| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm glad it was of use to you.
It's always good to be well informed when you subscribe to such sites ;)
|
05-10-10 03:56pm
|
Reply
202
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Thank you!
It's nice to be backed up on these sort of things.
And 'slap and tickle' is exactly what it is. Where were you when I was writing this review? Could have used that! :P
Anyway, thanks again.
|
05-10-10 09:30am
|
Comment
203
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
|
05-10-10 07:41am
Replies (0)
|
Review
204
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Pretty famous porn stars doing something different for a change.
* An attempt at offering bondage on a network that usually provides "regular porn"
* Consistent updates usually, about 2-3 a month.
* Videos available for streaming in FLV and download in WMV HD, MPG HD, WMV and MPG. Also available; Video to Go DVD-CD, iPod, iPhone, PSP and Xbox.
* Galleries are archived in zip-files and are High Res. Also available are screencaps. Also zipped
* Date is mentioned with every update.
* Gives access to the entire network.
*Ability to save your favorites, on the website for easy access in the future.
* Features many well known porn stars in a sort of soft-bondage.
*All exclusive content |
| Cons: |
* They use the same girls over and over on the entire network. This can be a pro and a con.
* It's completely unrealistic and unbelievable.
* When you advertise with a website that has 'disgraced' in its name, don't put up videos of regular sex with just a ball-gag and a belt here and there.
* Way too many advertisements on the website. On all pages. Makes for slower loading. Again, this is on the entire network.
* They try to lure you onto other websites with links in the navigation menu. Also, on the entire network.
* All videos look a like. They get a girl, immediately have sex with her and tie her up very loosely with a belt or something similar. And give her a ball-gag.
* FLV streaming doesn't work all the time. The older videos just won't play. Tried on many different browsers and even computers.
* The acting is just really bad. They have way too much fun for being 'disgraced'.
* last update was a month ago. They seem to take a one month break once in a while. |
| Bottom Line: |
Disgraced18.com is a website featuring pretty well known porn stars doing something different for a change. The website launched January 29th, 2009.
That being said, it's worth mentioning that they already have a pretty vast collection of videos, meaning that they do update frequently. Though they take the odd month off at times.
When they update, they update well, about 2-3 times a month. Last update now was a month ago.
Currently they have about 53 videos which have been made over the last year and a half.
When it comes down to the videos, they don't offer a lot of variety. There's about a minute or 2 of acting and storyline, which is not worth your time usually.
The following is a standard procedure for all movies. They tie up her hands, very loosely I might add. Then put a ball-gag in her mouth and have sex with her. Sometimes they like to shake it up a little by making her crawl around like a pet or covering her up in messy foods or a placing a suction cup somewhere on the girls body.
While they do this, the girl usually tries her best to look disgraced, naive and innocent. Yet, at the same time, the girls laugh and will gladly do anything they ask of them.
This is not my idea of disgracing a girl.
But if you like your average well known porn stars doing something different, it might be fun to watch a couple of episodes.
As a heads up, you can get a lot of errors streaming the videos. Some just don't work all the time. This is mainly the older videos.
Regarding the idea of the website itself. It's obvious they saw Kink.com come out with PublicDisgrace.com and the huge demand there was for videos of that nature did not go unnoticed throughout the community.
I don't like mentioning other websites in reviews but this was in my opinion pretty darn obvious as this website followed several months later. It's not the first time they tried to copy other websites. And when you decide to copy a website, please, do it well.
Though this website, like any other in the network, is completely flooded with advertisement that also keep reloading the website, the search functions are very well thought out. You can either choose a website, choose a category, choose a model or just search for a term you'd like. Kudos on the search functions for PornPros.
All in all, the website is fun, like the rest of the network. But you get bored watching the same stuff over and over again.
They don't live up to their name either. When it's called Disgraced18, one expects a girl to actually be disgraced. And Kink.com set the bar for doing that. But it's still fun to see some well known porn star doing something a little different.
If you see any other websites in the network you're interested in, I'd say at least 3, a one-month subscription should suffice. But if you're in it for actual disgraced models, you're going to be very disappointed. |
|
05-10-10 07:35am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
205
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Comment
That is indeed good news. More sites should follow it's example.
