| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I was just about to reply and suggest you clear your cache/cookies as the webmaster suggested but I see you already figured it out now. Enjoy :-)
|
11-22-12 08:28am
|
Comment
502
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
11-22-12 12:59am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
503
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Ditto Rusty, whenever I have nothing else to do.
|
11-18-12 03:48am
|
Reply
504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Tried watching some massage scenes at Little Mutt a few years back and found it totally boring.
|
11-16-12 11:21am
|
Comment
505
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
11-14-12 05:02am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
506
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm definitely a "fully dressed" kind of guy, preferrably with lots of teasing before slowly removing the clothes.
|
11-14-12 02:54am
|
Reply
507
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
My initial attempts at trying to cross reference her at some model index sites came up with a blank so I was quite willing to go along with the fantasy that she's a nice wholesome 18 year old Texan girl. Only thing was when going through the photo sets particularly the outdoor settings something was telling me "this is not USA". I just got the feeling that the locations were some of the same ones used by the photographer Leocont at Met-Art so I dug out some of his photo sets just to see and of course one of the sets I opened was Venus A and after seeing those distictive tan lines and the mole on the left tit that's when I made the connection.
Anyway Met give her current age as 25 so I guess that would put her at around 18 when the Debbie Teen content was shot and as the site is not updating she will always be 18 there so I guess some truth in the advertising afterall.
|
11-14-12 01:50am
|
Reply
508
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Oddly enough once inside the member's area it does have the appearance of a single site with all the models listed on one page and no further logging in required to access each model's content.
|
11-13-12 03:13pm
|
Review
509
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of a network of 13 solo model sites that includes Molly’s Bedroom, Lana’s Fantasies, Busty Alli plus more.
Decent sized solo site with 183 photo sets (20,000+ images) and 71 videos.
Most photo sets sized at around 1033x1550px
Zip downloads for photos
Good mix of indoor and outdoor shoot locations
Videos can be downloaded or streamed online.
Bonus sites accessible from single network page with no further login required. |
| Cons: |
Video quality is mediocre
Mostly softcore solo nude posing which may be a con for some
Content can become a bit repetitive.
She fakes masturbation
Site not updating
Only 1 site in the network is updating with actual new content
Most of the content is probably 5-7 years old despite the site showing posting dates as between 2009-2012
No model info or bio.
No model interaction |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the solo site of Debbie Teen a cute blonde with a fit, tanned body and quite distinctive tan lines around her boobs and ass. The site gives you very little info about who she is other than a brief introduction in the tour which says she is 18, was born in Texas and is studying English Literature at college. After doing a little digging around I discovered she’s actually Ukrainian and has appeared at a few other sites looking totally different with black hair under the aliases of Venus A at Met-Art, Venus at Nubiles and Kerri at Femjoy.
The content here is mostly solo with some explicit nude posing and some implied masturbation. There are also a handful of two girl sets where she poses with her friend Lizzie who is a rather cute small breasted blonde but they never really get up to anything other than playing around and posing together. Considering the age of the content the photos looked surprisingly good and for the most part are fairly well shot. Given the large number of photo sets I did feel however that the set ups and outfits did become a little repetitive. In so many shoots she starts out wearing cotton panties, a thong or shorts with a cotton sleeveless top or t shirt. Sometimes you see several shoots in the same location and the only difference between one shoot and the next is the panties or top are a different colour.
The downloadable videos are 640x480 mp4s with a bit rate of around 1900kbps. They are mostly quite short at between 2 to 4 minutes and usually consist of a strip and posing naked. Sometimes she pretends to masturbate putting her hand down to her pussy but in reality she is barely touching herself but gives off a few fake moans. In a few other videos she gets out a vibrator and makes out as if she is masturbating with it. She just holds the vibrator down close to her pussy and moves it around a bit without actually inserting it while letting off some more fake moans. Quite honestly I’ve not seen anything as unconvincing and fake as this before so thankfully being a picture lover I don’t get too concerned about a model’s lack of acting ability as long as she looks pretty in a photo.
