| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
601
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Thorough review, this seems to be a popular site I'm always seeing it reviewed.
|
02-18-13 06:35pm
|
Reply
602
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Excellent review as ever - bit disappointed that Kink are being a little unfair with the whole not updating thing - I expect better from them.
|
04-03-12 02:53am
|
Reply
603
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Brilliant detailed review as ever. Sounds like the sort of site I would like if I were straight - a bit of everything around a general theme rather than specialising too much on heavy BDSM. Sounds like it has a bit of humour to it and is naughty rather than full-on overwhelming.
|
10-07-11 11:57am
|
Reply
604
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
Excellent review - this site seems deservedly popular. I agree with you about Kink.com - I wish they had more flexibility in moving between sites within your membership.
|
03-27-12 03:24pm
|
Reply
605
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Yeah even I've had a look at this site as I love public nudity and I agree about peoples reaction to it being really hot! Excellent, well-written review as always which gives a real sense of why you like the site.
|
03-16-12 03:52pm
|
Reply
606
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
Yes I agree - I don't like to see ordinary passers-by reactions, it's not fair to them and certainly not sexy. If you're doing exhibitionism, then the exhibitionists should be surrounded by voyeurs who want to be there and find it sexy.
|
10-08-11 01:59pm
|
Reply
607
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Was curious to read a review of yours, and the 99 rating and the site attracted me. You do a good job of justifying the high score in a well-written review. I love humiliation in BDSM and I have looked at this site in the past as I've joined the gay versions of kink.com sites.
Even I found the previews hot so they must be doing something right! The gay version, Bound in Public, is hot but somehow just a little too polished and not quite as daring or sleazy feeling - I guess to be fair they're all filmed in the US and the gay element makes it even riskier.
Great review of a great site.
|
08-01-11 02:14pm
|
Reply
608
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Hey there - there are several sites but the only one which seems true to the CFNM theme, and which I've joined, is CFNM.net
I've reviewed it and you can check out my review - most of the stories now have video and it's definitely worth joining for a month, though it's pricey and do check out my review for the flaws.
Remember I enjoyed it from a gay male perspective, focused on the guys, and I'm into humiliation of the men - this site has mostly humiliation content though a lot of it is pretty mild and a few scenes aren't so much about that.
No actual sex in any of the scenes though.
|
09-29-12 07:47am
|
Comment
609
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
|
09-28-12 05:53pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
610
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Hmmm thanks for such a detailed review, I've been looking at this site for a while but the high price put me off. It sounds a decent site, but seems less a "pure" CFNM site - to me if the women are removing their clothes and having full sex, you lose the "clothed" element, though I appreciate this doesn't happen in every scene.
|
09-22-11 11:18pm
|
Reply
611
|
Pure Mature
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment
This is an excellent comment but it could easily have been a full review, which would have been better for you and the site. Why not contact them and see if you can resubmit this, with a few tweaks, as a full review?
Welcome to the site.
|
10-16-12 05:35am
|
Reply
612
|
Purzel Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
jeppegutt's Comment
HATE streaming-only more than anything else!
Why pay for that when for the same money other sites let you keep the stuff?
Streaming-only sites are like a store that charges you the same to rent a DVD as to buy it!
|
07-23-13 09:09am
|
Reply
613
|
R18.com
(0)
|
Reply of
wannabe's Review
Totally unacceptable - they should be honest and just be a streaming site.
I last knew one site that still did this and even they got with the program and dumped the policy a few years ago.
|
04-01-18 11:14am
|
Comment
614
|
Rate These Guys
(0)
|
|
10-07-11 07:44pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
615
|
Rate These Guys
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Reply
Cheers mate - maybe you could private message me with your username on the site so I can see your comments - do you have a favourite model on there? Submitted any challenges?
|
08-29-11 10:32am
|
Review
616
|
Rate These Guys
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Totally fresh and I believe unique concept - a rare achievement in such a crowded marketplace
+ Genuinely amateur feel
+ Most models are believably natural, ordinary guys
+ Genuine user interaction between both models and webmaster, who both listen to comments
+ Inventive scenarios suggested by other members
+ No DRM
+ Clean, uncluttered site design is simple to navigate
+ Choice of download sizes plus fast, responsive streaming
+ Updates regularly, usually every other day |
| Cons: |
- Average to high price $29.95 a month - no reduction for 2nd month and no long-term deals.