Thanks for the info! Good to know.
|
06-03-07 11:59am
|
Reply
206
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Wow, thank you for the compliment!
The site is indeed a little off. It's just that it's all the same and after 5 years one would expect a little variety. And it's just not very user friendly even after 5 years.
As for the hair, she went brunette about 4 years ago I think and went back to being a blond about half a year ago. So now she's a blond but not blond like she used to be, platinum. No she's more a "regular blond".
Hope it gave you some insight and it will help you with your decision.
Thanks again for the thumbs up, really appreciate it!
|
05-31-10 10:09am
|
Review
207
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* A website devoted to a very cute girl who has been around for about 5 years now!
* Loads of videos, about 200+
* Videos available in WMV, MOV and "WMVHD-ish"
* Many bonus sites that come with it
* A nice mix of videos with her being either a brunette or blond
* Gives access to the entire network.
* Updates are although not very often, pretty frequent. About 1 every other week on average
* Still the same Dream Kelly, this can be good as well as bad. She just hasn't changed much repertoire-wise.
* All exclusive content
* Talks more in videos, though usually the same stuff over and over again of her wanting you (inside her), it's an improvement.
* No more videos in 2 parts which made for 2 half updates each other week. |
| Cons: |
* A girl with a little identity crisis, blond to brunette to blond...
* She does the same things she did in videos 3 years ago, maybe a bit more close up masturbation.
* No big changes in the site in 3 years. Think navigation, type of videos etc.
* Download speed limit, about 1700-1800 KBps.
* Certainly not download manager friendly, the links expire within 5 minutes.
* No upload dates with the videos or galleries. So I'm not quite sure on the updates anymore.
* The HD videos were 720p videos for about 100 videos. They now recently switched back to 960x540 which is quite strange.
* Still advertises with the cute blond and pink streaked Kelly while she looked like that 4-5 years ago
* Navigation could use a make over, still no search function which is quite annoying with 200+ videos.
* Older videos aren't worth it
* Still no interaction with Kelly.
* Talks more during videos
* Galleries aren't zipped.
* Videos start playing automatically
* No platinum blond hair with pink streaks |
| Bottom Line: |
DreamKelly is a website devoted to the awesome Kelly who has been around for almost 5 years now!
Actually, I wanted to wait doing this review until July because that will be her 5 year anniversary on this website. I've done a review on her site before, some 3 years ago.
Let's see if things have changed a bit since...
Let's start off with the homepage. They still advertise with the hot young Kelly with the platinum blond hair and cute pink streaks. Really? She hasn't looked like in 4 years now! In the meantime she has gone brunette to blond again. Ok, so we know now that's a lie. No biggie but it's something to think of before subscribing.
Let's go inside!
On the homepage you can see which new videos and galleries they have put up. The only thing missing is the dates which they used to messed with a couple of years ago. They had the tendency to change the upload dates so it would seem they had updated quite frequently. They obviously decided to leave new subscribers in the dark now.
The video page isn't all that better. Same old layout which wouldn't have been a problem if the navigation was good. They offer 41 pages with 5 videos each. This makes for 200+ videos.
No search function and 40+ pages with 200+ videos makes for lousy navigation. Oh well, let's watch a video to get an idea of the quality...
The first 50 videos you can just skip as the quality is really bad. Even for 5 years ago. When you hit around page 28-29, you're in HD country. This is where they began with WMVHD, though maybe not all of them are 720, most of them are. They kept this up until about half a year go when they decided to quit making videos in 2 parts. They now make full videos of Kelly still doing the same masturbation routine but more closeup and with her talking more.
When you want to download a movie, you have to open the page for each video. It then starts playing automatically in Windows Media Player.
This is not only annoying but can be hard on your PC as well. If you want to download you have the option of WMV, MOV and "WMVHD". If you intend on using a download manager, be aware that the download links expire within 5 minutes! Also, the speed gets capped off at 1700-1800 Kilobytes per second.
The galleries you ask? Three words: Not worth it. Not zipped, rarely updated, in the last update she's still a brunette.
