| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
Donovan's Darlings
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Hmmmm.....seems like they only drip feed you their content if you have a membership here. Under "What do I get if I join?" they say "45655 pin sharp pictures on rotation" and "6892 images online right now" It seems they also have a token purchase system which I presume is to encourage you to buy individual picture sets that are not currently online. I'm afraid this kind of set up would never persuade me to part with my money. If I want this kind of content I think I would go with your recommendation for Pin Up Wow in your reply to the Martha's Girls comment.
|
10-28-12 04:27am
|
Reply
527
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
This is one of those sites I have never joined but frequently check out the tour thinking I'd quite like to join but mainly due to the regional pricing have never gone through with it. Last time I checked it out I was seeing £19.90 GBP (around $30 USD) but today I am seeing $19.90 USD the same as you through Netbilling so perhaps they have seen sense and finally dropped the regional pricing through their primary biller. The CCBill option however is a little more expensive this end at £14.90 GBP (around $24 USD). I would quite like to sign up at the $19.90 option but have never used Netbilling before and feel a little apprehensive about using them.
|
10-25-12 05:48am
|
Reply
528
|
Gravure.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes I agree it is unusual to find a Japanese site that is user friendly towards English speaking users. I found some great cosplay content featuring Japanese models in newsgroups a while back but when I tried visiting the actual site the content was from I couldn't make heads or tails of it.
|
10-15-12 02:15pm
|
Comment
529
|
Gravure.com
(0)
|
|
10-15-12 04:04am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
530
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I would suggest the opportunities for those of us in middle age or getting on a bit to mount a hot partner and discover the answer are fairly limited. So according to the choice of answers anything over 10 minutes is "indefinately" in which case that is my answer. I don't have any problem holding on to it and it doesn't really come uninvited these days unlike in my younger years. I'm basing my answer on my hot partner being my wife given that she's 20 years my junior :)
|
10-14-12 01:32am
|
Reply
531
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
It seems like she's paranoid about having her content stolen...I wonder what's the betting there's no downloads available like in her old site.
I also found this in the news...."This is the only place you will be able to see over 50,000 pics of me that I have been adding each week for the past 3years, as well as over 60hrs of video".....but when i check the tour I only see 18 updates listed. Will look forward to your review if you take the plunge.
|
10-14-12 01:17am
|
Comment
532
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
|
10-12-12 12:18pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
533
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Sometimes I do.
|
10-11-12 02:44am
|
Reply
534
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I still join the same number of sites but I do pay a lot more attention to the price and take advantage of special offers when ever possible so I guess it has affected me a little. Spending $30 on a site these days is a rare occurence for me.
|
10-09-12 11:24pm
|
Reply
535
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
I do think the tours are misleading on these sites in that they don't make it clear that what you see in the tour is the network updates and requires a $99 minimum spend to see it all. The figures they quote for the number of models, images, scenes etc are for the entire network and not a single site subscription.
|
10-09-12 11:19pm
|
Reply
536
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can't speak from experience as I've never taken a $1 or free trial but my perception of them is that they fall somewhere between not worth the effort and a scam. Doing my research on sites at PU/TBP coupled with a decent site tour usually means I know what sites I like before joining so I don't ever worry about needing a trial. There have been occasions when I've paid something like $5 for 3 days full access to a site and downloaded everything i've wanted in that time but sites that let you do that these days are few and far between and i've only done that 2 or 3 times in 10 years of joining paysites.
|
10-07-12 12:48am
|
Reply
537
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
I guess she's not bothered about making any money from the new site since the "join now" button leads to a 404 page.
|
10-05-12 11:16am
|
Reply
538
|
St. Mackenzie's
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Well it depends on your definition of full nudity which in your case I think is everything being removed then it's probably very low, maybe less than 5%. The shoes, socks or stockings very often don't get removed, some models keep their panties on.
|
10-05-12 02:17am
|
Reply
539
|
St. Mackenzie's
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks CT, yes very softcore. I can only recall maybe 5 or 6 models having open leg shots.
|
10-05-12 02:12am
|
Reply
540
|
St. Mackenzie's
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Oh yes Michael White, that's the guy, I'd forgotten his name. I remember viewing his work at Met Art and thinking "Breath Takers" His work seems to be quite easily identifiable from the location and style, nearly always shot inside that same house. The schoolgirl theme does get a bit repetitive although 27 of the models are teachers and don't wear the uniform I think its safe to assume around two thirds of the sets contain girls in those uniforms.
I was a little baffled when I saw Take 5 Girls in the new site listings at TBP the other day. What happened there, did they close down then relaunch again? I will probably get around to joining that and Girlfolio one day as I do like this guy's work. I'm also quite smitten with one of the models he shoots, Hayley Marie, and wondering if he does the shoots on her solo site Hayley's Secrets. A $10 promo would certainly help rush those sites to the top of my list (hint, hint).
|
10-05-12 02:10am
|
Reply
541
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Micha's Review
Thanks for the review and warnings about this site. I was planning to take advantage of the $10 offer myself also but since I wouldn't trust Manwin with my credit card number I just haven't gotten around to going out and loading some cash onto my prepaid card yet. It sounds like Manwin are trying their best to fuck up this once great and formerly one of my favorite sites.
|
10-04-12 02:57am
|
Review
542
|
St. Mackenzie's
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
82 Gorgeous models
100% Exclusive content
Updates with a new photo set or video every other day
High resolution 2300 x 3500 photos
Zip downloads for all photo sets
Videos available in a choice of HD and Low resolution wmv
All content date stamped
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing |
| Cons: |
Very softcore, mostly topless and some mild nudity
These hi res photos don’t look as sharp as you would expect when blown up to full size, too many look out of focus, blurred or grainy as previous reviewers have mentioned with little sign of any improvement in recent updates.