There’s none of the extras you might look for in a solo site such as a diary, blog, cam shows or even a basic “about me” section so you can get to know the model; it’s basically just an archived collection of pictures and videos. The network overall provides nearly 1300 photo sets and 560 videos which if you’ve not been here before should be more than enough to make a month’s subscription worthwhile but if you’ve been here within the last few years you would probably find little actual new content. |
|
11-13-12 11:52am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
510
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Several times when I first started joining paysites back in 2003 before it crossed my mind that there might actually be porn review sites out there. In those days I mostly subscribed to sites whose content I'd seen posted on picture posting forums so still had a fair idea of what I was buying and didn't take too many chances.
|
11-13-12 11:30am
|
Reply
511
|
Lay The Kat
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
A very thourough review lk2, no stone left unturned as usual.
|
11-13-12 11:21am
|
Reply
512
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Review
A good review but that's quite a big difference between your score and that of the previous reviewers. I admit it's sometimes difficult to decide on a score for solo model sites because by their very nature they usually don't have a lot of content compared to some of the mega sites and networks out there. As rearadmiral said when I review a solo site that I either got as a free bonus site or as part of a larger network I also usually factor in the bonus content which prevents me giving it too low a score.
|
11-13-12 11:15am
|
Review
513
|
Molly's Bedroom
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of a network of 13 solo model sites including the likes of Lana’s Fantasies, Fun With Amber, Busty Alli plus more.
No separate login required for bonus sites.
Currently updating with a new photo set and video each week
Latest photo sets are high resolution at typically 2000x3000px
Zip downloads for photos
Newest videos full hd 1980x1080p |
| Cons: |
Smallish site with 58 photo sets and 36 videos
Older photos and videos are lower resolution
No scene descriptions, run times or file sizes given for the videos.
Not much for those looking for anything more than softcore solo action.
None of the other bonus sites appear to be updating with any new high hi-res content
Content from 2008 or earlier posted with 2010 dates.
No model interaction. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a solo site featuring cute Russian teen Molly (a.k.a. Diana at Amour Angels, Diane at Nubiles, Dolores at Femjoy) in mostly solo photos and videos with occasional masturbation and toy play. There’s also claimed to be some hardcore but I’ve only come across 1 b/g photo set and video so far and I don’t see any obvious signs of any others though it’s difficult to tell as you only get 1 preview thumbnail for the videos. Even the hardcore scene I downloaded it wasn’t obvious from the preview that it was a b/g scene.
The unusual thing about this site is that it’s been online for quite a number of years and stopped updating I believe somewhere around 2008 and was just an archive site then all of a sudden the site came back to life and new updates started appearing in recent months. You can clearly see that Molly is a few years older in the newest content that is being posted now. She’s also sporting a large butterfly shaped tattoo between her shoulder blades that is not present in the early shoots.
There’s a clear split in the quality of content between the newest and older updates; 22 photo sets have the higher resolution around 3000-3500px on the long end and the other 36 are between 1300-1500px long end. Similarly with the videos, 19 offer hd downloads of at least 1280x720 with most of those also having the 1980x1080 option while the older videos usually max at 720x576 or 640x480. The hd vids are mostly in mp4 format and in the ones I’ve downloaded the bit rates vary from 2700-8000kbps.
Once logged in to the members area all the bonus sites are easily accessible from a single user interface allowing you to easily jump from one site to another without any further logging in. The other models are all pretty cute teens and they claim to have 1292 photo sets and 557 videos across the entire network which I have no reason to doubt although most of that will be in mediocre quality. Outside of Molly’s site you’re unlikely to find many photos over 1500px or videos over 720x576. |
|
11-05-12 11:45am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
514
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The only times I've ever contacted webmasters has been when I've had a problem with the site rather than just providing feedback. I'm probably more likely to provide feedback to webmasters of sites I didn't join to let them know what is stopping me from joining such as regional pricing or some ambiguous terms and conditions. Only last week I wrote to Torrid Art to let them know how ridiculous I felt it was for a site to have 4000px photos and then impose a 1GB daily download limit on zips, I never did get a reply lol.