All in all, the website hasn't changed much. The videos are a bit more close up and more talking which is a plus. Also, no more videos in 2 parts. But other than that there's not really an improvement.
Better yet they got a little worse in some parts. The quality of the videos went down, the update dates are gone, galleries are neglected.
On a personal note, I loved this site. But after 5 years it might be time for a little change. And I really miss that platinum blonde hair with the pink streaks which she still advertises with...
Is it worth the money? Maybe for a month if you haven't seen her before... |
|
05-31-10 04:32am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
208
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
|
08-23-07 01:12pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
209
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Some new videos are in HD widescreen
* DreamKelly has gone more hardcore
* Site has a nice look to it
* Very nice picture galleries |
| Cons: |
* Site does not contain any of the TeenKelly website content.
* DreamKelly's doesn't look as good in all the videos.
* Older videos are very low quality.
* Navigation and ways to download can be improved greatly.
* Site goes down every so often for a minute or two.
* Updates aren't on a regular basis as they promise. |
| Bottom Line: |
DreamKelly.com is one of those sites that most people hoped would finally go a little bit more hardcore. If you were one of those people, you're in luck!
Sure she had some masturbation videos, one or two, but that was it. Now that has changed.
She's doing more masturbation videos with more toys and anal too.
Although DreamKelly looks very hot, in some of the newer videos she doesn't really pay much attention to her looks which is kind of a shame at times.
As for the site itself, the downloading is a hassle. The site goes down every so often.
Downloading all of the galleries is actually not an option. If you want all of the pictures, you have to download them by hand.
But the pictures almost make it worth it.
The new videos are in HD widescreen, sometimes they upload a non-HD video.
Why? I don't know.
You can choose with the HD videos between HD and regular too.
So if you don't want to download the 100 Megabytes HD videos you can always choose to download the smaller videos instead.
All in all, the website has a great look, the girl looks great, the new content looks great. Only the downloading can be a hassle and the gallery navigation could use some work. And the updating could use some more attention.
But... exclusive content from an exclusive girl. |
|
06-02-07 11:16am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
210
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
I also love Elegant Angel but I have to agree that the fact that the older stuff isn't offered on the site is somewhat of a con.
Other than that I always enjoy spending time with Elegant Angel.
|
06-12-12 06:13am
|
Reply
211
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
I agree, good review!
I like how you appreciate yet dislike the fact they went to midcore.
But is the new photographer better or worse in terms of shooting a model?
Thank you for the heads up on the changes!
|
03-09-12 04:36am
|
Reply
212
|
French Pee
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Thank you! It's always nice to know that your info was of use to someone else.
Are you going to join or still thinking it over?
|
06-12-07 10:48am
|
Review
213
|
French Pee
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Multiple video formats for downloading.
* Exclusive content.
* Regular updates.
* A lot of models, some of them are cute.
* Full network access to 22 sites.
* Option to stream the videos instead of download.
* Option to buy your membership by phone.
* Trial membership gets you full access. |
| Cons: |
* Not sure if all the models are French.
* Video quality of older videos is way below par.
* No option to download the videos as a whole, only scenes.
* No photo galleries, just video stills which are very low quality.
* Mostly the same models as the sister sites.
* Videos are all sort of the same. |
| Bottom Line: |
FrenchPee.com is a website that features videos of (supposedly) French girls drinking pee and getting peed on.
The website launched in 2005 and is now a home to more than 100 different exclusive videos. All videos are supposedly featuring French girls getting peed on. I'm not sure if every girl is really French though...
They offer regular updates, every week. The updates include a new video and a gallery of video stills.
The videos can be downloaded only as split scenes, not as a whole. Also the videos are offered in a variety of formats such as: WMV320x240 1200kbps, WMV640x480 2400kbps, MPEG 640x480 2400kbps and QuickTime 640x480 2400kbps. They can also be streamed. The galleries of video stills are very low quality. Also the older videos are very low quality.
Most models featured in the videos are pretty cute compared to the sister sites, although a lot of them appear on those websites too.
The membership can also be bought by phone. I don't know how this works though.
All in all, the website is connected to a network that offers a broad range of niche specialty sites and has a great amount of exclusive footage.
