I hope that other Fame sites don’t adopt the pay-to-download model
- 120+ videos
- Updates frequently (every two or three days)
- Lots of BTS
Cons: - Basic membership only gives streaming
- Downloads cost extra per scene
- Cancelling can be tricky
Bottom Line: I should have paid more attention before joining this site because even though the TBP page lists it as streaming only with downloads costing more, I somehow missed that. Downloading could become an expensive option since there isn't a one-charge add-on fee to unlock downloads but there is a requirement to pay an additional $2.95 per scene that you want to download. That could add up quickly.

Pretty Dirty is part of the Fame Digital family of sites so there is some expectation of quality porn offered on a well-designed site and both of those expectations have been met.

The quality of the porn is more of a subjective judgment since it really comes down to what each person likes. My preference is for the harder-edged stuff found at other Fame sites (such as Evil Angel) but even though the porn is more mainstream here it still meets the same high production values found on sister sites. While you will find some scenes that have somewhat edgier plots like threeways and anal, the focus here is more on old-fashioned boy/girl sex. The models are all A-list or models who are new to the business. This site will certainly appeal to anyone who likes the newest models in the business.

Two things about the porn itself are worth noting. First, this site has a lot of older man, younger woman stuff with a sizable proportion of that being the stepdaughter / stepfather niche. There are lots of other niches served, but if you like these ones this site has a lot to keep you entertained. The second thing is that the site offers a lot of behind-the-scenes material and what they offer tends to be more than just a camera recording the scene being shot. The BTS stuff here has some of that fly-on-the-wall footage but spends more time interviewing the performers. For those of us interested in knowing what makes some of our favorite models tick these scenes are interesting to watch.

The site itself is logical and well laid out. Each scene is identified by a medium-sized thumbnail with the performers, scene name and upload date listed too. Clicking on the thumbnail brings you to a separate page where you can view a trailer or the full scene. I don’t normally stream scenes so the number of resolutions available seems a bit of overkill to me, but I’ll assume that there is demand for the wide variation. The scenes can be streamed in 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. As I noted above if you want to download a scene you can do so for an additional $2.95 charge. Presumably the same resolutions would be available for the downloads as those are offered on other Fame sites too.

The site offers photos as both singles and zips. There are no additional charges for downloading the photos.

The site currently has approximately 130 scenes available and updates frequently with a new scene being added every few days. The BTS uploads aren't included in that update schedule so a member won’t feel cheated if an update is a BTS scene.

The site offers a lot of different ways to sort and search and those seem to be effective. Many of the scenes are part of a ‘series’ so you can go to that series. You can sort by niche using tags and there is also a search function. You can sort by scene or by the female star.

One warning that has to go along with and Fame site is that cancelling is easy IF you know what information you’ll need. The most critical piece of information will be in your email inbox, and that’s what Fame site were you billed through. Fame uses several of them (and even added a new billing site recently) and if you pick the wrong one you won’t find your membership. You’ll also need your username and password so keep those handy especially if you have the site remember your login credentials so you don’t have to.

Giving this site a score and a recommendation is tough to do because I find the porn a little too tame and I prefer to download my porn. But for someone who likes more mainstream porn and prefers streaming this site could be a perfect fit for them. My biggest beefs with the site are more subjective and I don’t want to factor those preferences into the score or recommendation. So wearing my objective porn-reviewer hat I’d say that this site offers a decent collection of some well-shot porn starring some of the newest and hottest models in the business. The production values are high. The site itself is laid out well and finding something you’ll like is easy. The site offers great value for the $15 TBP discount price.

But… it’s fair to say that most people who are members here at PU are more collectors so you need to be warned that this is a streaming site only unless you want to spend a lot of money. I’m going to keep my fingers crossed that this business model doesn’t spread to other Fame sites.

10-14-16  10:51am

Replies (0)
Review
887
Visit Lethal Hardcore

Lethal Hardcore
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large studio site
- Popular studio
- A-list models
- Older videos available
- Downloads and streaming
- Updates weekly
- All popular niches available
Cons: - Videos start streaming automatically
- Many DVDs are missing scenes
- Not a great tag system
- Not exclusive (LH videos are on other sites)
- Lots of fake breasts
- No easy way to cancel
- No TBP discount
Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of many of the studio sites but for some reason I’ve never joined Lethal Hardcore before this. That might be because LH DVDs are available on so many different websites that it didn’t make sense to join the studio site. But in the interests of getting some new porn I figured I’d take the plunge.

