| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1426
|
Microminimus
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Good review.
It is difficult to fathom why you make a photo based website & then make it so clumsy as to be user-hostile.
Sure in the 1990s it may have been more the norm, but surely there are loads of people out there now capable of doing a slick photo site with user customisable zips.
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-02-13 02:03am
|
Reply
1427
|
Milena Velba
(0)
|
Reply of
Karasek's Review
A very balanced & reasoned review. Welcome to PU
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-18-10 02:46pm
|
Reply
1428
|
Miss Hybrid
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Review
A good balanced review.
Well done!
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-18-10 03:00am
|
Reply
1429
|
Miss Youth
(0)
|
Reply of
MissYouth's Reply
Sounds a lot better.
Thanks for the Heads Up.
I'll take a look.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-05-10 11:06am
|
Reply
1430
|
Miss Youth
(0)
|
Reply of
kyote1's Review
Now that doesn't sound at all good.
Much more work is required, judging by your review.
Not just the videos, but photosets as well, if there is only one download permitted at once & it freezes site navigation.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-21-10 10:25am
|
Reply
1431
|
Mistress Jessica
(0)
|
Reply of
tboy's Comment
That is a shame on both counts.
The lack of nudity & the fact she is closing it.
She is certainly a fine looking lady.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-05-11 11:37pm
|
Reply
1432
|
ModFX Models
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Hhmmm.
When I clicked it, it just reloaded the intro page.
Doesn't look good really, does it!
Cap'n. :0(
|
01-26-12 03:00pm
|
Reply
1433
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Yes, what with this & the US only discount for Teen Dreams, I think they need to watch their promotional prices a little closer.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-05-13 03:29am
|
Reply
1434
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I can well believe that, my friend!
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-03-12 09:56am
|
Reply
1435
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
That doesn't sound like a good fit for me.
Cap'n. :0(
|
04-03-12 09:20am
|
Reply
1436
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Link from this site doesn't work or typing in.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-22-13 11:35pm
|
Reply
1437
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
yote78's Reply
Yes, I think you are looking in the wrong place for the likes of that. This is more a borderline artsy / softcore set up
Cap'n :0/
|
01-09-12 11:43am
|
Reply
1438
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
A solid review of a frustratingly disappointing site. Nicely done. :0)
You are correct that it looks more like a portfolio than a membership site.
If they could update/clean up the website, & add more photos of higher quality then they might start to get somewhere!
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-08-12 04:20pm
|
Reply
1439
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I can't really argue that point.
I'm pleased you found it useful anyway.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-11 11:57am
|
Reply
1440
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I am pleased to have helped.
Yes, it is but I am afraid it is so poorly implemented at the moment, I couldn't recommend it.
Whilst the style & standard of photography is there, there is neither quantity or quality of content at the moment.
I have never been a member of Digital Desire.
I may check it out, but not for a while yet.
Being burnt like this makes you more cautious for a while. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-11 03:46am
|
Review
1441
|
Morey Studio
(0)
59.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1) Reasonably priced for an 'art' oriented site.
2) Nice variety of model type, as with all things in life, some more attractive than others.
3) Photography is of a high standard.
There are some really nice ( short ) sets.
4) No attempt at videos.
You may think it odd to put this as a pro, but I do admire someone that sticks to their strengths.
This is purely a photography site. |
| Cons: |
A lot I'm afraid.
1) Poor navigation.
Some links even take you out of the member area.
I haven't come across that in a long time & it used to be a pet peeve! ;0)
2) Short of opening every link, there is no way of knowing how much material is available on the site.
3) Very little material of each model & published sets are short, typically 40 odd shots, some as much as 60 some as few as 20.
4) Viewable photos are NOT high res.
Some are still around 800 pixels, a 'large' set is 1200 although the downloadable zip sets tend to be a little higher, but still only around 2000 pixels. Poor show for a purported art photography site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Although I really wanted to like this site, because I appreciated the style of photography shown in the free area, once becoming a member I was deeply disappointed, both in quantity & quality. Doubly so after Spencers relatively glowing review!
At times, I found myself wondering if it was the same site he reviewed.
Largely, it is the poor site implementation that is the main problem, but as things stand I shan't be letting this one renew.
Of the content that is there, some is familiar, probably from LSG as Drooler pointed out.
The clincher, dropping the site to not recommended, was Access Blocked, due to 'Excessive Usage' whilst I was actually writing the review.
Not impressed.
Membership cancelled.
Cap'n. :0( |
|
03-26-11 12:27pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1442
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I think you are probably right there! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-29-11 02:02pm
|
Reply
1443
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
A very fair review of a site that you found somewhat frustrating. :0)
|
07-27-11 09:32am
|
Comment
1444
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
|
08-15-10 04:45am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1445
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for the additional info.
Appreciated!
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-29-10 02:04pm
|
Comment
1446
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
|
06-29-10 11:32am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1447
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
LePornoisseur's Comment
Well that is of no use to the photo folk.
Cap'n. :0(
|
09-14-13 11:03am
|
Comment
1448
|
Nadine Jansen
(0)
|
|
03-25-12 10:45am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1449
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Well, I took them up on it.
As well you know I am not a video guy.
Whilst they have revamped & have refreshed the selection of anchors, I really do not like the current program format. In real terms it gives a lot less stripping, which is really what I am interested in. I doubt I shall let this one renew.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-02-12 11:17am
|
Reply
1450
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
I wholeheartedly agree with you.
The first time an anchor appears in the episode, she should strip from fully clothed. I can live with nude from the start on a second appearance.
Are they still showing guest anchor segments fully nude then an interview with them fully clothed?
I do wish they would show the clothed interview first!
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-13-10 05:32am
|