|
11-04-12 04:44am
|
Reply
515
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have done on a couple of occasions but I do the same as rearadmiral and prepare my reviews in MS Word so any typos usually get highlighted and fixed before I post it.
|
11-04-12 04:35am
|
Reply
516
|
Kissak
(0)
|
Reply of
rocz's Review
Thanks for the warning about this site rocz. I actually had this site bookmarked as one which looked quite interesting to me. When you say no pic downloads I assume you mean no zip files? Or is the "right click save as" also disabled? Have you tried downloading the pics with a programme like Firefox Download them all?
|
11-03-12 09:28am
|
Review
517
|
Victoria Divine
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Independent billing via Epoch with no regional pricing
Gorgeous model with hot body
Exclusive content
Content date stamped.
Update’s with 1 new photo set and 1 new video each week.
Nice high resolution photos, most sets 2000 x 3008px, a few at 1463 x 2200px
Zip downloads for photos
Videos available to download and stream online
Bonus content gives access to another 13 solo model sites. |
| Cons: |
Small site, 27 photo sets (2267 images) and 21 videos to date.
Very softcore, only naked posing.
Photo zips all have the file name “pictures” so renaming required.
Video quality is poor by today’s standards.
Videos are short at around 5 minutes each.
All except 3 of the videos have the same annoying backing track.
None of the extras you might look for in a solo site to add some personality, no model info or “about me” section, no interaction in the form of a diary, blog or cam shows.
Difficult login, a partially obscured captcha where I usually have to refresh the page several times before I get one I can read.
Bonus site access not immediate. They say it can take up to an hour to set up the login for the bonus sites but after 2 hours I still couldn’t access them so sent off a support email, never got a reply but 10 minutes later tried again and the login worked |
| Bottom Line: |
I discovered Victoria Divine listed as a new site while browsing one of my favourite TGP sites a couple of weeks ago and while I’m not normally one for rushing out and spending $30 on a new site with little content the thing that most interested me about this site was the fact it gave access to a bunch of other solo sites including Molly’s Bedroom and Lana’s Fantasies that have been on my “to join” list for a long time. As Molly’s Bedroom bills via CCBill with regional pricing for me the fact I could sign up to Victoria Divine via Epoch meant I was getting an extra site for less money so nothing to lose as far as I was concerned.
According to the site tour Victoria is a 19 year old former fashion model who is venturing in to nude modelling for the first time to help pay her tuition fees, Yeah right! Once inside the members area there is no further information telling you who she is or where she’s from. Once I started browsing her photo sets I got the feeling that she looked familiar so ended up doing some digging around to try and discover where I had seen her before. It turns out she is a Ukrainian model known as Vika R at Met-Art with photo sets on there dating as far back as 2004 so I guess that throws the 19 year old theory out the window. In fact comparing how she looks in those old Met-Art sets compared to these so called recent updates here just makes me wonder how recent the content actually is on this alleged new site.
Another thing that makes me wonder how recent the content actually is at this site is the video quality as it’s certainly not up to the standard you usually see in 2012, it’s not even in wide screen let alone hd. The download options are 720 x 576 wmv or 480 x 360 mp4. The bitrates for both are around 1600kbps. The videos are also quite amateurish, poor lighting, jerky camerawork at times and poor editing. The action is all fairly tame; you get to see Victoria naked but nothing more than that. In one video you get to watch her sat on a sofa fully clothed reading a magazine for 5 minutes, she does get up and walk to the kitchen half way through to pour a coffee and you get a nice view of her ass in a tight pair of jeans. In another video you get to watch her stand in front of a mirror topless brushing her hair for 5 minutes. In some other videos you can watch her rolling around on a bed playing with some stuffed toys and taking a shower and a bath and that’s about as exciting as the action gets. Oh and the same annoying sound track accompanies almost all the videos; if you’re planning a membership here better search youtube first for Magnus Kollberg–My Name is Courtney to make sure you could stand listening to that track 18 times.