The quality could be better, especially the galleries.
Some exclusive models wouldn't be bad either.
But on a brighter note, the trial membership gives you full access.
The content is all kind of the same but should keep you entertained for a couple of days. Especially if this is your niche. |
|
06-12-07 08:48am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
214
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I agree. Tattoos are a niche in my opinion.
I used to hate them as well, and still do. Unless they fit the person and actually look pretty. Which is very hard to find.
Did find some at SuicideGirls over the years...
|
06-26-12 02:40pm
|
Reply
215
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Glad to hear you are enjoying your subscription after the last comment ;)
|
06-26-12 08:34am
|
Reply
216
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
It's great site but the content gets "bland" quite fast.
And, like many other have said before me, it's often a mistake to join a website for 1 model.
Though, if the content is special enough it might turn out well.
|
05-22-12 05:14am
|
Reply
217
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Review
I fully agree with you on the quality of the websites, though the navigation could use a bit of a make over in my opinion.
As for the fact that the other websites are not included, this really annoyed me at one point.
Also, for some reason I was waiting for something spectacular from this website.
Like a drill-do that just goes berserk and REALLY messes up a girl or whatever. Just something that we have never seen before.
Though that video is still to be made by Kink.com...
Otherwise a fun website for sure. Great review!
|
06-05-12 08:58am
|
Comment
218
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
|
02-28-12 10:12am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
219
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
To be honest, $30 is a bit steep in my opinion as well. But as you state yourself, it's the only site out there.
The content is also pretty good for a site without any competition.
It's the slow updates that make it not worth the $30.
The recurring $17 is good. But then you have to be a member for at least a month. They should just cut the first month by 5-10 bucks.
|
05-31-10 03:20am
|
Comment
220
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
|
05-30-10 08:37am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
221
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
Wow, that's great! Hope you like what they offer and enjoy your stay.
Curious about your thoughts on improving the site as well. Could you let us PU-ers know what your ideas are?
|
05-30-10 08:34am
|
Reply
222
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Thank you, I really appreciate that.
Especially coming from a good reviewer like yourself.
|
05-27-10 12:15pm
|
Review
223
|
Futanaria
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
05-27-10 04:58am (Update History)
Reason: Score wasn't right.
|
| Pros: |
* A website devoted to real girls with gigantic cocks
* A couple of well known actresses (mostly in the older videos)
* Videos available in both WMV and MOV
* A hentai fetish brought to life! Very imaginative!
* A diary is kept to keep you informed about the updates
* Advertisement free website
* A clean and clear looking website, looks cute too. Unless you really hate the color pink.
* All exclusive content. Really a one of a kind website.
* Download manager friendly, no DRM, no download limits.
* Update every 5 days. So 1 video update every 10 days and 1 gallery update every 10 days.
* The stories are funny, the outfits are hot, the girls are cute ...and hung. |
| Cons: |
* They have been using some "cheaper" girls in some of the last videos. Also no more well known stars for a while now. Very minor con.
* Not a whole lot of different video formats. Could benefit from more options and HD.
* No upload date with any of the videos or galleries
* The "cum" they use is a bit too fake but again, this is only a very minor con.
* Not enough swallowing in the videos
* Updates have slowed to once every 5 days. One new video every 10 days.
* Galleries still aren't zipped for easy download.
* Navigation could be easier. Just the homepage is sort of weird at first. When you find the video page, all is well.
* Could use a search function and a forum.
* They seem to be slowly losing the finesse they had in the beginning.
* There's at least a month between the gallery, which is first put up and the video which goes with the aforementioned gallery (or vice versa). |
| Bottom Line: |
Futanaria.com is a website which brings a hentai fetish of "dickgirls" to life! The website started in May, 2009.
If transsexuals/she-males, dickgirls, hentai, fake dicks/breasts or massive loads of sperm isn't your thing, please steer clear of this site. As it's filled with hot girls bringing a very special hentai niche to life!
When you first enter the site, the navigation seems a bit confusing but you get used to it quickly. On the left you'll see 2 small previews of videos and galleries acting as links to the sub-pages for videos and bios.
