| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
601
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definitely not enough options to choose from :)
I'd go for anything full-back; ideally lacy and sophisticated. Granny panties work if they are sheer... although actually, anything works if it's sheer. I don't mind cotton either; even a pair of white cotton briefs are sexy if a hand is slipped under them. My favourite is probably the boyshort - either plain cotton or fancier in lace; I think the hip-hugging shape is very flattering.
But I'm with messmer on the thong. I can perhaps understand (although still not share) the appeal in real life, eg girls on the beach etc; getting to see parts that you wouldn't see otherwise. But a thong basically isn't there; so in porn, I don't see the point - might as well start naked anyway.
|
06-30-11 01:02am
|
Reply
602
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Toned and muscular up to a point works for me - like Toadsith, I don't even mind a 6-pack, as long as a girl still has boobs and curves. Actual hardcore bodybuilders, though, with big veiny muscles, isn't appealing at all. Unlike turboshaft, it doesn't bother me that a girl could kick my ass; it's arguably even a turn-on, although not so much that I'd call myself submissive...
|
06-28-11 11:21pm
|
Comment
603
|
Sausage Party
(0)
|
|
06-26-11 12:34am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
604
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I make the same assumption as tangub, ie that it refers to public wifi as opposed to at home - I guess most folk would be using a wireless connection at home.
Either way, the answer for me is no; I'm not brazen enough to look at smut in public :) And at home, wifi never works well for me - too many neighbouring networks, I guess - so the half dozen computers, consoles etc I have are all wired.
|
06-25-11 06:31am
|
Reply
605
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends on the definition; to me, search means able to type in something, or perhaps list based on multiple criteria.
As others have said, the model index is the most useful. But I do like some facility to browse by some other criteria; eg photographer, setting (indoor/outdoor), body type etc. I find that going through the site again from a different angle often reveals stuff I wouldn't have found just from the model list.
But I haven't really joined any sites that are so big to make anything other than a model index strictly necessary.
|
06-23-11 11:45pm
|
Reply
606
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
mashy's Reply
Hmm... considering that 720p HD video is perhaps 3gb/hour, this site's limit allows downloading 12 hours of video a day, so approx 1TB over a month. If there's that much content that one person actually wants... definitely VFM that can't be argued with.
But mashy, you are right - no matter how profitable certain customers may or may not be, if their activity is within the allowed limits, then it's unprofessional to complain - a customer is a customer, and hopefully valued as such!
|
06-22-11 03:48pm
|
Reply
607
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I have to agree with pat362... whereas it's annoying when sites limit you to eg 2gb per day - stopping you even downloading just a few scenes in one go - bandwidth does cost the sites and 41GB is pretty generous.
Unless you were trying to download an entire site with eg a 3-day trial membership - which, to be fair, isn't really in the spirit of things - I can't imagine that being much of a restriction.
And if you can download >1TB of content for around $30, there's really not much of anything - porn or otherwise - that can compare in value :)
|
06-22-11 01:39am
|
Reply
608
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Agree with Capn - a win is appreciated, and perhaps raffle tickets are an extra motivation to get involved more; but certainly not the main reason. I'm not checking at raffle time; but when I have won (twice so far!) it's been a pleasant surprise via email.
|
06-21-11 09:46pm
|
Reply
609
|
Torrid Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Looking at the previews, I can see why you like this - looks to be lots of full strips, which lately I find very appealing. And whereas I'm not averse to girl-girl content, it's good to see they are sticking to their niche. One to add quite high up my list; maybe before a revisit to Breath Takers.
|
06-20-11 02:57pm
|
Reply
610
|
STR8 Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
Whereas I'm straight, and so only go for straight (assume girl-girl counts ;)) and mainly softcore porn, I've felt that gay porn fans are underrepresented here, so it's genuinely interesting to read a balanced take on sites that most of us wouldn't look at.