This is the list of bonus sites you get with Victoria Divine: Lana’s Fantasies, Molly’s Bedroom, Busty Alli, Fun With Amber, Little Danni, Debbie Teen, Kimmy Teen, Abigail 18, Lovely Anne, Lovely Irene, Lovely Tera, Erica’s Fantasies and Jenny Reid. A separate login is required for the bonus sites but once logged in to one of them they are all available from a single user interface. It takes less than 3 hours to download and watch everything at Victoria Divine so it’s mainly the large amount of bonus content that keeps me from scoring it less than 70. |
|
11-03-12 05:16am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
518
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
The search engine results show slightly more indoor than outdoor shoots but its not far off a 50/50 split. More often than not the models are wearing something at the start of the set but generally its not a fully clothed striptease, might be just some items of lingerie or sometimes a dress with nothing underneath
|
11-01-12 02:05am
|
Reply
519
|
Molly's Bedroom
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks Khan, I might take the plunge on this little network of sites.
|
10-31-12 12:02pm
|
Review
520
|
Amour Angels
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Independent biller, choose from Epoch or Segpay with no regional pricing.
Exclusive content
A new update added every other day. In the last month 11 new photo sets and 5 new videos which is typical of most months.
Photos are available in 3 different sizes, small 683 x 1024, medium 1668 x 2500 and original which varies and can be anything from 2136 x 3216 up to 4912 x 7360.
Zip downloads are available in each size.
Photo set cover included in each zip and set name included in file name.
Most videos are in 1280 x 720 hd in both avi and wmv format. The latest wmv updates play at 10000 kbps. The videos also have the option to be downloaded in 1 minute clips or streamed online.
Lots of information provided, model stats and bios, content date stamped, all file sizes shown and run times listed for videos.
Model ratings and user comments allowed.
Excellent browse and search options. |
| Cons: |
Normally I’d list a bonus site as a pro but the Teen Art Club bonus site and bonus Amour GF content adds little value to the site and even detracts from the rest of the high quality content IMO.
Their online flash based photo slideshow viewer is the worst I’ve seen although it’s not something I ever use.
An annoying captcha at login, a line of 5 numbers that rotate in and out of view, first time I’ve seen that.
Every video has the file name “full” so will need to rename everything yourself.
No ethnic diversity amongst the models
Some may consider the site too softcore if you want more than just naked girls posing.
Most of the above cons were not really much of an issue for me personally; the single most irritating thing about the whole site for me was one aspect of the navigation in that hitting the back button didn’t always take you back to the page you came from. |
| Bottom Line: |
Amour Angels is a softcore teen glamour site featuring a fine collection of 562 models and the work of around 90 different photographers. The site has been online since August 2006 and has built up a collection of 999 photo sets and 253 videos to date. The models here nearly all come from either Russia or The Ukraine and all but a tiny handful; are in the 18 to 21 age range. The model collection is not really very diverse; most are slender with small to medium breasts. Using the excellent search engine I established that 90% of the models have a B cup bra size or smaller so if you like your women with a fuller figure you will have fairly slim pickings here
The site is well laid out with plenty of navigation options; you can browse all updates via the year and month listings with separate sections provided for videos, photos, a model index and a photographer index. The main problem I had with the navigation as mentioned in the cons was that whatever section I was browsing after clicking on a model/photo set/video when I hit the back button to return to the page I was on before it would constantly dump me back on page 1 again and I would have to constantly navigate back to where I was. Eventually I got into the habit of “right click open link in new tab/window” to avoid losing my place I tried the site with Chrome to check if it was just a problem with IE but still the same problem exsisted.
They also have an excellent search engine allowing you to search models by criteria such as age, eye and hair colours, country and bra size. You can also search the photo and video sets by many different indoor and outdoor locations. Same problem again with the navigation though; click on a set or model in your search results then hit the back button and your search results have disappeared.
