| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
--Gorgeous models! Many of the girls are unique to this network. There are a couple dozen girls I recognize from other sites, but for the most part they are "new" to me. Almost all are Eastern Euro girls in the 18 to 23 age range.
--High quality photos and videos! The photos come in 3 resolutions, with the upper end usually 5200 pixels on the long end, sometimes more. The newest videos are 1080p, and I think all are 720p or higher. All are generally well light and photographed. All photo sets have zips, and the videos are available in AVI, MP4, and WMV.
--The photos and videos are explicit (meaning almost all have pussy close-ups), but tasteful.
--Easy site navigation. Nothing too complicated here. There is a main updates page, separate pages for videos and photosets, and a model directory (alphabetical listing).
--The site has other features, such as voting for models, photosets, and videos, a basic search feature, and marking models and sets as favorites. |
| Cons: |
--Updates only once every 2 days.
--Many of the models have only 1 set or at most a few.
--Videos are few and sometimes far between (1 to 3 per month).
--Some of the photoset zips are a bit large for the highest res (up to and even over 1 gig), although that's really a minor quibble for me.
--The download speeds are sometimes a bit low, but that may be on my end. |
| Bottom Line: |
Showy Beauty is a smallish site run by the same folks who run Amour Angels and several other sites. It is primarily a photo site with some video (videos are mostly solo, some girl-girl). As of today, I counted 412 models. The site was launched in August of 2011. A number of my favs were there, along with a dozen or so really hot girls I'd never seen before, so I went ahead and joined up about a week ago.
The beauty of girls and quality of the photos and videos is right up there with best sites like Met-Art, MPL, and Femjoy. And many of the models are exclusive to this site and the "parent site" Amour Angels.
The only real drawback is the low frequency of updates (every other day), and the relatively small size of the site. It's not a site I will stay joined to, but I'll definitely put it in my rotation. The site preview allows you to see the cover page of all sets by every model, but no actual content.
If you like quality photos and the occasional video of gorgeous young women, then you will like this site. |
|
05-20-15 05:26am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
152
|
Spunky Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
trev's Comment
If the free tour doesn't say zip files somewhere they probably don't have them. I've learned that the hard way too. Trev, I'd love to see a full review, including the bonus sites.
|
03-04-13 12:55pm
|
Review
153
|
Streamate.com
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-there is a large selection of models (100s), with many very attractive girls. Quite a few are unattractive, but you should be able to find dozens that you like.
-models can do "Gold Shows" which are typically priced from $2 to $5 for a show that lasts 5 to 10 minutes. Most girls do a fairly standard routine in their gold shows, but its an inexpensive way to see what they've got, and what they're willing to do.
-private chats here are not as expensive here as some other sites (like MFC or Naked.com). They are typically $3 a minute, and often less. Many of my favorites are $2 a minute. The model sets her prices.
-you can spy on the regular pvt sessions. Once you enter, you'll be charged for a minimum of one minute. But it makes it possible for you to check out the girl's body for a few bucks if she doesn't do gold shows.
-you can click on a button that makes your chat invisible to other users...so only the model sees what you type. |
| Cons: |
-the model notification thing they have that notifies you when one of your favorites is online has never worked for me.
-the favorites list (where you have your list of favorite models) has also never worked properly for me. I think it allow about 10 to 12 models per page, but when you go to page 2 or 3, often you find models that were on page 1 or 2. When you go back to page 1, it's not the same models listed as when you first opened it.
-some of the European girls struggle with their English, which can cause problems when you are trying to explain to them what you want them to do. Fortunately you can email them on their model page if you need to explain something that might be complicated (saves time in private chat)
-models can permanently ban you, and it has happened to me a couple of times for absolutely no valid reason. Other sites set a 30 or 60 day max ban length. One model I am fairly sure banned me by accident (confused me with another member w/similar name). |
| Bottom Line: |
I first got into Webcam sites about 2 years ago, and have tried several since (Naked.com, MFC, Streamate, Live Jasmin). Streamate is tied with MFC as my favorites. On Streamate, I usually only do Gold Shows, but if I can find a model that I really like, and her private chats are $2 or $3 a minute, I will occasionally do a private chat.