- Limited selection of photos which are just screen caps
- Video length can be very short - as little as 2 minutes - though this does go with theme of site
- Not all content is porn - introduction videos are fully clothed, but again goes with unique theme of site
- Limited search options
- Still on the small side (but growing fast)
- Not all models interact
- Updates may be resubmitted "improved" videos or non-porn introductions (but more frequent than most sites) |
| Bottom Line: |
Rate These Guys have achieved the impossible - a genuinely new, fresh genre of porn which I think may actually be unique, at least in gay porn.
The basic concept is that guys submit a minimum number of home videos which must include certain themes ("genres" according to this site - very posh!). These are then displayed on the site for users to rate. Once a week, a certain genre of video is selected. The guy who gets the highest average vote in that genre wins a cash prize.
Users can also submit "challenges" of what they would like the guys to do - guys who attempt them get an automatic cash payment, and an extra cash prize if they win in that category.
I know that this may seem very "staged" and unreal, like many so-called "gay for pay" sites, where the "straight" actors look about as straight as Harvey Fierstein in drag, but to be honest it's either done so well that I can suspend disbelief, or it's at least 90% the real deal. I've only seen one of the models on another site, and that was also a amateur, "gay for pay" site. I'd say the majority are genuinely just ordinary guys looking to make some cash.
The best part of the site is the interaction. As a member you can comment on every video as well as rate it. Guys can and do re-submit improved videos based on your suggestions. One of my suggestions has already been set as a challenge, and all models can see what you've commented on their videos and reply, though not all do.
The flash streaming, at a decent 700x390 size, is smooth and quick with no buffering and slowness. Downloads are WMV and you can choose from 640x360 or 960x540 - they're DRM-free and quite short, so quick to download. Photos have only been added recently and are just screencaps, but are a good size of downloadable JPEGs. Quality is amateur - the lighting and camera angles can be a bit off - but watchable and in keeping with the theme.
The guys are mainly British and white but there's a couple of South American and non-white British guys and new guys are added all the time. All are under 30 but there's a good range of body types and looks.
Overall the site isn't perfect, but it's new and still growing, and the webmaster seems genuinely keen to listen and make a unique concept work, and it's improving all the time. As the site grows, I can see this becoming my first 90-plus site. For now despite the flaws, the sheer sexiness and uniqueness of the site - it's the first site I've intentionally stayed a member of for more than the first month - means it gets a richly deserved 89 - my highest rating so far. |
|
08-28-11 11:40pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
617
|
Rate These Guys
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Reply
Hey no probs - I am kind of a novice with DRM so thought maybe it did have it and I just hadn't noticed!
I am hoping to do a review of the site today.
|
08-28-11 10:52pm
|
Reply
618
|
Rate These Guys
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
I've joined this site some time ago and have deliberately delayed my review to see how it developed... enjoyed your review as always but was surprised to see you said it used DRM - the only other reivew site I've found that reviews it (Gay Demon) says it doesn't and I can't see any evidence of it myself as I've used the site - but as I am a current member I'm not sure. What makes you think it uses DRM?
Be good if you updated this review or did a comment if you're still a member to see how it's developed in your opinion - my review should go live very soon.
|
08-28-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
619
|
Real Life Cam
(0)
|
Reply of
theviv's Review
Thsnks for the update on your review, glad they got back to you about the camera issue and thanks for your replies explaining about the site - I hadn't thought about them being naked in shower etc.
Welcome to my Trust List!
|
11-23-12 12:05am
|
Reply
620
|
Real Life Cam
(0)
|
Reply of
theviv's Review
Interesting review but I have to agree with the other user - if they never have sex then this effectively is not a porn site!
|
11-17-12 04:36pm
|
Reply
621
|
Reality Junkies
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Superb quality review as ever. I do wish sites which are part of a network would at least give a small token discount when you join more than one site - just as a thank-you for being one of their better customers!
|
04-30-12 11:48pm
|
Reply
622
|
Red Light Sex Trips
(0)
|
Reply of
Thomas20's Review
Superb first review - welcome to the site, hope you stick around!
|
09-27-12 04:38pm
|
Reply
623
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for that, hope you didn't mind me pointing it out, just didn't want your review to be spoiled by a little mistake it's all too easy to make!
Curious though - what's an IR performer?
|
08-26-11 08:01am
|
Reply
624
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
A good warning review, but you seem to have missed a chunk out - one of your sentences ends mid-sentence - "with multiple partners at the...."
Sounds an awful site of a good model which is always a pity - and pop-up hell is ALWAYS a bad sign.
Thanks for warning people off the site, this is what PU is really useful for.
|
08-25-11 11:53pm
|
Reply
625
|
Regan Reese
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Very thorough comment which would have made an equally good review!
|
09-05-11 06:21pm
|