The photo sets themselves feature mostly solo girls often starting out either clothed or partially clothed and showing off their naked bodies. Many of the sets feature full explicit nudity with plenty of open leg and up close pussy shots however you won’t find any masturbation or toy use going on here. There are also some 2 and 3 girl sets/scenes that feature some mild simulated lesbian kissing and touching. There’s more or less a 50/50 split between indoor and outdoor locations. One slight negative was that I often found models that had two different photo updates that are clearly from the same photo shoot, i.e. same location and outfit
I much prefer photos and haven’t spent an awful lot of time browsing the videos. I quite enjoyed seeing some of my favourite models like Sunna, Ingret and Anna with the amazing F cup breasts come to life in the videos but the videos actually go on a bit too long for me and I tend to lose interest after about 5 minutes. Take the video of Alya titled “Spring Love” for example, there’s only so long a girl lying on a bed rubbing a tulip over her body can hold my attention and that video goes on for 28 minutes. Most videos probably average 10-15 minutes though and all the ones I’ve watched so far contain background music which I actually prefer to the dead silent ones I’ve come across in several recent subscriptions.
Regarding the bonus content the section titled “Amour GF” is just 15 galleries of 2-10 pictures each and the bonus site Teen Art Club has another 57 photo galleries with maximum resolution of 682 x 1024 and hasn’t updated since 2007.
Overall a fine site for lovers of softcore teen erotica, I just wish they’d fine tune the navigation by fixing the back button. |
|
10-31-12 11:54am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
521
|
Molly's Bedroom
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks Denner that's interesting to know. Actually back in 2007 I had a membership to a 5 site network that was Lovely Anne, Lovely Irene, Lovely Tera, Erica's Fantasies and Jenny Reid so it looks like they have now combined those 2 networks into one package. If memory serves me right back then the only site still updating was Anne's though I may be wrong.
|
10-30-12 08:39am
|
Reply
522
|
Molly's Bedroom
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I've had this network of solo sites down as a possible join for some time. Just recently I've come across a new site victoriadivine.com which I don't see listed at PU/TBP but which includes this bunch of sites Molly's Bedroom, Lana's Fantasies etc as bonus sites. Just curious Denner, did you have access to Victoria Divine with your membership to Molly's Bedroom because I don't see it listed as one of the bonus sites when going via Molly's Bedroom?
|
10-30-12 07:49am
|
Reply
523
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Review
An interesting review. So this site expects you to pay a minimum of $60 for 2 months continuous membership and you have to wait around for the first month before you can download HD content which most other decent sites offer as the norm these days, it doesn't sound like a very competetive business model to me.
I liked your con about "the sex is always the same"....kind of reminds me why I became bored with hardcore porn a long time ago and now just enjoy solo female content. Welcome to PU.
|
10-30-12 06:43am
|
Reply
524
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I follow English football, (that's soccer to our American friends). The team I have supported since being a young boy back in the 1970s is Chelsea FC and quite honestly until the last decade there has been very little to get excited about but since being bankrolled by our wealthy Russian owner in the last few years we have seen considerable success culminating in that magical night in Munich last May when we won the European Champions League for the first time.
|
10-29-12 04:20am
|
Reply
525
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes I think you are right about that, in the early days I seem to remember the main focus of the site was a lot of British amateur models but now they seem to have a lot of Eastern Europeans, I even noticed Young Legal Porn's Beata had a new update when I checked out the site the other day. I would certainly be interested in seeing an up to date user review if your planning on doing one :)
I seem to remember reading one or two comments in the past about other sites where users have complained about getting screwed by Netbilling which makes me kind of nervous about using them. I'm not bothered about the email address because I already have a seperate email that is specifically used for porn. I do have a prepaid credit card I could try using but when I'm sat in front of my computer of an evening I tend to think "do I really want to go out in the cold to the store and load cash on to my card" and the answer is usually "nope...just join something else with a reputable biller"
|
10-28-12 04:44am
|