Every zip download has the file name “photo_zip” so you need to rename everything yourself.
File names of the videos are just a date so will also need renaming if you want to know who is in the video when you come to view it.
No file sizes given.
Around half the videos don’t have download options.
The older videos without the HD option look grainy on full screen.
Only one photo size, no small or medium options.
Primitive site design and navigation
No search tools. |
| Bottom Line: |
I received a $9.95 email promo offer to this site and after checking out the tour and spotting some of my favourite Only Tease models here like Hayley Marie and Lucy Anne I couldn’t resist signing up for a month to check it out at that price. St Mackenzie’s describes themselves as the most unruly institute of learning in England where it’s sexy students and equally sexy teachers get up to all sorts of mischievous antics. Only problem is they never really get as naughty as you might have expected or hoped for. This is only really a very softcore teasing site about the same strength as Only Tease where you will see the girls posing in their sexy uniforms, stockings and lingerie before stripping and posing topless or nude. A small minority of the models have some open leg shots but most will only give you the occasional glimpse of pussy. There’s no masturbation or toy play and even though there are lots of sets and videos featuring two, three or more girls there’s no real sexual contact between the models other than removing clothes and occasional touching.
St Mackenzie’s has been online since January 2009 and with consistent updates has grown into a reasonable sized collection already. A new update is added every other day and a typical month’s updates consist of 9 new photo sets and 6 new videos. As of today the site has a total of 382 photo sets (35,304 images) and 222 videos. A word of warning: only 107 of the videos come with download options, the rest can only be viewed online.
The navigation is fairly basic with not many options. You can browse “updates” which lists all the content by year and month starting with the most recent or via the model index which is split in to two parts, “pupils” and “teachers”. The only problem with browsing via the “updates” section is that the videos there have no download links. Going into the pupils and teachers listings on each model’s page you will find her 5 most recent updates listed with a scene description and links to download the picture zip and video download options. Videos and picture sets beyond the 5 most recent are listed below under “more updates”. Click on the picture sets here and they will open in a new window with the zip download link. Click on the videos here and Windows Media Player will open and after a few seconds buffering will stream the video online. They don’t provide any download links for videos beyond those that appear within any model’s 5 most recent updates. You can pretty much see the site layout for yourself prior to joining as the tour has the same site layout as the member’s area with the exception of the download links.
The videos that can be downloaded usually have two options, a HD 1280 x 720 wmv @ 8000 kbps and low res 640 x 480 wmv @ 900+ kbps. A few of the older videos only have the low res option. The videos are usually around 5 minutes long and usually consist of the model’s posing and teasing in their uniforms with some upskirt views and panty flashing before removing their clothes. It’s another one of those sites with mostly silent movies, there’s no background music and the model’s seldom talk, at least not in any of the one’s I’ve watched so far.
As for the photos which is my preferred niche, they look fine when viewing them downsized to monitor size in a slide show but when opening them up and viewing them in their full size resolution you can certainly see some flaws as I mentioned in the cons above. I get the impression this is the work of the same photographer from Breath Takers. The photo shoots are pretty much all taken inside the same house recognisable from Breath Takers and the style of photography is pretty much the same where in most of the shoots the models are stood in front of or close to a window making use of the natural light as it penetrates the window.
Overall I did enjoy the collection of gorgeous British models and their sexy outfits in spite of the site’s flaws and it was certainly helped by the fact I only paid $10 to join so the site just about scrapes a probably over generous 80 from me. It’s an ok site if you have a fetish for girls teasing in uniforms, mini-skirts, stockings, tights with plenty of upskirts and panty flashing but if you require explicit nudity or sexual action then probably best to avoid this site. |
|
10-04-12 01:53am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
543
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
At this minute I have about 40GB of free space on my PC which is about 25% of total but as I write this I'm waiting for the courier to deliver my new pc with an empty 1TB hd so tomorrow I would have a different answer. Most of my porn downloading goes straight on to external drives anyway. I still have almost 2TB of a 3TB drive free so that will keep me going for some time yet.
|
10-03-12 02:34am
|
Reply
544
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Would only usually consider on the larger sites with multiple daily updates such as MET and ATK and even then only if there's a decent discount compared to the monthly price.
|
10-02-12 12:08pm
|
Reply
545
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I really don't mind either because I just let my browser remember the password so I only usually have to type them the first time I enter the member's area.
|
09-25-12 07:09am
|
Reply
546
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I actually don't mind it now and then if it's just a single lone female involved...ALS Scan/Angels springs to mind....but I wouldn't go out of my way to join a site dedicated to the subject.
|
09-23-12 02:19am
|
Reply
547
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Lol....glad you're enjoying it.....kind of.
|
09-22-12 05:10am
|
Reply
548
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No interest to me. I like my porn females only.
|
09-21-12 08:35am
|
Reply
549
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I don't watch it on tv, quite happy with my pc monitor.
|
09-21-12 08:34am
|
Comment
550
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
|
09-21-12 08:31am
Replies (4)
|