Lethal Hardcore is a mainstream porn studio and like most mainstream porn studios they try to cover as many niches as possible. That’s good because one site can have many niches that a member likes but it’s also bad because it can mean that you have no interest in a lot of the porn on the site. An example is that I prefer 18-20 year old models with small breasts and a well-served niche on this site is fuller-figured women with large breasts, both natural and fake. But I can’t complain because the site still offers a lot for the money.

As a mainstream studio, LH hires the A-list models of the day. If you have a favorite mainstream porn model from any time of the past 15 years you’ll likely find her here.

If the upload dates are accurate then this site has been around since 1999. I’m a little skeptical about that since the video quality of those old videos is actually pretty good. It’s possible that the site remastered the scenes at some point though. It’s a definite plus to have scenes this old that are of this quality. The oldest scenes are available at 1920x1080 with 5000kb/s and 29fps. While that sounds great you have to remember that these would have been shot on videotape or with low resolution cameras so these older scenes really don’t look as good as the specs suggest they should. (A real plus for this site is that they do offer their back catalogue of titles. Some other studio sites don’t so that. This is great for those of us who have been collecting porn for a long time as it gives us a chance to see some of our favorites from years ago.)

The newest videos are available with those same specs (1920x1080 with 5000kb/s and 29fps) but given that they’re shot with modern cameras they look like you’d expect them to look.

All of the scenes have three download options which are labeled HQ, Stream and Mobile. None of the scenes have any specs listed with those options. The ‘Stream” videos are 1280x720 with 1500kb/s and 29fps. The “Mobile” videos are 640x360 with 500kb/s and 29fps.

One complaint about the page where the scene can be downloaded is that the scene will begin to stream automatically when you load the page. So be warned and make sure your speakers are turned down if you don’t want anyone wondering what you’re watching.

Another negative, and this is something that other studio sites seem to do as well, is that some of the DVDs are missing scenes. This is especially apparent when the model on the box cover doesn’t have a scene uploaded.

One last quibble is that the primary biller is a site called customercare.co. That’s a biller that doesn’t allow a member to cancel a recurring subscription easily as billers like CC Bill and Epoch do. You’re left emailing them to ask that the membership be cancelled so make sure to get started on that early to avoid a charge you don’t want.

The site does have a search function but that seems to only give scenes rather than DVDs. There is a list of common niches on the left of the screen that are useful for sorting. But a site of this size with such a range of porn really needs to have a better search and tag system.

Both the site and the studio are active and a new DVD is added each week. There are currently 636 DVDs available with an average of four scenes per DVD. That’s good value for your porn dollars. The DVDs appear to be current and not just rehashed stuff from years ago since the models are current.

The site allows download managers but it doesn’t allow pausing and resuming so if your download stops for whatever reason it will have to be started from the beginning again.

The site has a lot going for it but it isn't really a standout. The porn is good but Lethal Hardcore videos are available elsewhere so it doesn’t make a membership here an essential addition to any collection. The video resolutions available here are certainly better than what you’d find at sites like Videobox though. Overall I’d recommend it since it is good porn and the site itself offers a good value even though there is no TBP discount.

10-10-16  11:10am

Replies (0)
Reply
888
Visit FTV MILFs

FTV MILFs
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

I've heard that FTVX is coming later this year too. That's a site I'll be joining as soon as it goes live. FTV does some excellent stuff so I have high hopes for their hardcore site.

10-09-16  05:16am

Reply
889
Visit Gag Factor

Gag Factor
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

Agreed. JM had the best bukkake and gokkun on the market. I really wish someone would take that up again.

10-03-16  01:33pm

Reply
890
Visit FTV MILFs

FTV MILFs
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

I'd never heard of this site until you mentioned it but that isn't too surprising since I'm not really into MILFs. Part of me wishes the site didn't exist so the owners could put more time and effort into getting FTV X off the ground. Combining the beautiful women of FTV with hardcore sex is a recipe for a great site.