Anyway, I had no idea that there was a genre of solo straight-guys-for-gay-audiences... learn something new every day! Keep up the good work... oh, and great name :)
|
06-20-11 02:47pm
|
Reply
611
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Possibly from time to time; but more out of obscure fascination than specifically titillation; and probably moreso in my youth, which brings back a memory from the days of downloading from Usenet.
For the uninitiated, this involved having to scan the subject lines for something interesting; then waiting ages to download an image in multiple parts and join them... before finally being able to see what depravity the nascent internet had served up.
Anyway, in this case, a friend and I spied the subject 'Woman pissing into other woman's ass via bag'. That's exactly what we got.
|
06-20-11 01:43am
|
Reply
612
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, arguably, most of us could choose 'pull on it regularly'; but as Drooler alluded to, that's really only for temporary enlargement, not permanent.
Anyway, despite being probably fairly average in that department, I've never felt a need/desire for anything to be larger.
|
06-17-11 05:46am
|
Comment
613
|
Erotic Wifes
(0)
|
|
06-17-11 04:50am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
614
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Email for me. On a couple of occasions I've not received a a reply, but only when it wasn't that important... as such, didn't chase it up, and just made a mental note about unresponsiveness.
If I had a billing query that I really couldn't resolve, I guess I'd phone... and probably be quite sheepish about it!
|
06-17-11 12:49am
|
Reply
615
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I don't mind the odd cut or fade, but unrealistic oohs and aahs, and music are definitely a turn-off. I've seen just a couple of sites with acceptable BGM; but mostly it's shockingly corny stuff and makes the whole scene farcical rather than arousing...
|
06-13-11 05:14am
|
Reply
616
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never appealed to me... I guess I'm content with perusing smut in the comfort and safety zone of my own home. If I'm not here, then I've generally got more pressing things to do than watch porn!
|
06-11-11 03:34pm
|
Reply
617
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've been singularly unimpressed by 3D films I've seen at the cinema, so I can imagine porn would be even more of a letdown, possibly literally...
|
06-09-11 12:57pm
|
Comment
618
|
JuicyBunny
(0)
|
|
06-07-11 04:31am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
619
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Agree with Tangub, I find them boring - one site I really like has a few sets and the yoga ones are some of the very few that I skip over there.
Although perhaps it's not specifically the yoga thing, since the I find the superset of totally-nude-from-start-to-finish art-nude sets rather dull. There's little excitement without the anticipation of seeing what you haven't yet!
I suppose with the right frame of mind, the yoga can inspire thoughts of what acrobatic feats the models may be capable of? But it's a bit too much of a, er, stretch for me.
|
06-05-11 02:15am
|
Reply
620
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Tangub, re the lack of zips, and saving your pics as... have you not tried a download manager? DownThemAll for Firefox is free, and effortlessly downloads a whole page full of images.
Otherwise, thanks - as ever - for the review :)
|
06-04-11 04:40pm
|
Reply
621
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As others have said, design and navigation are quite linked, so a bad design often = difficult to navigate = less likely to join.
But on it's own, an ugly site is a turn-off, I'd really have to know what the material is like to get past it.
Good designs have the opposite effect - eg I will visit FigureBaby again sometime, partly because the layout and navigation of it is so exemplary.
|
06-04-11 12:54am
|
Reply
622
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
WWW, great review, thanks - as a panty and nylon enthusiast, this group of sites has been on my list for a while, and has now been bumped up a few places. I also share your disdain for insipid music, so it's good to see a site that avoids it; my main disagreement is that I love anything sheer :)
|
06-04-11 12:37am
|
Reply
623
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only site subscriptions; and some racy books and magazines. However, if I was going to buy any adult goods... online is definitely where I would do it!
|
06-03-11 12:04am
|
Reply
624
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Just you wait until you get your statement and it says 'Wank it later'.
|
05-30-11 12:50pm
|
Reply
625
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Perhaps I'm underestimating the dexterity of ladies' feet - but, never having been the recipient of a foot job, I am concerned with the amount of leverage present at the end of a long pair of legs, and the potential for painful mishaps...
|
05-30-11 12:47pm
|