As others have noted, Webcam sites can be addictive, so you have to be careful. When I first got into them, I checked my credit card statements after the first 5 months, and was shocked when I added it up and had spent over $2000! I looked in my mirror, and said WTF dude, are you crazy? Now fortunately I have a good job, and I do get to work a good bit of overtime, but I decided that it generally wasn't worth it. So I banned myself from the sites, or more specifically from doing private chats. I've fallen off the wagon a few times, but nothing major.
If you're going to use these sites, you have to ask yourself what do you get from them that you can't get from the typical $30 a month video porn site. There is an intriguing element of "reality porn" with these sites, in that you can tell the model exactly what you want her to do. When you add to that the fact that you will find models that are very appealing to you both physically and from a personality standpoint, it is easy to see how it can become addictive. In my case, I love to watch a girl doing a slow strip tease in a fairly specific way, and then masturbating with her fingers until her pussy gets really juicy and she cums. I haven't found a regular porn site that has the models perform exactly how I would if I were the director. So I still do the occasional private chat when I find a girl that I really like.
One tip that I can give to newbies is to make sure you use a video capture program to make your own videos of your private chats. MFC and Live Jasmin are the only 2 sites that I know of that do it for you, and I think it costs extra on LJ. I use Capture Wiz, and have been very happy with it. It has a time counter on it, so you can track your time in the private chat (Streamate does not have a counter for you to monitor).
The private chat rating comment section is very useful here, and you should definitely read a models comments before doing a private chat with her. If a model is a "time-waster" (stalls for time with needless questions or otherwise doesn't listen to you), someone will generally have made a comment about it. I always take the time to leave a comment after a private chat. If you have to leave a bad one, be advised, the model will probably ban you.
The last thing that I should mention is the subject of video quality. This will obviously vary from model to model depending on their video equipment, but none of them on any site will even come close to true 30 frame per second 1080p HD video. I do like some pussy close up time in my private chats, so I usually ask the model to zoom on her face in free chat to see what her cam quality is. Some of the girls only have digital zoom, but a few use camcorders and can zoom right in with very good quality. Ten years from now the "net" will probably easily handle true HD video streaming, and webcam quality will be much better too. It's going to even more addictive! Hopefully I'll be a rich dude by then. |
|
12-20-12 11:02pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
154
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Excellent review! I wonder if Suze will follow Holly's lead, and let Met-Art take over management of the site. Check a little down in the comments for the link about Met-Art managing Holly's site.
|
01-31-13 08:29pm
|
Reply
155
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
Great review Squirrel! The current 9.95 promo is very tempting. I'm not big on tattoos either--at least not to the extent that many American porn models go with them. A nice tramp stamp or one or two small tatts isn't so bad--but it often goes far beyond that. I especially hate tatts near the pussy. I think most American girls who decide to get into porn have already been "bad girls" for a few years before they do, so 99 out of 100 already have them when they walk through the door. I doubt if the sites require it. I just wish there was some way to make todays young women understand that there really are a lot of guys out there who prefer natural bodies with no tatts or fake tits.
|
01-25-13 04:51pm
|
Reply
156
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Comment
Dracula, if you did sign up, please do a review. It's been a long long time since I was there.
|
04-27-13 09:36pm
|
Reply
157
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
Nice review Otoh! I've never been a member there, but I'll eventually get around to it. A lot of my favs have some material there.
|
05-28-13 02:28am
|
Reply
158
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Nice review Rusty! I just checked out the site, and its definitely on my list of sites to join now. The search feature is pretty good--I was able to pull up tons of interesting material just using title keywords. One question--is there any 1080p HD or is it all 720p?
|
01-15-13 01:07pm
|
Reply
159
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Zoltan's Review
Great review Zoltan, I noticed on previous reviews of this site that reviewers noted the highest resolution photos didn't have zip files. Is that still the case?
|
03-14-13 06:57am
|
Reply
160
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks for the info Skippy!