10-03-16  01:31pm

Review
891
Visit Holed

Holed
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A-list, 18-22 models
- High production values
- Logical site, easy to use
- Updates weekly
- Many download and streaming option
- Photos available
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Small site (16 scenes)
- No TBP/PU discount
- Lots of upsells within the site
Bottom Line: When you have a site whose tagline is “deep/anal/buttplay” you can be assured that I’ll be a member. As the tagline says, this site is 100% anal.

Holed is affiliated with the Porn Pros network so the site and scenes have that feel to it. The models are all young (18-22), usually petite and are mostly the lineup of A-list models in porn today who do anal scenes. The scenes themselves have very little plot or setup. I prefer some tension be created before the sex starts but with the overall quality of the scenes I can cut them a little slack.

The site offers their porn in a variety of ways that will be sure to satisfy almost anyone. Streaming is available in either SD or HD. A trailer is available too. When it comes to downloads there are lots of options: four MP4 resolutions (4K – 2160p, 1080p, 720p, 480p), one MPG format (480p) and one WMV file (720p). The 4K scenes are 3840x2160 with bitrates that differ between scenes though the lowest I saw in those was 15,000kb/s. The 1080p scenes are 1920x1080 and they also have different bitrates depending on the scene. I saw bitrates from 10,000 to 25,000 kb/s. Framerates on all the scenes is either 23 or 59fps. With specs like that you’d expect the scenes to be crisp and sharp and you’d be right. At least with the higher resolution as I didn’t dip into the low resolution downloads.

Photos are also available (in a zip) and those are 1500x1125. This really isn't a photo site so it isn't a surprise that the photo quality isn't class-leading like the videos are.

The site has a few downsides, the biggest being its size: as of today there are only 16 videos available. The site will continue to grow as it is updating but with only one new scene added per week it’ll take a while for this site to become a good value at the full price. And speaking of price, there is no TBP/PU discount so you’ll have to pay the full fee of $30USD to join. Some may balk at that but I still think that given the quality of what’s on offer it is still worthwhile to join.

A minor negative is shared with other Porn Pros sites and that is the large number of ads and upsells when you’re on the site. Most of them can be easily ignored and I will say that I actually liked that for each scene there was a listing of other scenes on the network starring that model.

I had no trouble using a download manager and download speeds were what I’d see on comparable sites.

The bottom line? While there will be a lot of people who disagree with me on this, I’d much rather pay for quality rather than quantity and Holed certainly delivers on quality. Objectively the production values are excellent and the site is well laid out and easy to use. Subjectively you get blistering scenes from some of the hottest anal queens in the business today. If you like A-list, young and petite models engaging in some vigorous anal sex than you really should consider a membership here. Not that Holed would listen to me, but they could improve things in the short-term by offering a TBP/PU discount at least until the site grows more.

10-03-16  09:38am

Replies (1)
Comment
892
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)

Join through Exploited College Girls

Net Video Girls is bundled with a few other sites. One of those is Exploited College Girls. I rejoin here regularly and did so through NVG this time and that was a mistake. NVG bills through RocketGate and that biller doesnt make things easy to cancel. You're left trying to contact the site to get your recurring membership cancelled. If you join through ECG they use CC Bill and Epoch, both of which have simple and easy cancellation forms on their site.

I'll be avoiding RocketGate in the future.

10-03-16  04:09am

Replies (1)
Reply
893
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

Things are a bit unusual for me right now in that I have 11 memberships on the go. I have three annual subscriptions or ones that I just let recur, and I'd normally have two or three monthly memberships too.

10-03-16  04:04am

Reply
894
Visit Gag Factor

Gag Factor
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment

It's nice to see that they're up to their old tricks. I was a member there a long time ago and they were recycling then too. It's too bad because JM Productions had some of the best porn on the market. i really wish someone would restart the American Bukkake and American Gokkun series' again.

09-20-16  05:40am

Reply
895
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I have an old briefcase at home that has 20+ portable drives in it... I have friends who want me to put the briefcase in my Will.

09-20-16  05:38am

Reply
896
Visit Naughty Midwest Girls XXX

Naughty Midwest Girls XXX
(0)
Reply of NaughtyMidwest's Reply

Thanks for your comments. Warts and all, I'm a big fan of your site. The porn is very hot!

09-13-16  05:39pm

Reply
897
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Actually pat, New Sensations has been big into this kind of porn for a while. When they first started they did it really well and created some intensely hot scenes. What I've seen lately isn't as hot but it is still good porn and a good value.