You might want to check the bio page first as it gives you an idea of every girl available and makes it a more personal experience. The only thing missing is links to the girls' videos. After that, head on down to the video-page.
Once you have reached the videos, you will see a big list of about 20 videos. All with a little screenshot and 2 links next to it for .wmv and .mov files. Nothing fancy but it does the job.
Yet, it does lack the somewhat required HD format almost every site offers these days.
On the top and bottom of the list is a small link to "More Videos". This goes on for about 3 pages. So yes, if you did your math correctly the site currently offers about 60 videos.
Not really bad for a site that's been around for a year now. Too bad the video updates slowed down to 1 every 10 days. Same goes for the galleries.
The videos feature girls wearing cute outfits with gigantic fake cocks spewing gallons of fake sperm. On a rare occasion they even have gigantic fake breasts with humongous nipples spewing fake breast milk.
No real cocks or men anywhere, luckily! Just wanted to mention this before they decide to hire a guy for once. This would totally ruin the experience. Anyway, the girls have sex with each other or play with themselves and get drenched in sperm.
The only thing missing is the girls swallowing. They have gallons of fake cum and only a drop is swallowed. And even this is a rare occasion.
When you are done downloading, head on to the galleries.
What? You can't find it? You're not the first! Head back to the main page, scroll down to the bottom of the main page and click on the small link in the bottom right corner called "See More Scenes". There ya go!
They could certainly benefit from a little user input through a forum to avoid these issues. Also, a search function would be nice.
A diary is also kept, which is partly featured on the main page. Each entry contains a link to either a video or gallery update. Not sure, who writes the diary though...
All in all, the website is a lot of fun but doesn't offer a lot of content. The navigation is the site's biggest issue.
Luckily it's only $ 17 a month. Though you'd probably be better off signing up every once in a while to catch the updates as there are only 3 new videos each month. It's download manager friendly and doesn't have a download limit.
The stories are funny, the outfits are hot, the girls are cute ...and hung. |
|
05-27-10 04:42am
Replies (4)
|
Review
224
|
Gag Fuck
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Regular updates, every week.
* Many different video formats.
* Pretty fast growing site.
* More hot girls than the sister sites.
* Some averagely known amateur porn actresses.
* Attached to a 22-site network.
* All exclusive content.
* Real gag-sex.
* Option to stream and download the videos.
* Option to pay by phone. |
| Cons: |
* No option to download a full video, only split scenes.
* Still a pretty small site.
* Same girls as on the other sites, just a better pick.
* Very expensive for the content that they offer. Luckily they're tied to a network.
* Not every video features as much gagging as the next.
* Videos are all very similar to one another.
* No photo-galleries but they do offer video stills which are pretty low quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
GagFuck.com is a website that features videos of girls gagging on penises. They get fucked in the throat so to speak. All the content is exclusive.
The website launched somewhere late 2006. The first couple of months the updates were rare. But the last couple of months they have been updating regularly every week.
The videos they offer can be downloaded in WMV320x240 1200kbps, WMV640x480 2400kbps, MPEG 640x480 2400kbps and QuickTime 640x480 2400kbps, which is fair.
The videos are only to be downloaded in split scenes. There's no option to download the movies as a whole. But you do get the option to stream the split scenes.
Galleries leave some things to be desired. They only offer video stills, no real photographs. And they're very low quality too.
Not all the videos offer as much gagging-action as the other. But other than that, the videos are pretty much all the same.
The network the website is tied to offers a broad range of niches. This makes up for the content a bit but it's still pricey.
You can buy your membership through phone too.
All in all, the website's still a bit pricey even if it's tied to a 22-site network.
They do offer a fun niche-site with exclusive content.
But the videos are very similar to one another and get boring after a while. But the broad range of niches the network offers makes up for it.
This website alone is no reason to get a subscription, yet. Maybe in a while when they get more content. |
|
06-11-07 04:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
225
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
raystar's Comment
Same here, keeps me coming back time after time.
I do come back every 4 or 5 months or so.
And it's true that the videos are repetitive, but it doesn't matter me in the case.
|
06-04-07 03:49pm
|
|