|
01-20-13 09:13pm
|
Reply
161
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Excellent review skippy! I checked out the free tour, and noticed that one of my favorite girls has a ton of photo sets. Did you say that the videos are just a few minutes long?
|
01-18-13 06:43am
|
Reply
162
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks tangub, I guess I shoulda checked on that before commenting!
|
04-01-13 09:58am
|
Comment
163
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
|
03-31-13 10:07pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
164
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
It is kinda odd RLane, almost like they must be piggybacking on the end of someone else's photo shoot, but they only have the time to do one vid and one photo set. It would definitely be nice to see multiple photo sets and vids from them, as they do have a unique style.
|
02-23-13 09:22pm
|
Review
165
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The video quality is excellent, especially with the newer videos! Models are very attractive and young (18 to 25). Photo sets are very good quality, and do not appear to be vid caps. Site navigation is good. Updates with 2 new models a week on average. The site is a little different than most porn sites. They claim to be the only pussy classification site on the web, which is probably true, although I think maybe there should be more than 3 types (LOL). The 3 categories they have are the "puffy peach" (model has fat labia majoria that hide her clit and labia, and create "pussy cleavage"), the "big taco" (model's clit and labia are visible in a standing pose), and the "juicy cherry" (model's clit and labia are long and hang down). Each model starts out with one video and one or two photo sets. The videos involve a sexy strip and then some pussy play, either with fingers or toys. I had no problem logging into the two bonus sites. |
| Cons: |
Many models have only one video and one photo set. I don't understand why--maybe they dont book them for a full days shoot. I would definitely like to see more sets of many of their models shot in their style. The videos do seem to get a bit repetitive and similar after a while. It would be nice to see more of the girls masturbating to orgasm. There is a little more pissing than I like--thats not something I'm into. |
| Bottom Line: |
Excellent video quality with attractive young models. A lot of archived content. Some of the bigger names in Euro porn stars can be found here including the gorgeous Caprice. A few of the things you will find here with regularity are pussy close ups, pussy pumps, camel toe panty play, labia stretching, anal beads used up and down on the pussy, and pissing. A pussy focused site that is pleasantly different from the standard photo/video porn site. That along with the beautiful girls and high video/photo quality make Wet and Puffy definitely worth joining for a month. The free tour is pretty good if you've never been there before. |
|
12-18-12 12:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
166
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Glad it worked out Cybertoad! Their site does look amazing, and I'm going to join soon. I wish they had a better preview, with a full model list.
I figured out the problems I was having with ATK Galleria--it was my Kaspersky Antivirus being a total system resource hog, and it's new cloud technology, which means it gives itself priority download access to its cloud files whenever anything is being downloaded from the net. Granted my 2 computers are getting a little long in the tooth, but I've had no issues since I uninstalled it. I was going to slam Galleria for it in my upcoming review, but the problem was definitely my equipment and software.
|
04-28-14 10:27pm
|
Reply
167
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Cybertoad, do you think it might be your browser, and have tried different ones?
I am having similar problems at ATK Galleria, although in my case it's mainly inconsistent and extremely long download times. Happens with either IE or Chrome for me. And I know it's not my PC because a speed test on my ISP's homepage shows normal download speeds.
I really hope this isn't a real issue with Wow Girls, as they are on my list to join, and from their tour pages, the material looks awesome.
Can any other members chime in?
|
04-13-14 03:21pm
|
Reply
168
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
dieselman's Reply
Dieselman, I was checking out the free tour at Young Legal Porn, and couldn't find a list of all the Diesel sites. Is there one gateway page?
|
02-04-13 05:10pm
|
Reply
169
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for that excellent break down. I'll probably go with Young Legal Porn--looks like a great site!
|
02-04-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
170
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Yes, great review lk2fireone. It's hard to figure out which Diesel site to join first. Any advice?
|
02-03-13 11:25am
|
Reply
171
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I was wondering the same thing, as I am probably going to join Young Legal Porn very soon. Where are u Dieselman?
|
02-19-13 10:13pm
|
|