I'd also recommend Desperate Pleasures. This is a more amateurish site but if you like stepfather/stepdaughter porn and even (acted) father/daughter porn this is a great site.


09-13-16  01:26pm

Review
898
Visit Naughty Midwest Girls XXX

Naughty Midwest Girls XXX
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Rare site in an underserved niche (US-based old/young)
- Has some beautiful models
- 140+ scenes
- Mostly boy/girl but does have some girl/girl
- Offers both photos and videos
- Reasonable price for the site
- Updates
Cons: - Production values are relatively low
- Wide discrepancy in the cameras used
- Updates on a bi-weekly schedule
Bottom Line: I found this to be a tough review to write because while I really like the porn that this site has to offer the site itself and the production values leave a lot to be desired. This really is a case of overlooking some flaws to get access to a niche I really like, but I’m sure we’ve all done that before.

I don’t know how I missed this site for all of these years but I’m glad I stumbled on it. Given the title I presumed it was one of the many sites that feature solo masturbation scenes or things like wet T-shirt contests. Nothing in the title indicated to me that the site offered old/young porn.

I’m sure if you are a regular porn subscriber you have also run across numerous sites like this that have an amateur feel to them. Everything about it seems amateur from the production values to the website layout. Sites like these lack the polish of the large studio-based sites. That isn’t a bad thing. My experience is that when I find an under-served niche that I like run by an amateur the sites often have some of the hottest material because the people making it share the interest as well. That seems to be the case here too.

The site does have a lot going for it in that it offers porn in the rare niche of US-based old/young porn. Most of the models here seem to be relatively unknown and most are very attractive. The male talent in most of the scenes seems to be the guy who owns the site and he is a pudgy guy who has to be in his late 50s or early 60s. Call me twisted, but something about that scenario adds a lot of heat to a scene for me.

While there is a mixture of kinds of scenes on the site most of them are boy/girl hard-core. There are some solo scenes. There are also several girl/girl scenes but most of those turn into boy/girl/girl after some lesbian action.

Many sites featuring old/young porn seem to go in for the stepdaughter theme and I realize that creeps some people out. That theme is used here but the more common theme is that of a babysitter.

Most of the scenes are shot using a combination of POV and tripod-mounted cameras. This method is never going to give the best scenes but they can work. A significant problem that this site suffers from is that one of the cameras used (usually for POV stuff) is very low resolution. It is low enough that it detracts from the overall scene.

There are currently over 140 scenes on the site. The site is updating and it shouldn’t be a surprise that the updates only happen approximately once every two weeks.

The videos are available in WMV and MP4 formats but each of those only comes in one resolution and those aren't great. The WMVs are 720x480, 1600 kb/s and 30fps. The MP4s are a bit better at 1280x720, 4000 kb/s and 30fps. One minor flaw is that the MP4 files are listed as being for the iPad so I wrongly assumed that they’d be lower resolution than the WMV files. But the thing is that SOME of them are lower resolution and some aren't. I can accept that older files are lower resolution but it would be useful to list the resolution on the file so the viewer could choose not only between the file type but the resolution as well.

Photos are available as singles or zips. Those aren't high-resolution either at 1280x960.

Initially I wasn’t able to use my download manager but I think now that may have been an isolated issue or a problem with my software because the site now allows me to use one.

This won’t be an issue for many readers, but I was a bit disappointed to not find many anal scenes at all. There are three or four and these aren't the best filmed scenes on the site.

The price for a monthly membership is pretty good and goes a long way to making up for some of the site’s shortcomings. There isn't a TBP discount but the regular monthly price is just over $20.

The bottom line for me is that this site is both easy to recommend and easy to reject – and that all depends on whether you like this niche. The site has some serious flaws: the production values aren't great and the site has an overall amateur feel to it. It lacks the quality of a bigger, better funded site. But if you like this niche those flaws can either be overlooked or they can add to the allure of the scene. So if you like this niche the site gets a strong recommendation and if you don’t like this niche you should probably spend your porn budget elsewhere.

09-12-16  03:25pm

Replies (2)
Reply
899
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

I like the heat they build by being taboo.

09-12-16  08:44am

Reply
900
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(0)
Reply of slutty's Reply

100% agree.

08-29-16  04:40pm


Shown : 876-900 of 3065 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.64 seconds.